Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 18, 2015

Government Turnover and the Effects of Regime Type: How Requiring Alternation in Power Biases Against the Estimated Economic Benefits of Democracy

Abstract

Incumbents voluntarily leaving office after losing elections is a hallmark of democracy. Hence, the most prominent binary democracy measure (Democracy–Dictatorship/Alvarez–Cheibub–Limongi–Przeworski [DD/ACLP]) requires observed alternation in power to score regimes democratic. Such “alternation rules” may, however, lead to underestimating democracy’s effect on economic growth. As strong economic performance reduces the probability of incumbents losing democratic elections, young democracies with high growth may falsely be coded dictatorships; their popular governments have yet to lose an election. We identify the expected bias using different tests, for example, when following Przeworski et al.’s advice to re-estimate relationships after re-coding multi-party regimes without alternation as democratic, or when employing differences in information about alternation from different time points to contrast original DD estimates with our “real-time” DD estimates. We present resembling arguments on how alternation rules may bias democracy’s estimated relationships with civil war onsets and coups, but find fewer empirical indications of biases here.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A. (2001, July). An African success story: Botswana. MIT Department of Economics (Working Paper No. 01-37).
Acemoglu D., Johnson S., Robinson J. A., Yared P. (2008). Income and democracy. American Economic Review, 98, 808-842.
Acemoglu D., Naidu S., Restrepo P., Robinson J. A. (2014, March). Democracy does cause growth (Working Paper No. 20004). Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Alesina A., Devleeschauwer A., Easterly W., Kurlat S., Wacziarg R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 155-194.
Alesina A., Gerald D. C., Roubini N. (1997). Political cycles and the macroeconomy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Alesina A., Osler S., Roubini N., Swagel P. (1996). Political instability and economic growth. Journal of Economic Growth, 1(2), 189-211.
Alvarez M., Cheibub J. A., Limongi F., Przeworski A. (1996). Classifying political regimes. Studies in Comparative International Development, 31(2), 3-36.
Barro R. J., Sala-i Martin X. I. (2004). Economic growth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Baum M. A., Lake D. A. (2003). The political economy of growth: Democracy and human capital. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 333-347.
Beaulieu E., Gary W. C., Saiegh S. (2012). Sovereign debt and regime type: Reconsidering the democratic advantage. International Organization, 66, 709-738.
Besley T. (2006). Principled agents? The political economy of good government. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Bogaards M. (2007). Measuring democracy through election outcomes: A critique with African data. Comparative Political Studies, 40, 1211-1237.
Boix C., Miller M., Rosato S. (2013). A complete data set of political regimes, 1800-2007. Comparative Political Studies, 46, 1523-1554.
Bratton M., Van de Walle N. (1997). Democratic experiments in Africa: Regime transitions in comparative perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Brender A., Drazen A. (2008). How do budget deficits and economic growth affect reelection prospects? Evidence from a large panel of countries. The American Economic Review, 98, 2203-2220.
Casper G., Tufis C. (2003). Correlation versus interchangeability: The limited robustness of empirical findings on democracy using highly correlated data sets. Political Analysis, 11(2), 196-203.
Cederman L.-E., Gleditsch K. S., Buhaug H. (2013). Inequality, grievances, and civil war. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Cederman L.-E., Hug S., Krebs L. F. (2010). Democratization and civil war: Empirical evidence. Journal of Peace Research, 47, 377-394.
Cederman L.-E., Wimmer A., Min B. (2010). Why do ethnic groups rebel? New data and analysis. World Politics, 62(1), 87-119.
Cheibub J. A., Gandhi J., Vreeland J. (2010). Democracy and dictatorship revisited. Public Choice, 143(1), 67-101.
Clague C., Keefer P., Knack S., Olson M. (1996). Property and contract rights in autocracies and democracies. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 243-276.
Clark W. R., Golder M., Golder S. N. (2012). Principles of comparative politics (2nd ed.). London, England: CQ Press.
Cooray A., Potrafke N. (2011). Gender inequality in education: Political institutions or culture and religion? European Journal of Political Economy, 27, 268-280.
Coppedge M., Gerring J., Altman D., Bernhard M., Fish S., Hicken A,. . .Teorell J. (2011). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: A new approach. Perspectives on Politics, 9, 247-267.
Dahl R. A., Tufte E. R. (1973). Size and democracy. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Danevad A. (1995). Responsiveness in Botswana politics: Do elections matter? The Journal of Modern African Studies, 33, 381-402.
Doucouliagos H., Ulubasoglu M. A. (2008). Democracy and economic growth: A meta-analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 52(1), 61-83.
Duch R. M., Stevenson R. (2005). Assessing the magnitude of the economic vote over time and across nations. Electoral Studies, 25, 528-547.
Easterly W., Levine R. (1997). Africa’s growth tragedy: Policies and ethnic divisions. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112, 1203-1250.
Elkins Z. (2000). Gradations of democracy? Empirical tests of alternative conceptualizations. American Journal of Political Science, 44, 293-300.
Feng Y. (2005). Democracy, governance and economic performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ferejohn J. (1986). Incumbent performance and electoral control. Public Choice, 50(1-3), 5-25.
Geddes B., Wright J., Frantz E. (2014a). Autocratic breakdown and regime transitions: A new data set. Perspectives on Politics, 12, 313-331.
Geddes B., Wright J., Frantz E. (2014b). Autocratic Regimes Code Book, Version 1.2. Retrieved from http://sites.psu.edu/dictators/wp-content/uploads/sites/12570/2014/06/GWF-Codebook.pdf
Gerring J., Bond P., Barndt W. T., Moreno C. (2005). Democracy and economic growth: A historical perspective. World Politics, 57, 323-364.
Gerring J., Maguire M., Skaaning S.-E. (2013, October). Democracy and growth: A lexical approach (Working Paper). Boston, MA: Boston University.
Goertz G. (2005). Social science concepts: A user’s guide. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Gurr T. R. (1970). Why men rebel. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Haber S., Menaldo V. (2011). Do natural resources fuel authoritarianism? A reappraisal of the resource curse. American Political Science Review, 105(1), 1-26.
Harvey N. (1998). The Chiapas rebellion: The struggle for land and democracy. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Hibbs D. A. Jr. (1982). President Reagan’s mandate from the 1980 elections: A shift to the right? American Politics Quarterly, 10, 387-420.
Hibbs D. A. Jr. (2000). Bread and peace voting in U.S. presidential elections. Public Choice, 104(1-2), 149-180.
Hollyer J. R., Rosendorff B. P., Vreeland J. R. (2011). Democracy and transparency. Journal of Politics, 73, 1191-1205.
Houle C. (2009). Inequality and democracy: Why inequality harms consolidation but does not affect democratization. World Politics, 61, 589-622.
Huntington S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
Knutsen C. H. (2011a). Democracy, Dictatorship and Protection of Property Rights. Journal of Development Studies, 47, 164-182.
Knutsen C. H. (2011b). The economic effects of democracy and dictatorship (Ph.D. thesis). Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Norway.
Knutsen C. H. (2011c). Democracy and economic growth: A changing relationship? In Claes D. H., Knutsen C. H. (Eds.), Governing the global economy: Politics, institutions, and economic development (pp. 171-188). London, England: Routledge.
Krauss E. S., Pekkanen R. J. (2010). The rise and fall of Japan’s liberal democratic party. The Journal of Asian Studies, 69(1), 5-15.
Krieckhaus J. (2004). The regime debate revisited: A sensitivity analysis of democracy’s economic effect. British Journal of Political Science, 34, 635-655.
Leith J. C. (2005). Why Botswana prospered. Montreal, Quebec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
Levitsky S., Way L. A. (2010). Competitive authoritarianism: Hybrid regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lewis-Beck M. S., Stegmaier M. (2000). Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Annual Review of Political Science, 3, 183-219.
Lindberg S. I. (2006). Democracy and elections in Africa. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Maddison A. (2007). Contours of the world economy, 1-2030 AD. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Magaloni B. (2006). Voting for autocracy: Hegemonic party survival and its demise in Mexico. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Mehlum H., Moene K. O., Torvik R. (2006). Cursed by resources or institutions? World Economy, 29, 1117-1131.
Moyo R. (2012, November 22). Botswana’s ruling party could lose support. Mail & Guardian. Retrieved from http://mg.co.za/article/2012-11-22-after-46-years-in-power-botswanas-leader-could-lose-next-election
Munck G. L., Verkuilen J. (2002). Conceptualizing and measuring democracy: Evaluating alternative indices. Comparative Political Studies, 35(1), 5-34.
Pacek A., Radcliff B. (1995). The political economy of competitive elections in the developing world. American Journal of Political Science, 39, 745-759.
Papaioannou E., Siourounis G. (2008). Democratisation and growth. The Economic Journal, 118, 1520-1551.
Potrafke N. (2012). Islam and democracy. Public Choice, 151(3-4), 185-192.
Powell G. B. Jr. (2000). Elections as instruments of democracy: Majoritarian and proportional visions. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Powell G. B Jr., Whitten G. D. (1993). A cross-national analysis of economic voting: Taking account of the political context. American Journal of Political Science, 37, 391-414.
Powell J. (2012). Determinants of the attempting and outcome of coups d’état. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 56, 1017-1040.
Przeworski A. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski A., et al. (2013). Political Institutions and Political Events (PIPE): Codebook, Version 2. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/a/nyu.edu/adam-przeworski/home/data
Przeworski A., Alvarez M. E., Cheibub J. A., Limongi F. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Przeworski A., Limongi F. (1993). Political regimes and economic growth. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(3), 51-69.
Rock M. (2009). Corruption and democracy. The Journal of Development Studies, 45(1), 55-75.
Romer P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98(5), 71-102.
Schedler A. (2006). The logic of electoral authoritarianism. In Schedler A. (Ed.), Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition (pp. 1-23). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.
Tsie B. (1996). The political context of Botswana’s development performance. Journal of Southern African Studies, 22, 599-616.
Vreeland J. R. (2008). The effect of political regime on civil war: Unpacking anocracy. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52, 401-425.
World Bank. (2003). Breaking the conflict trap: Civil war and development policy. Washington, DC: Author.

Biographies

Carl Henrik Knutsen is a professor at the Department of Political Science, University of Oslo. His research interests include the economic consequences of political institutions and the determinants of regime change. His publications include articles in the American Journal of Political Science, Electoral Studies, Journal of Development Studies, and World Development.
Tore Wig is research fellow and Phd candidate at the Department of Political Science, University of Oslo. His research interests include the institutional determinants of civil conflict, and how institutions in autocracies impact on regime survival.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material

Supplemental material files:

File (cps_knutsen_wig_replication.zip)
File (online_appendix_knutsen_wig_cps.pdf)

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 18, 2015
Issue published: June 2015

Keywords

  1. democratization and regime change
  2. politics of growth/development
  3. non-democratic regimes
  4. political economy
  5. political regimes

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2015.
Request permissions for this article.
Request Permissions

Authors

Affiliations

Carl Henrik Knutsen
University of Oslo, Norway
Tore Wig
University of Oslo, Norway

Notes

Carl Henrik Knutsen, University of Oslo, Moltke Moes vei 31, Oslo 0851, Norway. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Comparative Political Studies.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1255

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 15 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 17

  1. Conceptual and Measurement Issues in Assessing Democratic Backsliding
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. What Is the Interaction Between Separation of Democratic Powers and St...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Leader Turnover, Regime Type, and Growth Volatility
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Conceptual and Measurement Issues in Assessing Democratic Backsliding
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The role of the separation of democratic powers on structural transfor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Democracy and the quality of economic institutions: theory and evidenc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Should we care (more) about data aggregation?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Using Machine Learning for measuring democracy: A practitioners guide ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. A business case for democracy: regime type, growth, and growth volatil...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Democracy’s third wave and national defense spending
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Executive Turnover and the Investigation of Former Leaders in New Demo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Using Machine Learning for Measuring Democracy: An Update
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Coexistence as a Strategy for Opposition Parties in Challenging the Af...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Executive Constraint, Political Stability, and Economic Growth
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Regimes in the World (RIW): A Robust Regime Type Measure Based on V-De...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Demokrati, «Quality of Government» og menneskelig velferd: Et tilsvar ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Updated data on institutions and elections 1960–2012: presenting the I...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text