skip to main content
research-article

Unlikely allies in preventing sexual misconduct: Student led prevention efforts in a technical communication classroom: experience report

Published:19 January 2022Publication History
Skip Abstract Section

Abstract

Students' participation in relevant service learning can have a unique impact on their institution of higher education, if provided the opportunity. This article explores student-designed sexual misconduct prevention efforts taking place in an undergraduate project management course at one institution of higher education. We found that involving students in particular kinds of campus communication design and implementation simultaneously improved those efforts and offered students the opportunity to participate in impactful civic projects. In our article, we first examine the most common approach to sexual misconduct prevention, while considering its limitations. We then introduce a nontraditional collaboration---technical communication student involvement within prevention work---which resulted in new efforts. Finally, we illustrate how instructors can integrate similar collaborations.

References

  1. Allen, N., & Benninghoff, S. T. (2004). TPC program snapshots: Developing curricula and addressing challenges. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(2), 157--185. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  2. Austin, M. J. M., Dardis, C. M., Wilson, M. S., Gidycz, C. A., & Berkowitz, A. D. (2016). Predictors of sexual assault-specific prosocial bystander behavior and intentions: A prospective analysis. Violence Against Women, 22(1), 90--111. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  3. Bennett, S., Banyard, V. L., & Garnhart, L. (2014). To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(3), 476--496. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  4. Berkowitz, B (n.d.). Assessing community problems. Retrieved https://ctb.ku.edu/en/table-of-contents/assessment/assessing-community-needs-and-resources/analyzing-community-problems/mainGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  5. Berman, S. (2006). Service Learning: A Guide to Planning, Implementing, and Assessing Student Projects (second edition). Skyhorse Publishing.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  6. Campus Advocacy & Prevention Professionals Association (CAPPA). (n.d.). About CAPPA. http://www.nationalcappa.org/ourworkGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  7. Cantor, D., Fisher, B., Chibnall, S., Harps, S., Townsend, R., Thomas, G., Lee, H., Kranz, V., Herbison, R., & Madden, K. (2020). Report on the AAU campus climate survey on sexual assault and misconduct. Westat. https://www.aau.edu/sites/default/files/AAU-Files/Key-Issues/Campus-Safety/Revised%20Aggregate%20report%20%20and%20appendices%201-7_(01-16-2020_FINAL).pdfGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  8. Cassel, A. (2012). Are you the problem, or the solution? Changing male attitudes and behaviors regarding sexual assault. Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research, 17, 50--58. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  9. Clark, D. (2004). Is professional writing relevant? A model for action research. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(3), 307--323.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  10. Coker, A. L., Fisher, B. S., Bush, H. M., Swan, S. C., Williams, C. M., Clear, E. R., & DeGue, S. (2015). Evaluation of the green dot bystander intervention to reduce interpersonal violence among college students across three campuses. Violence Against Women, 21(12), 1507--1527. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  11. Coker, A. L., Bush, H. M., Fisher, B. S., Swan, S. C., Williams, C. M., Clear, E. R., & DeGue, S. (2016). Multi-college bystander intervention evaluation for violence prevention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 50(3), 295--302. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  12. Coker, A. L., Bush, H. M., Cook-Craig, P. G., DeGue, S. A., Clear, E. R., Brancato, C. J., Fisher, B. S., & Recktenwald, E. A. (2017). RCT testing bystander effectiveness to reduce violence. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(5), 566--578. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  13. Cooper, S. E., & Dranger, P. N. (2018). Building a culture of respect across genders: Eliminating sexual misconduct. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy, 32(2), 129--150. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  14. Crooks, C. V., Jaffe, P., Dunlop, C., Kerry, A., & Exner-Cortens, D. (2019). Preventing gender-based violence among adolescents and young adults: Lessons learned from 25 years of program development and evaluation. Violence Against Women, 25(1), 29--55. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  15. DeGue, S., Valle, L. A., Holt, M. K., Massetti, G. M., Matjasko, J. L., & Tharp, A. T. (2014). A systematic review of primary prevention strategies for sexual violence perpetration. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 19(4), 346--362. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  16. Edenfield, A.C. (2019). "Queering consent: Justice in sexual consent messaging design." Communication Design Quarterly, 7(2). Retrieved https://bit.ly/2TANHyOGoogle ScholarGoogle ScholarDigital LibraryDigital Library
  17. Gidycz, C. A., Orchowski, L. M., King, C. R., & Rich, C. L. (2008). Sexual victimization and health-risk behaviors: A prospective analysis of college women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23(6), 744--763. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  18. Gidycz, C. A., Orchowski, L. M., & Berkowitz, A. D. (2011). Preventing sexual aggression among college men: An evaluation of a social norms and bystander intervention program. Violence Against Women, 17(6), 720--742. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  19. Gidycz, C. A., & Dardis, C. M. (2014). Feminist self-defense and resistance training for college students: A critical review and recommendations for the future. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 15, 322--333. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  20. IDEA Faculty FAQs (n.d.). Office of Analysis, Assessment and Accreditation. Retrieved from http://www.usu.edu/aaa/idea_faculty_faq.cfmGoogle ScholarGoogle Scholar
  21. Jones, N. N., Moore, K. R., & Walton, R. (2016). Disrupting the past to disrupt the future: An antenarrative of technical communication. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 211--229.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  22. Jozkowski, K. N. (2015). Beyond the dyad: An assessment of sexual assault prevention education focused on social determinants of sexual assault among college students. Violence Against Women, 21(7), 848--874. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  23. Jozkowski, K. N., Peterson, Z. D., Sanders, S. A., Dennis, B., & Reece, M. (2014). Gender differences in heterosexual college students' conceptualizations and indicators of sexual consent: Implications for contemporary sexual assault prevention education. The Journal of Sex Research, 51(8), 904--916.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  24. Kimme Hea, A. C., & Wendler Shah, R. (2016). Silent partners: Developing a critical understanding of community partners in technical communication service-learning pedagogies. Technical Communication Quarterly, 25(1), 48--66.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  25. Kleinsasser, A., Jouriles, E. N., McDonald, R., & Rosenfield, D. (2015). An online bystander intervention program for the prevention of sexual violence. Psychology of Violence, 5(3), 227--235. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  26. Levand, M. A. (2020). Consent as Cross-Cultural Communication: Navigating Consent in a Multicultural World. Sexuality & Culture, 24(3), 835--847.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  27. McMahon, S., Allen, C. T., Postmus, J. L., McMahon, S. M., Peterson, N. A., & Lowe Hoffman, M. (2014). Measuring bystander attitudes and behavior to prevent sexual violence. Journal of American College Health, 62(1), 58--66. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  28. McMahon, S., Wood, L., Cusano, J., & Macri, L. M. (2019). Campus sexual assault: Future directions for research. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 31(3), 270--295. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  29. Moynihan, M. M., Banyard, V. L., Cares, A. C., Potter, S. J., Williams, L. M., & Stapleton, J. G. (2015). Encouraging responses in sexual and relationship violence prevention: What program effects remain 1 year later? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 30(1), 110--132. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  30. Paul, L. A., & Gray, M. J. (2011). Sexual assault programming on college campuses: Using social psychological belief and behavior change principles to improve outcomes. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 12(2), 99--109. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  31. Peterson, K., Sharps, P., Banyard, V., Powers, R. A., Kaukinen, C., Gross, D., Decker, M. R., Baatz, C., & Campbell, J. (2018). An evaluation of two dating violence prevention programs on a college campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 33(23), 3630--3655. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  32. Scott, J. B. (2004). Rearticulating civic engagement through cultural studies and service-learning. Technical Communication Quarterly, 13(3), 289--306.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  33. Utah State University 2019 Sexual Misconduct Survey Data Report. Office of Equity.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
  34. Shah, R. W. (2018). The courage of community members: Community perspectives of engaged pedagogies. College Composition and Communication, 70(1), 82--110.Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  35. Vladutiu, C. J., Martin, S. L., & Macy, R. J. (2011). College-or university-based sexual assault prevention programs: A review of program outcomes, characteristics, and recommendations. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 12(2), 67--86. Google ScholarGoogle ScholarCross RefCross Ref
  36. Walton, R., Colton, J.S., Wheatley-Boxx, R., & Gurko, K. (2016). Social Justice Across the Curriculum: Research-Based Course Design. Programmatic Perspectives, 8(2), 119--41.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar

Index Terms

  1. Unlikely allies in preventing sexual misconduct: Student led prevention efforts in a technical communication classroom: experience report

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Login options

    Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

    Sign in

    Full Access

    • Published in

      cover image Communication Design Quarterly
      Communication Design Quarterly  Volume 9, Issue 4
      December 2021
      16 pages
      EISSN:2166-1642
      DOI:10.1145/3487213
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Copyright © 2022 Copyright is held by the owner/author(s)

      Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      • Published: 19 January 2022

      Check for updates

      Qualifiers

      • research-article

    PDF Format

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader