Advertisement

Abstract

The oxidizing capacity of the global atmosphere is largely determined by hydroxyl (OH) radicals and is diagnosed by analyzing methyl chloroform (CH3CCl3) measurements. Previously, large year-to-year changes in global mean OH concentrations have been inferred from such measurements, suggesting that the atmospheric oxidizing capacity is sensitive to perturbations by widespread air pollution and natural influences. We show how the interannual variability in OH has been more precisely estimated from CH3CCl3 measurements since 1998, when atmospheric gradients of CH3CCl3 had diminished as a result of the Montreal Protocol. We infer a small interannual OH variability as a result, indicating that global OH is generally well buffered against perturbations. This small variability is consistent with measurements of methane and other trace gases oxidized primarily by OH, as well as global photochemical model calculations.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

File (montzka.som.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Levy H., Normal atmosphere: Large radical and formaldehyde concentrations predicted. Science 173, 141 (1971).
2
Logan J. A., Prather M. J., Wofsy S. C., McElroy M. B., Tropospheric chemistry: A global perspective. J. Geophys. Res. 86, 7210 (1981).
3
Spivakovsky C. M., et al., Three-dimensional climatological distribution of tropospheric OH: Update and evaluation. J. Geophys. Res. 105, 8931 (2000).
4
P. Forster et al., in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon et al., Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2007), pp. 129–234.
5
Wang Y., Jacob D. J., Anthropogenic forcing on tropospheric ozone and OH since preindustrial times. J. Geophys. Res. 103, 31123 (1998).
6
D. Ehhalt et al., in Climate Change 2001, The Scientific Basis, J. T. Houghton et al., Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, New York, 2001), pp. 239–287.
7
Lelieveld J., Dentener F. J., Peters W., Krol M. C., On the role of hydroxyl radicals in the self-cleansing capacity of the troposphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 4, 2337 (2004).
8
Lelieveld J., et al., Atmospheric oxidation capacity sustained by a tropical forest. Nature 452, 737 (2008).
9
Weinstock B., Niki H., Carbon monoxide balance in nature. Science 176, 290 (1972).
10
Singh H. B., Preliminary estimation of average tropospheric HO concentrations in the northern and southern hemispheres. Geophys. Res. Lett. 4, 453 (1977).
11
Lovelock J. E., Methyl chloroform in the troposphere as an indicator of OH radical abundance. Nature 267, 32 (1977).
12
Brenninkmeijer C. A. M., et al., Interhemispheric asymmetry in OH abundance inferred from measurements of atmospheric 14CO. Nature 356, 50 (1992).
13
Mak J. E., Brenninkmeijer C. A. M., Manning M. R., Evidence for a missing carbon monoxide sink based on tropospheric measurements of 14CO. Geophys. Res. Lett. 19, 1467 (1992).
14
Montzka S. A., et al., New observational constraints for atmospheric hydroxyl on global and hemispheric scales. Science 288, 500 (2000).
15
Jöckel P., Brenninkmeijer C. A. M., Lawrence M. G., Jeuken A. B. M., van Velthoven P. F. J., Evaluation of stratosphere-troposphere exchange and the hydroxyl radical distribution in three-dimensional global atmospheric models using observations of cosmogenic 14CO. J. Geophys. Res. 107, 4446 (2002).
16
Bousquet P., Hauglustaine D. A., Peylin P., Carouge C., Ciais P., Two decades of OH variability as inferred by an inversion of atmospheric transport and chemistry of methyl chloroform. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 5, 2635 (2005).
17
Prinn R. G., et al., Evidence for variability of atmospheric hydroxyl radicals over the past quarter century. Geophys. Res. Lett. 32, L07809 (2005).
18
Krol M. C., et al., What can 14CO measurements tell us about OH? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 5033 (2008).
19
Manning M. R., Lowe D. C., Moss R. C., Bodeker G. E., Allan W., Short-term variations in the oxidizing power of the atmosphere. Nature 436, 1001 (2005).
20
Lelieveld J., et al., New directions: Watching over tropospheric hydroxyl (OH). Atmos. Environ. 40, 5741 (2006).
21
Dentener F., et al., Interannual variability and trend of CH4 lifetime as a measure for OH changes in the 1979–1993 time period. J. Geophys. Res. 108, 4442 (2003).
22
Duncan B., Logan J., Model analysis of the factors regulating the trends and variability of carbon monoxide between 1988 and 1997. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8, 7389 (2008).
23
Dalsøren S. B., Isaksen I. S. A., CTM study of changes in tropospheric hydroxyl distribution 1990–2001 and its impact on methane. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L23811 (2006).
24
See supporting material on Science Online.
25
Rigby M., et al., Renewed growth of atmospheric methane. Geophys. Res. Lett. 35, L22805 (2008).
26
Krol M., Lelieveld J., Can the variability in tropospheric OH be deduced from measurements of 1,1,1-trichloroethane (methyl chloroform)? J. Geophys. Res. 108, 4125 (2003).
27
Dlugokencky E. J., et al., Observational constraints on recent increases in the atmospheric CH4 burden. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L18803 (2009).
28
van der Werf G. R., et al., Interannual variability in global biomass burning emissions from 1997 to 2004. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 3423 (2006).
29
Walter B. P., Heimann M., Matthews E., Modeling modern methane emissions from natural wetlands 1. Model description and results. J. Geophys. Res. 106, 34189 (2001).
30
Jöckel P., et al., The atmospheric chemistry general circulation model ECHAM5/MESSy1: Consistent simulation of ozone from the surface to the mesosphere. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 6, 5067 (2006).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 331 | Issue 6013
7 January 2011

