Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online December 11, 2017

Researching Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Christians and Muslims: Some Thematic Reflections

Abstract

This paper highlights some thematic reflections primarily based on two empirical research projects on lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) Christians and Muslims. It begins by discussing reflexivity by way of contextualising the subsequent exploration of specific themes. This is followed by a discussion of the plight of LGB Christians and Muslims which renders research on this population highly sensitive. The paper then explores the theme of researching meanings and lived experiences sensitively, focusing on the importance of being theoretically and culturally sensitive; and the relevance of methodological pragmatism and pluralism. It then proceeds to a detailed discussion of accessing ‘hidden’ populations and trust building; and the dynamics of the insider/outsider status. The paper concludes with a call for LGB research to take seriously intersectionality of contemporary LGB identity (e.g. sexual, religious, cultural, ethnic), and the role of religion/spirituality in LGB lives and politics.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Adams M. (2003). ‘The Reflexive Self and Culture: A Critique’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 54, No. 2, pp. 221–238.
Adkins A. (2002) ‘Reflexivity and the Politics of Qualitative Research’, in May T. (editor) Qualitative Research in Action. London: Sage.
Alison J. (2007) The Gay Thing: Following the Still Small Voice’, in Loughlin G. (editor) Queer Theology. Oxford: Blackwell.
Alty A., and RODHAM K. (1998). ‘The Ouch! Factor: Problems in Conducting Sensitive Research’, Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 8, No. 2, pp. 275–282.
Atkinson R., and FLINT J. (2001). ‘Accessing Hidden and Hard-to-Reach Populations: Snowball Research Strategies’, Social Research Update, No. 33 (Summer). http://www.soc.surrey.ac.uk/sru/SRU33.html
Banton M. (2005). ‘Three Current Issues in Ethnic and Racial Studies’, British Journal of Sociology, Vol. 56, No. 4, pp. 621–633.
Bauman Z. (2005) Liquid Life. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck U. (1992) The Risk Society. London: Sage.
Beck U. (1997) The Reinvention of Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Beck U., and WILLMS J. (2004) Conversations with Ulrich Beck. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Blakey H., PEARCE J., and CHESTERS G. (2006) Minorities within Minorities: Beneath the Surface of South Asian Participation. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
Brackenridge C. (1999). ‘Managing Myself’, International Review of Sociology of Sport, Vol. 34, No. 4, pp. 399–410.
Brannen J., and NILSEN A. (2005) ‘Individualisation, Choice and Structure: A Discussion of Current Trends in Sociological Analysis’, Sociological Review, Vol. 53. No. 3, pp. 412–428.
Brekhus W. (2003) Peacocks, Chameleons, Centaurs. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Crockett A., and VOAS D. (2003). ‘A Divergence of Views: Attitude Change and the Religious Crisis over Homosexuality’, Sociological Research Online, Vol. 8, No. 4. http://www.socresonline.org.uk/8/4/crockett.html
Devault M. L. (1997) ‘Personal Writing in Social Science: Issues of Production and Implementation’, in Hertz R. (editor) Reflexivity and Voice. London: Sage.
Finlay L. (2002a). ‘Negotiating the Swamp: The Opportunity and Challenges of Reflexivity in Research Practice’, Qualitative Research, Vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 209–230.
Finlay L. (2002b). ‘Outing the Researcher: The Provenance, Principles and Practice of Reflexivity’, Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 12, No. 4, pp. 531–545.
Fish J. (1999). ‘Sampling Lesbians: How to Get 1000 Lesbians to Complete a Questionnaire’, Feminism and Psychology, Vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 229–238.
Fish J. (2000). ‘Sampling Issues in Lesbian and Gay Psychology: Challenges in Achieving Diversity’, Lesbian and Gay Psychology Review, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 32–38.
Gamson J., and MOON D. (2004). ‘The Sociology of Sexualities: Queer and Beyond.’ Annual Review of Sociology, Vol. 30, pp. 47–64.
Geest F. V. (2007). ‘Christian Denominational Political Action on the Subject of Homosexuality’, Review of Religious Research, Vol. 48, No. 4, pp. 401–409.
Gough B. (2003) ‘Deconstructing Reflexivity’, in Finlay L., and Gough B. (editors) Reflexivity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Greene B. (2003) ‘Beyond Heterosexism and Across the Cultural Divide - Developing an Inclusive Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Psychology: A Look to the Future’, in Garnets L., and Kimmel D. C. (editors) Psychological Perspectives on Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Experiences. New York: Columbia University Press.
Han C. (2007) ‘They Don't Want to Cruise Your Type: Gay Men of Color and the Racial Politics of Exclusion’, Social Identities, Vol. 13. No. 1, pp. 51–67.
Haney L. (2002) ‘Negotiating Power and Expertise in the Field’, in May T. (editor) Qualitative Research in Action. London: Sage.
Hash K. M., and CRAMER E. P. (2003) ‘Empowering Gay and Lesbian Caregivers and Uncovering Their Unique Experiences Through the Use of Qualitative Methods’, in Meezan W., and Martin J. I. (editors) Research Methods with Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Populations. New York: Haworth Press.
Hassett M. K. (2007) Anglican Communion in Crisis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Heaphy B., WEEKS J., and DONOVAN C. (1998). ‘“That's Like My Life”: Researching Stories of Non-heterosexual Relationships’, Sexualities, Vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 453–447.
Heckathorn D. D. (1997). ‘Respondent-driven Sampling: A New Approach to the Study of Hidden Populations’, Social Problems, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 174–199.
Heckathorn D. D. (2002). ‘Respondent-driven Sampling II: Deriving Valid Population Estimates from Chain-referral Samples of Hidden Populations’, Social Problems, Vol. 49, No. 1, pp. 11–34.
Hekma G. (2002). ‘Imams and Homosexuality: A Post-gay Debate in the Netherlands’, Sexualities, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 237–248.
Hertz R. (1997) ‘Introduction: Reflexivity and Voice’, in Hertz R. (editor) Reflexivity and Voice. London: Sage.
Hesse-Biber S. N. (2007) ‘The Practice of Feminist In-depth Interview’, in Hesse-Biber S. N., and Leavy P. L. (editors) Feminist Research Practice. London: Sage.
Hesse-Biber S. N., and LEAVY P. (2006) The Practice of Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Hunter N., JOSLIN C., and McGOWAN S. (2004) The Rights of Lesbians, May Men, Bisexuals, and Transgender People. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Irwin L. G., and JOHNSON J. (2005). ‘Interviewing Young Children: Explicating our Practices and Dilemmas’, Qualitative Health Research, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 821–831.
Kavanaugh K., and AYRES L. (1998). ‘“Not as Bad as It Could Have Been”: Assessing and Mitigating Harm During Research Interviews on Sensitive Topics’, Research in Nursing and Health, Vol. 21, pp. 91–97.
Keenan M. (Forthcoming) ‘Freedom in Chains: Religion as Enabler and Constraint in the Lives of Gay Male Anglican Clergy’, in Da A. (editor). Religion and the Individual. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Korczynski M., and OTT U. (2006). ‘The Menu in Society: Mediating Structures of Power and Enchanting Myths of Individual Sovereignty’, Sociology, Vol. 40, No. 5, pp. 911–928.
Kumashiro K. K. (2003) Restoried Selves: Autobiographies of Queer Asian/Pacific Americans. New York: Haworth Press.
Lasala M. C. (2003) ‘When Interviewing “Family”: Maximizing the Insider Advantage in the Qualitative Study of Lesbians and Gay Men’, in Meezan W., and Martin J. I. (editors) Research Methods with Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Populations. New York: Haworth Press.
Letherby G., and JACKSON S. (2003) Feminist Research in Theory and Practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Lee R. M. (1993) Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. London: Sage.
Lee R. M. (1995) Dangerous Fieldwork. London: Sage.
Liamputtong P. (2007) Researching the Vulnerable. London: Sage.
May T. (1998). ‘Reflexivity in the Age of Reconstructive Social Research’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 7–24.
Meezan W., and MARTIN J. I. (2003) Research Methods with Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Populations. New York: Haworth Press.
Naples N. A. (1997) ‘A Feminist Revisiting of the Insider/Outsider Debate: The “Outsider Phenomenon” in Rural Iowa’, in Hertz R. (editor) Reflexivity and Voice. London: Sage.
Naples N. A. (2004) ‘The outsider phenomenon’, in Hesse-Biber S. N., and Yaiser M. L. (editors) Feminist Perspectives on Social Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Onwuegbuzie A. J., and LEECH N. L. (2005). ‘On Becoming a Pragmatic Researcher: The Importance of Combining Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methodologies’, International Journal of Social Research Methodology, Vol. 8, No. 5, pp. 375–387.
Pahl R., and SPENCER L. (2004). ‘Personal Communities: Not Simply Families of “Fate” or “Choice”’, Current Sociology, Vol. 52, No. 2, pp. 199–221.
Platzer H., and JAMES T. (1997). ‘Methodological Issues Conducting Sensitive Research on Lesbian and Gay Male Experience of Nursing Care’, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 25, pp. 626–633.
Plummer K. (1995) Telling Sexual Stories. London: Routledge.
Plummer K. (2003) Intimate Citizenship: Private Decisions and Public Dialogues. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
Ramazanoglu C. (2002) Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage.
Ramazanoglu C., and HOLLAND J. (2002) Feminist Methodology: Challenges and Choices. London: Sage.
Reinharz S. (1997) ‘Who Am I? The Need for a Variety of Selves in the Field’, in Hertz R. (editor) Reflexivity and Voice. London: Sage.
Renzetti C. M., and LEE R. M. (1993) Researching Sensitive Topics. London: Sage.
Sieber J. E. (1993) ‘The Ethics and Politics of Sensitive Research’, in Renzetti C. M., and Lee R. M. (editors) Researching Sensitive Topics. London: Sage.
Siraf A., 2006, ‘On Being Homosexual and Muslim: Conflicts and Challenges’, in Ouzgan L. (editor) Islamic Masculinities. London: Zed Books.
Skeggs B. (2002) ‘Techniques for Telling the Reflexive Self’, in May T. (editor) Qualitative Research in Action. London: Sage.
Spencer L., and PAHL R. (2006) Rethinking Friendship: Hidden Solidarities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Spreen M., and ZWAAGSTRA R. (1994). ‘Personal Network Sampling, Outdegree Analysis and Multilevel Analysis: Introducing the Network Concept in Studies of Hidden Populations’, International Sociology, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 475–491.
STONEWALL. (2007) Living Together. London: Stonewall. http://www.stonewall.org.uk/documents/living_together_final_web.pdf
Sullivan G., and JACKSON P. (2001) Gay and Lesbian Asia. New York: Harrington Park Press.
Sullivan G., and LOSBERG W. (2003) ‘A Study of Sampling in Research in the Field of Lesbian and Gay Studies’, in Meezan W., and Martin J. I. (editors) Research Methods with Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender Populations. New York: Haworth Press.
Tellis A. (2002) ‘The Well of Homeliness: South Asian Queers in Britain’, in Chedgzoy K., Francis E., and Pratt M. (editors) In a Queer Place. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Tillman L. C. (2002). ‘Culturally Sensitive Research Approaches: An African-American Perspective’, Educational Researcher, Vol. 31, No. 9, pp. 3–12.
Verloo M. (2006). ‘Multiple Inequalities, Intersectionality and the European Union’, European Journal of Women's Studies, Vol. 13, No. 3: pp. 211–228.
Wasserfall R. R. (1997) ‘Reflexivity, Feminism, and Difference’, in Hertz R. (editor) Reflexivity and Voice. London: Sage.
Weeks J., HEAPHY B., and DONOVAN C. 2001. Same-sex Intimacies: Families of Choice and Other Life Experiments. London: Routledge.
Wilcox M. (2006). ‘Outlaws on In-laws?: Queer Theory, LGBT Studies, and Religious Studies’, Journal of Homosexuality, Vol. 52, No. 1/2, pp. 73–100.
Yip A.K.T. (1997) Gay Male Christian Couples. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Yip A. K. T. (2002). ‘The Persistence of Faith among Nonheterosexual Christians: Evidence for the Neosecularization Thesis of Religious Transformation’, Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, Vol. 41, No. 2, pp. 199–212.
Yip A. K. T. (2003) ‘The Self as the Basis of Religious Faith: Spirituality of Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Christians’, in Davie G., Heelas P., and Woodhead L. (editors) Predicting Religion. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Yip A. K. T. (2004a). ‘Negotiating Space with Family and Kin in identity construction: The Narratives of British Non-heterosexual Muslims’, Sociological Review, Vol. 52, No. 3, pp. 336–350.
Yip A. K. T. (2004b) ‘Embracing Allah and Sexuality?: South Asian Non-heterosexual Muslims in Britain’, in Kumar P., and Jacobsen K. (editors) South Asians in the Diaspora. Leiden: EJ Brill.
Yip A. K. T. (2005). ‘Religion and the Politics of Spirituality/Sexuality: Reflections on Researching British Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Christians and Muslims’, Fieldwork in Religion, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 271–289.
Yip A. K. T. (2007a) ‘Sexual Orientation Discrimination in Religious Communities’, in Badgett L., and Frank J. (editors) Sexual Orientation Discrimination: An International Perspective. London: Routledge.
Yip A. K. T. (2007b). ‘Changing Religion, Changing Faith: Reflections on the Transformative Strategies of Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Christians and Muslims’, Journal for Faith, Spirituality and Social Change, Vol. 1, No. 1. http://www.fsscconference.org.uk/journal/1-1.htm

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: December 11, 2017
Issue published: January 2008

Keywords

  1. Lesbian
  2. Gay
  3. Bisexual
  4. Christian
  5. Muslim
  6. Identity
  7. Methodology
  8. Sampling
  9. Hidden Population

Rights and permissions

© 2008 SAGE Publications and the British Sociological Association.

Authors

Affiliations

Andrew K. T. Yip
University of Nottingham

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Sociological Research Online.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 829

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 17 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 32

  1. Researching homosexuality in Ghana and its implication on the research...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Bisexual Citizenship in Portugal
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Être gay ou lesbienne et musulman-e dans la Tunisie post-2011 : les né...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Between two worlds: Turkish religious LGBTs relationships with islam a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Does Religion Prevent LGBTQ Acceptance? A Case Study with Queer and Tr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Contemporary Same-Sex Muslim Sexualities: Identities and Issues
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Sexual Orientation and Workplace Bullying
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Negotiating Challenges and Aspirations in a Gendered Work Environment:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. An Exploration of the Relationship Between Spirituality, Religion and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. LGBT and Ethnicity
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. LGBTI Rights in Turkey
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Men and Gay Identity in the Workplace
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Contemporary Same-Sex Muslim Sexualities: Identities and Issues
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Sexual Orientation and Workplace Bullying
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Systemic Invisibilities, Institutional Culpabilities and Multicultural...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Navigating Identities: Subtle and Public Agency of Bicultural Gay Yout...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Religion, sexuality, and (in)equality in the lives of older lesbian, g...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. ‘We see it as being heterosexualised, being put into a care home’: gen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Fitting the bill? (Dis)embodied disclosure of sexual identities in the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Challenging the opposition of LGBT identities and Muslim cultures: ini...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. ‘It’s Nothing Personal’: Anti-Homosexuality in the British Workplace
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. LGBT Activism and Reflexive Religion: A Case Study from Finland in the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. “And Yet We Are Still Excluded”: Reclaiming Multicultural Queer Histor...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. “Out” in the field. Reflecting on the dilemmas of insider status on da...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Identity Management and the Fostering of Network Ignorance: Accounts o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Erasure, Exclusion by Inclusion, and the Absence of Intersectionality:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Embodying Gender, Age, Ethnicity and Power in ‘the Field’: Reflections...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Doing Pakistani Ethnicity the Female Way: Issues of Identity, Trust an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Exploring how gay men manage their social identities in the workplace
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Creating a Sexual Self in Heteronormative Space: Integrations and Impe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Geographical contributions to understanding contemporary Islam: curren...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. “Which Sexuality? Which Service?”: Bisexual Young People's Experiences...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

BSA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

BSA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text