Skip to main content
Log in

Patterns in the evolution of amentiferous fruits

  • Published:
Brittonia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 April 1974

Abstract

The diversity of fruit types within the Amentiferae appears to be the result of different seed dispersal and seedling establishment strategies that have evolved independently in the amentiferous families within the confines imposed by the wind-pollination syndrome. Dispersal of unadorned fruits and seeds by wind (e.g.,Betula, Rhoiptelea, Casuarina) has preceded the development of more efficient air-borne devices (e.g.,Ostrya, Carpinus, Engelhardia). Animal dispersal is the most advanced strategy, relying rarely on drupes, as in the shrubby Myricaceae, or on nuts, as inCorylus, Quercus, Carya, Juglans, Alfaroa, etc. The pattern of seedling establishment shows a structural-functional relationship to the seeddispersal strategy. Epigeal germination predominates in plants of open habitats. Those species with small fruits rely on wind dispersal, and their seeds have a relatively short germination time, whereas species with medium-sized fruits are often animal-dispersed with seeds that may have protracted germination times. In either case the reserve food supply for the young seedling is limited, and light is needed to spark photosynthesis. Hypogeal germination has evolved independently in several amentiferous families (e.g., Betulaceae, Fagaceae, Juglandaceae). This pattern is associated with closed habitats and plants with large seeds that have the capability of establishing vigorous seedlings in microhabitats of reduced light intensity where photosynthesis is impaired. The subterranean protection afforded the cotyledons and axillary meristems is a correlative feature that may have considerable importance in seedling survival where desiccation and predation are intense.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Literature Cited

  • Abbe, E. C. 1935. Studies in the phylogeny of the Betulaceae. I. Floral and inflorescence anatomy and morphology. Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)97: 1–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • & T. T. Earle 1940. Inflorescence, floral anatomy and morphology ofLeitneria floridana. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club67: 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher, R. W. 1961. British Flora. Vol. 1. London: Leonard Hill 1016 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Channell, R. B. &C. E. Wood, Jr. 1962. The Leitneriaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor.43: 435–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conde, L. F. &D. E. Stone 1970. Seedling morphology in the Juglandaceae, the cotyledonary node. J. Arnold Arbor.51: 463–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Constance, L. 1955. The systematics of the angiosperms, pp. 405–484.In: A Century of Progress in the Natural Sciences, 1853–1953. San Francisco: California Academy of Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corner, E. J. H. 1949. The Durian theory or the origin of the modern tree. Ann. Bot. (London), n.s.13: 367–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronquist, A. 1968. The Evolution and Classification of Flowering Plants. Boston: Houghton Mifflin x + 396 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, T. S. 1971. The genera of Myricaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor.52: 305–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1972. The genera of Juglandaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor.53: 26–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, M. J. 1928. The morphology and anatomy of the flowers of the Salicaceae I. Amer. J. Bot.15: 307–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. W. 1952. The comparative anatomy and phylogeny of the Betulaceae. Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)113: 235–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hans, A. S. 1970. Chromosome numbers in the Juglandaceae. J. Arnold Arbor.51: 534–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, J. L., P. H. Lovell &K. G. Moore 1970. The shapes and sizes of seeds. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.1: 327–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heimsch, C. &R. H. Wetmore 1939. The significance of wood anatomy in the taxonomy of the Juglandaceae. Amer. J. Bot.26: 651–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hjelmqvist, H. 1948. Studies on the floral morphology and phylogeny of the Amentiferae. Bot. Not. Suppl.2: 5–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, J. 1959. The Families of Flowering Plants. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iljinskaya, I. A. 1953. Monograph of the genusPterocarya Knuth. Trudy Bot. Inst. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. 1, Fl. Sist. Vysš. Rast.10: 7–123. (Translation, Israel Program for Scientific Translation, ISPT Cat. No. 5622, U.S. Dept. Commerce).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, M. 1960. Juglandaceae. In: C. G. G. J. van Steenis, Flora Malesiana I.6: 143–154.

  • Janzen, D. H. 1969. Seed-eaters versus seed size, number, toxicity, and dispersal. Evolution23: 1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1971. Seed predation by animals. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.2: 465–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keay, R. W. J. 1957. Wind-dispersed species in a Nigerian forest. J. Ecol.45: 471–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, G. H. M. 1951. Taxonomy of Vascular Plants. New York: Macmillan. xiii + 823 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leroy, J. F. 1955. étude sur les Juglandaceae. Mém. Mus. Natl. Hist. Nat. Sér. B, Bot.6: 1–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lubbock, J. 1892. Seedlings. Vol. 2. London: Paul, Trench, Trübner. 646 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manning, W. E. 1938. The morphology of the flowers of the Juglandaceae. I. The inflorescence. Amer. J. Bot.25: 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1940. The morphology of the flowers of the Juglandaceae. II. The pistillate flowers and fruit. Amer. J. Bot.27: 839–852.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1949. The genusAlfaroa. Bull. Torrey Bot. Club76: 196–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • -In press. Juglandales.In: Encyclopedia Britannica.

  • Martin, A. C. 1946. The comparative internal morphology of seeds. Amer. Midl. Naturalist36: 513–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, R. J. (ed.) 1970. Index to plant chromosome numbers for 1968. Regnum Veg.68: 1–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pijl, L. van der 1969. Principles of Dispersal in Higher Plants Berlin: Springer Verlag. vii + 154 pp.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radford, A. E., H. E. Ahles &C. R. Bell 1968. Manual of the Vascular Flora of the Carolinas. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. Lxi + 1183 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rendle, A. B. 1925. The Classification of Flowering Plants. Vol. 2. Dicotyledons. Cambridge: University Press. 640 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehder, A. 1927. Manual of Cultivated Trees and Shrubs. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ridley, H. N. 1930. The Dispersal of Plants Throughout The World. Ashford: L. Reeve. 744 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salisbury, E. J. 1942. The Reproductive Capacity of Plants. London: G. Bell & Sons. 244 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sargent, C. S. 1895, 1896. The Silva of North America. Vols. 7, 8, 9. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siebold, Ph. Fr. de &J. G. Zuccarini 1870. Juglandeae:In: Flora Japonica2: 87–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, C. C. 1970. The coevolution of pine squirrels(Tamiasciurus) and conifers. Ecol. Monogr.40: 349–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stebbins, G. L. 1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants. New York: Columbia University Press. xix + 643 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1971a. Relationships between adaptive radiation, speciation and major evolutionary trends. Taxon20: 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1971b. Adaptive radiation of reproductive characteristics in angiosperms. II. Seeds and seedlings. Annual Rev. Ecol. Syst.2: 237–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. E. 1961. Ploidal levels and stomatal size in the American hickories. Brittonia13: 293–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1969. Documented Plant Chromosome Numbers 1969: 2(Alfaroa). Sida3: 352–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1968. New World Juglandaceae: a new species ofAlfaroa from Mexico. Amer. J. Bot.55: 477–484.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1970. Evolution of cotyledonary and nodal vasculature in the Juglandaceae. Amer. J. Bot.57: 1219–1225.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1972. New World Juglandaceae, III. A new perspective of the tropical members with winged fruits. Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard.59: 297–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • & C. R. Broome 1971. Pollen ultrastructure: evidence for relationship of the Juglandaceae and the Rhoipteleaceae. Pollen & Spores8: 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takhtajan, A. 1969. Flowering Plants: Origin and Dispersal (translated by C. Jeffrey). Washington, D.C.: Smithsonian Institution Press. x + 310 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, R. F. 1968. Synopsis of a putatively phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants. Aliso6: 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, G. L. 1967. The genera of Euphorbiaceae in the southeastern United States. J. Arnold Arbor.48: 303–430.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead, D. R. 1965. Pollen morphology in the Juglandaceae. II. Survey of the family. J. Arnold Arbor.46: 369–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • — 1969. Wind pollination in the angiosperms: evolutionary and environmental considerations. Evolution23: 28–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, J. C. 1966. A Dictionary of the Flowering Plants and Ferns (revised by H. K. Airy Shaw). Cambridge: University Press. xxii + 1214 + 1iii pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winkler, H. 1904. Betulaceae.In: A. Engler (ed.), Das Pflanzenreich. IV.61: 1–149.

  • Wolfe, J. A. 1959. Tertiary Juglandaceae of western North America. Thesis: M.A., University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodworth, R. H. 1929a. Cytological studies in the Betulaceae. I.Betula. Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)87: 331–363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1929b. Cytological studies in the Betulaceae. II.Corylus andAlnus. Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)88: 383–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • — 1930. Cytological studies on the Betulaceae. IV.Betula, Carpinus, Ostrya, Ostryopsis. Bot. Gaz. (Crawfordsville)90: 108–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youngken, H. W. 1920. The comparative morphology, taxonomy and distribution of the Myricaceae of the eastern United States. Contr. Bot. Lab. Morris Arbor. Univ. Pennsylvania4: 339–400 + 10 plates.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was suported by NSF grant GB-28525X. The drawings were prepared by Susan Carlton Smith and financed by a grant from the Duke University Research Council.

An Erratum for this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2805886

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stone, D.E. Patterns in the evolution of amentiferous fruits. Brittonia 25, 371–384 (1973). https://doi.org/10.2307/2805641

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2805641

Keywords

Navigation