ABSTRACT
There is growing interest in technology that quantifies aspects of our lives. This paper draws on critical practice and speculative design to explore, question and problematise the ultimate consequences of such technology using the quantification of companion animals (pets) as a case study. We apply the concept of "moving upstream" to study such technology and use a qualitative research approach in which both pet owners, and animal behavioural experts, were presented with, and asked to discuss, speculative designs for pet quantification applications, the design of which were extrapolated from contemporary trends. Our findings indicate a strong desire among pet owners for technology that has little scientific justification, whilst our experts caution that the use of technology to augment human-animal communication has the potential to disimprove animal welfare, undermine human-animal bonds, and create human-human conflicts. Our discussion informs wider debates regarding quantification technology.
- Abebe. N. Cats vs. Dogs! A Statistical Analysis. Kickstarter Blog. April 23 2014. https://www.kick starter.com/blog/cats-vs-dogs-a-statistical-analysisGoogle Scholar
- American Pet Products Association (APPA) Pet Industry Market Size & Ownership Statistics. http://www.americanpetproducts.org/Google Scholar
- Apple. "Parenthood" marketing video (2014) available at https://www.apple.com/uk/iphone-5s/powerful/Google Scholar
- Ash, S. J., & Adams, C. E. Public preferences for freeranging domestic cat (Felis catus) management options. Wildlife Society Bulletin, (2003), 334--339.Google Scholar
- Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., & Antanitis, J. Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation. In Proc DIS 2012. 288--297. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., & Stolterman, E. Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design. In Proc CHI 2014. ACM. 1951--1960. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Basham, R. (2014). Surveilling the Elderly: Emerging Demographic Needs and Social. Uberveillance and the Social Implications of Microchip Implants: Emerging Technologies, 169.Google Scholar
- Blythe, M. Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014), 703--712. . Google ScholarDigital Library
- Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. Critical questions for big data Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662--679.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Chesney, T., & Lawson, S. (2007). The illusion of love: Does a virtual pet provide the same companionship as a real one?. Interaction Studies, 8(2), 337--342.Google Scholar
- Choe, E. K., Lee, N. B., Lee, B., Pratt, W., & Kientz, J. A. Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014) 1143--1152. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dong, T., Ackerman, M. S., & Newman, M. W. If these walls could talk: designing with memories of places. In Proc of DIS 2014. 63--72. ACM. . Google ScholarDigital Library
- Dumas, G., Serfass, D. G., Brown, N. A., & Sherman, R. A. The Evolving Nature of Social Network Research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 2014.Google Scholar
- Dunne, A., & Raby, F. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press. 2013. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Elsden, C., & Kirk, D. S. A quantified past: remembering with personal informatics. In Proc of companion publication DIS 2014, ACM Press (2014) Google ScholarDigital Library
- Fitchard, K. Forget the quantified self, we're entering the age of the quantified pet. Gigacom. April 14 2013. https://gigaom.com/2013/04/14/forget-the-quantifiedself-were-entering-the-age-of-the-quantified-pet/Google Scholar
- Golbeck, J., & Neustaedter, C. Pet video chat: monitoring and interacting with dogs over distance. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts 211--220. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Haraway, D. J. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm. 2003.Google Scholar
- Holbrook, M. B., & Woodside, A. G. Animal companions, consumption experiences, and the marketing of pets J. of Business Research, 61(5), 2008.Google Scholar
- Holmquist, L. E. Prototyping: Generating ideas or cargo cult designs? Interactions, 12(2), 2005. 48--54. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Kahn, P. H., Severson, R. L., & Ruckert, J. H. The human relation with nature and technological nature. Cur. Dir. in Psychological Science, 18(1), 2009. 37--42.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Khovanskaya, V., Baumer, E. P., Cosley, D., Voida, S., & Gay, G. Everybody knows what you're doing: a critical design approach to personal informatics. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013) 3403--3412. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li, I., Dey, A. K., & Forlizzi, J. Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. In Proc Ubicomp. ACM (2011) 405--414. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li, I., Dey, A., Forlizzi, J., Höök, K., & Medynskiy, Y. Personal informatics and HCI: design, theory, and social implications. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 2417--2420. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Li, I., Medynskiy, Y., Froehlich, J., & Larsen, J. Personal informatics in practice: improving quality of life through data. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, ACM Press Google ScholarDigital Library
