Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online February 22, 2016

Candidate Selection in Germany: Local and Regional Party Elites Still in Control?

Abstract

In comparative terms, the strong legal regulation of internal party processes is a specific feature of the German party democracy. Local and regional party conventions are the formal sites of decision making in selecting parliamentary candidates. The national party level is relatively excluded from the procedures. The article argues that the decentralization of intraparty competences has facilitated a gatekeeping role for local and regional party elites. At the constituency level, most often a single candidate is presented to the party convention after he or she has been appointed in the informal preselection activities of local party elites. Gaining a local nomination is the crucial step for obtaining a federal parliamentary mandate, either by winning a direct constituency mandate or being awarded a safe list position. At the regional level, Land party elites are in control of producing balanced party lists. The article also looks at newer developments, such as the introduction of party primaries and gender quotas. It shows that these developments have somehow weakened, but not fundamentally altered, the predominance of subnational party elites in candidate selection.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Bille L. (2001). Democratizing a democratic procedure: Myth or reality? Candidate selection in Western European parties, 1960-1990. Party Politics, 7, 363-380.
Borchert J., Stolz K. (2011). German political careers: The state level as an arena in its own right? Regional and Federal Studies, 21, 205-222.
Bukow S. (2014). Die SPD-Parteiorganisationsreform 2009-2011: Mit Primaries und verstärkter Basisbeteiligung auf dem Weg zur modernsten Partei Europas? [The SPD party organisational reform 2009-2011: do primaries and more inclusion of the party on the ground pave the way towards the most modern party in Europe?]. In Münch U., Kranenpohl U., Gast H. (Eds.), Parteien und Demokratie: Innerparteiliche Demokratie im Wandel [Parties and democracy: changes in intra-party democracy] (pp. 133-150). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
Bukow S., Poguntke T. (2013). Innerparteiliche Organisation und Willensbildung [Intra-party organisation and decision-making]. In Niedermayer O. (Ed.), Handbuch Parteienforschung [Handbook on party research] (pp. 179-209). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
Detterbeck K. (2012). Multi-level party politics in Western Europe. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Detterbeck K. (2013). The rare event of choice: Party primaries in German Land parties. German Politics, 22, 270-287.
Detterbeck K., Rohlfing I. (2014). Party leader selection in Germany. In Pilet J.-B., Cross W. (Eds.), The selection of political party leaders in contemporary parliamentary democracies (pp. 77-92). Abingdon, England: Routledge.
Deutscher Bundestag. (2014). Datenhandbuch zum Deutschen Bundestag [Data handbook on the German Bundestag/Federal parliament]. Berlin, Germany: Author.
Farrell D. (2001). Electoral systems: A comparative introduction. Basingstoke, England: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gallagher M. (1988). Introduction. In Gallagher M., Marsh M. (Eds.), Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics (pp. 1-9). London, England: Sage.
Hazan R., Rahat G. (2010). Democracy within parties: Candidate selection methods and their political consequences. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Hennl A. (2014). Intra-party dynamics in mixed-member electoral systems: How strategies of candidate selection impact parliamentary behavior. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 26, 93-116.
Höhne B. (2010). Strukturmuster, Selektionsprämissen und Resultate von Kandidatenaufstellungen zu Bundestags- und Europawahlen in Deutschland [Structures, selection patterns of candidate selection in Bundestag and European elections in Germany]. In Jun U., Höhne B. (Eds.), Parteien als fragmentierte Organisationen [Parties as fragmented organisations] (pp. 85-122). Leverkusen, Germany: Barbara Budrich.
Höhne B. (2013). Reform von Kandidatenaufstellungen: Fehlende Realisierungspotenziale in Parteien [Reform of candidate nomination: failing to materialize]. In Niedermayer O., Höhne B., Jun U. (Eds.), Abkehr von den Parteien? Parteiendemokratie und Bürgerprotest [Deserting parties? Party democracy and citizen’s protest] (pp. 177-203). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
Kaack H. (1969). Wer kommt in den Bundestag? Abgeordnete und Kandidaten 1969 [Who gets into the Bundestag? Deputies and candidates 1969]. Leverkusen, Germany: Leske.
Katz R., Mair P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics, 1, 5-28.
Leunig S. (2012). Die Regierungssysteme der deutschen Länder [The systems of government in the German Länder/states]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
Mair P. (1997). Party system change: Approaches and interpretations. Oxford, England: Clarendon Press.
Padgett S. (1994). The German Social Democratic Party: Between old and new left. In Bell D., Shaw E. (Eds.), Conflict and cohesion in Western European Social Democratic Parties (pp. 10-30). London, England: Sage.
Poguntke T. (1994). Parties in a legalistic culture: The case of Germany. In Katz R., Mair P. (Eds.), How parties organize: Change and adaptation in party organizations in Western democracies (pp. 185-215). London, England: Sage.
Rahat G., Hazan R. (2001). Candidate selection methods: An analytical framework. Party Politics, 7, 297-322.
Reiser M. (2011). Wer entscheidet unter welchen Bedingungen über die Nominierung von Kandidaten? Die innerparteilichen Selektionsprozesse zur Aufstellung in den Wahlkreisen [Who decides according to which criteria on candidate selection? The intra-party selection mechanismes on constituency level]. In Niedermayer O. (Ed.), Die Parteien nach der Bundestagswahl 2009 [The parties after the Bundstag elections of 2009] (pp. 237-259). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
Reiser M. (2013). Ausmaß und Formen des innerparteilichen Wettbewerbs auf der Wahlkreisebene: Nominierung der Direktkandidaten für die Bundestagswahl 2009 [Forms and degree of intra-party competition at constituency level: nominating the constituency candidates for the Bundestag elections of 2009]. In Faas T., Arzheimer K., Roßteuscher S., Weßels B. (Eds.), Koalitionen, Kandidaten, Kommunikation [Coalitions, candidates, communication] (pp. 129-147). Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS.
Roberts G. (1988). The German Federal Republic: The two-lane route to Bonn. In Gallagher M., Marsh M. (Eds.), Candidate selection in comparative perspective: The secret garden of politics (pp. 94-118). London, England: Sage.
Schüttemeyer S. (1999). Fraktionen und ihre Parteien in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland: Veränderte Beziehungen im Zeichen professioneller Politik [Parliamentary groups and their parties in the Federal Republic of Germany: changing relations in the sign of professional politics]. In Helms L. (Ed.), Parteien und Fraktionen [Parties and parliamentary groups] (pp. 39-65). Leverkusen, Germany: Leske + Budrich.
Schüttemeyer S., Sturm R. (2005). Der Kandidat—das (fast) unbekannte Wesen [The candidate - the (nearly) unknown beast]. Zeitschrift für Parlamentsfragen, 36, 539-553.
Statistisches Bundesamt. (2013). Die Wahlbewerber für die Wahl zum 18: Deutschen Bundestag 2013: Informationen des Bundeswahlleiters [The nominated candidates for the elections of the 18th German Bundestag 2013: Informations of the Bundeswahlleiter/the Federal Elections Officer]. Wiesbaden, Germany: Author.
Turner E., Wigbers D. (2014). Ambitionierte Zielsetzung, unzureichende Realisierung? Reform der Kandidatenauswahl in Großbritannien und Deutschland [Ambitious goals, unsatisfaying results? Reforming candidate selection in Great Britain and Germany]. In Münch U., Kranenpohl U., Gast H. (Eds.), Parteien und Demokratie: Innerparteiliche Demokratie im Wandel [Parties and democracy: changes in intra-party democracy] (pp. 57-74). Baden-Baden, Germany: Nomos.
Zeuner B. (1973). Wahlen ohne Auswahl: Die Kandidatenaufstellung zum Bundestag [Elections without choice: Bundestag candidate selection]. In Steffani W. (Ed.), Parlamentarismus ohne Transparenz [Parliamentarism without transparency] (pp. 165-190). Opladen, Germany: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Biographies

Klaus Detterbeck is professor at the University of Education Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany. His areas of expertise are party politics, federalism, and European integration. He has been coconvenor of the ECPR Standing Group on Federalism and Regionalism. Among his most recent publications are Parties and Civil Society in Federal Systems with Wolfgang Renzsch (2015, Oxford University Press), Multi-Level Party Politics in Western Europe (2012, Palgrave Macmillan), Parteien und Parteiensystem (2011, UVK Verlag), and Föderalismus in Deutschland with Wolfgang Renzsch and Stefan Schieren (2010, OldenbourgVerlag).

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: February 22, 2016
Issue published: June 2016

Keywords

  1. candidate selection
  2. informality
  3. party organization
  4. Germany
  5. elite politics

Rights and permissions

© 2016 SAGE Publications.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Klaus Detterbeck
University of Education Schwäbisch Gmünd, Schwäbisch Gmünd, Germany

Notes

Klaus Detterbeck, University of Education Schwäbisch Gmünd, Oberbettringer Straße 200, Schwäbisch Gmünd 73525, Germany. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in American Behavioral Scientist.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1001

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 18 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 22

  1. The informal rules of candidate selection and their impact on intra-pa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Who Runs for Higher Office? Electoral Institutions and L...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Power-seeking, networking and competition: why women do not rise in pa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. What drives the intra-party democracy of the “Alternative for Germany”...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Inclusivity and Decentralisation of Candidate Selectorates: Factional ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Local preferences in candidate selection: Evidence from a conjoint exp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Digitalization in Candidate Selection. Support and Resistance Within E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Strategies of the Party Selectorate: The Two-Level Game in District Se...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. More free-floating, less outward-looking: How more inclusive candidate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. How Democracy Works within a Populist Party: Candidate Selection in th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Digging in the ‘Secret Garden of Politics’: The Institutionalisation a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Mandate type, electoral safety, and defections from the party line: Th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. More federal legislators lead to more resources for their constituenci...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. No Need for Wider Selectorates? Party Members’ Preferences for Reformi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. MPs’ principals and the substantive representation of disadvantaged im...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. MPs’ Representational Focus in MMP Systems. A Comparison Between Germa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Productivity and Reselection in a Party-based Environment: Evidence fr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Representing the Region on the Floor: Socioeconomic Characteristics of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Erststimmen generierende Merkmale der Direktkandidaten bei Bundestagsw...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Who is recruiting our crew? Contextual determinants of MPS’ selection
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Keeping One’s Seat: The Competitiveness of MP Renomination in Mixed-Me...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Wie stellen Parteien ihre Parlamentsbewerber auf?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text