INTRODUCTION
Completion of the draft human genome sequence in 2001 revealed that a remarkable ∼8% of the genome consists of retrovirus-like elements (
1). Although the elements found to date are replication defective, many are related to gammaretroviruses currently circulating as infectious agents in a range of mammalian and avian species (
2). Moreover, the ability of gammaretroviruses to cross species boundaries is clear from the fossil record of endogenous viruses and from evidence of recent jumps across wide species barriers, from rodents to primates (gibbon ape leukemia virus [GaLV]) and marsupials (koala retrovirus [KoRV]) (
3 – 5).
The long-standing observation of the ability of some variants of feline leukemia virus (FeLV), a feline gammaretrovirus, to replicate to high titers in human cells
in vitro led to early concerns with regard to zoonotic spread (
6,
7). FeLVs represent important pathogens of the domestic cat that are capable of cross-species spread to endangered feline species (
8,
9). Despite widespread domestic contact with FeLV-infected cats, which can shed virus in saliva and other body fluids, a series of careful studies has shown no evidence of serological responses in exposed individuals (
10). Human serum factors that lyse or inactivate gammaretroviruses (
11,
12) offer a significant obstacle to cross-species spread but appear insufficient to account fully for resistance, since sensitivity can be attenuated in viruses released by human cells after initial cell-cell spread (
13).
Our recent interest in the replication of FeLV in human cells was fueled by the desire to use these agents as insertional mutagens and gene discovery tools in human cancer cells in a manner similar to that of murine leukemia viruses (MLVs) in their natural host (
14,
15). In support of this goal, the ability of FeLV to integrate preferentially at strong promoters and enhancers is also manifested in human cells infected
in vitro (
16). However, it became apparent from our initial studies that the resistance of human cells to FeLV is a multifaceted phenomenon that is likely to be relevant to cross-species transfer, motivating us to conduct a deeper study.
FeLVs are a family of viruses that frequently occur as phenotypic mixtures in infected cats (
17,
18). Three major subgroups, which use different receptors to enter feline host cells, have been described (
17). Virtually all natural isolates contain a subgroup A FeLV component (FeLV-A) that enters via the thiamine transporter THTR1 (
19). This is the major horizontally transmitted form of FeLV in cats but has been considered unlikely to be zoonotic due to its low affinity for the human receptor homologue, hTHTR1 (
19). Many field isolates of FeLV consist of a mixture of FeLV-A and FeLV-B, the latter arising by recombination and acquisition of envelope gene sequences from endogenous FeLV-related sequences (
20). FeLV-B isolates can replicate efficiently in at least some cultured human cells with no cytopathic effect (
6,
7,
17). Moreover, FeLV-B strains enter via the widely expressed phosphate transporter Pit-1 and/or the related transporter Pit-2 (
21). Another human-cell-tropic variant is FeLV-C, which is generated by mutation of the receptor-binding domain of Env (
22), facilitating entry through the heme transporter FLVCR1 or FLVCR2 (
23,
24). However, FeLV-C isolates are rare in nature (∼1% of isolates) (
17) and presumably short-lived, due to their propensity to induce rapidly fatal aplastic anemia (
25). A further FeLV envelope variant that has been described is the potently immunosuppressive FeLV-T, but this is also acutely pathogenic and is stringently host-specific; its complex entry requirements include a truncated envelope protein derived from endogenous FeLV-related proviruses that is released by normal feline lymphoid cells (
26,
27). Taken together, these biological properties implicate FeLV-B strains as the most likely candidates for zoonotic spread.
While the study of HIV and other primate lentiviruses has identified many factors that control host range by restricting replication (
28), the gammaretroviruses have been less well studied in this regard. MLVs have been shown to be highly sensitive to human APOBEC3 cytidine deaminase activity but able to evade murine APOBEC3 (
29,
30). The effects of human APOBEC3 activity on FeLV have not been reported, although the remarkable sequence stability of the commonly transmitted form of FeLV in the domestic cat and its low mutation rate in the infection of other felids strongly suggests that it has evolved to evade feline APOBEC activity (
31,
32).
This study confirms FeLV-B as the variant most likely to have zoonotic potential, since virtually all human cells are susceptible, with only limited postentry barriers to infection. The resistance of primary blood cells at a postintegration step and potent APOBEC3 induction of mutations in virions released from hematopoietic cells appear to be significant factors in limiting infectivity for human cells. The possibility that FeLV could evolve to evade these barriers cannot be discounted.
DISCUSSION
FeLV-B strains are human-cell-tropic variants that are generated frequently during FeLV infection
in vivo (
20,
43,
44) and are therefore of prime interest with respect to the zoonotic potential of FeLV. This study demonstrated fully permissive or partially permissive infection in a broad range of cancer-derived cell lines and in nontransformed keratinocytes and lung fibroblasts. Cell lines of hematopoietic origin were generally less permissive and were assigned to two discrete groups based on high or low FeLV protein expression and virion release. Primary PBMCs and some EBV-transformed LCLs were nonpermissive with respect to these measures (
Fig. 1C and
2;
Table 2). While a spectrum of phenotypes was observed, this study revealed apparently universal susceptibility of human cells to initial infection with FeLV-B, with no evidence of a significant preintegration block to infection (
Fig. 4); indeed, the early steps of reverse transcription and integration appear to be unimpaired in nonpermissive cells (
Fig. 3 and
5A to
C). However, at least two postintegration blocks to FeLV-B replication appear to be operative in human cells. One block is clearly mediated by the APOBEC system, as indicated by the high rates of G→A mutations in FeLV in leukemia cell lines that release abundant viral particles with low infectivity and in nonhematopoietic cancer cell lines that display a partially permissive phenotype with respect to viral spread (e.g., Raji and TKCC15LO cells, respectively) (
Table 2;
Fig. 3B and
5). The predominant mutational signature was indicative of A3G in most cases, and we noted a weak correlation between A3G mRNA expression and mutational activity across a panel of cell lines (
Fig. 5). This observation does not exclude the possibility that A3G also inhibits by nonmutational mechanisms, such as inhibition of reverse transcription (
45).
The profound block to FeLV mRNA and protein expression in primary PBMCs (
Fig. 2) and to virus release from these cells occurred without detectable mutation, despite the expression of high levels of A3G mRNA (
Fig. 5), indicating a restriction that is A3G independent. APOBEC3 proteins have also been reported to block incoming murine retroviruses, and it appears that ectopic expression of A3A in mice can do so by a nonmutational mechanism (
41). However, as far as we are aware, there is no evidence that APOBEC restriction can operate on incoming viruses after integration. Potential mediators of postintegration suppression of incoming viruses include epigenetic regulators, such as those that are abundantly expressed in embryonal stem cells, and restrict the expression of exogenous and endogenous retroelements (
46). The possibility that the resistance of PBMCs to FeLV reflects such a general resistance mechanism against gammaretrovirus zoonosis merits further study. In this regard, we note reports of profound restriction of xenotropic murine leukemia virus-related virus (XMRV) growth in human PBMCs, which showed evidence of replication with G→A mutations only at extremely high levels of viral input (
47).
With regard to relevance to zoonotic resistance, a key question is whether the widespread susceptibility to FeLV replication observed in human cells reflects the phenotype of the tissue of origin or a loss-of-function phenomenon due to oncogenic transformation. The strongly restrictive phenotype of PBMC cultures, which contain a rich variety of primary cell types, suggests that restriction is likely to represent an important
in vivo barrier. While the relative susceptibility of leukemia cell lines may be due to loss of function, the similar phenotype observed in primary CD34
+ cells (
Table 1) suggests that this may instead reflect an immature progenitor phenotype. Moreover, many nonhematopoietic cell lines proved to be highly permissive for transcription, virion assembly, and release of FeLV-B particles, with no evidence of APOBEC-mediated mutations. Observation of this phenotype in IMR90 nontransformed lung fibroblasts, for example, which retain the capacity for replicative senescence (
48), as well as in HaCAT skin keratinocytes, shows that susceptibility to infection can occur in the absence of oncogenic transformation (
Table 1). Moreover, the earliest description of productive FeLV replication in human cells was based on infection of HEL2000 primary lung fibroblasts (
6). In the case of transformed cells, it is difficult to discern whether the relative susceptibility to FeLV represents a normal cellular state relevant to potential zoonosis. While very-high-level A3G expression and mutational activity were observed in the TKCC15LO pancreatic cancer cell line (
Fig. 5), this may not reflect the normal phenotype of pancreatic tissue. Upregulated A3G has been postulated to play a direct oncogenic role in some pancreatic cancers (
49).
The susceptibility of human cancer cells to spreading FeLV-B replication provides a potentially instructive parallel with the mobilization and frequent reinsertion of L1 retrotransposons in >50% of human cancers (
50); high levels were noted in lung, colon, prostate, and breast cancers, while the data sets for other tumor types showed few if any new insertions in renal carcinomas and melanomas. These findings parallel the present observations in that colon, lung, and breast cancer cell lines were fully permissive to FeLV infection, but renal cancer cells and one melanoma line displayed a strong early block to FeLV replication, with no evidence of APOBEC-mediated mutations (
Table 1;
Fig. 5B). A further intriguing parallel is provided by a recent study of XMRV pathogenesis in macaques, where intravenous inoculation of high-titer virus led to the dissemination and persistence of viral protein expression, with the highest levels in lung, colon, and prostate tissues (
51). Taken together, these observations suggest that susceptibility to infection may be the default state in some primary tissues. Moreover, susceptibility to FeLV may provide a useful marker to aid in the identification of further factors that confer tissue-specific susceptibility to genome instability in cancer as well as resistance to incoming retroviruses.
Can the risk of zoonotic infection with FeLV be discounted? Despite control measures, including vaccination, that have reduced the prevalence of FeLV in some parts of the world, this virus family remains one of the most important pathogens of cat species worldwide (
52). Moreover, the limited barriers protecting human cells against FeLV infection contrast with the plethora of restriction factors that protect against the cross-species transmission of primate lentiviruses, where recent jumps have occurred (
53). The successful transfer of other gammaretroviruses that use PIT-1 as an entry receptor from rodents to primates (
5) argues that future adaptation of FeLV for zoonotic spread is not beyond the repertoire of this virus family. The possibility of human exposure to high doses of FeLV analogous to those employed in recent primate challenge experiments with XMRV (
51,
54) is extremely remote; however, it may be interesting to revisit the apparent lack of adaptive immune responses in exposed individuals, e.g., veterinary workers (
10), using more-sensitive techniques.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Virus stocks.
FeLV-B stocks were generated by transfection of an infectious molecular clone (pFGB) (
55) and propagation in the feline fibroblast cell line AH927 or HEK human embryonic kidney cells as described previously (
56). For FeLV-A stocks, HEK293 cells were transfected with pFGA-5 (
20) to avoid possible recombination and generation of FeLV-B (
57). FeLV infectivity was determined by titration on S
+ L
− QN10 cells (
33).
Cells.
Cell lines were derived from curated frozen stocks maintained in our laboratory (Jurkat, K562, CEM, Reh, Kasumi, U937, MCF-7) or by colleagues in the Glasgow Cancer Research UK Centre, including A. Biankin (pancreatic cancer TKCC series) and T. Holyoake (chronic myeloid leukemia lines KYO-1, BV173, KU812, LAMA84, and EM-2; B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia lines ALL/MIK and TOM-1). IMR90 fibroblasts were provided by P. Adams (
48), while EBV-transformed lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs) were obtained from R. Jarrett, and HaCAT keratinocytes were provided by S. Graham. CEMSS cells were kindly provided by M. Malim (King's College, London, United Kingdom). CD34
+ cells were purified by positive selection using anti-CD34-conjugated magnetic microbeads (catalog no. 130-046-703; Miltenyi Biotec Inc.) from cord blood samples generously provided by the Children's Cancer and Leukemia Group (CCLG). Primary blood mononuclear cells were obtained from Cambridge Bioscience (1 sample) and the Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service (3 samples).
