Skip main navigation
Close Drawer MenuOpen Drawer Menu
Articles

How Applying Instrumental Stakeholder Theory Can Provide Sustainable Competitive Advantage

    Published Online:3 Jul 2018https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0111

    Abstract

    Instrumental stakeholder theory considers the performance consequences for firms of highly ethical relationships with stakeholders, characterized by high levels of trust, cooperation, and information sharing. While research suggests performance benefits, an obvious question remains: If instrumental stakeholder theory–based stakeholder treatment is so valuable, why isn’t it the dominant mode of relating to stakeholders? We argue that the existing instrumental stakeholder theory literature has three shortcomings that limit its ability to explain variance in performance. (1) Little theory exists around how instrumental stakeholder theory–based stakeholder management could provide sustainable competitive advantage. (2) The literature has largely neglected the potential downsides (i.e., costs) associated with pursuing these sorts of stakeholder relationships. (3) There is a paucity of theory on the contexts in which the incremental benefits of instrumental stakeholder theory–based stakeholder relationships are most likely to exceed the costs. As our primary contribution, we develop a theoretical path from a communal sharing relational ethics strategy—characterized by an intention to rely on relational contracts, joint wealth creation, high levels of mutual trust and cooperation, and communal sharing of property—to a close relationship capability, which we argue is valuable, rare, and difficult to imitate and, thus, a potential source of sustainable competitive advantage. We also consider the potential costs of achieving this capability and identify contexts in which the resulting relationships are likely to have the greatest net value.

    REFERENCES

    • Acedo F. J., Barroso C., & Galan J. L. 2006. The resource-based theory: Dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal, 27: 621–636. Google Scholar
    • Aguinis H., Joo H., & Gottfredson R. K. 2013. What monetary rewards can and cannot do: How to show employees the money. Business Horizons, 56(2): 241–249. Google Scholar
    • Argote L. 1999. Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar
    • Au W. T., & Kwong J. Y. Y. 2004. Measurements and effects of social value orientation in social dilemmas: A review. In R. Suleiman, D. V. Budescu, I. Fischer, & D. M. Messick (Eds.), Contemporary research in social dilemmas: 71–98. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Autio E., Sapienza H. J., & Almeida J. G. 2000. Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 909–924.Link , Google Scholar
    • Baker G., Gibbons R., & Murphy K. J. 2002. Relational contracts and the theory of the firm. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117: 39–84. Google Scholar
    • Baldwin M. W. 1992. Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112: 461–484. Google Scholar
    • Barki H., & Pinsonneault A. 2005. A model of organizational integration, implementation effort, and performance. Organization Science, 16: 165–179. Google Scholar
    • Barnard C. I. 1938. The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Barney J. B. 1991. Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–118. Google Scholar
    • Barney J. B. 2011. Purchasing, supply chain management and sustained competitive advantage: The relevance of resource-based theory. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 48(2): 3–6. Google Scholar
    • Barney J. B., & Clark D. N. 2007. Resource-based theory: Creating and sustaining competitive advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Barney J. B., & Hansen M. H. 1994. Trustworthiness as a source of competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 15(Special Issue 1): 175–190. Google Scholar
    • Barney J. B., & Wright P. M. 1998. On becoming a strategic partner: The role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37: 31–46. Google Scholar
    • Bendheim C. L., Waddock S. A., & Graves S. B. 1998. Determining best practice in corporate-stakeholder relations using data envelopment analysis: An industry-level study. Business & Society, 37: 306–338. Google Scholar
    • Bosse D. A., & Coughlan R. 2016. Stakeholder relationship bonds. Journal of Management Studies, 53: 1197–1222. Google Scholar
    • Brickson S. L. 2007. Organizational identity orientation: The genesis of the role of the firm and distinct forms of social value. Academy of Management Review, 32: 864–888.Link , Google Scholar
    • Bridoux F., & Stoelhorst J. W. 2014. Microfoundations for stakeholder theory: Managing stakeholders with heterogeneous motives. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 107–125. Google Scholar
    • Bridoux F., & Stoelhorst J. W. 2016. Stakeholder relationships and social welfare: A behavioral theory of contributions to joint value creation. Academy of Management Review, 41: 229–251.Link , Google Scholar
    • Browning L. D., Beyer J. M., & Shetler J. C. 1995. Building cooperation in a competitive industry: SEMATECH and the semiconductor industry. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 113–151.Link , Google Scholar
    • Chatman J. A., & Barsade S. G. 1995. Personality, organizational culture and cooperation: Evidence from a business simulation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40: 423–443. Google Scholar
    • Chen M.-J. 1996. Competitor analysis and interfirm rivalry: Toward a theoretical integration. Academy of Management Review, 21: 100–134.Link , Google Scholar
    • Choi J., & Wang H. 2009. Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal, 30: 895–907. Google Scholar
    • Clement R. W. 2006. Just how unethical is American business? Business Horizons, 49: 313–327. Google Scholar
    • Coff R. W. 1999. When competitive advantage doesn’t lead to performance: The resource-based view and stakeholder bargaining power. Organization Science, 10: 119–133. Google Scholar
    • Cohen W. M., & Levinthal D. A. 1990. Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128–152. Google Scholar
    • Cooper M. C., & Gardner J. T. 1993. Building good business relationships: More than just partnering or strategic alliances? International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, 23(6): 14–26. Google Scholar
    • Cording M., Harrison J. S., Hoskisson R. E., & Jonsen K. 2014. Walking the talk: A multistakeholder exploration of organizational authenticity, employee productivity and post-merger performance. Academy of Management Perspectives, 28(1): 38–56.Link , Google Scholar
    • de Luque D., Washburn N. T., Waldman D. A., & House R. J. 2008. Unrequited profit: How stakeholder and economic values relate to subordinates’ perceptions of leadership and firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53: 626–654. Google Scholar
    • Dess G. G., & Beard D. W. 1984. Dimensions of organizational task environments. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29: 52–73. Google Scholar
    • Dicken P. 2011. Global shift: Mapping the changing contours of the world economy (6th ed.). New York: Guilford Press. Google Scholar
    • Donaldson T., & Preston L. E. 1995. The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20: 65–91.Link , Google Scholar
    • Dosi G., Malerba F., Ramello G. B., & Silva F. 2006. Information, appropriability, and the generation of innovative knowledge four decades after Arrow and Nelson: An introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15: 891–901. Google Scholar
    • Doz Y. L. 1996. The evolution of cooperation in strategic alliances: Initial conditions or learning processes? Strategic Management Journal, 17(Special Issue 1): 55–83. Google Scholar
    • Dyer J. H. 1997. Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value. Strategic Management Journal, 18: 535–556. Google Scholar
    • Dyer J. H., & Singh H. 1998. The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23: 660–679.Link , Google Scholar
    • