초록

Rethinking Coleridge's “I have a smack of Hamlet”Abstract Kyung-Ook Lee This essay attempts to rethink Coleridge’s remark, “I have a smack of Hamlet.” Coleridge has been considered as one of Shakespearean critics who was most responsible for forming the weak and irresolute image of Hamlet in the Romantic era. When he said “I have a smack of Hamlet,” people assuming that he identifies himself with Hamlet in a propensity of procreation, did not take it very seriously. Rather, they reacted depreciatingly to Coleridge’s idea of himself with a relation to Hamlet who they thought was too delicate but charming. And this kind of reaction seems to be present nowadays. This essay, however, examines the remark from the perspective of Coleridge’s ideas of human existence and human thinking. Coleridge has both positive and negative notion of human thought. For him, thinking is the mental faculty which may lead us to discover the truth and ultimately to confront with the infinite. However, on the negative level thinking can be deteriorated to disease. As he mentions that Hamlet is the play which makes him read Shakespeare’s plays from philosophical perspective, he sees the negative function of thinking which he finds in himself in Hamlet. Hamlet’s thinking produces another one that produces another one that produces another one until this reaches nowhere, eventually ending up with sense of guilt and self reproach. This pattern of thinking also occupies Coleridge’s mind. This negative function of thinking is responsible for a sense of incompleteness of human existence. As shown in Hamlet’s “To be or not to be” soliloquy, Hamlet’s problem is human ignorance of his life including his life before birth and after death; in other words, human ignorance of himself. With this fundamental sense of incompleteness or uncertainty, he faces necessity to clarify all the mysteries which happened including his father's death and his mother's hasty marriage. All his thoughts only confine him in limbo between thoughts and action instead of solving problems. Coleridge like Hamlet aims to know himself by means of thinking only to find himself prisoned in limbo between thoughts and action.

키워드

인간의 실존, 생각, 자기의식, 불완전성, 자아, 신성

참고문헌(27)open

  1. [단행본] 가와이 쇼이치로 / 2009 / 󰡔햄릿󰡕의 수수께끼를 풀다 / 시그마북스

  2. [단행본] 여석기 / 2008 / 나의 󰡔햄릿󰡕 강의 / 생각의 나무

  3. [단행본] Beer, John / 1989 / Coleridge’s Originality as a Critic of Shakespeare, In Coleridge’s Theory of Imagination Today / AMS Press : 147 ~ 165

  4. [단행본] Bradley, A.C / 1963 / From Shakespearean Tragedy, In The Signet Classic hakespeare / The New American Library : 200 ~ 211

  5. [단행본] Carlson,Richard / 1895 / Stop Thinking Start Living, In London: HarperCollins, 2012. Coleridge, Samuel Taylor / London

  6. [단행본] Carlson, Richard / 1969 / The Friend, In Rooke, 2 vols / Princeton UP and Routledge

  7. [단행본] Carlson, Richard / 1957 / The Notebooks of Samuel Taylor Coleridge 8 vols / Pantheon Books and Routledge & Kegan Pau

  8. [단행본] Carlson, Richard / 1983 / Biographia Literaria 2 vols / Princeton UP

  9. [단행본] Carlson, Richard / 1984 / Lectures 1808-1819: On Literature 2 vols / Princeton UP and Routledge

  10. [단행본] Carlson, Richard / 1995 / On the Constitution of the Church and State 2 vols / Princeton UP and Routledge

  11. [단행본] Carlson, Richard / 1990 / The Table Talk of Samuel Taylor Coleridge / Princeton UP and Routledge

  12. [단행본] Carlson, Richard / 2002 / Thomas McFarland / Princeton UP

  13. [학술지] De Grazia, Margreta / 1999 / Teleology, Delay, and the Old Mole / Shakespeare Quarterly 50 : 251 ~ 267

  14. [단행본] Greenberg,Martin / 1986 / The Hamlet Vocation of Coleridge and Wordsworth / U of Iowa P

  15. [학술지] Halpern, Richard / 2008 / Eclipse of Action: Hamlet and the Political Economy of Playing / Shakespeare Quarterly 59 : 450 ~ 482

  16. [단행본] Hedley,Douglas / 2000 / Coleridge,Philosophy and Religion:Aids to Reflection and the Mirror of the Spirit / Cambridge UP

  17. [단행본] Holms,Richard / 1998 / Coleridge:Darker Reflection / HarperCollins

  18. [단행본] Hubler, Edward / 1963 / A Note on the Sources of Hamlet, In The Signet Classic Shakespeare / The New American Library : 183 ~ 187

  19. [학술지] Knowles, Ronald / 1992 / Hamlet and Counter-Humanism / Renaissance Quarterly 52 : 1046 ~ 1069

  20. [학술지] Levy, Eric P / 2000 / “Things standing thus unknown”: The Epistemology of Ignorance in Hamlet / Studies in Philology 97 : 192 ~ 209

  21. [학술지] Levy, Eric P / 2002 / The Mind of Man in Hamlet / Renascence 45 : 219 ~ 233

  22. [학술지] Roy, Ayon / 2007 / The Specter of Hegel in Coleridge’s Biographia Literaria / Journal of the History of Ideas 68 : 279 ~ 304

  23. [단행본] Shakespeare, William / 1963 / The Signet Classic Shakespeare / The New American Library

  24. [학술지] Steiner, George / 2005 / Ten (possible) Reason for the Sadness of Thought / Salmagundi 146 : 3 ~ 32

  25. [단행본] Tolle,Echart / 1999 / The Power of Now / Namaste Publishing and New World Library

  26. [단행본] Vallins,David / 2000 / Coleridge and the Psychology of Romanticism / Macmillan

  27. [단행본] Wilson,Eric G / 2004 / Coleridge’s Melancholia:An Anatomy of Limbo / UP of Florida