Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Other
First published April 2004

Preferential Voting: Incidence and Effects

Lauri KarvonenView all authors and affiliations
Volume 25, Issue 2
https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512104041283

Abstract

Many democratic voting systems simply present voters with a choice between parties, while others give them the opportunity to choose among individual candidates as well. This article focuses on the latter type of electoral systems, that is, those allowing for preferential voting. A classification according to the degree and type of candidate choice is presented, and the electoral systems of some 70 democracies are classified with the aid of this scheme. Preferential voting proper is found to be largely a western European phenomenon. Eight hypotheses concerning the effects of preferential voting on party systems, parties, candidates, and voters are tested. Overall, the impression is that preferential voting has few discernible effects at the aggregate level.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

Get Access

References

Anckar, D. and Anckar, C. (2000). “Democracies without Parties,” Comparative Political Studies 33(2): 225–247 .
Google Scholar
Bienen, H.S. and Van de Walle, N. (1991). Of Time and Power: Leadership Duration in the Modern World. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press .
Google Scholar
Blais, A. (1991). “The Debate over Electoral Systems,” International Political Science Review 12(3): 239–260 .
Google Scholar
Bowler, S. and Farrell, D.F. (1993). “Legislator Shirking and Voter Monitoring: Impacts of European Parliament Electoral Systems upon Legislator-Voter Relationships,” Journal of Common Market Studies 31(1): 45–69 .
Google Scholar
Browne, E., Frendeis, J. and Gleiber, D. (1986). “Dissolution of Governments in Scandinavia: A Critical Events Perspective,” Scandinavian Political Studies 9: 93–110 .
Google Scholar
Cain, B., Ferejohn, J. and Fiorina, M. (1987). The Personal Vote: Constituency Service and Electoral Independence. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press .
Google Scholar
Carey, J.M. and Shugart, M.S. (1995). “Incentives to Cultivate a Personal Vote: A Rank Ordering of Electoral Formulas,” Electoral Studies 14(4): 417–439 .
Google Scholar
Cox, G.W. (1997). Making Votes Count. Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Google Scholar
Cox, G.W. (2003). Lijphart Election Archive, URL: http://dodgson.ucsd.edu/lij/.
Google Scholar
Curtice, J. and Shively, W.P. (2002). “Who Represents Us Best? One Member or Many?” Unpublished manuscript.
Google Scholar
Damgaard (2003). Folkets styre. Magt og ansvar i dansk politik. Århus: Aarhus Universitetsforlag.
Google Scholar
Derbyshire, J.D. and Derbyshire, I. (1999). Political Systems of the World, Volume 1. Oxford: Helicon .
Google Scholar
Dogan, M. (1989). “Irremovable Leaders and Ministerial Instability in European Democracies,” in M. Dogan (ed.), Pathways to Power: Selecting Rulers in Pluralist Democracies. Boulder, CO: Westview .
Google Scholar
Eckstein, H. (1966). Division and Cohesion in Democracy: A Study of Norway. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press .
Google Scholar
Farrell, D.M. (1996). “Campaign Strategies and Tactics,” in L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds), Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Comparative Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
Google Scholar
Farrell, D.M. (2001). Electoral Systems: A Comparative Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave .
Google Scholar
Freedom House (1994). Freedom in the World. The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties, 1993–1994. New York .
Google Scholar
Freedom House (1999). Freedom in the World. The Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties, 1998–1999. New York .
Google Scholar
Gidlund, G. (1999). “Att s‰tta gr‰nser för pengars makt,” in S. Holmberg and T. Möller (eds), Premi‰r för personval. SOU 1999: 92. Stockholm: Elanders Gotab.
Google Scholar
Hurwitz, L. (1973). “Contemporary Approaches to Political Stability,” Comparative Political Studies 6: 449–463 .
Google Scholar
IDEA (1997). Voter Turnout from 1945 to 1997: A Global Report on Political Participation. Stockholm .
Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union (1993) Electoral Systems: A World-Wide Comparative Study. Geneva .
Google Scholar
Inter-Parliamentary Union (various years). Chronicle of Parliamentary Elections and Developments. Geneva .
Google Scholar
Johnston, J.P. and Koene, M. (2000). “Learning History’s Lessons Anew,” in S. Bowler and B. Grofman (eds), Elections in Australia, Ireland, and Malta under the Single Transferable Vote: Reflections on an Embedded Institution. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press .
Google Scholar
Justitiedepartementet (1986). “Valsystemet i 20 l‰nder. En översikt. Rapport till folkstyrelsekommittÈn,” Magnus Isberg. DS Ju. Stockholm: Regeringskansliets offsetcentral.
Google Scholar
Katz, R.S. (1980). A Theory of Parties and Electoral Systems. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press .
Google Scholar
Katz, R.S. (1986). “Intraparty Preference Voting,” in B. Grofman and A. Lijphart (eds), Electoral Laws and their Consequences. New York: Agathon Press .
Google Scholar
Katz, R.S. (1996). “Party Organizations and Finance,” in L. LeDuc, R.G. Niemi and P. Norris (eds), Comparing Democracies: Elections and Voting in Comparative Perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage .
Google Scholar
Komiteanmietintö (1999). “Vaalirahoituskomitean mietintö. Bet‰nkande av valfinansieringskommittÈn.” Komiteanmietintö/KommittÈbet‰nkande 1999: 6. Helsinki: OY Edita AB.
Google Scholar
Lijphart, A. (1994). Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945–1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
Google Scholar
McKean, M. and Scheiner, E. (2000). “Japan’s New Electoral System: La Plus Áa Change...,” Electoral Studies 19: 447–477 .
Google Scholar
Marsh, M. (1985). “The Voters Decide? Preferential Voting in European List Systems,” European Journal of Political Research 13: 365–378 .
Google Scholar
Matland, R.E. and Studlar, D.T. (2004). “Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross National Analysis,” manuscript accepted for publication in British Journal of Political Science.
Google Scholar
Mayer, L. (1980). “Party Systems and Cabinet Stability,” in P. Merkl (ed.), Western European Party Systems: Trends and Prospects. New York: Free Press .
Google Scholar
Petersson, O., Von Beyme, K., Karvonen, L., Nedelmann, B. and Smith, E. (1999). Democracy the Swedish Way: Report from the Democratic Audit of Sweden 1999. Stockholm: SNS Förlag .
Google Scholar
Roberts, K.M. and Wibbels, E. (1999). “Party Systems and Electoral Volatility in Latin America: A Test of Economic, Institutional, and Structural Explanations,” American Political Science Review 93(3): 575–590 .
Google Scholar
Rule, W. (1994). “Parliaments of, by and for the People: Except for Women?” in W. Rule and J.F. Zimmermann (eds), Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press .
Google Scholar
Saalfeld, T. (1995). “On Dogs and Whips: Recorded Votes,” in H. Döring (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt and New York: Campus Verlag and St. Martin’s Press .
Google Scholar
S·nchez de Dios, M. (1999). “Parliamentary Party Discipline in Spain,” in S. Bowler, D.M. Farrell and R.S. Katz (eds), Party Discipline and Parliamentary Government. Columbus: Ohio State University Press .
Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1994). Comparative Constitutional Engineering: An Inquiry into Structures, Incentives and Outcomes. London: Macmillan .
Google Scholar
Shugart, M.S. (1994). “Minorities Represented and Unrepresented,” in W. Rule and J.F. Zimmermann (eds), Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press .
Google Scholar
Statens offentliga utedningar (1977). “Personval och valkretsindelning.” Bet‰nkande av personvals-och valkretskommittÈn. SOU 1977: 94. Stockholm: Gotab.
Google Scholar
Statens offentliga utedningar (1993). “÷kat personval.” Bet‰nkande av personvalskommittÈn. SOU 1993: 21. Stockholm: Norstedts tryckeri AB.
Google Scholar
Taagepera, R. (1994). “Beating the Law of Minority Attrition,” in W. Rule and J.F. Zimmermann (eds), Electoral Systems in Comparative Perspective: Their Impact on Women and Minorities. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press .
Google Scholar
Taylor, M. and Herman, V.M. (1971). “Party Systems and Government Stability,” American Political Science Review 65: 28–37 .
Google Scholar
Warwick, P.V. (1994). Government Survival in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press .
Google Scholar
Wright, J.F.H. (1986). “The Australian Experience with Majority-Preferential and Quota-Preferential Systems,” in B. Grofman and A. Lijphart (eds), Electoral Laws and their Consequences. New York: Agathon Press .
Google Scholar

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Volume 25, Issue 2
Pages: 203 - 226
Article first published: April 2004
Issue published: April 2004

Keywords

  1. Candidates and parties
  2. Electoral systems
  3. Preferential voting

Rights and permissions

© 2004.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lauri Karvonen
Department of Political Science, Åbo Akademi, FI-20500 Åbo, Finland[email protected]
View all articles by this author

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in International Political Science Review.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 695

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 57 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 65

  1. The Effect of More Choice on Voter Turnout Causal Evidence from German...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Sources of campaign funding for incumbents versus challengers in list ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. What makes politicians work harder? The role of electoral advantage
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Elections and Democracy: Role of Institutions in Bosnia and Herzegovin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Moral hazard in electoral teams: List rank and campaign effort
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Electoral Rules and Corruption as Drivers of Political Fragmentation i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Provenance-and machine learning-based recommendation of parameter valu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Do more flexible lists increase the take-up of preference voting?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Preferential Voting Systems: Influence on Intra-party Competition and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Preferential Voting: Theoretical Approach and Empirical Consequences
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Hypotheses, Data, and Methodology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Preferential Voting Across the World
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Consequences of Preferential Voting
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Who Receives More Preference Votes and Who Is Elected?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Legislative turnover and its sources: It’s the selection
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Do citizens make inferences from political candidate characteristics w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Campaigning and Candidates: Different Strategies for Different Candida...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Interventionism of voters: district size, level of government, and the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Determinants of legislative turnover in Western Europe, 1945–2015
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Proportional Representation, Large District Magnitude and Closed Lists
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. A balance between candidate- and party-centric representation under mi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. The Effect of Electoral Systems on Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Natu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Party nomination strategies in flexible-list systems...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Too much choice, too little impact: a multilevel analysis of the conte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Candidate-centred electoral systems and voter turnout
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Determinants of Preferential Voting in Italy: General Lessons from a C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Personvalg ved stortingsvalg?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Split-Ticket Voting in an STV System: Choice in a Non-Strategic Contex...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. The 2015 Norwegian Local Elections: Support for Governing Radical Righ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Sponsoring Private Member's Bills in F inl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. The Effect of Electoral Systems on Voter Turnout: Evidence from a Natu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. The EuroVotePlus experiment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Party loyalty and electoral dealignment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Why Do MPs Want To Be MEPs? Candidate Incentives and Party Nomination ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Ballot Position Effects Under Compulsory and Optional Preferential-Lis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Electoral Systems and Legislators’ Constituency Effort...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Brave rebels stay home...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Party registration rules and party systems in Latin America
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Legislators’ local roots...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Ballot Structure and Satisfaction with Democracy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. District magnitude and the personal vote
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. What affects candidate selection processes? A cross-national examinati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Constituency Service in Multi-level Democracies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. STRATEGIC INCENTIVES IN UNCONVENTIONAL ELECTORAL SYSTEMS: INTRODUCTION...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. District Magnitude and Home Styles of Representation in European Democ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Blogging in the Shadow of Parties: Exploring Ideological Differences i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Patterns of intraparty competition in open-list & SNTV systems
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. The ‘Hows’, not the ‘Whys’ or the ‘Wherefores’: The Role of Intra‐part...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. A Cross‐National Analysis of Party Switching
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Candidate and party bias in the news and its effects on party choice: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. The Finnish Eduskunta : Still the Nordic ‘...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Where to draw the line? From degree to dichotomy in measures of democr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. It's Not Only About Lists: Explaining Preference Voting in Belgium
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Personal vote‐seeking in flexible list systems: How electoral incentiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Unexpected Winners: The Significance of an Open-List System on Women's...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Does Television Personalise Voting Behaviour? Studying the Effects of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Giving More Weight to Preferential Votes: Welcome or Superfluous Refor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. The Representative Roles of MPs: A Citizen Perspective
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Choosing between Representing Women or Representing Ethnic Groups in E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Personutvelgingen i norske valg
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Citizens' freedom to choose representatives: Ballot structure, proport...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Candidates or Parties?: Objects of Electoral Choice in Ireland
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Electoral Systems and Turnout
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. O sistema eleitoral de lista aberta no Brasil
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Når angrep blir et forsvar – En kritikk av Helleviks «kritikk»
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Subscribe to this journal

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

Start 2 week free trial
Need help?

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub
Download PDF

Also from Sage