Parties, pirates and politicians: The 2014 European Parliamentary elections on Czech Twitter

[1] Babiš, A. (2014). Twitter account. Retrieved from https://twitter.com/AndrejBabis Search in Google Scholar

[2] Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.67066110.1080/1369118X.2012.670661Search in Google Scholar

[3] Bogost, I. (2012). Alien phenomenology, or what it’s like to be a thing. London, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. 10.5749/minnesota/9780816678976.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[4] Boyd, D., Golder, S, & Lotan, G. (2010). Tweet, tweet, retweet: Conversational aspect of retweeting on twitter. 43rd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (pp. 1–10). 10.1109/HICSS.2010.412Search in Google Scholar

[5] Bruns, A., & Burgess, J. E. (2011). #Ausvotes: how Twitter covered the 2010 Australian federal election. Communication, Politics and Culture, 44(2), 37–56. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Bruns, A. (2012). How long is a tweet? Mapping dynamic conversation networks on Twitter using Gawk and Gephi. Information, Communication, & Society, 15(9), 1323–1351. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.63521410.1080/1369118X.2011.635214Search in Google Scholar

[7] Bruns, A., & Stieglitz, S. (2012). Quantitative approaches to comparing communication patterns on twitter. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 30,(3-4), 160–185. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2012.74424910.1080/15228835.2012.744249Search in Google Scholar

[8] Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press. Search in Google Scholar

[9] CVVM. (2014). Citizens about the European Parliament elections - May 2014 (press release in Czech). Retrieved from http://cvvm.soc.cas.cz/media/com_form2content/documents/c1/a7233/f3/pv140519.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[10] Czech Statistical Office. (2014). Elections to the European Parliament. Retrieved from http://volby.cz/pls/ep2014/ep?xjazyk=EN Search in Google Scholar

[11] Dahlgren, P. (2009). Media and political engagement: Citizens, communication, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Dijck, J. (2013). The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media. New York: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.000110.1093/acprof:oso/9780199970773.001.0001Search in Google Scholar

[13] Dijck, J., & Poell, T. (2013). Understanding social media logic. Media and Communication, 1(1), 2–14. 10.17645/mac.v1i1.70Search in Google Scholar

[14] Dotey, A., Rom, H., & Vaca, C. (2011). Information diffusion in social media. Stanford University. Retrieved from http://snap.stanford.edu/class/cs224w-2011/proj/mrom_Finalwriteup_v1.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[15] Falkvinge, R. (2013). Swarmwise: The tactical manual to changing the world. Retrieved from http://falkvinge.net/files/2013/04/Swarmwise-2013-by-Rick-Falkvinge-v1.1-2013Sep01.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[16] Gibson, R., Nixon, P., & Ward, S. (Eds.). (2003). Political parties and the internet: Net gain? London, New York: Routledge. 10.4324/9780203391419Search in Google Scholar

[17] Hansen, L. D., Schneiderman, B., & Smith. A. M. (2011). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Chadwick, A. (2006). Internet politics: States, citizens, and new communication technologies. New York: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Katz, S. R., & Mair, P. (1995). Changing models of party organization and party democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party. Party Politics, 1(1), 5–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135406889500100100110.1177/1354068895001001001Search in Google Scholar

[20] Kelly, K. (2010). What technology wants. New York: Viking Books. Search in Google Scholar

[21] Larsson, O. A., & Moe, H. (2012). Studying political microblogging: Twitter users in the 2010 Swedish election campaign. New Media, 14 (5), 729–747. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146144481142289410.1177/1461444811422894Search in Google Scholar

[22] Latour, B. (2007). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Search in Google Scholar

[23] Leavitt, A., Burchard, E., Fisher, D., & Gilbert, A. (2009). The influentials: New approaches for analyzing influence on twitter. Retrieved from http://www.webecologyproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/influence-report-final.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[24] Margolis, M., & Moreno-Riao, G. (2009). The prospect of internet democracy. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate. Search in Google Scholar

[25] Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. London: Viking. Search in Google Scholar

[26] Poell, T., & Borra, E. (2012). Twitter, YouTube, and Flickr as platforms of alternative journalism: The social media account of the 2010 Toronto G20 protests. Journalism, 13(6), 695–713. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146488491143153310.1177/1464884911431533Search in Google Scholar

[27] Pool, S. I. (1983). Technologies of freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. 10.4159/9780674042216Search in Google Scholar

[28] Probst, A. (2013). Twitter in Czech Republic - April 2013. Retrieved from http://www.slideshare.net/andrej_probst/twitter-in-czech-republic-april-2013 Search in Google Scholar

[29] Ratkiewicz, J. et al. (2010). Detecting and tracking the spread of astroturf memes in microblog streams. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/pdf/1011.3768.pdf Search in Google Scholar

[30] Rheingold, H. (2002). Smart mobs: The next social revolution. Cambridge: Basic Books. Search in Google Scholar

[31] Shirky, C. (2008). Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin Press. Search in Google Scholar

[32] Schneider, M. S., & Foot, K. (2005). Web sphere analysis: An approach to studying online action. In Ch. Hine (Ed.), Virtual methods: Issues in social research on the internet (pp. 157–170). Oxford: Berg Publishers. Search in Google Scholar

[33] Siapera, E. (2012). Understanding new media. Los Angeles: Sage. Search in Google Scholar

[34] Smith, M. A., Rainie, L., Himelboim, I., & Shneiderman, B. (2014). Mapping twitter topic networks: From polarized crowds to community clusters. Pew Research Internet Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2014/02/20/mapping-twitter-topic-networks-from-polarized-crowds-to-community-clusters/ Search in Google Scholar

[35] Šulcová, H., & Švarcová, A. (2014). Five percent limit in the election is discriminatory, says the leader of the Czech Pirate Party (in Czech). Český rozhlas, Rádiožurnál. Retrieved from http://www.rozhlas.cz/radiozurnal/dvace Search in Google Scholar

[36] Transparency International Czech Republic. (2014). Monitoring of the political parties’ electoral campaigns (in Czech). Retrieved from http://www.transparentnivolby.cz/eu2014/kandidati/ Search in Google Scholar

[37] Vergeer, M., Hermans, L., & Sams, S. (2011). Online social networks and micro-blogging in political campaigning: The exploration of a new campaign tool and a new campaign style. Party Politics, 19(3), 477–501. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/135406881140758010.1177/1354068811407580Search in Google Scholar

[38] Winner, L. (1980). Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109(1), 121–136. Search in Google Scholar

[39] Xenos, M., & Foot, A. K. (2005). Politics as usual, or politics unusual? Position taking and dialogue on campaign websites in the 2002 u.s. elections. Journal of Communication, 55(1), 169–185. www.klaboseni.czwww.smrfoundation.org http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02665.x10.1111/j.1460-2466.2005.tb02665.xSearch in Google Scholar