Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online April 26, 2018

Democratic discontent and support for mainstream and challenger parties: Democratic protest voting

Abstract

The literature disagrees over the extent to which defection from mainstream parties and support for challenger parties are related to individuals’ discontent with the functioning of democratic political systems. This article develops the democratic protest voting model, a theoretical framework to analyze how different forms of democratic discontent relate to the chance of defecting from mainstream parties and supporting left- and right-wing challenger parties. The empirical results reveal that voters tend to support parties that are aligned with the specific nature of their democratic discontent. These results imply that voting for challenger parties should not be conceptualized as a mere expression of protest decoupled from political preferences, but as a process of democratic protest voting that is informed by normative democratic preferences.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Armingeon K, Guthmann K (2014) Democracy in crisis? The declining support for national democracy in European countries, 2007–2011. European Journal of Political Research 53(3): 423–442.
Bélanger E, Aarts K (2006) Explaining the rise of the LPF: Issues, discontent, and the 2002 Dutch Election. Acta Politica 41(1): 4–20.
Bélanger É, Nadeau R (2005) Political trust and the vote in multiparty elections: The Canadian case. European Journal of Political Research 44(1): 121–146.
Billiet J, De Witte H (1995) Attitudinal dispositions to vote for a ‘new’ extreme right-wing party: The case of ‘Vlaams Blok’. European Journal of Political Research 27(2): 181–202.
Dahl RA (2006) A Preface to Democratic Theory, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
de Lange SL (2007) A new winning formula? The programmatic appeal of the radical right. Party Politics 13(4): 411–435.
de Vries CE, Edwards EE (2009) Taking Europe to its extremes: Extremist parties and public euroscepticism. Party Politics 15(1): 5–28.
Ferrín M, Kriesi H (2016) Introduction: Democracy – The Veredict of Europeans. In: Ferrín M, Kriesi H (eds) How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy?, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–20.
Foster C, Frieden J (2017) Crisis of trust: Socio-economic determinants of Europeans’ confidence in government. European Union Politics 18(4): 511–535.
Geissel B, Newton K (2012) Evaluating Democratic Innovations: Curing the Democratic Malaise?, New York: Routledge.
Held D (2006) Models of Democracy, 3rd ed. Cambridge: Polity.
Hernández E (2016) Europeans’ views of democracy: The core elements of democracy. In: Ferrín M, Kriesi H (eds) How Europeans View and Evaluate Democracy, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 43–63.
Hernández E, Kriesi H (2016) Turning your back on the EU. The role of Eurosceptic parties in the 2014 European Parliament elections. Electoral Studies 44: 515–524.
Hobolt SB, Tilley J (2016) Fleeing the centre: The rise of challenger parties in the aftermath of the euro crisis. West European Politics 39(5): 971–991.
Hooghe M, Dassonneville R (2018) A spiral of distrust: A panel study on the relation between political distrust and protest voting in Belgium. Government and Opposition 53(1): 104–130.
Huber E, Rueschemeyer D, Stephens JD (1997) The paradoxes of contemporary democracy: Formal, participatory, and social dimensions. Comparative Politics 29(3): 323–342.
Ivarsflaten E (2008) What unites right-wing populists in Western Europe? Re-examining grievance mobilization models in seven successful cases. Comparative Political Studies 41(1): 3–23.
Katz RS, Mair P (1995) Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The emergence of the cartel party. Party Politics 1(1): 5–28.
Kitschelt H (1995) The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Koster W de, Achterberg P, Waal J van der (2013) The new right and the welfare state: The electoral relevance of welfare chauvinism and welfare populism in the Netherlands. International Political Science Review 34(1): 3–20.
Lubbers M, Coenders M (2017) Nationalistic attitudes and voting for the radical right in Europe. European Union Politics 18(1): 98–118.
Lubbers M, Scheepers P (2000) Individual and contextual characteristics of the German extreme right-wing vote in the 1990s. A test of complementary theories. European Journal of Political Research 38(1): 63–94.
Mair P (2009) Representative versus Responsible Government. MPlfG Working paper. Cologne, Germany: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies series.
March L (2011) Radical Left Parties in Europe, New York: Routledge.
Miller AH, Listhaug O (1990) Political parties and confidence in government: A comparison of Norway, Sweden and the United States. British Journal of Political Science 20(3): 357–386.
Norris P (2011) Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited, New York: Cambridge University Press.
Oesch D (2008) Explaining workers’ support for right-wing populist parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland. International Political Science Review 29(3): 349–373.
Passarelli G, Tuorto D (2018) The five star movement: Purely a matter of protest? The rise of a new party between political discontent and reasoned voting. Party Politics 24(2): 129–140.
Ramiro L (2016) Support for radical left parties in Western Europe: Social background, ideology and political orientations. European Political Science Review 8(1): 1–23.
Rooduijn M, Burgoon B, van Elsas EJ, et al.(2017) Radical distinction: Support for radical left and radical right parties in Europe. European Union Politics 18(4): 536–559.
Rooduijn M, van der Brug W, de Lange SL (2016) Expressing or fuelling discontent? The relationship between populist voting and political discontent. Electoral Studies 43: 32–40.
Schumacher G, Rooduijn M (2013) Sympathy for the ‘devil’? Voting for populists in the 2006 and 2010 Dutch general elections. Electoral Studies 32(1): 124–133.
Schumpeter JA (1976 [1942]) Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 5th ed. London: Allen and Unwin.
Torcal M, Montero JR (2006) Political Disaffection in Contemporary Democracies: Social Capital, Institutions, and Politics, London; New York: Routledge.
Van der Brug W, Fennema M, Tillie J (2000) Anti-immigrant parties in Europe: Ideological or protest vote? European Journal of Political Research 37(1): 77–102.
Van der Brug W, Fennema M, Tillie J (2005) Why some anti-immigrant parties fail and others succeed a two-step model of aggregate electoral support. Comparative Political Studies 38(5): 537–573.
Vidal G (2018) Challenging business as usual? The rise of new parties in Spain in times of crisis. West European Politics 41(2): 261–286.
Visser M, Lubbers M, Kraaykamp G, et al.(2014) Support for radical left ideologies in Europe. European Journal of Political Research 53(3): 541–558.
Webb P (2013) Who is willing to participate? Dissatisfied democrats, stealth democrats and populists in the United Kingdom. European Journal of Political Research 52(6): 747–772.

Supplementary Material

Supplemental Material

European Union Politics

Supplemental material files:

File (eup-17-1365-file002.pdf)

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 26, 2018
Issue published: September 2018

Keywords

  1. Challenger parties
  2. democracy
  3. discontent
  4. mainstream parties
  5. protest voting

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2018.
Request permissions for this article.
Request Permissions

Authors

Affiliations

Enrique Hernández
Department of Political Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

Notes

Enrique Hernández, Department of Political Science, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Edifici B, Campus de Bellaterra, Cerdanyola del Vallès 08193, Spain. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in European Union Politics.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 2211

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 15 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 18

  1. Tough Positions, Trustful Voters? How Mainstream Party Position-Taking...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Does populist voting rise where representative democracy is systemical...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Voting experience in a new era: The impact of past eligibility on the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. New parties in a crowded electoral space: the (in)stability of radical...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Arrived in Power, and Yet Still Disgruntled? How Government Inclusion ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Policy positions, power and interest group-party lobby routines
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. What if it Kicked in More Strongly? A Counterfactual Analysis of Prote...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Mit der Demokratie versöhnt?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. How the 2017 Federal Election in Germany Affected Satisfaction with De...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. The shadow of the Pithead: Understanding social and political attitude...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. The failure of mainstream parties and the impact of new challenger par...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Crook!: The impact of perceived corruption on non-electoral forms of p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Populismus ohne host ideology? Sachfrageneinstellungen, populistische ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Piecing the Puzzle Together: A Critical Review of Contemporary Researc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Disentangling How Populism and Radical Host Ideologies Shape Citizens’...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Multidimensional incongruence, political disaffection, and support for...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. New political parties through the voters’ eyes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Democracy belief systems in Europe: cognitive availability and attitud...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text