Abstract
Breast cancer metastasis to bone continues to be a major clinical problem, and patient-to-patient variability in rates of disease progression and metastasis complicate treatment even further. This may be due to differences in the cancer cells, the osteoclasts, or the pre-metastatic niche, but all of these contribute to proteolytic remodeling necessary for osteolytic lesion establishment, primarily through secretion of cathepsin K, the most powerful human collagenase. There is debate about the relative contributions of breast cancer cells and osteoclasts and synergism between the two in altering the biochemical and biomechanical properties of the colonized bone, as these are difficult to parse with animal models. To quantify the relative contributions of breast cancer cells and osteoclasts in bone resorption, we have been developing engineered bone microenvironment tissue surrogates by adapting a poly(ester urethane) urea system embedded with microbone particles. Here, we report their use with MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and RAW264.7 derived osteoclasts, to provide temporal, multiscale reporters of bone resorption that can be measured non-destructively: 1) collagen degradation measured by C-terminal collagen fragment release, 2) mineral dissolution by measuring calcium released with the calcium arsenazo assay, and also show their beneficial effects in upregulating cathepsin K expression compared to tissue culture polystyrene controls. These more natural derived bone surrogates may be useful tools in mimicking bone metastatic niche and determining differences between proteolytic activity of different patients’ tumor and bone resident cells in a controlled manner.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
F. Cardoso et al., Ann Oncol 13, 197 (2002).
G. R. Mundy, Nat Rev Cancer 2, 584 (2002).
C. Le Gall, et al., Cancer Res 67, 9894 (2007).
A. J. Littlewood-Evans et al., Cancer Res 57, 5386 (1997).
G. R. Mundy, Nat Rev Cancer 2, 584 (2002).
P. Garnero et al., J Biol Chem 273, 32347 (1998).
C. Le Gall, E. Bonnelye, P. Clezardin, Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2, 218 (2008).
S. Desmarais, F. Masse, M. D. Percival, Biol Chem 390, 941 (2009).
K. D. Brubaker, R. L. Vessella, L. D. True, R. Thomas, E. Corey, J Bone Miner Res 18, 222 (2003).
C. G. Kleer et al., Clin Cancer Res 14, 5357 (2008).
W. A. Li et al., Anal Biochem 401, 91 (2010).
B. Chen, M. O. Platt, J Transl Med 9, 109 (2011).
R. J. Pelham Jr., Y. Wang, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 94, 13661 (1997).
S. R. Peyton, P. D. Kim, C. M. Ghajar, D. Seliktar, A. J. Putnam, Biomaterials 29, 2597 (2008).
C. F. Deroanne, C. M. Lapiere, B. V. Nusgens, Cardiovasc Res 49, 647 (2001).
M. A. Wozniak, R. Desai, P. A. Solski, C. J. Der, P. J. Keely, J Cell Biol 163, 583 (2003).
J. A. Rowley, G. Madlambayan, D. J. Mooney, Biomaterials 20, 45 (1999).
P. Garnero et al., J Bone Miner Res 18, 859 (2003).
N. B. Watts, Clinical Chemistry 45, 1359 (1999).
F. Lecaille, D. Bromme, G. Lalmanach, Biochimie 90, 208 (2008).
C. L. Wilder, K. Y. Park, P. M. Keegan, M. O. Platt, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics, (2011).
M. O. Platt et al., Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 292, H1479 (2007).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dumas, J.E., Parks, A.N. & Platt, M.O. Bone Microenvironment Tissue Surrogates Engineered for Reporting of Metastasized Breast Cancer Osteolytic Activity. MRS Online Proceedings Library 1625, 104 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2014.76
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/opl.2014.76