Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online November 10, 2014

More than entertainment: YouTube and public responses to the science of global warming and climate change

Abstract

Abstract

The public receives and presents science-related information on global warming and climate change in many forms, but little is known about how this information is conveyed through the Internet. More specifically, very few studies have considered YouTube videos focusing on climate change. This study provides a better understanding of how this type of information may be disseminated through several levels of analysis. For this purpose, the exact narrative for the 10 most popular videos about climate change was first established by concentrating particularly on the presentation of the science of climate change. Then the public’s responses to and engagement in each video were examined through a semantic analysis of comments on the video. The results indicate that, regardless of the narrative, science-based comments dominated, but often discussed climate change in general instead of specific videos to which they were attached. In the absence of gatekeepers, YouTube users rode the coattails of popular videos about climate change and addended the videos’ messages by highlighting evidence of weak, strong, or politicized science.

Résumé

Le public reçoit et présente des informations d’ordre scientifique sur le réchauffement global et le changement climatique sous diverses formes, mais on sait peu de choses sur la manière dont ces informations sont véhiculées par l’Internet. Pour être plus précis, très peu d’études se sont intéressées aux vidéos de You Tube portant sur le changement climatique. A travers différents niveaux d’analyse, cette étude tente de faire mieux comprendre la façon dont ces informations peuvent être disséminées. A cet effet et en premier lieu, le contenu narratif exact des 10 vidéos les plus populaires sur le changement climatique a été recensé en se concentrant en particulier sur les présentations d’ordre scientifique du changement climatique. Puis les réponses du public visionnant les vidéos ont été examinées à travers une analyse sémantique des annotations sur les vidéos. Les résultats indiquent que, indépendamment du contenu narratif, les annotations d’ordre scientifique dominent, mais qu’elles portent souvent sur le changement climatique en général plutôt que sur les vidéos spécifiques auxquelles elles se rattachent. En l’absence de contrôle d’accès, les utilisateurs de You Tube profitent des vidéos les plus populaires sur le changement climatique pour faire passer des messages qui mettent l’accent sur des preuves d’ordre scientifique, que ce soit des données de vulgarisation scientifique, des données de la recherche scientifique, ou des données à visée politique.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Akerlof K, Rowan KE, Fitzgerald D, Cedeno AY (2012) Communication of climate projections in US media amid politicization of model science. Nature Climate Change 2(9): 648–654.
Banerjee M, Capozzoli M, McSweeney L, Snha D (1999) Beyond kappa: A review of interrater agreement measures. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 27(1): 3–23.
Bolsen T, Druckman JN, Cook FL (2014) How frames can undermine support for scientific adaptations: Politicization and the status-quo bias. Public Opinion Quarterly 78(1): 1–26.
Borgatti SP, Everett MG, Freeman LC (2002) UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
Bou-Franch P, Lorenzo-Dus N, Blitvich PG-C (2012) Social interaction in YouTube text-based polylogues: A study of coherence. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 17(4): 501–521.
Boykoff MT, Boykoff JM (2007) Climate change and journalistic norms: A case-study of U.S. mass-media coverage. Geoforum 38(6): 1190–1204.
Brewer PR, Ley BL (2013) Whose science do you believe? Explaining trust in sources of scientific information about the environment. Science Communication 35(1): 115–137.
Cho SE, Choi MG, Park HW (2012) Government–civic group conflicts and communication strategies: A text analysis of TV debates on Korea’s import of U.S. beef. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 11: 1–20.
Chung CJ, Park HW (2010) Textual analysis of a political message: The inaugural address of two Korean presidents. Social Sciences Information 49(2): 215–239.
Danowski JA, Park HW (2014) Arab Spring effects on meanings for Islamist Web terms and on Web hyperlink networks among Muslim-majority nations: A naturalistic field experiment. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 14(2).
Dudo A, Brossard D, Shanahan J, Scheufele DA, et al. (2010) Science on television in the 21st century: Recent trends in portrayals and their contributions to public attitudes toward science. Communication Research 38(6): 754–777.
Earl J, Kimport K (2011) Digitally Enabled Social Change: Activism in the Internet age. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Endo K (2013) Social journalism in the inter-media society: Results from the social survey on the Great East Japan Earthquake and the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 12(2): 5–17.
Garrett RK (2011) Troubling consequences of online political rumoring. Human Communication Research 37(2): 255–274.
Hansen A (2011) Communication, media and environment: Towards reconnecting research on the production, content and social implications of environmental communication. International Communication Gazette 73(1–2): 7–25.
Hsu C-L, Park SJ, Park HW (2013) Political discourse among key Twitter users: The case of Sejong city in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 12(1): 65–79.
Jung K, No W, Kim JW (2014) Who Leads Nonprofit Advocacy through Social Media? Some Evidence from the Australian Marine Conservation Society’s Twitter Networks. Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia 13(1): 69–81.
Khan GF, Vong S (2014) Virality over YouTube: An empirical analysis. Internet Research 24(5). Available online.
Kingdon JW (2010) Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
Lee Y-O, Park HW (2013) E-campaigning versus the Public Official Election Act in South Korea: Causes, consequences and implications of cyber-exile. Aslib Proceedings 65(4): 388–405.
Leiserowitz AA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Smith N, et al. (2013) Climategate, public opinion, and the loss of trust. American Behavioral Scientist 57(6): 818–837.
Leydesdorff L, Hellsten I (2005) Metaphors and diaphors in science communication: Mapping the case of ‘stem-cell research’. Science Communication 27(1): 64–99.
Lim JS, Golan GJ (2011) Social media activism responding to the influence of political parody videos on YouTube. Communication Research 38(5): 710–727.
Lindblom CE (1959) The science of ‘muddling through’. Public Administration Review 19(2): 79–88.
Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Leiserowitz A (2008) Communicating and marketing as climate-change-intervention assets: A public health perspective. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 35(5): 488–500.
Malka A, Krosnick JA, Langer G (2009) The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: Trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis 29(5): 633–647.
Mann ME, Bradley RS, Hughes MK (1999) Northern hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium: Inferences, uncertainties, and limitations. Geophysical Research Letters 26(6): 759–762.
McCombs M, Shaw D (1972) The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36(2): 176–187.
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) Cool dudes: The denial of climate change among conservative white males in the United States. Global Environmental Change 21(4): 1163–1172.
Muller R (2004) Global warming bombshell. MIT Technology Review (October)
Myers TA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Akerlof K, et al. (2012) The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nature Climate Change 3: 343–347.
Nam Y, Lee YO, Park HW (2013) Can Web ecology provide a clearer understanding of people’s information behavior during election campaigns? Social Science Information 52(1): 91–109.
Nisbet MC (2009) Communicating climate change: Why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51(2): 12–23.
O’Neill SJ, Boykoff M (2011) The role of new media in engaging the public with climate change. In: Whitmarsh L, O’Neill SJ, Lorenzoni I (eds) Engaging the Public with Climate Change: Communication and behaviour change. London: Earthscan, 233–251.
Pew Research Center (2012) YouTube & news: A new kind of visual journalism. Project for Excellence in Journalism. Available at: http://www.journalism.org/2012/07/16/youtube-news/.
Pielke RA (2006) When scientists politicize science. Regulation (Spring): 28–34.
Pielke RA (2007) The Honest Broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Porter A, Hellsten I (2014) Investigating social media responses to complex social problems using a multi-determinant framework: The case of Climategate on YouTube. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 19(4): 1024–1041.
Sams S, Lim YS, Park HW (2011) e-Research applications for tracking online socio-political capital in the Asia-Pacific region. Asian Journal of Communication 21(5): 450–466.
Schneider SH (2000) Is the ‘citizen-scientist’ an oxymoron? In: Kleinman DL (ed.) Science, Technology, and Democracy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 103–121.
Schuldt JP, Konrath SH, Schwarz N (2011) ‘Global warming’ or ‘climate change’? Public Opinion Quarterly 75(1): 115–124.
Slayton R (2007) Discursive choices: Boycotting ‘Star Wars’, between science and activism. Social Studies of Science 37(1): 27–66.
Smith N, Joffe H (2012) How the public engages with global warming: A social representations approach. Public Understanding of Science 22(1): 16–32.
Stempel C, Hargrove T, Stempel GH III (2007) Media use, social structure, and belief in 9/11 conspiracy theories. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly 84(2): 353–372.
Stone D (2001) Policy Paradox: The art of political decision making. New York, NY: W.W. Norton. (rev. ed.)
Thelwall M (2012) Introduction to Webometric Analyst 2.0: A research tool for social scientists. Available at: http://lexiurl.wlv.ac.uk/searcher/IntroductionToWebometricAnalyst2.doc.
Thelwall M, Sud P, Vis F (2012) Commenting on YouTube videos: From Guatemalan rock to El Big Bang. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 63(3): 616–629.
Union of Concerned Scientists (2008) Federal Science and the Public Good: The integrity of science in policy making. Available at: http://www.ucsusa.org/scientific_integrity/solutions/big_picture_solutions/federal-science-and-the.html.
Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Weinberg AM (1972) Science and trans-science. Minerva 10(2): 209–222.
Whitmarsh L (2009) What’s in a name? Commonalities and differences in public understanding of ‘climate change’ and ‘global warming’. Public Understanding of Science 18: 401–420.
Williams AE (2011) Media evolution and public understanding of climate science. Politics and the Life Sciences 30(2): 20–30.
Xie L, Natsev A, Kender JR, Hill M, et al. (2011) Tracking visual memes in rich-media social communities. In: Proceedings of the Fifth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media. Available at: http://www.aaai.org/Library/ICWSM/icwsm11contents.php.
Zia A, Todd AM (2010) Evaluating the effects of ideology on public understanding of climate change science: How to improve communication across ideological divides? Public Understanding of Science 19(6): 743–761.

Biographies

Matthew A. Shapiro is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the Illinois Institute of Technology and an East Asia Institute Fellow. Dr Shapiro’s published and ongoing research lies at the intersection between economics and public policy. More specifically, he attempts to understand how national innovation systems are formed and contribute to sustainable development, how climate change is addressed and impacted by relevant policies and political forces, and how communications from politicians, scientists, and the media impact both of these areas. More information about Dr Shapiro ([email protected]) can be found at understandgreen.com.
Han Woo Park is a Full Professor in the Department of Media and Communication at YeungNam University, South Korea. His research focuses on the use of new digital technologies in extending social and semantic networks, and on the role of communication in scientific, technical, innovative, and governmental activities. He has been a research associate at the Royal Netherlands Academy, a visiting scholar at the Oxford Internet Institute, and a director of the World Class University Webometrics Institute. He is currently the director of the Cyber Emotions Research Center and Asia Triple Helix Society. He has founded a prestigious conference on Triple Helix and Network Sciences in Asia, called DISC (Daegu Gyeongbuk International Social Network Conference, http://asia-triplehelix.org), and he sits on the editorial boards of important journals including Journal of Contemporary Eastern Asia, Scientometrics, Quality & Quantity, Knowledge Economy, and Big Data & Society. Further, he has guest-edited special issues for both Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication and Asian Journal of Communication.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: November 10, 2014
Issue published: March 2015

Keywords

  1. climate change
  2. global warming
  3. politicized science
  4. science communication
  5. semantic network analysis
  6. social network analysis
  7. webometrics
  8. YouTube

Mots-clés

  1. analyse de réseau sémantique
  2. analyse de réseau social
  3. changement climatique
  4. communication sur la science
  5. réchauffement global
  6. science politisée
  7. webométrie
  8. You Tube

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2014.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Matthew A. Shapiro
Department of Social Sciences, Illinois Institute of Technology, Chicago, IL, USA
Han Woo Park
Department of Media and Communication, Yeungnam University, Gyeongbuk, South Korea

Notes

Han Woo Park, Department of Media and Communication, Yeungnam University, 257 Humanities Hall, 280 Daehak-Ro Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 712-749, South Korea. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Social Science Information.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 3239

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 48 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 60

  1. Affect in science communication: a data-driven analysis of TED Talks o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Examining key capitals contributing to students' science‐related caree...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Evaluating Role of Instagram’s Multimedia in Connective Action Leverag...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. YouTube Comments on Gene-Edited Babies: What Factors Affect Diverse Op...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. The effect of social network sites usage in climate change awareness i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Interdisciplinary Analysis of Science Communication on Social Media du...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Don’t Talk Climate Like This: Exploring the Moderating Effects of Comm...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Video features predicting engagement in climate change education
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Evolution of Filter Bubbles and Polarization in News Recommendation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Political Information Use and Its Relationship to Beliefs in Conspirac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Social Media Misinformation About Extreme Weather Events and Climate C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Examining a conceptual framework of aggressive and humorous styles in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  13. Scientific Discourse on YouTube : Motivati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Infotainment May Increase Engagement with Science but It Can Decrease ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Discussion of Climate Change on Reddit: Polarized Discourse or Deliber...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Del ver al compartir: el rol de las emociones en la propagación de con...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Towards Design Guidelines for Effective Health-Related Data Videos: An...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Young Adults’ Reactions and Engagement with Short-form Videos on Sea L...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Die Videoplattform YouTube als Informationskanal für Nachhaltigkeitsko...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Predictors of Viewing YouTube Videos on Incheon Chinatown Tourism in S...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Interactions between emotional and cognitive engagement with science o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  22. Analysis of Ageism, Sexism, and Ableism in User Comments on YouTube Vi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Communicating complex marine science: Does media format matter?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. The Interaction between Political Typology and Filter Bubbles in News ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. French Science Communication on YouTube: A Survey of Individual and In...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Communicating complex ocean issues: How strategically framed messages ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Global Climate Change or National Climate Changes? An Analysis of the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Teenage Youtubers in Korea: Proposing the concept of active media use ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Audiovisual Science Communication on TV and YouTube. How Recipients Un...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Environmental Science Communication for a Young Audience: A Case Study...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. An empirical analysis of knowledge co-construction in YouTube comments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Media Literacy, Scientific Literacy, and Science Videos on the Interne...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Climate change on YouTube: A potential platform for youth learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Media Students, Climate Change, and YouTube Celebrities: Readings of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Identifying trends in nursing start-ups using text mining of YouTube c...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Audio-visuelle Wissenschaftskommunikation im Internet
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Science and Medicine on YouTube
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Communicating about Climate Change Through Art and Science
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Science and Environmental Communication on YouTube: Strategically Dist...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Towards the operationalization of controversial news: a study of onlin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. On the relationship between weather and Agricultural Commodity Index i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Scapegoat Ecology: Blame, Exoneration, and an Emergent Genre in Enviro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Visuelle Wissenschaftskommunikation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. El cambio climático visto desde internet: una evaluación de su conteni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Homophily and prestige: An assessment of their relative strength to ex...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. YouTubers’ networking activities during the 2016 South Korea earthquak...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. The US News Media, Polarization on Climate Change, and Pathways to Eff...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Climate Change and YouTube: Deliberation Potential in Post-video Discu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Motivations to seek science videos on YouTube: free-choice learning in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Visuelle Wissenschaftskommunikation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Science and Medicine on YouTube
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Phys FilmMakers: teaching science students how to make YouTube-style v...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Mastering Social Media in the Modern Business World
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Longitudinal dynamics of the cultural diffusion of Kpop on YouTube
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Versatile networks in combining qualitative and quantitative data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. Forschungsperspektiven der Wissenschaftskommunikation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Measuring international relations in social media conversations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Mastering Social Media in the Modern Business World
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Networked Cultural Diffusion and Creation on YouTube: An Analysis of Y...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Antismoking campaign videos on YouTube and audience response: Applicat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text