Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online July 4, 2023

Doing things when others do: Temporal synchrony and subjective wellbeing

Abstract

Proposing a measure of synchrony, the level of accordance between individual and collective schedules, we examined the effects of synchrony on the two indicators of subjective wellbeing, daily mood, and life satisfaction. We argue that temporal norms underlying collective schedules are a part of social norms, the deviation from which influences an individual's wellbeing via external and internal sanctions. Analyses of time-use data showed that synchrony was effective in improving evaluative wellbeing (life satisfaction) but not affective wellbeing (daily mood). More specifically, synchrony did not predict well who was satisfied with life but did fairly well predict who was not, which implies that compliance with temporal norms is a necessary but not sufficient condition of life satisfaction.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Adam B (1995) Timewatch: The Social Analysis of Time. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Calkins K (1970) Time: perspectives, marking and styles of usage. Social Problems 17(4): 487–501.
Cohen E, Ejsmond-Frey R, Knight N, et al. (2010) Rower’s high: behavioral synchrony is correlated with elevated thresholds. Biology Letters 6(1): 106–108.
Damsholt T (2020) Times of corona: investigating the temporalities of everyday life during lockdown. Ethnologia Europaea 50(2): 137–155.
Dunbar RIM (2008) Mind the gap; or why humans are not just great apes. Proceedings of the British Academy 154: 403–423.
Durkheim E (1966) Suicide: A Study in Sociology. New York: Free Press.
Durkheim E (1995 [1912]) The Elementary Forms of Religious Life. New York: Free Press.
Etzioni A (2000) Social norms: internalization, persuasion and history. Law and Society Review 34(1): 157–178.
Forman FJ (1989) Taking Our Time: Feminist Perspectives on Temporality. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Gingerich J (2018) Freedom’s Spontaneity. Doctoral dissertation. University of California Los Angeles.
Glorieux I, Mestdag I, Minnen J (2008) The coming of the 24-hour economy? Time & Society 17(1): 63–83.
Haidt J, Seder P, Kesebir S (2008) Hive psychology, happiness, and public policy. Journal of Legal Studies 37(June): 5133–5156.
Hove M, Risen J (2009) It’s all in the timing: interpersonal synchrony increases affiliation. Social Cognition 27(6): 949–960.
Jahoda M (1981) Work, employment, and unemployment: values, theories, and approaches in social research. American Psychologist 36(2): 184–191.
Jordheim H (2014) Introduction: multiple times and the work of synchronization. History and Theory 53(4): 498–518.
Kim S (2020) Solitary eating, an inferior alternative? An examination of time-use data in South Korea. International Sociology 35(4): 415–432.
Lakens D, Stel M (2011) If you move in sync, they must feel in sync: movement synchrony leads to attributions of rapport and entitativity. Social Cognition 29(1): 1–14.
Lakin J, Jefferis V, Cheng CM, et al. (2003) The Chameleon effect as social glue: evidence for the evolutionary significance of nonconscious mimicry. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 27(3): 145–162.
Lewis D, Weigert A (1981) The structures and meanings of social time. Social Forces 60(2): 432–462.
McAdams RH (1997) The origin, development, and regulation of norms. Michigan Law Review 96(2): 338–433.
McNeill WH (1995) Keeping Together in Time: Dance and Drill in Human History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Miret M, Caballero FF, Olaya B, et al. (2017) Association of experienced and evaluative well-being with health in nine countries with different income levels: a cross-sectional study. Globalization and Health 13: 65.
Munn N (1992) The cultural anthropology of time: a critical essay. Annual Review of Anthropology 21: 93–123.
Nowotny H (1992) Time and social theory: towards a social theory of time. Time & Society 1(3): 421–454.
Reinecke J and Ansari S (2015) When times collide: temporal brokerage at the intersection of markets and developments. Academy of Management Journal 58(2): 618–648.
Schwartz B (1974) Waiting, exchange, and power: the distribution of time in social systems. American Journal of Sociology 79(4): 841–870.
Sørensen J (2014) Rural-urban differences in life satisfaction: evidence from the European Union. Regional Studies 48(9): 1451–1466.
Torquati L, et al. (2019) Shift work and poor mental health: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. American Journal of Public Health 109(11): e13–e20.
Valdesolo P, DeSteno D (2011) Synchrony and the social tuning of compassion. Emotion 11(2): 262–266.
Van Tienoven TP (2019) A multitude of natural, social and individual time. Time & Society 28(3): 971–994.
Vihalemm T, Harro-Loit H (2019) Measuring society’s temporal synchronization via days of importance. Time & Society 28(4): 1333–1362.
Vladisavljević M, Mentus V (2019) The structure of subjective well-being and its relation to objective well-being indicators: evidence from EU-SILC for Serbia. Psychological Reports 122(1): 36–60.
Wiltermuth S, Heath C (2009) Synchrony and cooperation. Psychological Science 20(1): 1–5.
World Health Organization (2022) Mental Health and COVID-19: early evidence of the pandemic’s impact. Scientific Brief, 02 March. WHO reference number: WHO-2019-nCoV-Sci_Brief-Mental_health-2022.1.
Zerubavel E (1981) Hidden Rhythms: Schedules and Calendars in Social Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Zerubavel E (1982a) The standardization of time: a sociohistorical perspective. American Journal of Sociology 88(1): 1–23.
Zerubavel E (1982b) Easter and passover: on calendars and group identity. American Sociological Review 47(2): 284–289.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: July 4, 2023
Issue published: February 2024

Keywords

  1. synchrony
  2. temporal norms
  3. subjective wellbeing (SWB)
  4. spontaneity
  5. social integration

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2023.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Sangmoon Kim
Department of Sociology, Dongguk University, Seoul, Korea

Notes

Sangmoon Kim, Department of Sociology, Dongguk University, 30 Pildong-Ro 1 Gil, Jung-Gu, Seoul, 04620, Korea. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Time & Society.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 156

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text