Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online August 26, 2009

Campaigning and the Catch-All Party: The Process of Party Transformation in Britain

Abstract

Otto Kirchheimer’s well-known diagnosis of ‘catch-all’ partism in Western Europe rests on an implicit causal argument about the consequences of social change for political parties. This article takes up the causal story underlying Kirchheimer’s account and traces its implications for a specific, though central, party activity: campaigning. As Kirchheimer discerned, the transformation of advanced industrial societies radically altered the context of parties’ strategic decision-making. In the area of election campaigning, parties confronted heightened incentives to approach the electorate with ‘persuasive’ rather than more traditional ‘mobilizing’ appeals and developed a greatly increased demand for reliable information about voter preferences. These shifts, in turn, had consequences for party organization, promoting the centralization and marginalization of individual members Kirchheimer associates with the catch-all party type. Through the lens of campaign change, then, we can observe the causal processes that unite the diverse features Kirchheimer links to his catch-all party — although our attention is also drawn to ways in which party development has not conformed to Kirchheimer’s expectations. This article illustrates these intersecting processes with a discussion of Labour and Conservative campaigns in Britain.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

1.
I would like to thank participants at the conference ‘Kirchheimer Reconsidered: Applications and Implications of the Catch-All Thesis Forty Years Later’ (Iowa City, IA; July 2007) and three anonymous reviewers for their valuable suggestions on previous drafts of this article.
2.
1 The final characteristic is a strengthening of ties to interest groups.
3.
2 Cross-national studies include Dalton et al. (1984) and Dogan (2001); sceptical rejoinders, Mair (1993) and Elff (2007). The contributions to Evans (1999) reveal interesting tensions between cross-national and single-country findings.
4.
3 Previous authors have made similar distinctions between campaign objectives and drawn similar conclusions about their relative utility (Denver and Hands, 1997; Farrell and Webb, 2000). Denver and Hands, for example, identify four ‘aims of campaigning’ — informing, persuading, reinforcing and mobilizing (p. 18) — although they, too, appear to give a basic primacy to persuading and mobilizing. They also anticipate the present argument in holding that, as ‘British voters have become less strongly committed to parties and more unstable in their voting behavior, the parties have been forced to . . . direct more effort to persuasion rather than relying on more traditional techniques of mobilizing supporters’ (p. 21).
5.
4 This understanding of polling was also reflected in resistance against it. Robert Worcester recalls being asked by a Labour staffer to bury an early finding that the public wanted ‘a political party that “represented all classes”’ on the grounds that ‘we [Labour] don’t want and don’t need middle-class support to win British elections’ (Worcester and Mortimore, 1999: 12).
6.
5 These data include the Liberal Democrats, although this party (with its constituency-campaign focus) seems unlikely to be reducing ‘traditional campaigning’ in the aggregate.

References

Bowler, Shaun and David M. Farrell (eds) (1992) Electoral Strategies and Political Marketing. New York: St Martin’s Press.
Butler, David ( 1995) British General Elections Since 1945, 2nd edn. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell .
Butler, David and Donald Stokes ( 1974) Political Change in Britain: The Evolution of Electoral Choice, 2nd edn. London: Macmillan.
Crewe, Ivor, Bo Särlvik and James Alt ( 1977) ‘Partisan Dealignment in Britain 1964-1974’, British Journal of Political Science 7: 129-90.
Clarke, Harold D., David Sanders, Marianne C. Stewart and Paul F. Whiteley ( 2004) Political Choice in Britain. New York : Oxford University Press.
Dalton, Russell J., Scott C. Flanagan and Paul Allen Beck ( 1984) Electoral Change: Realignment and Dealignment in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Denver, David and Gordon Hands ( 1997) Modern Constituency Electioneering: Local Campaigning in the 1992 General Election. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.
Denver, David, Gordon Hands, Justin Fisher and Iain MacAllister ( 2003) ‘Constituency Campaigning in Britain, 1992-2001’, Party Politics 9: 541-59.
Dogan, Mattei ( 2001) ‘Class, Religion, Party: Triple Decline of Electoral Cleavages in Western Europe’, in Lauri Karvonen and Stein Kuhnle (eds) Party Systems and Voter Alignments Revisited, pp. 93-114. New York: Routledge.
Downs, Anthony ( 1957) An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper-Collins.
Duverger, Maurice ( 1954) Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. Translated by Barbara and Robert North. New York: Wiley.
Elff, Martin ( 2007) ‘Social Structure and Electoral Behavior in Comparative Perspective: The Decline of Social Cleavages in Western Europe Revisited’, Perspectives on Politics 5: 277-94.
Evans, Geoffrey (ed.) (1999) The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context. New York: Oxford University Press.
Evans, Geoffrey, Anthony Heath and Clive Payne ( 1999) ‘Class: Labour as a Catch-All Party?’, in Geoffrey Evans and Pippa Norris (eds) Critical Elections: British Parties and Voters in Long-Term Perspective, pp. 87-101. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Farrell, David M. and Paul Webb ( 2000) ‘Political Parties as Campaign Organizations’, in Russell J. Dalton and Martin P. Wattenberg (eds) Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies, pp. 102-28. New York: Oxford University Press.
Fisher, Justin, David Denver and Gordon Hands ( 2006) ‘The Relative Electoral Impact of Central Party Coordination and Size of Party Membership at Constituency Level’, Electoral Studies 25: 664-76.
Franklin, Mark N. ( 1985) The Decline of Class Voting in Britain: Changes in the Basis of Electoral Choice, 1964-1983. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Goldthorpe, John H. ( 1999) ‘Modeling the Pattern of Class Voting in British Elections, 1964-1992’, in Geoffrey Evans (ed.) The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context, pp. 59-82. New York: Oxford University Press.
Heath, Anthony, Roger Jowell and John Curtice ( 1985) How Britain Votes. New York: Pergamon Press.
Katz, Richard S. and Peter Mair ( 1995) ‘Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party’, Party Politics 1: 5-28.
Kavanagh, Dennis ( 1995) Election Campaigning: The New Marketing of Politics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Kirchheimer, Otto ( 1966) ‘The Transformation of the Western European Party Systems’, in Joseph LaPalombara and Myron Weiner (eds) Political Parties and Political Development, pp. 177-200. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mair, Peter ( 1993) ‘Myths of Electoral Change and the Survival of Traditional Parties’, European Journal of Political Research 24: 121-33.
Moon, Nick ( 1999) Opinion Polls: History, Theory, and Practice. New York: Manchester University Press.
Norris, Pippa ( 1998) ‘The Battle for the Campaign Agenda’, in Anthony King et al. New Labour Triumphs: Britain at the Polls, pp. 113-44. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
Pattie, Charles J., Ronald J. Johnston and Edward A. Fieldhouse ( 1995) ‘Winning the Local Vote: The Effectiveness of Constituency Campaign Spending in Great Britain, 1983-1992’, American Political Science Review 89: 969-83.
Pattie, Charles J. and Ronald J. Johnston ( 2003) ‘Hanging on the Telephone? Doorstep and Telephone Canvassing at the British General Election of 1997’, British Journal of Political Science 33: 303-22.
Safran, William ( 2009) ‘The Catch-all Party Revisited: Reflections of a Kirchheimer Student’, Party Politics 15(5), this volume.
Scarrow, Susan E. ( 1996) Parties and Their Members: Organizing for Victory in Britain and Germany. New York: Oxford University Press.
Smith, Jennifer K. ( 2006) ‘The Politics of Campaign Professionalization’ . Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago, IL.
Swanson, David L. and Paolo Mancini (eds) (1996) Politics, Media, and Modern Democracy: An International Study of Innovations in Electoral Campaigning and their Consequences. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Weakliem, David L. and Anthony F. Heath ( 1999) ‘The Secret Life of Class Voting: Britain, France, and the United States Since the 1930s’, in Geoffrey Evans (ed.) The End of Class Politics? Class Voting in Comparative Context, pp. 97-133. New York: Oxford University Press.
Webb, Paul D. ( 1995) ‘Are British Political Parties in Decline?’ Party Politics 1: 299-322.
Wellhofer, E. Spencer ( 1986) ‘Looking Backward: Stability and Volatility in the British Electorate’, Western Political Quarterly 39: 413-34.
Whiteley, Paul F. and Patrick Seyd ( 1994) ‘Local Party Campaigning and Electoral Mobilization in Britain’, Journal of Politics 56: 242-52.
Whiteley, Paul F. and Patrick Seyd ( 2002) High-Intensity Participation: The Dynamics of Party Activism in Britain. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Worcester, Robert M. and Roger Mortimore ( 1999) Explaining Labour’s Landslide. London: Politico’s.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: August 26, 2009
Issue published: September 2009

Keywords

  1. Britain
  2. campaign activities
  3. catch-all parties
  4. party organization
  5. party strategy

Rights and permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Jennifer K. Smith
University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Party Politics.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 1137

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 11 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 10

  1. Strategic choices and electoral gains: unpacking constituency campaign...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. From Hegemony to Pasokification: Socialist MPs in Transition
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Parties’ voter targeting strategies: What can facebook ads tell us?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. How catchall parties compete ideologically: Beyond party typologies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Three Faces of Constituency Campaigns in Mixed-Member Electoral System...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Digital Media, Ground Wars and Party Organisation: Does Stratarchy Exp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. The electoral impact of grassroots activity in the 2012 local election...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Party change, social media and the rise of ‘citizen-initiated’ campaig...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Das innerparteiliche Kampagnenmanagement im Bundestagswahlkampf 2013: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Tragedy or farce? The repetition of Australian industrial relations hi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub