skip to main content
10.1145/3328529.3328562acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessmsocietyConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open Access

The Rise of Germany's AfD: A Social Media Analysis

Published:19 July 2019Publication History

ABSTRACT

In 2017, a far-right party entered the German parliament for the first time in over half a century. The Alternative für Deutschland (AfD) became the third largest party in the government. Its campaign focused on Euroscepticism and a nativist stance against immigration. The AfD used all available social media channels to spread this message. This paper seeks to understand the AfD's social media strategy over the last years on the full gamut of social media platforms and to verify the effectiveness of the party's online messaging strategy. For this purpose, we collected data related to Germany's main political parties from Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and Instagram. This data was subjected to a unified multi-platform analysis, which relies on four measures: party engagement, user engagement, message spread, and acceptance. This analysis proves the AfD's superior online popularity relative to the rest of Germany's political parties. The evidence also indicates that automated accounts contributed to this online superiority. Finally, we demonstrate that as part of its social media strategy, the AfD avoided discussion of its economic proposals and instead focused on pushing its anti-immigration agenda to gain popularity.

References

  1. Kai Arzheimer. 2015. The AfD: Finally a Successful Right-Wing Populist Eurosceptic Party for Germany? West European Politics 38, 3 (2015), 535--556.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Sitaram Asur, Bernardo A. Huberman, Gábor Szabó, and Chunyan Wang. 2011. Trends in Social Media: Persistence and Decay. 5th International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media (2011).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  3. Justus Bender and Marvin Oppong. 2017. Frauke Petry und die Bots. FAZ. Retrieved March 01, 2019 from https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/digitaler-wahlkampf-frauke-petry-und-die-bots-14863763.html.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  4. Nicole Berbuir, Marcel Lewandowsky, and Jasmin Siri. 2016. The AfD and its Sympathisers: Finally a Right-Wing Populist Movement in Germany? German Politics 24 (Jan. 2016), 154--178.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Knut Bergmann, Matthias Diermeier, and Judith Niehues. 2016. Die AfD - eine Partei der Besserverdiener? (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. David M. Blei, Andrew Y. Ng, Michael I. Jordan, and John Lafferty. 2003. Latent Dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research 3 (2003), 993--1022. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  7. Leticia Bode and Emily K. Vraga. 2018. Studying Politics Across Media. Political Communication 35, 1 (2018), 1--7.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  8. Michael Bossetta. 2018. The Digital Architectures of Social Media: Comparing Political Campaigning on Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, and Snapchat in the 2016 U.S. Election. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 95, 2 (2018), 471--496.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Oliver Decker, Alexander Yendell, Johannes Kiess, and Elmar Brähler. 2017. Polarisiert und radikalisiert? Medienmisstrauen und die Folgen für die Demokratie.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  10. Dimap.de. 2017. WahlREPORT Bundestagswahl. Retrieved March 01, 2019 from https://www.infratest-dimap.de/umfragen-analysen/bundesweit/wahlreport-deutschland/ 2017/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  11. Paul-Jasper Dittrich. 2017. Social networks and populism in the EU: Four things you should know.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  12. Julia Ebner. 2017. How Germany's far right took over Twitter - and tilted the election. The Guardian. Retrieved March 01, 2019 from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/sep/26/germany-farright- election-afd-trolls.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  13. Thomas Eckerl and Oliver Hahn. 2018. Die Selfie-Seite der Macht: Instagram in der politischen Kommunikation in Deutschland. In Strategische Politische Kommunikation im digitalen Wandel: Interdisziplinäre Perspektiven auf ein dynamisches Forschungsfeld, Michael Oswald and Michael Johann (Eds.). Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, 237--257.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  14. Sven Engesser, Nicole Ernst, Frank Esser, and Florin Büchel. 2017. Populism and social media: How politicians spread a fragmented ideology. Information, Communication & Society 20, 8 (2017), 1109--1126.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. Rui Fan, Jichang Zhao, Yan Chen, and Ke Xu. 2013. Anger is More Influential Than Joy: Sentiment Correlation in Weibo. arXiv preprint arXiv:1309.2402 (2013).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  16. Emilio Ferrara, Onur Varol, Clayton A. Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2016. The rise of social bots. Commun. ACM 59, 7 (2016), 96--104. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Kirill Filimonov, Uta Russmann, and Jakob Svensson. 2016. Picturing the Party: Instagram and Party Campaigning in the 2014 Swedish Elections. Social Media + Society 2, 3 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  18. Simon Franzmann. 2014. Die Wahlprogrammatik der AfD in vergleichender Perspektive. Mitteilungen des Instituts für Deutsches und Internationales Parteienrecht und Parteienforschung 20 (Jan. 2014), 115--124.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  19. Paolo Gerbaudo. 2018. Social media and populism: an elective affinity? Media, Culture & Society 40, 5 (2018), 745--753.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. Robert Gorwa and Douglas Guilbeault. 2018. Unpacking the Social Media Bot: A Typology to Guide Research and Policy. Policy & Internet (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. T. L. Griffiths and M. Steyvers. 2004. Finding scientific topics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, Suppl. 1 (April 2004), 5228--5235.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  22. Robert Grimm. 2015. The rise of the German Eurosceptic party Alternative für Deutschland, between ordoliberal critique and popular anxiety. International Political Science Review 36, 3 (2015), 264--278.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Simon Hegelich. 2018. Die digitale Revolution der Meinungsbildung Social Media im Wahlkampf. Hans Seidel Stiftung, Munich, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  24. Simon Hegelich and Morteza Shahrezaye. 2015. The Communication Behavior of German MPs on Twitter: Preaching to the Converted and Attacking Opponents. European Policy Analysis 1 (2015), 155--174.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Marc Helbling and Anke Tresch. 2011. Measuring party positions and issue salience from media coverage: Discussing and cross-validating new indicators. Electoral Studies 30, 1 (2011), 174--183.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Andreas Jungherr. 2016. Twitter use in election campaigns: A systematic literature review. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 13, 1 (2016), 72--91.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. Bente Kalsnes. 2016. The social media paradox explained: comparing political parties' Facebook strategy versus practice. Social Media+ Society 2, 2 (2016).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  28. David Karpf. 2017. Analytic Activism: Digital Listening and the New Political Strategy. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Majid Khosravinik. 2017. Right Wing Populism in the West: Social Media Discourse and Echo Chambers. Insight Turkey 19 (Jan. 2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  30. Juho Kim. 2018. The radical market-oriented policies of the Alternative for Germany (AfD) and support from non-beneficiary groups -- discrepancies between the party's policies and its supporters. Asian Journal of German and European Studies 3, 1 (21 May 2018), 6.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Anders O Larsson and Bente Kalsnes. 2014. 'Of course we are on Facebook': Use and non-use of social media among Swedish and Norwegian politicians. European Journal of Communication 29, 6 (2014), 653--667.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Kristina Lerman and Rumi Ghosh. 2010. Information Contagion: an Empirical Study of the Spread of News on Digg and Twitter Social Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1003.2664 (2010).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  33. Azi Lev-On. 2012. YouTube Usage in Low-Visibility Political Campaigns. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 9, 2 (2012), 205--216.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  34. Viktor Mayer-Schnberger. 2013. Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think. Viktor Mayer-Schnberger and Kenneth Cukier. John Murray Publishers, UK. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  35. Gianpietro Mazzoleni and Roberta Bracciale. 2015. Socially mediated populism: the communicative strategies of political leaders on Facebook. Palgrave Communications 4, 50 (2015).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  36. Juan Carlos Medina Serrano, Simon Hegelich, Morteza Shahrezaye, and Orestis Papakyriakopoulos. 2018. Social Media Report: The 2017 German Federal Elections. TUM University Press, Munich, Germany.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  37. Yves Meny and Yves Surel. 2002. Democracies and the Populist Challenge. Palgrave Macmillan UK.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  38. Fred Morstatter, Jürgen Pfeffer, Huan Liu, and Kathleen M Carley. 2013. Is the Sample Good Enough? Comparing Data from Twitter's Streaming API with Twitter's Firehose. In ICWSM. Proceedings of the seventh International Conference on Weblogs and Social Media, Cambridge, Massachusetts.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  39. Caroline Lego Munoz and Terri L. Towner. 2017. The Image is the Message: Instagram Marketing and the 2016 Presidential Primary Season. Journal of Political Marketing 16, 3-4 (2017), 290--318.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  40. Christian Nestler and Jan Rohgal. 2014. Eine deutsche Angst - Erfolgreiche Parteien rechts von der Union: Zur AfD und den gegenwärtigen Gelegenheitsstrukturen des Parteienwettbewerbs. Zeitschrift für Politik 61, 4 (Dec. 2014), 389--413.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  41. Lisa-Maria Neudert, Bence Kollanyi, and Philip N. Howard. 2017. Junk News and Bots during the German Parliamentary Election: What are German Voters Sharing over Twitter?Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  42. Oskar Niedermayer and Jürgen Hofrichter. 2016. Die Wählerschaft der AfD: Wer ist sie, woher kommt sie und wie weit rechts steht sie? Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen 47 (Jan. 2016), 267--285.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  43. Pippa Norris. 2003. Preaching to the Converted?: Pluralism, Participation and Party Websites. Party Politics 9, 1 (2003), 21--45.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  44. Karoline Oelsner and Linette Heimrich. 2015. Social media use of German politicians: towards dialogic voter relations? German Politics 24, 4 (2015), 451-- 468.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  45. Orestis Papakyriakopoulos, Simon Hegelich, Morteza Shahrezaye, and Juan Carlos Medina Serrano. 2018. Social media and microtargeting: Political data processing and the consequences for Germany. Big Data & Society 5, 2 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  46. Pew Research Center: Global Attitudes & Trends. 2018. News Media and Political Attitudes in Germany. Retrieved March 01, 2019 from https://www.pewglobal.org/fact-sheet/news-media-and-political-attitudesin- germany/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  47. Pew Research Center: Internet & Technology. 2018. Teens, Social Media & Technology 2018. Retrieved March 01, 2019 from https://www.pewinternet.org/2018/05/31/teens-social-media-technology-2018/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  48. Neil Postman. 1970. The reformed English curriculum. In High school 1980: The shape of the future in American secondary education, Alvin C. Eurich (Ed.). Pitman Publishing Corporation, New York, N.Y., 160--2168.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  49. Stephen A Rains and Steven R Brunner. 2015. What can we learn about social network sites by studying Facebook? A call and recommendations for research on social network sites. New Media & Society 17, 1 (2015), 114--131.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  50. Patricia Rossini, Jeff Hemsley, Sikana Tanupabrungsun, Feifei Zhang, and Jennifer Stromer-Galley. 2018. Social Media, Opinion Polls, and the Use of Persuasive Messages During the 2016 US Election Primaries. Social Media + Society 4, 3 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  51. Uta Russmann and Jakob Svensson. 2017. Interaction on Instagram?: Glimpses from the 2014 Swedish Elections. IJEP 8 (2017), 50--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  52. Sebastian Schelter, Felix Biessmann, Malisa Zobel, and Nedelina Teneva. 2016. Structural Patterns in the Rise of Germany's New Right on Facebook. In ICDM Workshops. IEEE Computer Society, Barcelona, Spain, 440--445.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  53. Franzisca Schmidt. 2018. Drivers of Populism: A Four-country Comparison of Party Communication in the Run-up to the 2014 European Parliament Elections. Political Studies 66, 2 (2018), 459--479.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  54. Rüdiger Schmitt-Beck. 2017. The 'Alternative für Deutschland in the Electorate': Between Single-Issue and Right-Wing Populist Party. German Politics 26, 1 (2017), 124--148.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  55. Statista. 2017. Ranking der beliebtesten Parteien bei Twitter nach der Anzahl der Follower in Deutschland im August 2017. Retrieved March 01, 2019 from https://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/659207/umfrage/anzahl-dertwitter- follower-von-parteien-in-deutschland/.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  56. Stefan Stieglitz and Linh Dang-Xuan. 2013. Social media and political communication: a social media analytics framework. Social Network Analysis and Mining 3, 4 (2013), 1277--1291.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  57. Sebastian Stier, Arnim Bleier, Haiko Lietz, and Markus Strohmaier. 2018. Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter. Political Communication 35, 1 (2018), 50--74.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  58. Jesper Strömbäck and Peter Van Aelst. 2013. Why political parties adapt to the media: Exploring the fourth dimension of mediatization. International Communication Gazette 75, 4 (2013), 341--358.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  59. Jennifer Stromer-Galley. 2014. Presidential campaigning in the Internet age. Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  60. Andree Thieltges, Orestis Papakyriakopoulos, Juan Carlos Medina Serrano, and Simon Hegelich. 2018. Effects of Social Bots in the Iran-Debate on Twitter. arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.10105 (2018).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  61. T.J. Thomson and Keith Greenwood. 2017. I "Like" That: Exploring the Characteristics That Promote Social Media Engagement With News Photographs. Visual Communication Quarterly 24, 4 (2017), 203--218.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  62. Anke Tresch, Jonas Lefevere, and Stefaan Walgrave. 2018. How parties' issue emphasis strategies vary across communication channels: The 2009 regional election campaign in Belgium. Acta Politica 53, 1 (2018), 25--47.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  63. Sonja Utz. 2009. The (potential) benefits of campaigning via social network sites. Journal of computer-mediated communication 14, 2 (2009), 221--243.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  64. José van Dijck and Thomas Poell. 2013. Understanding Social Media Logic. Media and Communication 1, 1 (2013), 2--14.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  65. Onur Varol, Emilio Ferrara, Clayton A. Davis, Filippo Menczer, and Alessandro Flammini. 2017. Online Human-Bot Interactions: Detection, Estimation, and Characterization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1703.03107 (2017).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  66. Lucia Vesnic-Alujevic and Sofie Van Bauwel. 2014. YouTube: A Political Advertising Tool? A Case Study of the Use of YouTube in the Campaign for the European Parliament Elections. Journal of Political Marketing 13, 3 (2014), 195--212.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  67. Quang H. Vuong. 1989. Likelihood Ratio Tests for Model Selection and Non- Nested Hypotheses. Econometrica 57, 2 (1989), 307--333.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  68. MarkusWagner and Thomas M Meyer. 2014. Which issues do parties emphasise? Salience strategies and party organisation in multiparty systems. West European Politics 37, 5 (2014), 1019--1045.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  69. Fang Wu and Bernardo A Huberman. 2007. Novelty and collective attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 45 (2007).Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. The Rise of Germany's AfD: A Social Media Analysis

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Login options

      Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

      Sign in

      Full Access

      • Published in

        cover image ACM Other conferences
        SMSociety '19: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Social Media and Society
        July 2019
        247 pages
        ISBN:9781450366519
        DOI:10.1145/3328529

        Copyright © 2019 ACM

        Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

        Publisher

        Association for Computing Machinery

        New York, NY, United States

        Publication History

        • Published: 19 July 2019

        Permissions

        Request permissions about this article.

        Request Permissions

        Check for updates

        Qualifiers

        • research-article
        • Research
        • Refereed limited

        Acceptance Rates

        Overall Acceptance Rate78of189submissions,41%

      PDF Format

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader