Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online August 25, 2015

‘And the rest is implementation.’ Comparing approaches to what happens in policy processes beyond Great Expectations

Abstract

Implementation occurs as a ‘late’ part in the stages model of the policy process. As such, it is seen as following upon and subordinate to the preceding stages of agenda-setting and policy formation. Hence, implementation is often addressed as ‘the rest’. This view on implementation as a presupposed residual in goal achievement implies little attention to ‘political’ dimensions, like ambiguity and conflict. Therefore, the view can only partially explain the – sometimes disappointing – results of policy processes. Alternatively, approaches to the policy/implementation nexus with an explicit focus on what happens at the street level have a greater explanatory potential. They are not taking implementation for granted as a seemingly technical matter, simply prescribed by policy objectives.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Barrett SM, Fudge C (1981) Examining the policy-action relationship. In: Barrett SM, Fudge C (eds) Policy and Action: Essays on the Implementation of Public Policy, London: Methuen, pp. 3–34.
Coleman A, Checkland K, Harrison S, Hiroeh U (2010) Local histories and local sensemaking: A case of policy implementation in the English National Health Service. Policy & Politics 38(2): 289–306.
Edelman M (1971) Politics as Symbolic Action. Chicago: Markham.
Elmore RF (1979) Backward mapping: Implementation research and policy decisions. Political Science Quarterly 94(4): 601–616.
Ferman B (1990) When failure is success: Implementation and Madisonian government. In: Palumbo DJ, Calista DJ (eds) Implementation and the Policy Process: Opening Up the Black Box, New York: Greenwood Press, pp. 39–50.
Goggin ML, Bowman AO’M, Lester JP, et al. (1990) Implementation Theory and Practice: Toward a Third Generation, Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman/Little, Brown and Company.
Gunn L (1978) Why is implementation so difficult? Management Services in Government 33(4): 169–176.
Hill MJ (2013) The Public Policy Process, (6th ed). Harlow: Pearson Education.
Hill MJ, Hupe PL (2014) Implementing Public Policy: An Introduction to the Study of Operational Governance, (3rd ed). London: Sage.
Hill M and Hupe P (2003) The multi-layer problem in implementation research. Public Management Review 5(4): 471–490.
Hogwood BW, Gunn L (1984) Policy Analysis for the Real World, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Holzinger K, Knill C (2005) Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy 12(5): 775–796.
Hupe PL (2011) The thesis of incongruent implementation: Revisiting Pressman and Wildavsky. Public Policy and Administration 26(1): 63–80.
Hupe PL (2014) What happens on the ground: Persistent issues in implementation research. Public Policy and Administration 29(2): 164–182.
Hupe PL, Hill MJ, Nangia M (2014) Studying implementation beyond deficit analysis: The top-down view reconsidered. Public Policy and Administration 29(2): 145–163.
Jenkins WI (1978) Policy Analysis: A Political and Organizational Perspective, London: Martin Robertson.
John P (1998) Analysing Public Policy. London: Pinter.
Johansson S (2010) Implementing evidence-based practices and programmes in the human services: Lessons from research in public administration. European Journal of Social Work 13(1): 109–125.
Kennedy KJ, Chan JK-S, Fok PK (2011) Holding policy-makers to account: Exploring “soft” and “hard” policy and the implications for curriculum reform’. London Review of Education 9(1): 41–54.
Knill C, Lenschow A (1998) Coping with Europe: The impact of British and German administrations on the implementation of EU environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy 5(4): 595–614.
Knoepfel P, Weidner H (1982) Formulation and implementation of air quality control programmes: Patterns of interest consideration. Policy & Politics 10(1): 85–109.
Knoepfel P, Larrue C, Varone F, et al. (2007) Public Policy Analysis, Bristol: Policy Press.
Lindblom CE, Woodhouse EJ (1993) The Policy-Making Process, (3rd ed). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Lipsky M (1980) Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Marsh D, Rhodes RAW (1992) Implementing Thatcherite Policies: Audit of an Era, Buckingham: Open University Press.
Matland RE (1995) Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 5(2): 145–174.
May PJ (1993) Mandate design and implementation: Enhancing implementation efforts and shaping regulatory styles. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 12(4): 634–663.
May PJ (1995) Can cooperation be mandated? Implementing inter-governmental environmental management in New South Wales and New Zealand. Publius 25(1): 89–113.
May PJ (2014) Implementation failures revisited: Policy regime perspectives’. Public Policy and Administration. Epub ahead of print 12 September 2014. DOI: 10.1177/0952076714561505.
May PJ, Jochim AE (2013) Policy regime perspectives: Policies, politics and governing. Policy Studies Journal 41(3): 426–452.
Nilsen P, Stähl C, Roback K, et al. (2013) Never the twain shall meet? A comparison of implementation science and policy implementation research. Implementation Science 8(63): 1–12.
Oosterwaal A, Torenvlied R (2012) Policy divergence in implementation: How conflict among decisive legislators reinforces the effect of agency preferences. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22(2): 171–195.
Pressman J, Wildavsky A (1973) (3rd ed. 1984) Implementation: How Great Expectations in Washington are Dashed in Oakland; or, Why It’s Amazing that Federal Programs Work at all, This Being a Saga of the Economic Development Administration as Told by Two Sympathetic Observers Who Seek to Build Morals on a Foundation of Ruined Hopes, Berkeley: University of California Press.
Sabatier PA (1986) Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: A critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of Public Policy 6(1): 21–48.
Sabatier PA, Weible CM (2007) The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and clarifications. In: Sabatier PA (ed.) Theories of the Policy Process, Boulder, CO: Westview Press, pp. 3–17.
Sætren H (2005) Facts and myths about research on public policy implementation: Out-of-fashion, allegedly dead, but still very much alive and relevant. Policy Studies Journal 33(4): 559–582.
Sætren H (2014) Implementing the third generation research paradigm in policy implementation research: An empirical assessment. Public Policy and Administration 29(2): 84–105.
Simon HA (1957) Administrative Behaviour, (2nd ed). New York: Macmillan.
Stoker RP (1991) Reluctant Partners: Implementing Federal Policy, Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Stone D (2012) Policy Paradox: The Art of Political Decision Making (3rd ed, revised), New York: W.W. Norton & Company.
Torenvlied R, Akkerman A (2004) Theory of ‘soft’ policy implementation in multilevel systems with an application to social partnership in the Netherlands. Acta Politica 39(1): 31–58.
Van Gunsteren HR (1976) The Quest for Control: A Critique of the Rational-Central Rule Approach in Public Affairs, London: John Wiley & Sons.
Van Meter D, Van Horn CE (1975) The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration and Society 6(4): 445–488.
Wilson W (1887) The study of administration. Political Science Quarterly 2(2): 197–222. .
Winter SC (2006) Implementation. In: Peters BG, Pierre J (eds) Handbook of Public Policy, London: Sage, pp. 151–166.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: August 25, 2015
Issue published: April 2016

Keywords

  1. Implementation
  2. policy implementation
  3. public policy
  4. public policy process
  5. policy formation
  6. policy formulation

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2015.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Peter L Hupe
Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Michael J Hill
University of Brighton, UK

Notes

Peter L Hupe, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, Room M8-08, Rotterdam, 3000 DR, The Netherlands. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Public Policy and Administration.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 6785

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 104 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 86

  1. Not Whether to Coordinate, But How: Concerns and Mechanism Choice Unde...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. How do you do, implementation? A Latour-inspired critical approach to ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Designing policies that could work: understanding the interaction betw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. A story of (in)coherence: climate adaptation for health in South Afric...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Limits of Activation? Street-Level Responses to the 2015 Refugee Chall...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. How policy growth affects policy implementation: bureaucratic overload...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. The transportation policy elite and their ladder of citizen participat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Engaging professionals in the strategic renewal of public services: A ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. The CCP, Campaign Governance and COVID-19: Evidence from Shanghai
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. The process of implementing a multi-level and multi-sectoral national ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Implementing relational contracting in a public client organization: t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. “Nobody wants to be a dead hero”: Coping with precarity at the frontli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Impossible déségrégation ?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Handling Tensions in Frontline Policy Implementation: Legitimating, In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Critical infrastructure of social and labour market integration: Capac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Implementacja polityki ochrony środowiska w Chinach a wzorce zarządzan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. 1915(c) Medicaid Waivers for Children With Severe Emotional Disturbanc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. A critical analysis of walking policy in Ireland and its contribution ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Embracing Complexity in Policy Implementation Research: A Comparative ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Political contestation in policy implementation: A narrative inquiry i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Comparing policy conflict on electricity transmission line sitings
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Party Politics and the Implementation of Gender Quotas: Resisting Inst...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Bleibeorientierung Geflüchteter, die Rolle der Aufnahmegesellschaft un...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. To comply or to be committed? Public procurement and labour rights in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Policy implementation in the health sector of the federal state of Bel...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. The expression of ‘policy’ in palliative care: A critical review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Issue-Based Complexity: Digitally Supported Negotiation in Geodesign L...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Implementing market mechanisms in the Paris era: the importance of bur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Digitalisierung der öffentlichen Verwaltung: Die Umsetzung des Onlinez...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Barriers and Facilitators to the Implementation of Effective Alcohol C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Do Lawsuits by ENGOs Improve Environmental Quality? Results from the F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Legal contestation of artificial intelligence-related decision-making ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Market-Oriented Policies on Care for Older People in Urban China: Exam...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Interacting institutional logics in policy implementation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Walking the Talk of Social Equity? Street-Level Bureaucrats’ Decisionm...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. References
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Degree apprenticeships - a win-win model? A comparison of policy aims ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. The (un)intended effects of street-level bureaucrats’ enforcement styl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. How Hercules cleans up the Augean stables: differentiated implementati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Jamming with implementation research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. The Elephant in the Room: Public Servants and Implementation – An Intr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Mapping “Implementation System” Elements
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Implementation Failures as Learning Pathologies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Public Value Management in Brexit Britain
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Policy Implementation as Principal-Agent Problem: The Case of Kenya Wi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Concurrent Governance Processes of California’s Sustainable Groundwate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. (Mis)taking social responsibility? Implementing welfare state reform b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Unpacking the implementation blackbox using 'actor interface analysis'...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Contextualizing Policy: Understanding Implementation under Socio-techn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Performance-based policy in offender rehabilitation: Limitation or inn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. When Policy Hits Practice – Learning from the Failed Implementation of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. A systematic review and meta-synthesis of policy intervention characte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Understanding street-level bureaucrats’ attitude towards clients: Towa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. The Elephant in the Room – Public Servants and Implementation: An Intr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Mapping “Implementation System” Elements
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Implementation Failures as Learning Pathologies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. En Route to Implementation Science 3.0
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Complex Society as a Framework of the New Public Sector Leadership Rat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Moving policy implementation theory forward: A multiple streams/critic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Tangling with the Troika: ‘domestic ownership’ as political and admini...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Challenges for Management in Implementing Reforms at the Ministry Leve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Policy implementation deficiencies: Ghana’s microfinance sector failur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. On Frontline Workers as Bureau-Political Actors: The Case of Civil–Mil...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. How “wide green dikes” were reintroduced in The Netherlands: a case st...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Do strategic delta plans get implemented? The case of the Mekong Delta...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. “Work Is Worship” in Refugee Policy: Diminution, Deindividualization, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Ecosystem Approach for the Management of Deep-Sea Mining Activities
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Managing Risk Through Marine Spatial Planning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. Decentralized Implementation of Flood Resilience Measures – A Blessing...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Challenges to decision-making processes in the national HTA agency in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. The Importance of Policy Change for Addressing Public Health Problems
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  73. The Political Economy of Central Banking in Turkey: The Macroprudentia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Learning from a failed project – challenges of implementing ‘green’ te...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. Selection Processes in Prison-Based Treatment Referrals: A Street-Leve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  76. Shifting modes of governing municipal waste – A sociology of translati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Meet the local policy workers: Implementation of health promotion guid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Policy Implementation in an Age of Governance
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. Policy Learning and Organizational Capacity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Adopt or Adapt? Unpacking the Role of Institutional Work Processes in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Reconsidering EU Compliance: Implementation performance in the field o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. An investigation of the financial monitoring policies for microfinance...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Policy implementation through multi-level governance: analysing practi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. An Institutional and Opinion Analysis of Colorado’s Hydraulic Fracturi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Advancing Policy Process Research at Its Overlap with Public Managemen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Moving from ecosystem-based policy objectives to operational implement...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text