Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Open access
Research article
First published online October 1, 2014

Fracking on YouTube: Exploring Risks, Benefits and Human Values

Abstract

Fracking or the extraction of shale gas through hydraulic fracturing of rock has become a contested topic, especially in the United States, where it has been deployed on a large scale, and in Europe where it is still largely speculative. Research is beginning to investigate the environmental and economic costs and benefits as well as public perceptions of this new energy technology. However, so far the social and psychological impact of fracking on those involved in it, such as gas workers, or those living in the vicinity of fracking sites, has escaped the attention of the social science research community. In this article we begin to fill this gap through a small-scale thematic analysis of representations of fracking in fifty YouTube videos, where the trailer of a controversial film, Gasland (Fox, 2010), has had a marked impact. Results show that the videos discuss not only environmental and economic costs and benefits of fracking but also social and psychological impacts on individuals and communities. These videos reveal a human face of fracking that remains all too often hidden from view.

References

Bandura A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman.
Bonauito M., Breakwell G.M. and Cano I. 1998. ‘Identity processes and environmental threat: the effects of nationalism and local identity upon perception of beach pollution’. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 6(3): 157–75. CrossRef.
Braun V. and Clarke V. 2006. ‘Using thematic analysis in psychology’. Qualitative Research in Psychology 3: 77–101. CrossRef.
Breakwell G.M. 1986. Coping with Threatened Identities. London: Methuen.
Breakwell G.M. 2010a. ‘Models of risk construction: some applications to climate change’. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1(6): 765–907.
Breakwell G.M. 2010b. ‘Resisting Representations and Identity Processes’. Papers in Social Representations 19: 6.1–6.11.
Briggle A. 2013. ‘Duck, rabbit, gas well: A Gestalt theory of the fracking debate’. Science Progress (blog), 17 January: http://scienceprogress.org/2013/01/duck-rabbit-gas-well/.
Callicott B. 1989. In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University Press of New York Press.
Chandler M.J., Lalonde C.E., Sokol B. and Hallett D. 2003. ‘Personal persistence, identity development, and suicide: a study of native and non-native North American adolescents’. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 68(2): Serial No.273.
Coyle A. and Murtagh N. 2014. ‘Qualitative approaches to research using Identity Process Theory’. In Jaspal R. and Breakwell G.M (eds.) Identity Process Theory: Identity, Social Action and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 41–64. CrossRef.
Devine-Wright P. 2005. ‘Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy’. Wind Energy 8: 125–139. CrossRef.
Devine-Wright P. 2009. ‘Rethinking NIMBYism: The role of place attachment and place identity in explaining place-protective action’. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology 19(6): 426–41. CrossRef.
Devine-Wright P. and Howes Y. 2010. ‘Disruptions to place attachment and the protection of restorative environments: A wind energy case study’. Journal of Environmental Psychology 30(1): 271–90. CrossRef.
Dixon J., Durrheim K. and Di Masso A. 2014. ‘Places, identities and geopolitical change: Exploring the strengths and limits of Identity Process Theory’. In Jaspal R. and Breakwell G.M (eds.) Identity Process Theory: Identity, Social Action and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 270–94. CrossRef.
Elliot R. 1992. ‘Intrinsic value, environmental obligation, and naturalness’. The Monist 75: 138–60. CrossRef.
Engelder T. 2011. ‘Should fracking stop? No, it's too valuable’. Nature 447: 271–75.
Finewood M.H. and Stroup L.J. 2012. ‘Fracking and the neoliberalization of the hydro-social cycle in Pennsylvania's Marcellus Shale’. Journal of Contemporary Water Research and Education 147: 72–9. CrossRef.
Forbis R Jr. and Kear A. 2011. ‘Fracking across the USA: Disparate political responses to unconventional energy development’. Western Political Science Association 2011 Annual Meeting Paper.
Fox J. 2010. Gasland. New Video Group.
Freeman B. and Chapman S. 2007. ‘Is “YouTube” telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website’. Tobacco Control 16(3): 207–10. CrossRef.
Howarth R.W. and Ingraffea A. 2011. ‘Should fracking stop? Yes, it's too high risk’. Nature 477: 271–75. CrossRef.
Jasanoff S. 2010. ‘A new climate for society’. Theory, Culture and Society 27(2–3): 233–53. CrossRef.
Jaspal R. 2014. ‘Social psychological debates about identity’. In Jaspal R. and Breakwell G.M (eds.) Identity Process Theory: Identity, Social Action and Social Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 3–19. CrossRef.
Jaspal R. and Cinnirella M. 2010. ‘Coping with potentially incompatible identities: accounts of religious, ethnic and sexual identities from British Pakistani men who identify as Muslim and gay’. British Journal of Social Psychology 49(4): 849–70. CrossRef.
Jaspal R., Nerlich B. and Cinnirella M. 2014. ‘Human responses to climate change: Social representation, identity and socio-psychological action’. Environmental Communication: A Journal of Nature and Culture 8 (1): 110–30. CrossRef.
Jaspal R. and Nerlich B. 2014a. ‘Fracking in the UK press: Threat dynamics in an unfolding debate’. Public Understanding of Science 23 (3) 348–63. CrossRef.
Jaspal R. and Nerlich B. 2014b. ‘When climate science became climate politics: British media representations of climate change in 1988’. Public Understanding of Science 23 (2): 122–41. CrossRef.
Jaspal R., Nerlich B. and Koteyko N. 2013. ‘Contesting science by appealing to its norms: Readers discuss climate science in The Daily Mail’. Science Communication 35(3): 383–410. CrossRef.
Keelan J., Pavri-Garcia V., Tomlinson G. and Wilson K. 2007. ‘YouTube as a source of information on immunization: a content analysis’. JAMA 298(21): 2482–4. CrossRef.
Lashley M. 2012. ‘Lip dubbing on YouTube: Participatory culture and cultural globalization’. Transformative Works and Cultures 11. (online) CrossRef.
Lyons E. 1996. ‘Coping with social change: processes of social memory in the reconstruction of identities’. In Breakwell G.M. and Lyons E. (eds.) Changing European Identities: Social Psychological Analyses of Social Change, pp. 31–40. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Mooney C. 2011. ‘The truth about fracking’. Scientific American 305: 80–5. CrossRef.
Negro E.E. 2012. ‘Fracking wars: Federal, state and local conflicts over the regulation of natural gas activities’. Zoning and Planning Law Report 35(2): 1–13.
Nerlich B. 2010. “‘Climategate”: Paradoxical metaphors and political paralysis’. Environmental Values 19(4): 419–42. CrossRef.
Nerlich B. and Jaspal R. 2013. ‘UK media representations of carbon capture and storage: Actors, frames and metaphors’. Metaphor and the Social World 3 (1): 35–53. CrossRef.
O'Hara S., Humphrey M., Jaspal R., Nerlich B. and Poberezshkaya M. 2012. ‘Shale gas extraction in the UK: What people think’ http://www.scribd.com/doc/98974352/Public-Perceptions-of-Shale-Gas-in-the-UK-7.
O'Hara, Humphrey S. M., Jaspal R., Nerlich B. and Poberezshkaya M. 2013. ‘Public perception of shale gas extraction in the UK: How people's views are changing’ http://ground-gassolutions.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Nottm_PublicPerceptionsShaleGasUK_Mar2013.pdf.
Owen R., Bessant J. and Heintz M. (eds) 2013. Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Innovation of Science and Innovation in Society. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons. CrossRef.
Pandey A., Patni N., Singh M., Sood A. and Singh G. 2010. ‘YouTube as a source of information on the H1N1 influenza pandemic’. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 38(3): e1–e3. CrossRef.
Phadke R. 2011. ‘Resisting and reconciling Big Wind: Middle landscape politics in the New American West’. Antipode 43(3): 754–76. CrossRef.
Porter A.J. and Hellsten I.R. In press. ‘Investigating social media responses to complex social problems using a multi-determinant framework: The case of climategate on YouTube’. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. CrossRef.
The Royal Society and The Royal Academy of Engineering 2012. ‘Shale gas extraction in the UK: a review of hydraulic fracturing’. June 2012: royalsociety.org/policy/projects/shale-gas-extraction and raeng.org.uk/shale.
Schwartz S.H. 1992. ‘Universals in the content and structure of values: Theory and empirical tests in 20 countries’. In Zanna M. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, pp. 1–65. New York: Academic Press.
Slezak M. 2012. ‘Methane leaks suggest fracking benefits exaggerated’. New Scientist, 21 November, http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn22521-methane-leaks-suggestfracking-benefits-exaggerated.html?goback=.gde_67258_member_188195707.
Steingraber, S. and others. 2011. ‘Letter to the Honorable Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor of New York State’. 12 December 2011. Available at: http://steingraber.com/word-press/wp-content/uploads/CancerFrackingDec12.pdf.
Stiles W.B. 1999. ‘Evaluating qualitative research’, Evidence-based Mental Health 2: 99–101. CrossRef.
Taebi B., Correljé A., Cuppen E., Dignum M. and Pesch U. 2014. ‘Responsible innovation and an endorsement of public values: the need for interdisciplinary research’. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1 (1): 118–124. CrossRef.
Van Sant G. 2012. Promised Land. Participant media.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 1, 2014
Issue published: October 2014

Keywords

  1. Fracking
  2. environmental values
  3. human values
  4. social and psychological impacts
  5. identity

Rights and permissions

© 2014 White Horse Press.
Creative Commons License (CC BY 4.0)
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) which permits any use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).

Authors

Affiliations

Rusi Jaspal
Self and Identity Research Group Faculty of Health and Life Sciences De Montfort University Leicester, LE1 9BH, UK
Andrew Turner
D2K Research Group, School of Social and Community Medicine Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry University of Bristol Bristol BS8 2BN, UK
Brigitte Nerlich
Institute for Science and Society School of Sociology and Social Policy University of Nottingham University Park, Nottingham NG7 2RD, UK

Notes

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Environmental Values.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 27

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. In Our Backyard: Perceptions About Fracking, Science, and Health by Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  2. Framing ‘fracking’: Exploring public perceptions of hydraulic fracturi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  3. Climate of Arrogance, Disengagement and Injustice
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Stakeholder perspectives on shale gas fracking: a Q-method study of en...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Tackling Climate Change, Breaking the Frame of Modernity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Climate Change, Irreversible Change and Changing Perspectives
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.