Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 9, 2017

Three Models of Democratic Self-Defence: Militant Democracy and Its Alternatives

Abstract

Militant democracy relies on the idea that democracies ought to defend themselves from anti-democratic forces by constitutionalising repressive measures. We offer a criticism of this view by highlighting the exclusionary elitism on which militant democracy is built. In doing this, we consider two competing models of democratic self-defence: the procedural and the social. We suggest that the procedural model, while avoiding the exclusionary and other pitfalls of militant democracy, is detached from socio-political realities and fails to offer a comprehensive vision of democratic stability. The largely neglected social model of democratic self defence avoids this problem; it combines proceduralism’s commitment to dissensus with a social-democratic logic in the design of democratic constitutions. We argue in favour of such a social democratic self-defence and further develop this model around the guiding principle of political and social non-domination.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Accetti IC, Zuckerman I (2016) What’s Wrong with Militant Democracy? Political Studies. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/0032321715614849 (accessed 11 January 2017).
Backes U (1998) Schutz des Staates: Von der Autokratie zur streitbaren Demokratie. Wiesbaden: Springer.
Berlin I (2002 [1969]) Two Concepts of Liberty. In: Hardy H (ed.) Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.166–217.
Bernstein E (1993 [1899]) The Preconditions of Socialism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bourne A (2012) The Proscription of Parties and the Problem with Militant Democracy. The Journal of Comparative Law 7 (1): 196–213.
Brettschneider C (2012) When the State Speaks What Should It Say? How Democracies Can Protect Expression and Promote Equality. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Burke E (1999 [1774]) Speech to the Electors of Bristol. In: Burke E (ed.) Select Works of Edmund Burke (New Imprint of the Payne Edition, Vol. 4). Indianapolis, IN: Liberty Fund, pp.12–17.
Capoccia G (2005) Defending Democracy: Reactions to Extremism in Interwar Europe. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press.
Capoccia G (2013) Militant Democracy: The Institutional Bases of Democratic Self-Preservation. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 9: 207–226.
Dyzenhaus D (2000) Hermann Heller. In: Jacobson A, Schlink B (eds) Weimar: A Jurisprudence in Crisis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp.249–256.
Fox GH, Nolte G (1995) Intolerant Democracies. Harvard International Law Journal 36 (1): 1–70.
Frankenberg G (2004) The Learning Sovereign. In: Sajó A (ed.) Militant Democracy. Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, pp.113–132.
Hayek FA (1944) The Road to Serfdom. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Heller H (2000 [1928]) Political Democracy and Social Homogeneity. In: Jacobson A, Schlink B (eds) Weimar: A Jurisprudence in Crisis. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, pp.256–279.
Heller H (2007 [1929]) Europa und der Faschismus (ed Von Krosigk E). Saarbrucken: VDM Verlag.
Heller H (2015 [1933]) Authoritarian Liberalism? European Law Journal 21 (3): 295–301.
Issacharoff S (2007) Fragile Democracies. Harvard Law Review 120 (6): 1405–1467.
Jabloner C (1998) Kelsen and His Circle: The Viennese Years. European Journal of International Law 9 (2): 368–385.
Jackson B (2013) Social Democracy. In: Freeden M, Stears M, Sargeant LT (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Political Ideologies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.348–363.
Jovanovic M (2016) How to Justify ‘Militant Democracy’: Meta-Ethics and the Game-Like Character of Democracy. Philosophy & Social Criticism 42 (8): 745–762.
Kelsen H (1948) Absolutism and Relativism in Philosophy and Politics. American Political Science Review 42 (5): 906–914.
Kelsen H (1955) Foundations of Democracy. Ethics 66 (1, Part2): 1–101.
Kelsen H (2006 [1932]) Verteidigung der Demokratie: Abhandlungen zur Demokratietheorie. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebech.
Kelsen H (2013 [1929]) The Essence and Value of Democracy. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
Kirshner A (2014) A Theory of Militant Democracy: The Ethics of Combating Extremism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Lerner M (1938) It Is Later Than You Think: The Need for a Militant Democracy. New York, NY: Viking Books.
Linz JJ, Stepan A (1996) Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Loewenstein K (1937a) Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights I. American Political Science Review 31 (3): 417–432.
Loewenstein K (1937b) Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights II. American Political Science Review 31 (4): 638–658.
Malkopoulou A (2016) De-Presentation Rights as a Response to Extremism. Critical Review of Social and Political Philosophy 19 (3): 301–319.
Malkopoulou A (2017) Ostracism and Democratic Self-Defence in Athens. Constellations. Epub ahead of print 2 August 2017.
Mannheim K (1943) Diagnoses of Our Time: Wartime Essays of a Sociologist. London: Routledge.
Menéndez AJ (2015) Herman Heller NOW. European Law Journal 21 (3): 285–294.
Mommsen H (1996) The Rise and Fall of Weimar Democracy. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
Mouffe C (2000) The Democratic Paradox. London: Verso.
Müller JW (2012a) A ‘Practical Dilemma Which Philosophy Alone Cannot Resolve?’ Rethinking Militant Democracy: An Introduction. Constellations 19 (4): 536–539.
Müller JW (2012b) Beyond Militant Democracy? New Left Review 73: 39–47.
Müller JW (2016) Protecting Popular Self-Government from the People? New Normative Perspectives on ‘Militant Democracy’. Annual Review of Political Science 19: 249–265.
Niesen P (2002) Anti-Extremism, Negative Republicanism, Civic Society: Three Paradigms for Banning Political Parties. German Law Journal 3 (7): 1–46.
Norman L (2016) Defending the European Political Order: Visions of Politics in the Response to the Radical Right. European Journal of Social Theory. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431016679670 (accessed 11 January 2017).
Pettit P (1997) Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pettit P (2012) On the People’s Terms: A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pfersmann O (2004) Shaping Militant Democracy: Legal Limits to Democratic Stability. In: Sajó A (ed.) Militant Democracy. Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, pp.47–68.
Rosenblum N (2008) On the Side of the Angels: An Appreciation of Parties and Partisanship. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Ross A (1952) Why Democracy? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rummens S, Abts K (2010) Defending Democracy: The Concentric Containment of Political Extremism. Political Studies 58 (4): 649–665.
Sajó A (ed.) (2004) Militant Democracy. Utrecht: Eleven International.
Sajó A (2012) Militant Democracy and Emotional Politics. Constellations 19 (4): 562–574.
Schmitt C (2005 [1922]) Political Theology: Four Chapters on the Concept of Sovereignty. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Schumpeter J (2003 [1942]) Capitalism, Socialism, Democracy. London: Routledge.
Skinner Q (1998) Liberty Before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Thiel M (ed.) (2009) The ‘Militant Democracy’ Principle in Modern Democracies. London: Routledge.
Tyulkina S (2015) Militant Democracy: Undemocratic Political Parties and beyond. London: Routledge.
Urbinati N, Invernizzi Accetti C (2013) Editors’ Introduction. In: Kelsen H (ed.) The Essence and Value of Democracy. Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield, pp.1–24.
Van Spanje J, Van Der Brug W (2007) The Party as Pariah: The Exclusion of Anti-Immigration Parties and Its Effect on Their Ideological Positions. West European Politics 30 (5): 1022–1040.
Wolf R (1993) Hermann Heller. Kritische Justiz 24 (4): 500–507.

Biographies

Anthoula Malkopoulou is a Researcher and Lecturer in the Department of Government, Uppsala University, and Adjunct Professor at the University of Jyväskylä. She is the author of The History of Compulsory Voting in Europe: Democracy’s Duty? (Routledge, 2015), as well as articles in History of Political Thought, Redescriptions, Constellations and Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy. She has edited Equality and Representation (Routledge, 2018) and is co-editor of the peer-reviewed journal Redescriptions: Political Thought, Conceptual History and Feminist Theory.
Ludvig Norman is a Researcher and Lecturer in the Department of Government, Uppsala University, and 2016–2017 Visiting Scholar at the Institute of European Studies, University of California, Berkeley. He is the author of The Mechanisms of Institutional Conflict in the European Union (Routledge, 2016), as well as articles in the European Journal of International Relations, Journal of European Public Policy, European Journal of Social Theory and Cooperation and Conflict.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 9, 2017
Issue published: May 2018

Keywords

  1. militant democracy
  2. Kelsen
  3. Heller
  4. non-domination
  5. social democracy

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2017.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Anthoula Malkopoulou
Department of Government, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
Ludvig Norman
Department of Government, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden

Notes

Anthoula Malkopoulou, Department of Government, Uppsala University, Box 514, Uppsala 751 05, Sweden. Email: [email protected]
*
Authors contributed equally

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Political Studies.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 2723

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 35 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 32

  1. European Union defensive democracy’s responses to disinformation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Democratic self‐defense and public sphere institutions
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. On Militant Democracy, (Un)Civil Disobedience, and the Right to Resist...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. How not to respond to populism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Public broadcasting and democracy’s defense: responses to far-right pa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Book Review: Hermann Hellers Demokratischer Konstitutionalismus edited...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Education to secure empire and self-government: civics textbooks in Au...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. What militant democrats and technocrats share
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Addressing the paradox of tolerance in liberal democracies: why do Fra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Why and How Should the European Union Defend its Values?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. On militant democracy’s institutional conservatism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Public Reason, Partisanship and the Containment of the Populist Radica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Militant Democracy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Non-majoritarian institutions: two strands of liberalism in European e...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Allotted chambers as defenders of democracy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Defending democracy: Militant and popular models of democratic self‐de...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. The elitist defence of democracy against populists using education and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Citizens as Militant Democrats, Or: Just How Intolerant Should the Peo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Herman Heller on Democratic Self-defence: Militant Democracy Revisited
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Militant memocracy in International Relations: Mnemonical status anxie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Democratic self-defense: bringing the social model back in
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Salafism and Political Order in Africa
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. In Search of Civil Society: Disentangling Associational Practices and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Guardians of Democracy? On the Response of Civil Society Organisations...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. To Democratize or to Protect? How the Response to Anti‐System Parties ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Cross-partisanship and the vulnerability democracy: how civility and n...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Political responses to anti-Islamic protest: responses, rationales and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Democratic equality and militant democracy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Militant Democracy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Introduction
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

PSA Member Access


Political Studies Association members have access to this journal as part of their membership. Sign in here using your membership username and password.

PSA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text