Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Review article
First published online August 1, 2016

From Frankfurt to Cologne: On Wolfgang Streeck and the crises of democratic capitalism

Based on: Streeck Wolfgang, Buying Time – The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism (Verso, 2014)
First page of PDF

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Bardi L, Bartolini S, Trechsel AH (2014) Responsive and responsible? The role of parties in twenty-first century politics. West European Politics 37(2): 235–252.
Bauman Z (2000) Liquid modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
Beetham D (1991) The Legitimation of Power. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bonefeld W (2013) Adam Smith and ordoliberalism: On the political form of market liberty. Review of International Studies 39(2): 233–250.
Bowles S, Gintis H (1982) The crisis of liberal democratic capitalism: The case of the United States. Politics & Society 11(1): 51–93.
Brown W (2005) Edgework: Critical Essays on Knowledge and Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Cerny PG (1997) Paradoxes of the competition state: The dynamics of political globalization. Government and Opposition 32(2): 251–274.
Crouch C (2009) Privatized Keynesianism: An unacknowledged policy regime. British Journal of Politics and International Relations 11(3): 382–399.
Du Gay P, Scott A (2010) State transformation or regime shift? Addressing some confusions in the theory and sociology of the state. Sociologica 4(2): 1–23.
Duverger M (1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Wiley.
Esping-Andersen G (1990) The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Flew T (2014) Six theories of neoliberalism. Thesis Eleven 122(1): 49–71.
Foucault M (2008) The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–79. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gamble A (2006) Two faces of neo-liberalism. In: Robison R (ed.) The Neoliberal Revolution: Forging the Market State. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 20–35.
Habermas J (1975) Legitimation Crisis. Boston: Beacon Press.
Habermas J (2015) Democracy or capitalism? On the abject spectacle of a capitalistic world society fragmented along national lines. In: Habermas J, The Lure of Technocracy. Cambridge: Polity Press, 85–102.
Hall PA, Soskice D (eds) (2001) Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Katz RS, Mair P (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1(1): 5–28.
Kirchheimer O (1957) The waning of opposition in parliamentary regimes. Social Research 24(2): 127–56.
Kirchheimer O (1966) The transformation of Western European party systems. In: LaPalombara J, Weiner M (eds) Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 177–200.
Krouwel A (2003) Otto Kirchheimer and the catch-all party. West European Politics 26(2): 23–40.
Krouwel A (2006) Party models. In: Katz RS, Crotty WJ (eds) (2006) Handbook of Party Politics. London: SAGE, 249–269.
Lindert PH (2004) Growing Public: Social Spending and Economic Growth since the Eighteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Mair P (2013) Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.
Manin B (1997) The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mann M (2003) The autonomous power of the state: Its origins, mechanisms and results. In: Brenner N, Jessop B, Jones M, Macleod G (eds) State/Space: A Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, 53–64.
Mudge SL (2008) What is neo-liberalism? Socio-Economic Review 6(4): 703–731.
O’Connor J (1973) The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Offe C (1984) Contradictions of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.
Offe C (2009) Governance: An ‘empty signifier’? Constellations 16(4): 550–562.
Paterson M (2010) Legitimation and accumulation in climate change governance. New Political Economy 15(3): 345–368.
Peck J, Tickell A (2002) Neoliberalizing space. Antipode 34(3): 380–404.
Piketty T (2014) Capital in the Twenty-first Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Rhodes RAW (1994) The hollowing out of the state: The changing nature of the public service in Britain. The Political Quarterly 65(2): 138–151.
Rhodes RAW (1996) The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies 44(4): 652–667.
Ronzoni M (2015). How social democrats may become reluctant radicals: Thomas Piketty’s capital and Wolfgang Streeck’s buying time. European Journal of Political Theory, 10 September. DOI: 10.1177/1474885115601602.
Ross A (1946) Hvorfor Demokrati? København: Munksgaard.
Scarrow SE (2006) The nineteenth-century origins of modern political parties: The unwanted emergence of party-based politics. In: Katz RS, Crotty WJ (eds) Handbook of Party Politics London: SAGE, 16–24.
Streeck W (2011) The crisis of democratic capitalism. New Left Review 71: 5–29.
Streeck W (2012a) How to study contemporary capitalism. European Journal of Sociology 53(1): 1–28.
Streeck W (2012b) Citizens as customers: Considerations on the new politics of consumption. New Left Review 76: 27–47.
Streeck W (2014a) Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. London: Verso.
Streeck W (2014b) Small-state nostalgia? The currency union, Germany, and Europe: A reply to Jürgen Habermas. Constellations 21(2): 213–221.
Streeck W (2015a) Heller, Schmitt and the euro. European Law Journal 21(3): 361–370.
Streeck W (2015b) Comment on Wolfgang Merkel, ‘Is capitalism compatible with democracy?’ Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 9(1): 49–60.
Vogel SK (1996) Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Countries. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Wacquant L (2012) Three steps to a historical anthropology of actually existing neoliberalism. Social Anthropology 20(1): 66–79.
Wolfe A (1977) The Limits of Legitimacy: Political Contradictions of Contemporary Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Zhao D (2009) The mandate of heaven and performance legitimation in historical and contemporary China. American Behavioral Scientist 53(3): 416–433.

Biographies

Tim Holst Celik is a PhD student at the Copenhagen Business School (Department of Business and Politics), Denmark. His research looks at the ‘turn to governance’ and governability in the post-1970s period from a state-oriented and historically informed political economic perspective. Broader research interests include: political legitimation, fiscal policy and crises, philosophy of social science and social science methodology.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: August 1, 2016
Issue published: December 2016

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2016.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Tim Holst Celik
Copenhagen Business School, Denmark

Notes

Tim Holst Celik, Department of Business and Politics (DBP), Copenhagen Business School, Porcelænshaven 24, 2000 Frederiksberg, Denmark. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Thesis Eleven.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1051

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 1 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 2

  1. Consumer culture, precarious incomes and mass indebtedness: Borrowing ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Ambition and temporal sovereignty in recent Scottish cultural policy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text