Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online March 24, 2014

Impact of Homophily on Diffusion Dynamics Over Social Networks

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the impact of homophily on diffusion over social networks. An agent-based simulation model is developed to serve as the experimental ground for this analysis. Diffusion dynamics of a nonsticky innovation is investigated by varying homophily levels in the social network depicted in the model as the primary control variable. First of all, the results show that homophily is self-reinforcing. Second, starting from a nonhomophilous network, early increases in the level of homophily have a positive effect on the extent of diffusion, whereas further increases have a negative impact. Finally, several local minima and maxima are observed in the relation between the homophily level and the extent of diffusion. Our analysis focuses on node properties such as connectedness and average degrees in order to explain the observed regular relationship between homophily and diffusion. We argue that (i) homophily increases the connectedness of different status groups separately and (ii) increasing levels of homophily decreases the marginal importance of a single homophilous tie by increasing the sources of valuable information. Future research involves investigating the coevolution of social behavior and networks by allowing the adopted innovation to lead to value homophily, exploration of different diffusion initiation types, and different adoption heuristics.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Aral S., Muchnik L., Sundararajan A. (2009). Distinguishing influence-based contagion from homophily-driven diffusion in dynamic networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 106, 21544–21549.
Blau P. (1977). Heterogeneity and inequality: Towards a primitive theory of social structure. New York, NY: Free Press.
Brown J. J., Reingen P. H. (1987). Social ties and word-of-mouth referral behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 350–362.
Centola D. (2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science (New York, N.Y.), 329, 1194–1197.
Centola D. (2011). An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science (New York, N.Y.), 334, 1269–1272.
Centola D., Macy M. (2007). Complex contagions and the weakness of long ties. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 702–734.
Centola D., Willer R., Macy M. (2005). The emperor’s dilemma: A computational model of self-enforcing norms. American Journal of Sociology, 110, 1009–1040.
Choudhury M. D., Sundaram H., John A. (2010). “Birds of a feather”: Does user homophily impact information diffusion in social media. Arxiv preprint, 1–31.
Christakis N. A., Fowler J. H. (2007). The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. The New England Journal of Medicine, 357, 370–379.
DiMaggio P., Garip F. (2011). How network externalities can exacerbate intergroup inequality. American Journal of Sociology, 116, 1887–1933. doi: 10.1086/659653
DiMaggio P., Garip F. (2012). Network effects and social inequality. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 93–118.
Epstein J. M., Axtell R. L. (1996). Growing artificial societies: Social science from the bottom up. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Flache A., Macy M. W. (2011). Local convergence and global diversity: From interpersonal to social influence. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55, 970–995.
Gilbert N., Troitzsch K. G. (2005). Simulation for the social scientist (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Open University Press.
Golub B., Jackson M. O. (2012). How homophily affects the speed of learning and best-response dynamics. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 1287–1338.
Granovetter M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 1420–1443.
Jackson M. O. (2008). Social and economic networks (p. 19). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Jackson M.O., Lopez-Pintado D. (2011). Diffusion and contagion in networks with heterogeneous agents and homophily. Retreived from Social science research network, 1950476, 1–18.
Kandel D. B. (1978). Homophily, selection, and socialization in adolescent friendships. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 427–436.
Kossinets G., Watts D. J. (2009). Origins of homophily in an evolving social network. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 405–450.
Lazarsfeld P. F., Merton R. K. (1954). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In Berger M. (Ed.), Freedom and control in modern society. New York, NY: Van Nostrand.
Mark N. P. (2003). Culture and competition: Homophily and distancing explanations for cultural niches. American Sociological Review, 68, 319–345.
McPherson M., Smith-Lovin L., Cook J. M. (2001). Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Rreview of Sociology, 27, 415–444.
Noel H., Nyhan B., (2011). The ‘unfriending’ problem: The consequences of homophily in friendship retention for causal estimates of social influence. Social Networks, 33, 211–218.
Railsback S. F., Grimm V. (2011). Agent-based and individual-based modeling: A practical introduction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Rogers E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed., pp. 305–308.). New York, NY: Free Press.
Rogers E. M., Bhowmik D. K. (1970). Homophily-heterophily: Relational concepts for communication research. Public Opinion Quarterly, 34, 523–538.
Schelling T. C. (1971). Dynamic models of segregation. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1, 143–186.
Watts D. J. (1999). Small worlds: The dynamics of networks between order and randomness (p. 262). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Watts D. J. (2002). A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99, 5766–5771.
Wilensky U. (1999). NetLogo. Evanston, IL: Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University. Retrieved from http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/

Biographies

Mustafa Yavaş is a PhD sociology student at Yale University. He completed his BSc in industrial engineering from Boğaziçi University. His research interests are social networks, diffusion, income segregation, and systems theory. He may be contacted at [email protected]
Gönenç Yücel received his BSc and MSc degrees in industrial engineering from Boğaziçi University in 2000 and 2004. After earning his PhD degree in policy analysis from Delft University of Technology, he joined Boğaziçi University Industrial Engineering Department as an assistant professor. His research interests are simulation methodology and simulation-supported policy analysis by using agent-based and system dynamics models. He may be contacted at [email protected].

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: March 24, 2014
Issue published: June 2014

Keywords

  1. homophily
  2. diffusion
  3. threshold models
  4. social networks
  5. formal models
  6. simulation
  7. agent-based model
  8. segregation

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2014.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mustafa Yavaş
Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
Gönenç Yücel
Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey

Notes

Mustafa Yavaş, Bogazici University, 34342 Bebek, Istanbul, Turkey. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Social Science Computer Review.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1364

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 23 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

  1. Hybrid organisations and governance systems: the case of the European ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Diffusion of innovations through social networks: Determinants and imp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Analysis of Homophily Effects on Information Diffusion on Social Netwo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Quantifying worker interactions and characterizing worker performance ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Effects of homophily and heterophily on preferred-degree networks: mea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Quantifying Worker Interactions and Characterizing Worker Performance ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. How does homophily shape the topology of a dynamic network?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Homophily and Social Capital in a Network of Religious Congregations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. A multidimensional network link prediction algorithm and its applicati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Email Vs. Instagram Recruitment Strategies For Online Survey Research
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Homophily-Driven Evolution Increases the Diffusion Accuracy in Social ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Accounting for Heterogeneity in Network Formation Behaviour: An Applic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Examining the how of Plural Policing: Moving from Normative Debate to ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Real-world diffusion dynamics based on point process approaches: a rev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Multidimensional influencing factors of public opinion information dis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. New Evolutionary Adoption Model for Innovation Diffusion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Social Media and Teamwork
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Behavioural science and policy: where are we now and where are we goin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Efficient service discovery in decentralized online social networks
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Mixing and diffusion in a two-type population
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Innovation Diffusion in Social Networks: A Survey
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. How to measure information similarity in online social networks: A cas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Semantic homophily in online communication: Evidence from Twitter
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Gender bias in scholarly peer review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. What Knowledge Grows?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Structure Pattern Analysis and Cascade Prediction in Social Networks
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Using Graph Theory to Value Paying and Nonpaying Customers in a Social...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. A Multidimensional Nonnegative Matrix Factorization Model for Retweeti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text