Dilution/spreading assay and Southern blot analysis.
A total of 4 × 10
5 KYO-1 cells or Reh cells or 5 × 10
4 HEK293 cells were plated per well in 6 wells of a 12-well plate the day before infection. FeLV-B was harvested from subconfluent virus-producing HEK293 cells, filtered through 0.45-μm filters, and serially diluted 1:10 in RPMI 1640 medium with 10% fetal calf serum (FCS). A 0.5-ml volume of filtered diluted virus was added per well, or medium alone was added to the control well, for 2 h. Cells were then fed with fresh medium and were expanded as normal for 14 days. Genomic DNA was extracted from phosphate-buffered saline (PBS)-washed, pelleted cells using a Qiagen DNeasy blood and tissue kit. Aliquots (15 μg) of genomic DNA were digested overnight with KpnI, separated on a 0.8% agarose Tris-acetate-EDTA (TAE) gel, transferred to a Hybond N membrane (Amersham) in 20 × SSC (1× SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate), and hybridized to FeLV ExU3 as described previously (
21).
Quantitative real-time RT-PCR.
RNA was extracted from cultured cells using a Qiagen RNeasy minikit, and cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg RNA using a Qiagen QuantiTect reverse transcription kit. Aliquots (12.5 ng) of cDNA were amplified in triplicate using Power SYBR green PCR master mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Qiagen QuantiTect primer assays for human hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase (HPRT) (QT00059066), APOBEC3G (QT00070770), SLC20A1 (PIT-1) (QT00028763), or SLC19A2 (THTR1) (QT00007847) on an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system. Quantification was carried out relative to HEK293 cells, and values were normalized to HPRT expression.
Semiquantitative DNA PCR.
One hundred-nanogram aliquots of genomic DNA were amplified in Reddy Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) using primers FeLV envA F (5′-TAAAACACGGGGCACGTTAC-3′) and FeLV envA R (5′-GGAGGTGGGCTTCCACCAAG-3′), FeLV envB F (5′-ATGTGATCAGCCTATGAGGA-3′) and FeLV envB R (5′-CACTAGCTCCCGTTGTCGAG-3′), FeLV LTR F (5′-TAGCTGAAA CAGCAGAAGTTTCAAG-3′) and FeLV LTR F R (5′-GGAAGGTCGAACTCTGGTCAAC-3′), and Myc F (5′-CCAACAGGAACTATGACCTCG-3′) and Myc R (5′-GTAGAAGTTCTCCTCCTCGTC-3′). Samples were denatured at 94°C for 3 min and were then subjected to 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s. Amplification products were separated by electrophoresis on 2% agarose-TAE gels and were visualized by ethidium bromide staining.
DNA quantitative PCR.
Genomic DNA was extracted by a Qiagen DNeasy minikit, and 20-ng aliquots were amplified using primers for human β2 microglobulin (F, 5′-GGAATTGATTTGGGAGAGCAT-3′; R, 5′-CAGGTCCTGGCTCTACAATTTACTAA-3′), primers FeLV U3-LTR F (5′-TAGCTGAAA CAGCAGAAGTTTCAAG-3′) and FeLV U3-LTR R (5′-GGAAGGTCGAACTCTGGTCAAC-3′), and primers envB F (5′CGGTATCCCGGCAAGTAATG-3′) and envB R (5′-GGTTTTTGATCAGGCAGGACTAGA-3′) in Power SYBR green PCR master mix. Amplification products were detected on an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system. Samples were normalized to β2 microglobulin.
Western blotting.
