skip to main content
10.1145/2702123.2702260acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative Design: The Case of Quantified Cats and Dogs

Published:18 April 2015Publication History

ABSTRACT

There is growing interest in technology that quantifies aspects of our lives. This paper draws on critical practice and speculative design to explore, question and problematise the ultimate consequences of such technology using the quantification of companion animals (pets) as a case study. We apply the concept of "moving upstream" to study such technology and use a qualitative research approach in which both pet owners, and animal behavioural experts, were presented with, and asked to discuss, speculative designs for pet quantification applications, the design of which were extrapolated from contemporary trends. Our findings indicate a strong desire among pet owners for technology that has little scientific justification, whilst our experts caution that the use of technology to augment human-animal communication has the potential to disimprove animal welfare, undermine human-animal bonds, and create human-human conflicts. Our discussion informs wider debates regarding quantification technology.

References

  1. Abebe. N. Cats vs. Dogs! A Statistical Analysis. Kickstarter Blog. April 23 2014. https://www.kick starter.com/blog/cats-vs-dogs-a-statistical-analysisGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  2. American Pet Products Association (APPA) Pet Industry Market Size & Ownership Statistics. http://www.americanpetproducts.org/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Apple. "Parenthood" marketing video (2014) available at https://www.apple.com/uk/iphone-5s/powerful/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Ash, S. J., & Adams, C. E. Public preferences for freeranging domestic cat (Felis catus) management options. Wildlife Society Bulletin, (2003), 334--339.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardzell, S., Bardzell, J., Forlizzi, J., Zimmerman, J., & Antanitis, J. Critical design and critical theory: the challenge of designing for provocation. In Proc DIS 2012. 288--297. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  6. Bardzell, J., Bardzell, S., & Stolterman, E. Reading critical designs: supporting reasoned interpretations of critical design. In Proc CHI 2014. ACM. 1951--1960. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Basham, R. (2014). Surveilling the Elderly: Emerging Demographic Needs and Social. Uberveillance and the Social Implications of Microchip Implants: Emerging Technologies, 169.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Blythe, M. Research through design fiction: narrative in real and imaginary abstracts. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014), 703--712. . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  9. Boyd, D., & Crawford, K. Critical questions for big data Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662--679.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Chesney, T., & Lawson, S. (2007). The illusion of love: Does a virtual pet provide the same companionship as a real one?. Interaction Studies, 8(2), 337--342.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Choe, E. K., Lee, N. B., Lee, B., Pratt, W., & Kientz, J. A. Understanding quantified-selfers' practices in collecting and exploring personal data. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014) 1143--1152. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  12. Dong, T., Ackerman, M. S., & Newman, M. W. If these walls could talk: designing with memories of places. In Proc of DIS 2014. 63--72. ACM. . Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  13. Dumas, G., Serfass, D. G., Brown, N. A., & Sherman, R. A. The Evolving Nature of Social Network Research. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Dunne, A., & Raby, F. Speculative Everything: Design, Fiction, and Social Dreaming. MIT Press. 2013. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  15. Elsden, C., & Kirk, D. S. A quantified past: remembering with personal informatics. In Proc of companion publication DIS 2014, ACM Press (2014) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  16. Fitchard, K. Forget the quantified self, we're entering the age of the quantified pet. Gigacom. April 14 2013. https://gigaom.com/2013/04/14/forget-the-quantifiedself-were-entering-the-age-of-the-quantified-pet/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  17. Golbeck, J., & Neustaedter, C. Pet video chat: monitoring and interacting with dogs over distance. In CHI'12 Extended Abstracts 211--220. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  18. Haraway, D. J. The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness. Chicago: Prickly Paradigm. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Holbrook, M. B., & Woodside, A. G. Animal companions, consumption experiences, and the marketing of pets J. of Business Research, 61(5), 2008.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  20. Holmquist, L. E. Prototyping: Generating ideas or cargo cult designs? Interactions, 12(2), 2005. 48--54. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  21. Kahn, P. H., Severson, R. L., & Ruckert, J. H. The human relation with nature and technological nature. Cur. Dir. in Psychological Science, 18(1), 2009. 37--42.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Khovanskaya, V., Baumer, E. P., Cosley, D., Voida, S., & Gay, G. Everybody knows what you're doing: a critical design approach to personal informatics. In Proc. CHI 2013, ACM Press (2013) 3403--3412. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  23. Li, I., Dey, A. K., & Forlizzi, J. Understanding my data, myself: supporting self-reflection with ubicomp technologies. In Proc Ubicomp. ACM (2011) 405--414. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  24. Li, I., Dey, A., Forlizzi, J., Höök, K., & Medynskiy, Y. Personal informatics and HCI: design, theory, and social implications. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2011, ACM Press (2011), 2417--2420. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  25. Li, I., Medynskiy, Y., Froehlich, J., & Larsen, J. Personal informatics in practice: improving quality of life through data. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2012, ACM Press Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  26. Linehan, C., Kirman, B. J., Reeves, S., Blythe, M. A., Tanenbaum, J. G., Desjardins, A., & Wakkary, R. Alternate endings: using fiction to explore design futures. In CHI'14 Extended Abstracts. 45--48. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  27. Lupton, D. Quantified sex: a critical analysis of sexual and reproductive self-tracking using apps. Culture, health & sexuality, (2014) (ahead-of-print), 1--14.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. Mancini, C. Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto. Interactions, 18(4), 69--73. 2011. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  29. Mancini, C., Juhlin, O., Cheock, A. D., van der Linden, J., & Lawson, S. Animal-computer interaction (ACI): pushing boundaries beyond 'human'. In NordiCHI'14 833--836. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  30. Meints, K., De Keuster, T., & Butcher, R. (2010). How to prevent dog bite injuries? The blue dog. Injury Prevention, 16(Suppl 1), A171-A172Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  31. Meyer, J., Simske, S., Siek, K. A., Gurrin, C. G., & Hermens, H. Beyond quantified self: data for wellbeing. Ext. Abstracts CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014) 95--98. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  32. Miklósi, Á. Dog behaviour, evolution, and cognition. Oxford University Press. 2007.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Morozov E. To Save Everything Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don't Exist. Allen Lane Penguin Books. 2013.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Nathan, L. P., Friedman, B., Klasnja, P., Kane, S. K., & Miller, J. K. Envisioning systemic effects on persons and society throughout interactive system design. In Proc DIS 2008, ACM Press (2008), 1--10. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Payton, T. M., & Claypoole T. Privacy in the Age of Big Data: Recognizing Threats, Defending Your Rights, and Protecting Your Family. Rowman. 2014.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Resner, B. I. Rover@ Home: Computer mediated remote interaction between humans and dogs. Doctoral dissertation, MIT. 2001.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Rooksby, J., Rost, M., Morrison, A., & Chalmers, M. C. Personal tracking as lived informatics. In Proc. CHI 2014, ACM Press (2014) 1163--1172. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  38. Sanders, C. R. Actions speak louder than words: Close relationships between humans and nonhuman animals. Symbolic Interaction, 26(3), 405--426. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  39. Schleidt, W. M., & Shalter, M. D. Co-evolution of humans and canids. Evol. Cogn, 9, 57--72. 2003.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  40. Serpell, J. In the company of animals: A study of humananimal relationships. Cambridge Univ Press. 1996.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Sparrow, R. (2002). The march of the robot dogs. Ethics and Information Technology, 4(4), 305--318. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  42. Strengers, Y. Smart energy in everyday life: are you designing for resource man? Interactions 21(4) (2014) Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  43. Tahnk, J.L. 8 Apps and Gadgets to Keep Track of Your Child. Mashable. Jul 15 2013. http://mashable.com /2013/07/15/child-tracking-apps/Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  44. Tanenbaum, J. Design Fictional Interactions: Why HCI Should Care About Stories. Interactions, Sept 2014, 2223. ACM. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  45. Tromp, N. Let's resist the temptation to solve problems. Interactions 21, 4 ACM Press (2014), 20--21. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  46. Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Harvard Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Wingrave, C. A., Rose, J., Langston, T., & LaViola J. J. Early explorations of CAT: canine amusement and training. CHI'10 Extended Abstracts. ACM 2661--2670. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  48. Wolf, G. The data-driven life. New York Times 2010.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Problematising Upstream Technology through Speculative Design: The Case of Quantified Cats and Dogs

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2015
      4290 pages
      ISBN:9781450331456
      DOI:10.1145/2702123

      Copyright © 2015 ACM

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 18 April 2015

      Permissions

      Request permissions about this article.

      Request Permissions

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '15 Paper Acceptance Rate486of2,120submissions,23%Overall Acceptance Rate6,199of26,314submissions,24%

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader