Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 20, 2020

The Unintended Consequences of Democracy Promotion: International Organizations and Democratic Backsliding

Abstract

Since the end of the Cold War, international organizations (IOs) have engaged in unprecedented levels of democracy promotion, and research overwhelmingly links them to positive democratic outcomes. However, this increased emphasis on democracy has more recently been accompanied by rampant illiberalism and a sharp rise in cases of democratic backsliding in new democracies. What explains democratic backsliding in an age of unparalleled international support for democracy? Backsliding occurs when democratic institutions are weakened or eroded by elected officials, resulting in an illiberal or diminished form of democracy. I argue that IOs that support democracy unintentionally make backsliding more likely by neglecting to promote democratic institutions other than executives and elections, increasing executive power, and limiting states’ domestic policy options, which stunts institutional development. I find membership in IOs associated with democracy promotion makes backsliding more likely, decreases checks on executive power, and limits domestic policy options and party development in new democracies.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Abadie A., Diamond A., Hainmueller J. (2015). Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. American Journal of Political Science, 59(2), 495–510.
Ahmed F. Z. (2012). The perils of unearned foreign income: Aid, remittances, and government survival. American Political Science Review, 106(1), 146–165.
Alesina A., Devleeschauwer A., Easterly W., Kurlat S., Wacziarg R. (2003). Fractionalization. Journal of Economic Growth, 8, 155–194.
Allansson M., Melander E., Themner L. (2017). Organized violence, 1989-2016. Journal of Peace Research, 54(4), 574–587.
Almond G., Verba S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Sage.
Andrews D. M. (1994). Capital mobility and state autonomy: Toward a structural theory of international monetary relations. International Studies Quarterly, 38, 193–218.
Bäck H., Hadenius A. (2008). Democracy and state capacity: Exploring a J-shaped relationship. Governance, 21(1), 1–24.
Bai J. (2009). Panel data models with interactive fixed effects. Econometrica, 77, 1229–1279.
Beaulieu E., Hyde S. (2009). In the shadow of democracy promotion. Comparative Political Studies, 42(3), 392–415.
Berman S. (2016). The lost left. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 69–76.
Bermeo N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19.
Boehmer C., Gartzke E., Nordstrom T. (2004). Do intergovernmental organizations promote peace? World Politics, 57(1), 1–38.
Boix C., Miller M., Rosato S. (2012). A complete data set of political regimes, 1800-2007. Comparative Political Studies, 46(12), 1523–1554.
Brautigam D. A. (1992). Governance, economy, and foreign aid. Studies in Comparative International Development, 27(3), 3–25.
Brautigam D. A. (2000). Aid dependence and governance. Almqvist & Wiksell International.
Brooks S. M., Kurtz M. J. (2016). Oil and democracy: Endogenous natural resources and the political “resource curse.” International Organization, 70(2), 279–311.
Bugaric B. (2015). A crisis of constitutional democracy in post-communist Europe: “Lands in-between” democracy and authoritarianism. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 13(1), 219–245.
Bush S. S. (2015). The taming of democracy assistance: Why democracy promotion does not confront dictators. Cambridge University Press.
Cao X. (2009). Networks of intergovernmental organizations and convergence in domestic economic policies. International Studies Quarterly, 53(4), 1095–1130.
Carnegie A., Marniov N. (2017). Foreign aid, human rights, and democracy promotion: Evidence from a natural experiment. American Journal of Political Science, 61(3), 671–683.
Carothers T. (2002). The end of the transition paradigm. Journal of Democracy, 13(1), 5–21.
Carothers T. (2006). Confronting the weakest link: Aiding political parties in new democracies. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
Cerny P. G. (1994). The dynamics of financial globalization: Technology, market structure, and policy response. Policy Sciences, 27(4), 319–342.
Clark T. S., Linzer D. A. (2015). Should I use fixed or random effects? Political Science Research and Methods, 3(2), 399–408.
Cooper A., Legler T. (2006). Intervention without intervening? The OAS defense and promotion of democracy in the Americas. Palgrave Macmillan.
Coppedge M., Gerring J., Lindberg S. I., Skaaning S.-E., Teorell J., Altman D., . . . Staton J. (2018). V-Dem Codebook [version 8]. https://www.v-dem.net/media/filer_public/e0/7f/e07f672b-b91e-4e98-b9a3-78f8cd4de696/v-dem_codebook_v8.pdf
Correlates of War Project. (2016). State system membership list (v2016). https://correlatesofwar.org/data-sets/state-system-membership
Cruz C., Kefer P., Scartascini C. (2016). Database of political institutions codebook, 2015 update (DPI2015). https://publications.iadb.org/en/database-political-institutions-2015-dpi2015
Dahl R. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. Yale University Press.
Dimitrova A., Pridham G. (2004). International actors and democracy promotion in central and eastern Europe: The integration model and its limits. Democratization, 11(5), 91–112.
Dix R. H. (1992). Democratization and the institutionalization of Latin American political parties. Comparative Political Studies, 24(4), 488–511.
Donno D. (2013). Defending democratic norms: International actors and the politics of electoral misconduct. Oxford University Press.
Fearon J. D. (2003). Ethnic and cultural diversity by country. Journal of Economic Growth, 8(2), 195–222.
Feenstra R. C., Inklaar R., Timmer M. P. (2015). The next generation of the Penn World Table. American Economic Review, 105(10), 3150–3182.
Finkel E., Brudny Y. M. (2012). Russia and the colour revolutions. Democratization, 19(1), 15–36.
Finnemore M. (1993). International organizations as teachers of norms: The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization and science policy. International Organization, 47(4), 565–597.
Fish M. S. (2006). Stronger legislatures, stronger democracies. Journal of Democracy, 17(1), 5–20.
Flores T., Nooruddin I. (2016). Elections in hard times: Building stronger democracies in the 21st century. Cambridge University Press.
Follesdal A., Hix S. (2006). Why there is a democratic deficit in the EU: A response to Majone and Moravcsik. Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(3), 533–562.
Fomina J., Kucharczyk J. (2016). Populism and protest in Poland. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 58–68.
Fortin J. (2012). Is there a necessary condition for democracy? The role of state capacity in postcommunist countries. Comparative Political Studies, 45(7), 903–930.
Frank D. J. (1997). Science, nature, and the globalization of the environment, 1870-1990. Social Forces, 76(2), 409–435.
Friedman M. (1958). Foreign economic aid: Means and objectives. Yale Review, 47(4), 500–516.
Gartzke E., Nordstrom T., Boehmer C. (2012). Disaggregating IGOs in time and space. https://digitalcommons.utep.edu/pol_sci_papers/3/
Gelman A., Hill J. (2007). Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge University Press.
Gibler D. M., Randazzo K. A. (2011). Testing the effects of independent judiciaries on the likelihood of democratic backsliding. American Journal of Political Science, 55(3), 696–709.
Gleditsch K. S., Ward M. D. (2006). Diffusion and the international context of democratization. International Organization, 60(4), 911–933.
Gleditsch N. P., Wallensteen P., Eriksson M., Sollenberg M., Strand H. (2002). Armed conflict 1946–2001: A new dataset. Journal of Peace Research, 39(5), 615–637.
Grabbe H. (2001). How does Europeanization affect CEE governance? Conditionality, diffusion and diversity. Journal of European Public Policy, 8(6), 1013–1031.
Graham B. A. T., Miller M., Strøm K. (2017). Safeguarding democracy: Powersharing and democratic survival. American Political Science Review, 111, 686–704.
Grzymala-Busse A. (2007). Rebuilding leviathan: Party competition and state exploitation in post-communist democracies. Cambridge University Press.
Hadenius A., Teorell J. (2007). Pathways from authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 18(1), 143–157.
Haggard S., Kaufman R. R. (2016). Democratization during the third wave. Annual Review of Political Science, 19(8), 1–20.
Haggard S., Maxfield S. (1996). The political economy of financial internationalization in the developing world. International Organization, 50(1), 35–68.
Hanley S., Sikk A. (2016). Economy, corruption or floating voters? Explaining the breakthroughs of anti-establishment reform parties in eastern Europe. Party Politics, 22(4), 522–533.
Heckman J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.
Hegre H. (2014). Democracy and armed conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 51(2), 159–172.
Hellwig T. (2014). Balancing demands: The world economy and the composition of policy preferences. The Journal of Politics, 76(1), 1–14.
Henderson S. (2003). Building democracy in contemporary Russia: Western support for grassroots organizations. Cornell University Press.
Herman L. E. (2015). Re-evaluating the post-communist success story: Party elite loyalty, citizen mobilization and the erosion of Hungarian democracy. European Political Science Review, 8, 251–284.
Hernandez E., Kriesi H. (2016). The political consequences of the financial and economic crisis in Europe. European Journal of Political Research, 55, 203–224.
Howard M. M., Roessler P. G. (2006). Liberalizing electoral outcomes in competitive authoritarian regimes. American Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 365–381.
Huntington S. P. (1968). Political order in changing societies. Yale University Press.
Huntington S. P. (1991). The third wave: Democratization in the late twentieth century. University of Oklahoma Press.
Hyde S. D. (2011). The pseudo-democrat’s dilemma: Why election observation became an international norm. Cornell University Press.
Ingram P., Robinson J., Busch M. L. (2005). The intergovernmental network of world trade: IGO connectedness, governance, and embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 111(3), 824–858.
Innes A. (2014). The political economy of state capture in central Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 88–104.
Jablonski R. S. (2014). How aid targets votes: The impact of electoral incentives on foreign aid distribution. World Politics, 66(2), 293–330.
Johnstone I., Snyder M. (2016). Democracy promotion. In Cogan J. K., Hurd I., Johnstone I. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of international organizations (pp. 508–534). Oxford University Press.
Karl T. L. (1997). The paradox of plenty: Oil booms and petro-states. University of California Press.
Katsanidou A., Otjes S. (2015). How the European debt crisis reshaped national political space: The case of Greece. European Union Politics, 17(2), 262–284.
Kitschelt H., Manfeldova Z., Markowski R., Toka G. (1999). Post-communist party systems. Cambridge University Press.
Knack S. (2001). Aid dependence and the quality of governance. Southern Economic Journal, 68(2), 310–329.
Knack S. (2004). Does foreign aid promote democracy? International Studies Quarterly, 48, 251–266.
Krastev I. (2016). The unraveling of the post-1989 order. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 88–98.
Lipset S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy: Economic development and political legitimacy. American Economic Review, 53(1), 69–105.
Lipset S. M., Rokkan S. (1967). Cleavage structures, party systems, and voter alignments: An introduction. In Lipset S. M., Rokkan S. (Eds.), Party systems and voter alignments: Cross-national perspectives (pp. 1–64). The Free Press.
Luhrmann A., Lindberg S. I. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here: What is new about it? Democratization, 26(7), 1095–1113.
Maeda K. (2010). Two modes of democratic breakdown: A competing risks analysis of democratic durability. The Journal of Politics, 72(4), 1129–1143.
Mainwaring S. (1998). Party systems in the third wave. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 67–81.
Mainwaring S. (1999). Rethinking party systems in the third wave of democratization: The case of Brazil. Stanford University Press.
Mainwaring S., Perez-Linan A. (2013). Democracies and dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, survival, and fall. Cambridge University Press.
Mainwaring S., Scully T. R. (1995). Introduction: Party systems in Latin America. In Mainwaring S., Scully T. (Eds.), Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America (pp. 1–34). Stanford University Press.
Mansfield E. D., Pevehouse J. C. (2006). Democratization and the varieties of international organizations. International Organization, 60(1), 137–167.
Mansfield E. D., Pevehouse J. C. (2008). Democratization and the varieties of international organizations. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52(2), 269–294.
Marshall M. G., Gurr T. R., Jaggers K. (2016). Data users’ manual: Polity IV project—Political regime characteristics and transitions, 1800-2010 [Technical Report]. Center for Systemic Peace, University of Maryland.
Meyer J. W., Ramirez F. O., Soysal Y. N. (1992). World expansion of mass education. Sociology of Education, 65(2), 192–149.
Mishra R. (1999). Globalization and the welfare state. Edward Elgar.
Moore M. (1998). Death without taxes: Democracy, state capacity, and aid dependence in the fourth world. In White G., Robinson M. (Eds.), Towards a democratic developmental state (pp. 84–121). Oxford University Press.
Moravcsik A. (1994). Why the European community strengthens the state: Domestic politics and international cooperation. Minda de Gunzburg Center for European Studies.
Mosley L. (2000). Room to move: International financial markets and national welfare states. International Organization, 54(4), 737–773.
Nardulli P. F., Wong C. J., Singh A., Peyton B., Bajjalieh J. (2012). The Composition of Religious and Ethnic Groups (CREG) project. https://uofi.app.box.com/s/at0r1p9jubqk0cao6gve4pjl8r2rutpm
