Advertisement

Abstract

The ability to sense molecular tension is crucial for a wide array of cellular processes, including the detection of auditory stimuli, control of cell shape, and internalization and transport of membranes. We show that myosin I, a motor protein that has been implicated in powering key steps in these processes, dramatically alters its motile properties in response to tension. We measured the displacement generated by single myosin I molecules, and we determined the actin-attachment kinetics with varying tensions using an optical trap. The rate of myosin I detachment from actin decreases >75-fold under tension of 2 piconewtons or less, resulting in myosin I transitioning from a low (<0.2) to a high (>0.9) duty-ratio motor. This impressive tension sensitivity supports a role for myosin I as a molecular force sensor.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (laakso_som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
J. S. Berg, B. C. Powell, R. E. Cheney, Mol. Biol. Cell12, 780 (2001).
2
J. R. Holtet al., Cell108, 371 (2002).
3
C. Batters, M. I. Wallace, L. M. Coluccio, J. E. Molloy, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London Ser. B359, 1895 (2004).
4
P. G. Gillespie, J. L. Cyr, Annu. Rev. Physiol.66, 521 (2004).
5
A. Boseet al., Nature420, 821 (2002).
6
R. E. McConnell, M. J. Tyska, J. Cell Biol.177, 671 (2007).
7
D. E. Hokanson, J. M. Laakso, T. Lin, D. Sept, E. M. Ostap, Mol. Biol. Cell17, 4856 (2006).
8
L. Salas-Corteset al., J. Cell Sci.118, 4823 (2005).
9
M. A. Geeves, C. Perreault-Micale, L. M. Coluccio, J. Biol. Chem.275, 21624 (2000).
10
C. Veigelet al., Nature398, 530 (1999).
11
J. D. Jontes, E. M. Wilson-Kubalek, R. A. Milligan, Nature378, 751 (1995).
12
R. F. Siemankowski, M. O. Wiseman, H. D. White, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.82, 658 (1985).
13
J. H. Lewis, T. Lin, D. E. Hokanson, E. M. Ostap, Biochemistry45, 11589 (2006).
14
C. Veigel, S. Schmitz, F. Wang, J. R. Sellers, Nat. Cell Biol.7, 861 (2005).
15
J. T. Finer, R. M. Simmons, J. A. Spudich, Nature368, 113 (1994).
16
T. Lin, N. Tang, E. M. Ostap, J. Biol. Chem.280, 41562 (2005).
17
See methods in supporting information on Science Online.
18
C. Veigel, J. E. Molloy, S. Schmitz, J. Kendrick-Jones, Nat. Cell Biol.5, 980 (2003).
19
D. M. Warshawet al., J. Biol. Chem.275, 37167 (2000).
20
C. Ruppert, R. Kroschewski, M. Bahler, J. Cell Biol.120, 1393 (1993).
21
Y. Takagi, E. E. Homsher, Y. E. Goldman, H. Shuman, Biophys. J.90, 1295 (2006).
22
G. I. Bell, Science200, 618 (1978).
23
D. Altman, H. L. Sweeney, J. A. Spudich, Cell116, 737 (2004).
24
D. Tsygankov, M. E. Fisher, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.104, 19321 (2007).
25
We thank T. Lin for technical assistance and Y. E. Goldman for helpful discussions. Supported by NIH grants AR051174 (H.S. and E.M.O.) and GM057247 (E.M.O.).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 321 | Issue 5885
4 July 2008

Submission history

Received: 21 April 2008
Accepted: 9 June 2008
Published in print: 4 July 2008

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Notes

Supporting Online Material
www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/321/5885/133/DC1
Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S5
References

Authors

Affiliations

Joseph M. Laakso
The Pennsylvania Muscle Institute and Department of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
John H. Lewis
The Pennsylvania Muscle Institute and Department of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Henry Shuman
The Pennsylvania Muscle Institute and Department of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
E. Michael Ostap* [email protected]
The Pennsylvania Muscle Institute and Department of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed at the Department of Physiology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, B400 Richards Building, Philadelphia, PA 19104–6085, USA. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. A mechanochemical model recapitulates distinct vertebrate gastrulation modes, Science Advances, 9, 49, (2023)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.adh8152
    Abstract
  2. Structural basis for tunable control of actin dynamics by myosin-15 in mechanosensory stereocilia, Science Advances, 8, 29, (2022)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.abl4733
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media