Advertisement
No access
Report

Constraints on the Late Holocene Anthropogenic Contribution to the Atmospheric Methane Budget

Science
22 Nov 2013
Vol 342, Issue 6161
pp. 964-966

Bipolar Signature

Atmospheric methane has increased approximately 2.5-fold since the start of the industrial revolution, a consequence of human activity. However, a smaller and more gradual rise began around 6000 years ago, near the time when human agriculture began to develop and expand. Mitchell et al. (p. 964) present two, high-resolution ice core methane records of the past 2500 years, one from each pole. Methane emissions were primarily from the tropics, with secondary contributions from the higher latitudes where most humans lived. Thus, both natural and human sources are needed to explain the late-Holocene atmospheric methane record.

Abstract

The origin of the late preindustrial Holocene (LPIH) increase in atmospheric methane concentrations has been much debated. Hypotheses invoking changes in solely anthropogenic sources or solely natural sources have been proposed to explain the increase in concentrations. Here two high-resolution, high-precision ice core methane concentration records from Greenland and Antarctica are presented and are used to construct a high-resolution record of the methane inter-polar difference (IPD). The IPD record constrains the latitudinal distribution of emissions and shows that LPIH emissions increased primarily in the tropics, with secondary increases in the subtropical Northern Hemisphere. Anthropogenic and natural sources have different latitudinal characteristics, which are exploited to demonstrate that both anthropogenic and natural sources are needed to explain LPIH changes in methane concentration.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Figs. S1 to S17
Tables S1 and S2
References