North D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
Nygard H. M. (2017). The role of international organizations in regime transitions: How IGOs can tie a dictator’s hands. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 34(4), 406–430.
O’Donnell G., Schmitter P. C. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Pastor M. (1987). The International Monetary Fund and Latin America: Economic stabilization and class conflict. Westview Press.
Pevehouse J. C. (2005). Democracy from above: Regional organizations and democratization. Oxford University Press.
Pevehouse J. C., McManus R., Nordstrm T., Shannon M., Widmann M. (2016). The COW-2 international organizations dataset [Version 3.0]. https://correlatesofwar.org/data-sets/IGOs/international-organization-v2.3
Pierson C. (1995). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge University Press.
Poast P., Urpelainen J. (2015). How international organizations support democratization: Preventing authoritarian reversals or promoting consolidation? World Politics, 67(01), 72–113.
Poast P., Urpelainen J. (2018). Organizing democracy: How international organizations assist new democracies. University of Chicago Press.
Pridham G. (2007). Change and continuity in the European Union’s political conditionality: Aims, approach, and priorities. Democratization, 14(3), 446–471.
Przeworski A., Alvarez M. E., Cheibub J. A., Limongi F. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950-1990. Cambridge University Press.
Putnam R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.
Roberts K. M. (2007). Latin America’s populist revival. SAIS Review of International Affairs, 17(1), 3–15.
Rodrik D. (1997). Has globalization gone too far? Institute for International Economics.
Ross F. (2000). Beyond left and right: The new partisan politics of welfare. Governance, 13, 155–183.
Ross M. L. (2015). What have we learned about the resource curse? Annual Review of Political Science, 18, 239–259.
Ross M. L., Mahdavi P. (2015). Oil and gas data, 1932–2014. https://dataverse.harvard.edu/dataset.xhtml?persistentId=doi:10.7910/DVN/ZTPW0Y
Rupnik J. (2016). Surging illiberalism in the east. Journal of Democracy, 27(4), 77–87.
Savage J. D. (2017). Military size and the effectiveness of democracy assistance. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 61(4), 839–868.
Schedler A. (2002). The menu of manipulation. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 36–50.
Shanks C., Jacobson H. K., Kaplan J. H. (1996). Inertia and change in the constellation of international governmental organizations, 1981-1992. International Organization, 50(4), 593–627.
Simmons B. A., Dobbin F., Garrett G. (2006). Introduction: The international diffusion of liberalism. International Organization, 60(4), 781–810.
Simmons B. A., Elkins Z. (2004). The globalization of liberalization: Policy diffusion in the international political economy. The American Political Science Review, 98(1), 171–189.
Simpser A., Donno D. (2012). Can international election monitoring harm governance? The Journal of Politics, 74(2), 501–513.
Svolik M. (2008). Authoritarian reversals and democratic consolidation. American Political Science Review, 102(2), 153–168.
Tallberg J. (2008). Bargaining power in the European Council. Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(3), 685–708.
Tilly C. (1990). Coercion, capital, and European states, AD 990-1990. Oxford University Press.
Tolstrup J. (2013). When can external actors influence democratization? Leverage, linkages, and gatekeeper elites. Democratization, 20(4), 716–742.
Vasilopoulou S., Halikiopoulou D., Exadaktylos T. (2014). Greece in crisis: Austerity, populism and the politics of blame. Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(2), 388–402.
von Borzyskowski I., Vabulas F. (2018). Credible commitments? Explaining IGO suspensions to sanction political backsliding. International Studies Quarterly, 63, 139–152.
Waldner D., Lust E. (2018). Unwelcome change: Coming to terms with democratic backsliding. Annual Review of Political Science, 21(5), 1–21.
Ward D., Kim J. H., Graham M., Tavits M. (2015). How economic integration affects party issue emphases. Comparative Political Studies, 48(10), 1227–1259.
Wedel J. R. (2001). Collision and collusion: The strange case of western aid to Eastern Europe. Palgrave Macmillan.
World Bank. (2017). World development indicators, 2017.
Xu Y. (2017). Generalized synthetic control method: Causal inference with interactive fixed effects models. Political Analysis, 25(1), 57–76.
Yilmaz H. (2002). External-internal linkages in democratization: Developing an open model of democratic change. Democratization, 9(2), 67–84.

Biographies

Anna M. Meyerrose is a research associate at the Mershon Center for International Security Studies at the Ohio State University. Her research explores how international factors and domestic democratic institutions interact, focusing in particular on how external actors simultaneously condition and create challenges for these institutions in both new and mature democracies.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material

Research Data

Please find the research data visualised and available to download via Figshare in the display box below

This research data carries a CC-BY license

Please find the following supplemental material visualised and available to download via Figshare in the display box below. Where there are more than one item, you can scroll through each tab to see each separate item.

Please note all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is here associated with

File (cps_final_data.rdata)
File (cps_final_data_excluding_eu.rdata)
File (final_appendix.pdf)
File (io_charac.rdata)
File (replication_file_meyerrose.r)

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 20, 2020
Issue published: September 2020

Keywords

  1. democratization and regime change
  2. globalization
  3. intergovernmental relations
  4. political parties

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2020.
Request permissions for this article.
Request Permissions

Authors

Affiliations

Anna M. Meyerrose
Mershon Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA

Notes

Anna M. Meyerrose, Mershon Center, The Ohio State University, 1501 Neil Ave., Columbus, OH 43201, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Comparative Political Studies.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 7553

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 29 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 30

  1. Building strong executives and weak institutions: How European integra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. International technology transfer to Africa in light of the SDGs: What...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Is there an East–West divide on democracy in the European Union? Evide...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Making Markets Through Coalitions: The European Union and the Debate O...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The Effects of Import Shocks, Electoral Institutions, and Radical Part...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Globalization and Promissory Representation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. How Democratically-Elected Leaders Calculate the Costs of Subverting D...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Trojan horses in liberal international organizations? How democratic b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Spain as the EU’s ‘champion’ in Latin America: elites, government trus...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Toxic friend? The impact of the Russian invasion on democratic backsli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Protection for Hire: Cooperation through Regional Organizations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. New Democracies and Commitment to Human Rights Treaties
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Dysfunction and Pathology in Brussels: The European Commission and the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. The Forum: Global Challenges to Democracy? Perspectives on Democratic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Illiberal Incumbents and the Shifting Electorate: Evidence from Polish...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Signaling Democratic Progress through Electoral System Reform in Post-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Fallacies of Democratic State-Building
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Democratic decline in the EU and its effect on democracy promotion in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. The relationship between affective polarization and democratic backsli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Towards a unified approach to research on democratic backsliding
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Domestic Interests, Democracy, and Foreign Policy Change
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Foreign direct investment and democratic survival: a sectoral approach
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. „Transitions from democratic rule“ – Der Innen-Außen-Nexus demokratisc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Stability through constraints: the impact of fiscal rules on autocrati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Assaults on capitalism and democratic backsliding: Evidence from Asia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Resisting Abusive Legalism: Electoral Fairness and the Partisan Commit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Agents of resistance and revival? Local election monitors and democrat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Choosing to Be Constrained: Electoral Institutions and the Varieties o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. ‘One Hand Washes the Other’ in EU’s Eastern Neighbourhood: What Policy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Genocide and the Gender Gap in Political Representation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text