Advertisement

Protecting memories from stress

It is widely accepted that stress has a negative impact on memory retrieval. But specific approaches to learning can counteract this effect. Smith et al. found that when memory was tested immediately after the onset of stress, stress effects were reduced. Furthermore, when subjects learned novel material by using a highly effective learning technique involving practice tests, their memory was also protected against the negative effects of stress.
Science, this issue p. 1046

Abstract

More than a decade of research has supported a robust consensus: Acute stress impairs memory retrieval. We aimed to determine whether a highly effective learning technique could strengthen memory against the negative effects of stress. To bolster memory, we used retrieval practice, or the act of taking practice tests. Participants first learned stimuli by either restudying or engaging in retrieval practice. Twenty-four hours later, we induced stress in half of the participants and assessed subsequent memory performance. Participants who learned by restudying demonstrated the typical stress-related memory impairment, whereas those who learned by retrieval practice were immune to the deleterious effects of stress. These results suggest that the effects of stress on memory retrieval may be contingent on the strength of the memory representations themselves.

Get full access to this article

View all available purchase options and get full access to this article.

Supplementary Material

Summary

Materials and Methods
Supplementary Text
Tables S1 to S3
References (2833)

Resources

File (aah5067-smith-sm.pdf)

References and Notes

1
Buchanan T. W., Tranel D., and Adolphs R., Impaired memory retrieval correlates with individual differences in cortisol response but not autonomic response. Learn. Mem. 13, 382–387 (2006).
2
Buchanan T. W. and Tranel D., Stress and emotional memory retrieval: Effects of sex and cortisol response. Neurobiol. Learn. Mem. 89, 134–141 (2008).
3
Hidalgo V., Pulopulos M. M., Puig-Perez S., Espin L., Gomez-Amor J., and Salvador A., Acute stress affects free recall and recognition of pictures differently depending on age and sex. Behav. Brain Res. 292, 393–402 (2015).
4
Kuhlmann S., Piel M., and Wolf O. T., Impaired memory retrieval after psychosocial stress in healthy young men. J. Neurosci. 25, 2977–2982 (2005).
5
Schönfeld P., Ackermann K., and Schwabe L., Remembering under stress: Different roles of autonomic arousal and glucocorticoids in memory retrieval. Psychoneuroendocrinology 39, 249–256 (2014).
6
Schwabe L. and Wolf O. T., Timing matters: Temporal dynamics of stress effects on memory retrieval. Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci. 14, 1041–1048 (2014).
7
Smeets T., Otgaar H., Candel I., and Wolf O. T., True or false? Memory is differentially affected by stress-induced cortisol elevations and sympathetic activity at consolidation and retrieval. Psychoneuroendocrinology 33, 1378–1386 (2008).
8
Schwabe L., Joëls M., Roozendaal B., Wolf O. T., and Oitzl M. S., Stress effects on memory: An update and integration. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 36, 1740–1749 (2012).
9
de Kloet E. R., Oitzl M. S., and Joëls M., Stress and cognition: Are corticosteroids good or bad guys? Trends Neurosci. 22, 422–426 (1999).
10
E. L. Bjork, R. A. Bjork, “Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning,” in Psychology and the Real World: Essays Illustrating Fundamental Contributions to Society, M. A. Gernsbacher et al., Eds. (Worth Publishers, 2011), pp. 56–64.
11
Karpicke J. D., Butler A. C., and Roediger H. L. 3rd, Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory 17, 471–479 (2009).
12
Dunlosky J., Rawson K. A., Marsh E. J., Nathan M. J., and Willingham D. T., Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 14, 4–58 (2013).
13
Roediger H. L. 3rd and Karpicke J. D., The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 1, 181–210 (2006).
14
J. D. Karpicke, M. Lehman, W. R. Aue, “Retrieval-based learning: An episodic context account,” in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, B. H. Ross, Ed. (Elsevier Academic Press, 2014), pp. 237–284.
15
Roediger H. L. and Karpicke J. D., Test-enhanced learning: Taking memory tests improves long-term retention. Psychol. Sci. 17, 249–255 (2006).
16
Karpicke J. D. and Blunt J. R., Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science 331, 772–775 (2011).
17
Fritz C. O., Morris P. E., Acton M., Voelkel A. R., and Etkind R., Comparing and combining retrieval practice and the keyword mnemonic for foreign vocabulary learning. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 21, 499–526 (2007).
18
von Dawans B., Kirschbaum C., and Heinrichs M., The Trier Social Stress Test for Groups (TSST-G): A new research tool for controlled simultaneous social stress exposure in a group format. Psychoneuroendocrinology 36, 514–522 (2011).
19
Materials and methods are available as supplementary materials on Science Online.
20
Rowland C. A., The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychol. Bull. 140, 1432–1463 (2014).
21
Carpenter S. K., Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 35, 1563–1569 (2009).
22
Carpenter S. K., Semantic information activated during retrieval contributes to later retention: Support for the mediator effectiveness hypothesis of the testing effect. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 37, 1547–1552 (2011).
23
Carpenter S. K. and DeLosh E. L., Impoverished cue support enhances subsequent retention: Support for the elaborative retrieval explanation of the testing effect. Mem. Cognit. 34, 268–276 (2006).
24
Pyc M. A. and Rawson K. A., Why testing improves memory: Mediator effectiveness hypothesis. Science 330, 335 (2010).
25
Wing E. A., Marsh E. J., and Cabeza R., Neural correlates of retrieval-based memory enhancement: An fMRI study of the testing effect. Neuropsychologia 51, 2360–2370 (2013).
26
G. S. Everly, J. M. Lating, A Clinical Guide to the Treatment of the Human Stress Response (Springer Science+Business Media, ed. 3, 2013).
27
Hermans E. J., van Marle H. J., Ossewaarde L., Henckens M. J., Qin S., van Kesteren M. T., Schoots V. C., Cousijn H., Rijpkema M., Oostenveld R., and Fernández G., Stress-related noradrenergic activity prompts large-scale neural network reconfiguration. Science 334, 1151–1153 (2011).
28
Snodgrass J. G. and Vanderwart M., A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Learn. 6, 174–215 (1980).
29
Grös D. F., Antony M. M., Simms L. J., and McCabe R. E., Psychometric properties of the state-trait inventory for cognitive and somatic anxiety (STICSA): Comparison to the state-trait anxiety inventory (STAI). Psychol. Assess. 19, 369–381 (2007).
30
Weitzman E. D., Fukushima D., Nogeire C., Roffwarg H., Gallagher T. F., and Hellman L., Twenty-four hour pattern of the episodic secretion of cortisol in normal subjects. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 33, 14–22 (1971).
31
W. Schneider, A. Eschman, A. Zuccolotto, E-Prime User’s Guide (Psychology Software Tools, 2001).
32
Herlitz A., Nilsson L. G., and Bäckman L., Gender differences in episodic memory. Mem. Cognit. 25, 801–811 (1997).
33
Lewin C., Wolgers G., and Herlitz A., Sex differences favoring women in verbal but not in visuospatial episodic memory. Neuropsychology 15, 165–173 (2001).

(0)eLetters

eLetters is a forum for ongoing peer review. eLetters are not edited, proofread, or indexed, but they are screened. eLetters should provide substantive and scholarly commentary on the article. Embedded figures cannot be submitted, and we discourage the use of figures within eLetters in general. If a figure is essential, please include a link to the figure within the text of the eLetter. Please read our Terms of Service before submitting an eLetter.

Log In to Submit a Response

No eLetters have been published for this article yet.

Information & Authors

Information

Published In

Science
Volume 354 | Issue 6315
25 November 2016

Submission history

Received: 6 July 2016
Accepted: 24 October 2016
Published in print: 25 November 2016

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Acknowledgments

A full description of the materials, methods, and statistical analyses described in this manuscript is available in the supplementary materials. The data described in this paper are available from the first author upon request. This research was funded by the U.S. Army Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center.

Authors

Affiliations

Amy M. Smith* [email protected]
Tufts University, 490 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Victoria A. Floerke
Tufts University, 490 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA.
Ayanna K. Thomas
Tufts University, 490 Boston Avenue, Medford, MA 02155, USA.

Notes

*
Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Metrics & Citations

Metrics

Article Usage

Altmetrics

Citations

Cite as

Export citation

Select the format you want to export the citation of this publication.

Cited by

  1. Research-to-Resource: Introducing Retrieval Practice in Jazz Pedagogy, Update: Applications of Research in Music Education, (875512332211462), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1177/87551233221146282
    Crossref
  2. A Scoping Review of Retrieval Practice (Test-Enhanced Learning) in Nursing Education, Nursing Education Perspectives, Publish Ahead of Print, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NEP.0000000000001115
    Crossref
  3. The Forward Testing Effect Is Resistant to Acute Psychosocial Retrieval Stress, Experimental Psychology, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000571
    Crossref
  4. The benefit of retrieval practice on cued recall under stress depends on item difficulty, Neuroscience Letters, 797, (137066), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2023.137066
    Crossref
  5. Self-pacing and multiple-attempt assessment to address student anxiety in pharmacy calculations, Discover Education, 2, 1, (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-023-00032-3
    Crossref
  6. Stress and Individual Development, Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology, 53, 1, (47-60), (2023).https://doi.org/10.1007/s11055-023-01390-z
    Crossref
  7. Retrieval Practice Is Effective Regardless of Self-Reported Need for Cognition - Behavioral and Brain Imaging Evidence, Frontiers in Psychology, 12, (2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797395
    Crossref
  8. A retrospective and correlative analysis of academic and nonacademic predictors of COMLEX level 1 performance, Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 122, 4, (187-194), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1515/jom-2021-0175
    Crossref
  9. Supporting students’ active learning with a computer based tool, Active Learning in Higher Education, (146978742211004), (2022).https://doi.org/10.1177/14697874221100465
    Crossref
  10. Adult newborn granule cells confer emotional state–dependent adaptability in memory retrieval, Science Advances, 8, 45, (2022)./doi/10.1126/sciadv.abn2136
    Abstract
  11. See more
Loading...

View Options

Check Access

Log in to view the full text

AAAS ID LOGIN

AAAS login provides access to Science for AAAS Members, and access to other journals in the Science family to users who have purchased individual subscriptions.

Log in via OpenAthens.
Log in via Shibboleth.

More options

Register for free to read this article

As a service to the community, this article is available for free. Login or register for free to read this article.

Purchase this issue in print

Buy a single issue of Science for just $15 USD.

View options

PDF format

Download this article as a PDF file

Download PDF

Full Text

FULL TEXT

Media

Figures

Multimedia

Tables

Share

Share

Share article link

Share on social media