Advertisement
No access
Report

Large-Scale Controls of Methanogenesis Inferred from Methane and Gravity Spaceborne Data

Science
15 Jan 2010
Vol 327, Issue 5963
pp. 322-325

Measuring Methanogenesis

After carbon dioxide, methane is the second most important greenhouse gas, and an important species in terms of its role in atmospheric chemistry. The sources and sinks of methane, particularly the natural ones, are too poorly quantified, however, even to explain why the decades-long, steady increase of its concentration in the atmosphere was interrupted between 1999 and 2006. Bloom et al. (p. 322) use a combination of satellite data, which indicate water table depth and surface temperature, and atmospheric methane concentrations to determine the location and strength of methane emissions from wetlands, the largest natural global source. The constraints placed on these sources should help to improve predictions of how climate change will affect wet-land emissions of methane.

Abstract

Wetlands are the largest individual source of methane (CH4), but the magnitude and distribution of this source are poorly understood on continental scales. We isolated the wetland and rice paddy contributions to spaceborne CH4 measurements over 2003–2005 using satellite observations of gravity anomalies, a proxy for water-table depth Γ, and surface temperature analyses TS. We find that tropical and higher-latitude CH4 variations are largely described by Γ and TS variations, respectively. Our work suggests that tropical wetlands contribute 52 to 58% of global emissions, with the remainder coming from the extra-tropics, 2% of which is from Arctic latitudes. We estimate a 7% rise in wetland CH4 emissions over 2003–2007, due to warming of mid-latitude and Arctic wetland regions, which we find is consistent with recent changes in atmospheric CH4.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (bloom.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
K. Denman et al., in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon et al., Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2007), pp. 499–588.
2
Dlugokencky E. J., et al., Atmospheric methane levels off: Temporary pause or a new steady-state? Geophys. Res. Lett. 30, 1992 (2003).
3
Rigby M., et al., Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L22805 (2008).
4
McLeod A. R., et al., Ultraviolet radiation drives methane emissions from terrestrial plant pectins. New Phytol. 180, 124 (2008).
5
Frankenberg C., et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 5061 (2008).
6
Walter B. P., Heimann M., Matthews E., Modeling modern methane emissions from natural wetlands 1. Model description and results. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 34189 (2001).
7
Matthews E., Fung I., Lerner J., Methane emission from rice cultivation: Geographic and seasonal distribution of cultivated areas and emissions. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 5, 3 (1991).
8
Ward D. M., Winfrey M. R., Adv. Aquat. Microbiol. 3, 141 (1985).
9
Segers R., Biogeochemistry 41, 23 (1998).
10
Mer J. Le, Roger P., Production, oxidation, emission and consumption of methane by soils: A review. Eur. J. Soil Biol. 37, 25 (2001).
11
Joabsson A., Christensen T. R., Wallén B., Vascular plant controls on methane emissions from northern peatforming wetlands. Trends Ecol. Evol. 14, 385 (1999).
12
Fung I., et al., Three-dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle. J. Geophys. Res. 96, ( D7), 13033 (1991).
13
Bousquet P., et al., Contribution of anthropogenic and natural sources to atmospheric methane variability. Nature 443, 439 (2006).
14
Evans J. R., Resolving methane fluxes. New Phytol. 175, 1 (2007).
15
Bovensmann H., et al., SCIAMACHY: Mission objectives and measurement modes. J. Atmos. Sci. 56, 127 (1999).
16
Frankenberg C., et al., Tropical methane emissions: A revised view from SCIAMACHY onboard ENVISAT. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L15811 (2008).
17
Tapley B. D., Bettadpur S., Ries J. C., Thompson P. F., Watkins M. M., GRACE measurements of mass variability in the Earth system. Science 305, 503 (2004).
18
Lemoine J.-M., et al., Temporal gravity field models inferred from GRACE data. Adv. Space Res. 39, 1620 (2007).
19
Chen J. L., Wilson C. R., Famiglietti J. S., Rodell M., Attenuation effect on seasonal basin-scale water storage changes from GRACE time-variable gravity. J. Geod. 81, 237 (2007).
20
Kalnay E., et al., The NCEP/NCAR 40-year reanalysis project. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 77, 437 (1996).
21
Fiore A., et al., Variability in surface ozone background over the United States: Implications for air quality policy. J. Geophys. Res. (Atmos.) 108, 4787 (2003).
22
van der Werf G. R., et al., Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 3423 (2006).
23
Gedney N., Cox P. M., Huntingford C., Climate feedback from wetland methane emissions. Geophys. Res. Lett. 31, L20503 (2004).
24
Melack J. M., et al., Regionalization of methane emissions in the Amazon Basin with microwave remote sensing. Glob. Change Biol. 10, 530 (2004).
25
Cao M., Marshall S., Gregson K., Global carbon exchange and methane emissions from natural wetlands: Application of a process-based model. J. Geophys. Res. 101, ( D9), 14399 (1996).
26
Oki T., Sud Y. C., Design of total runoff integrating pathways (TRIP)—A global river channel network. Earth Interact. 2, 1 (1998).
27
Matthews E., Fung I., Methane emission from natural wetlands: Global distribution, area, and environmental characteristics of sources. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 1, 61 (1987).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 327 | Issue 5963
15 January 2010

Submission history

Received: 20 April 2009
Accepted: 11 November 2009
Published in print: 15 January 2010

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank J. Melack for providing feedback on the manuscript and R. Hipkin and F. Simons for assistance with GRACE gravity data. This work is funded by United Kingdom Natural Environmental Research Council studentship NE/F007973/1 and the National Centre for Earth Observation.

Authors

Affiliations

A. Anthony Bloom
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Paul I. Palmer* [email protected]
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Annemarie Fraser
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
David S. Reay
School of GeoSciences, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Christian Frankenberg
SRON Netherlands Institute for Space Research, Utrecht, Netherlands.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. How Stable Is the Methane Cycle?, Science, 327, 5970, (1211-1212), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.1187270
    Abstract
  2. An observation-constrained assessment of the climate sensitivity and future trajectories of wetland methane emissions, Science Advances, 6, 15, (2020)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.aay4444
    Abstract
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media