Resources

File (mitchell.sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
P. Forster, V. Ramaswamy, P. Artaxo, T. Berntsen, R. Betts, D. W. Fahey, J. Haywood, J. Lean, D. C. Lowe, G. Myhre, J. Nganga, R. Prinn, G. Raga, M. Schulz, R. Van Dorland, in Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, S. Solomon et al., Eds. (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 2007), pp. 131–234.
2
Ruddiman W. F., The anthropogenic greenhouse era began thousands of years ago. Clim. Change 61, 261–293 (2003).
3
Singarayer J. S., Valdes P. J., Friedlingstein P., Nelson S., Beerling D. J., Late Holocene methane rise caused by orbitally controlled increase in tropical sources. Nature 470, 82–85 (2011).
4
Fuller D. Q., van Etten J., Manning K., Castillo C., Kingwell-Banham E., Weisskopf A., Qin L., Sato Y.-I., Hijmans R. J., The contribution of rice agriculture and livestock pastoralism to prehistoric methane levels: An archaeological assessment. Holocene 21, 743–759 (2011).
5
Ruddiman W. F., Guo Z. T., Zhou X., Wu H. B., Yu Y. Y., Early rice farming and anomalous methane trends. Quat. Sci. Rev. 27, 1291–1295 (2008).
6
Ruddiman W. F., Kutzbach J. E., Vavrus S. J., Can natural or anthropogenic explanations of late-Holocene CO2 and CH4 increases be falsified? Holocene 21, 865–8879 (2011).
7
Fung I., John J., Lerner J., Matthews E., Prather M., Steele L. P., Fraser P. J., Three-dimensional model synthesis of the global methane cycle. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 96, 13033 (1991).
8
Chappellaz J., Blunier T., Kints S., Dällenbach A., Barnola J.-M., Schwander J., Raynaud D., Stauffer B., Changes in the atmospheric CH4 gradient between Greenland and Antarctica during the Holocene. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 102, 15987 (1997).
9
Brook E. J., Harder S., Severinghaus J., Steig E. J., Sucher C. M., On the origin and timing of rapid changes in atmospheric methane during the last glacial period. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 14, 559–572 (2000).
10
Lassey K. R., Etheridge D. M., Lowe D. C., Smith A. M., Ferretti D. F., Centennial evolution of the atmospheric methane budget: what do the carbon isotopes tell us? Atmos. Chem. Phys. 7, 2119–2139 (2007).
11
Montzka S. A., Krol M., Dlugokencky E., Hall B., Jöckel P., Lelieveld J., Small interannual variability of global atmospheric hydroxyl. Science 331, 67–69 (2011).
12
Naik V., Voulgarakis A., Fiore A. M., Horowitz L. W., Lamarque J.-F., Lin M., Prather M. J., Young P. J., Bergmann D., Cameron-Smith P. J., Cionni I., Collins W. J., Dalsøren S. B., Doherty R., Eyring V., Faluvegi G., Folberth G. A., Josse B., Lee Y. H., MacKenzie I. A., Nagashima T., van Noije T. P. C., Plummer D. A., Righi M., Rumbold S. T., Skeie R., Shindell D. T., Stevenson D. S., Strode S., Sudo K., Szopa S., Zeng G., Preindustrial to present-day changes in tropospheric hydroxyl radical and methane lifetime from the Atmospheric Chemistry and Climate Model Intercomparison Project (ACCMIP). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 13, 5277–5298 (2013).
13
Dlugokencky E. J., Bruhwiler L., White J. W. C., Emmons L. K., Novelli P. C., Montzka S. A., Masarie K. A., Lang P. M., Crotwell A. M., Miller J. B., Gatti L. V., Observational constraints on recent increases in the atmospheric CH4 burden. Geophys. Res. Lett. 36, L18803 (2009).
14
Goldewijk K. K., Beusen A., Janssen P., Long-term dynamic modeling of global population and built-up area in a spatially explicit way: HYDE 3.1. Holocene 20, 565–573 (2010).
15
Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials on Science Online.
16
Mitchell L. E., Brook E. J., Sowers T., McConnell J. R., Taylor K., Multidecadal variability of atmospheric methane, 1000-1800 CE. J. Geophys. Res. Biogeosci. 116, G02007 (2011).
17
Etheridge D. M., Steele L. P., Francey R. J., Langenfelds R. L., Atmospheric methane between 1000 AD and present: Evidence of anthropogenic emissions and climatic variability. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 103, 15979 (1998).
18
MacFarling Meure C., Etheridge D., Trudinger C., Steele P., Langenfelds R., van Ommen T., Smith A., Elkins J., Law Dome CO2, CH4 and N2O ice core records extended to 2000 years BP. Geophys. Res. Lett. 33, L14810 (2006).
19
Fudge T. J., Steig E. J., Markle B. R., Schoenemann S. W., Ding Q., Taylor K. C., McConnell J. R., Brook E. J., Sowers T., White J. W. C., Alley R. B., Cheng H., Clow G. D., Cole-Dai J., Conway H., Cuffey K. M., Edwards J. S., Lawrence Edwards R., Edwards R., Fegyveresi J. M., Ferris D., Fitzpatrick J. J., Johnson J., Hargreaves G., Lee J. E., Maselli O. J., Mason W., McGwire K. C., Mitchell L. E., Mortensen N., Neff P., Orsi A. J., Popp T. J., Schauer A. J., Severinghaus J. P., Sigl M., Spencer M. K., Vaughn B. H., Voigt D. E., Waddington E. D., Wang X., Wong G. J.WAIS Divide Project Members, Onset of deglacial warming in West Antarctica driven by local orbital forcing. Nature 500, 440–444 (2013).
20
Nakazawa T., Machida T., Tanaka M., Fujii Y., Aoki S., Watanabe O., Differences of the amospheric CH4 concentration between the Arctic and Antarctic regions in pre-industrial/pre-agricultural era. Geophys. Res. Lett. 20, 943–946 (1993).
21
T. Marik, thesis, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany (1998).
22
Khalil M. A. K., Rasmussen R. A., Sources, sinks, and seasonal cycles of atmospheric methane. J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 88, 5131 (1983).
23
Konijnendijk T. Y. M., Weber S. L., Tuenter E., van Weele M., Methane variations on orbital timescales: A transient modeling experiment. Clim. Past. 7, 635–648 (2011).
24
Houweling S., Dentener F., Lelieveld J., Simulation of preindustrial atmospheric methane to constrain the global source strength of natural wetlands. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 105, 17243 (2000).
25
Ruddiman W. F., The early anthropogenic hypothesis: Challenges and responses. Rev. Geophys. 45, RG4001 (2007).
26
Sapart C. J., Monteil G., Prokopiou M., van de Wal R. S., Kaplan J. O., Sperlich P., Krumhardt K. M., van der Veen C., Houweling S., Krol M. C., Blunier T., Sowers T., Martinerie P., Witrant E., Dahl-Jensen D., Röckmann T., Natural and anthropogenic variations in methane sources during the past two millennia. Nature 490, 85–88 (2012).
27
Pechony O., Shindell D. T., Driving forces of global wildfires over the past millennium and the forthcoming century. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 19167–19170 (2010).
28
Wang X. F., Auler A. S., Edwards R. L., Cheng H., Ito E., Solheid M., Interhemispheric anti-phasing of rainfall during the last glacial period. Quat. Sci. Rev. 25, 3391–3403 (2006).
29
Ruddiman W. F., Ellis E. C., Effect of per-capita land use changes on Holocene forest clearance and CO2 emissions. Quat. Sci. Rev. 28, 3011–3015 (2009).
30
Kaplan J. O., Krumhardt K. M., Ellis E. C., Ruddiman W. F., Lemmen C., Goldewijk K. K., Holocene carbon emissions as a result of anthropogenic land cover change. Holocene 21, 775–791 (2011).
31
L. E. Mitchell, thesis, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR (2013).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 342 | Issue 6161
22 November 2013