Submission history

Received: 10 September 2010
Accepted: 22 November 2010
Published in print: 7 January 2011

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

We thank C. Siso, B. Miller, L. Miller, D. Mondeel, L. Bruhwiler, P. Novelli, B. Weatherhead, J. W. Elkins, J. H. Butler, station personnel involved with sampling flasks, C. M. Spivakovsky, R. G. Prinn, and other AGAGE scientists, P. Bergamaschi, and J.-F. Meirink. Supported in part by the Atmospheric Composition and Climate Program of NOAA’s Climate Program Office and by the Stichting Nationale Computerfaciliteiten (National Computing Facilities Foundation).

Authors

Affiliations

S. A. Montzka* [email protected]
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
M. Krol
Institute for Marine and Atmospheric Research Utrecht, University of Utrecht, 3584 CC Utrecht, Netherlands.
Meteorology and Air Quality Group, Wageningen University, 6708 PB Wageningen, Netherlands.
E. Dlugokencky
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
B. Hall
NOAA Earth System Research Laboratory, Boulder, CO 80305, USA.
P. Jöckel
Department of Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.
J. Lelieveld
Department of Atmospheric Chemistry, Max Planck Institute for Chemistry, D-55128 Mainz, Germany.
Cyprus Institute, Nicosia 1645, Cyprus.

Notes

*
To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: [email protected]
Present address: Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt, Institut für Physik der Atmosphäre, Oberpfaffenhofen, D-82234 Wessling, Germany.

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Reconciling the bottom-up and top-down estimates of the methane chemical sink using multiple observations, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23, 1, (789-807), (2023).https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-789-2023
    Crossref
  2. A high-resolution satellite-based map of global methane emissions reveals missing wetland, fossil fuel, and monsoon sources, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 23, 5, (3325-3346), (2023).https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-23-3325-2023
    Crossref
  3. Precisious Observations of Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide and Methane Mole Fractions in the Polar Belt of Near-Yenisei Siberia, Russian Meteorology and Hydrology, 47, 11, (829-838), (2023).https://doi.org/10.3103/S1068373922110024
    Crossref
  4. Reaction mechanism and kinetics of H and Cl atom abstraction in Dichloromethane with OH radical, Computational and Theoretical Chemistry, 1223, (114082), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comptc.2023.114082
    Crossref
  5. Estimating emissions of methane consistent with atmospheric measurements of methane and δ 13 C of methane , Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22, 23, (15351-15377), (2022).https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-15351-2022
    Crossref
  6. Investigating the global OH radical distribution using steady-state approximations and satellite data, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 22, 16, (10467-10488), (2022).https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-10467-2022
    Crossref
  7. Atmospheric CO2 and CH4 Fluctuations over the Continent-Sea Interface in the Yenisei River Sector of the Kara Sea, Atmosphere, 13, 9, (1402), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13091402
    Crossref
  8. The Role of Emission Sources and Atmospheric Sink in the Seasonal Cycle of CH4 and δ13-CH4: Analysis Based on the Atmospheric Chemistry Transport Model TM5, Atmosphere, 13, 6, (888), (2022).https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13060888
    Crossref
  9. Risk of the hydrogen economy for atmospheric methane, Nature Communications, 13, 1, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-35419-7
    Crossref
  10. Phenology is the dominant control of methane emissions in a tropical non-forested wetland, Nature Communications, 13, 1, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27786-4
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media