PBS-washed, pelleted cells were lysed in whole-cell lysis buffer and protein concentrations measured by a Bio-Rad protein assay. Virion lysates were prepared from 2 ml precleared virion supernatant by centrifugation in a Beckman TL100 benchtop ultracentrifuge for 2 h at 37,000 rpm and 4°C. Virion pellets were resuspended in 75 μl lysis buffer, and an equal volume (13 μl) of virion protein or 10-μg aliquots of cellular protein were separated on 4-to-12% NuPAGE Novex Bis-Tris gels in NuPAGE morpholinepropanesulfonic acid (MOPS) SDS buffer and were transferred to Hybond ECL membranes (Amersham) in NuPAGE transfer buffer. Following overnight blocking in 5% milk in Tris-buffered saline–Tween 20 (TBST), the filter was exposed to a 1:500 dilution of an anti-p27Gag monoclonal antibody (VPG19.1; a gift of Brian Willett), and detection was carried out with the ECL detection reagent (GE Healthcare).
Hypermutation analysis.
FeLV gag or pol fragments were generated by amplification of 100-ng aliquots of infected-cell genomic DNA in Reddy Mix PCR master mix (Thermo Fisher) using primers FeLV p27gag F (5′-CCCAGTGGCCCTAACTAACC-3′) and R (5′-GCTGGCGTTTCCTCTTTCC-3′) or FeLV Pol F (5′-GCAACCGGTAAGGTGACTC-3′) and Pol R (5′-TTCAAAGGGTTTGGTGATATCTG-3′). DNA was denatured at 94°C for 3 min and was then put through 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 30 s. Products were purified through Qiagen QIAquick PCR purification columns and were then cloned into pCR2.1-TOPO (Invitrogen), transformed into TOP10 competent cells, and plated onto Amp X-Gal (5-bromo-4-chloro-3-indolyl-β-d-galactopyranoside) agar plates. White colonies were cultured and plasmid DNA extracted using Qiaprep spin preps, and DNA was sequenced from M13 F and M13 R primers by Source BioScience and was examined for mutations relative to the pFGB molecular clone using Hypermut, version 2.0.
Alu-Gag PCR.
Primary PCR on 50 ng genomic DNA was performed in Platinum Taq DNA polymerase (Invitrogen) using 10 μM primers AluF (5′-GCCTCCCAAAGTGCTGGGATTACAG-3′) and FeLV gag R (5′-ATAGGGAGGTGGCTCTTCTG-3′) at 95°C for 2 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 s, 50°C for 15 s, and 72°C for 3 min 30 s. Nested PCR was carried out on 4 μl primary PCR product or 4 ng unamplified DNA using primers FeLV RU5 F (5′-TCTTTGCTGAGACTTGACCG-3′) and FeLV RU5 R (5′-ACTAGGTCTTCCTCGGCGAT-3′) and probe FeLV RU5 (5′-FAM-TGCATCTGACTCGTGGTCTC-TAMRA-3′) using Takyon LowRox Probe Mastermix dTTP blue (UF-LPMT-BO101) (Eurogentec) and settings of 50°C for 2 min and 95°C for 3 min, followed by 40 cycles of 95°C for 10 s and 60°C for 60 s on an ABI 7500 real-time PCR system.
LTR circle detection.
Aliquots (100 ng) of genomic DNA from 3-day (PBMCs, Reh and KYO-1 cells) or 24-h (3201 and HEK293 cells) FeLV-infected cells were amplified in Reddy Mix PCR master mix with primers Circles env F (5′ TAAAACAGCGGCAACAACTG-3′) and Circles gag R (5′-GTCTCCGATCAACACCCTGT-3′) or the positive-control primers pan-Myc 23F (5′-CCAACAGGAACTATGACCTCG-3′) and pan-Myc 96R (5′-GTAGAAGTTCTCCTCCTCGTC-3′). Following an initial denaturation step at 94°C for 3 min, 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 s, 60°C for 30 s, and 72°C for 1 min 30 s were performed. Portions (15 μl) of each 25-μl reaction mixture were separated on 1.4% agarose-TAE gels and were visualized by staining with ethidium bromide.