Submission history

Received: 9 April 2013
Accepted: 23 October 2013
Published in print: 22 November 2013

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by NSF Office of Polar Programs (OPP) grants 0538578, 0520523, 0944584, and 0538538; and by NASA/Oregon Space Grant Consortium grant NNG05GJ85H and the NOAA Climate and Global Change Fellowship Program, administered by the University Corporation for Atmospheric Research (C.B.). We thank two anonymous reviewers whose comments greatly improved the manuscript; B. Markle, A. Morin, B. Williams, and J. Edwards for assisting in sample preparation and analysis; T. Marik, who provided the original eight-box model code (BOSCAGE); J. Severinghaus and G. Etiope, who contributed preliminary results from their work; T. Konijnendijk, J. Van Etten, and J. Singarayer, who provided model data from their published works; the WAIS Divide Science Coordination Office at the Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV for the collection and distribution of the WAIS Divide ice core (K. Taylor, NSF grants 0230396, 0440817, 0944348, and 0944266–University of New Hampshire); NSF OPP, which funds the Ice Drilling Program Office and Ice Drilling Design and Operations group for coring activities; NSF, which funds the National Ice Core Laboratory, which curated and processed the core; Raytheon Polar Services, which provided logistics support in Antarctica; and the 109th New York Air National Guard for airlift in Antarctica. Data and description can be downloaded from the NOAA National Climate Data Center (www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/paleo.html). EBAMM model code is archived with L.E.M.’s thesis (31), available online at http://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/xmlui/handle/1957/37906.

Authors

Affiliations

Logan Mitchell* [email protected]
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Ed Brook
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
James E. Lee
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Christo Buizert
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA.
Todd Sowers
Department of Geosciences and Earth and Environmental Systems Institute, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Notes

*
Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Using ice core measurements from Taylor Glacier, Antarctica, to calibrate in situ cosmogenic 14 C production rates by muons , The Cryosphere, 17, 2, (843-863), (2023).https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-17-843-2023
    Crossref
  2. The ST22 chronology for the Skytrain Ice Rise ice core – Part 1: A stratigraphic chronology of the last 2000 years, Climate of the Past, 18, 8, (1831-1847), (2022).https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-18-1831-2022
    Crossref
  3. A Post‐Phaseout Retrospective Reassessment of the Global Methyl Bromide Budget, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 127, 3, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1029/2021JD035567
    Crossref
  4. ENSO‐Driven Fires Cause Large Interannual Variability in the Naturally Emitted, Ozone‐Depleting Trace Gas CH 3 Br , Geophysical Research Letters, 49, 3, (2022).https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL094756
    Crossref
  5. Enhanced moisture delivery into Victoria Land, East Antarctica, during the early Last Interglacial: implications for West Antarctic Ice Sheet stability, Climate of the Past, 17, 5, (1841-1855), (2021).https://doi.org/10.5194/cp-17-1841-2021
    Crossref
  6. Old carbon reservoirs were not important in the deglacial methane budget, Science, 367, 6480, (907-910), (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aax0504
    Abstract
  7. The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene, Science, 351, 6269, (2021)./doi/10.1126/science.aad2622
    Abstract
  8. Using Water Table Depths Inferred From Testate Amoebae to Estimate Holocene Methane Emissions From the Hudson Bay Lowlands, Canada, Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences, 126, 2, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1029/2020JG005969
    Crossref
  9. The Anthropocene: Comparing Its Meaning in Geology (Chronostratigraphy) with Conceptual Approaches Arising in Other Disciplines, Earth's Future, 9, 3, (2021).https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001896
    Crossref
  10. The role of wetland expansion and successional processes in methane emissions from northern wetlands during the Holocene, Quaternary Science Reviews, 257, (106864), (2021).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quascirev.2021.106864
    Crossref
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media