- Linehan, C., Kirman, B. J., Reeves, S., Blythe, M. A., Tanenbaum, J. G., Desjardins, A., & Wakkary, R. Alternate endings: using fiction to explore design futures. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts. 45--48. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Lupton, D. Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, health & sexuality, (2014) (ahead-of-print), 1--14.Google Scholar
- Mancini, C. Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto. Interactions, 18(4), 69--73. 2011. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Mancini, C., Juhlin, O., Cheock, A. D., van der Linden, J., & Lawson, S. Animal-computer interaction (ACI): pushing boundaries beyond 'human'. In NordiCHI'14 833--836. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Meints, K., De Keuster, T., & Butcher, R. (2010). How to prevent dog bite injuries? The blue dog. Injury Prevention, 16(Suppl 1), A171-A172Google Scholar
- Meyer, J., Simske, S., Siek, K. A., Gurrin, C. G., & Hermens, H. Beyond quantified self: data for wellbeing. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014) 95--98. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Miklósi, Á. Dog behaviour, evolution, and cognition. Oxford University Press. 2007.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Morozov E. To Save Everything Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don't Exist. Allen Lane Penguin Books. 2013.Google Scholar
- Nathan, L. P., Friedman, B., Klasnja, P., Kane, S. K., & Miller, J. K. Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. In Proc DIS 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1--10. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Payton, T. M., & Claypoole T. Privacy in the Age of Big Data: Recognizing Threats, Defending Your Rights, and Protecting Your Family. Rowman. 2014.Google Scholar
- Resner, B. I. Rover@ Home: Computer mediated remote interaction between humans and dogs. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. 2001.Google Scholar
- Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., & Chalmers, M. C. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014) 1163--1172. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sanders, C. R. Actions speak louder than words: Close relationships between humans and nonhuman animals. Symbolic Interaction, 26(3), 405--426. 2003.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Schleidt, W. M., & Shalter, M. D. Co-evolution of humans and canids. Evol. Cogn, 9, 57--72. 2003.Google Scholar
- Serpell, J. In the company of animals: A study of humananimal relationships. Cambridge Univ Press. 1996.Google Scholar
- Sparrow, R. (2002). The march of the robot dogs. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(4), 305--318. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Strengers, Y. Smart energy in everyday life: are you designing for resource man? Interactions 21(4) (2014) Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tahnk, J.L. 8 Apps and Gadgets to Keep Track of Your Child. Mashable. Jul 15 2013. http://mashable.com /2013/07/15/child-tracking-apps/Google Scholar
- Tanenbaum, J. Design Fictional Interactions: Why HCI Should Care About Stories. Interactions, Sept 2014, 2223. ACM. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Tromp, N. Let's resist the temptation to solve problems. Interactions 21, 4 ACM Press (2014), 20--21. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard Press.Google Scholar
- Wingrave, C. A., Rose, J., Langston, T., & LaViola J. J. Early explorations of CAT: canine amusement and training. CHI'10 Extended Abstracts. ACM 2661--2670. Google ScholarDigital Library
- Wolf, G. The data-driven life. New York Times 2010.Google Scholar
Index Terms
-
Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative Design: The Case of Quantified Cats and Dogs
-
Recommendations
-
In Tension with Progression: Grasping the Frictional Tendencies of Speculative, Critical, and other Alternative Designs
CHI '21: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsSpeculative design, critical design, and other alternative designs have emerged as popular approaches and burgeoning traditions within HCI and design research. While examples of this work abound, comparatively little theory exists for grasping ...
-
Using design fiction to reflect on autonomy in smart technology for people living with dementia
UbiComp '16: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing: AdjunctThe field of HCI is changing, which brings with it new responsibilities. Ubiquitous computing touches on many aspects of modern life and its consequences are not yet fully understood. In the context of dementia ubiquitous technologies are currently ...
-
Noisy technology, unhappy dogs: where technology might support caregiving in the home
ACI '22: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference on Animal-Computer InteractionWhile the advance of technology in our homes makes human lives easier, it also presents an ever growing source of sounds that may be confusing for the dogs that share our homes with us. To understand to what extent this may be a challenge, we present ...
Comments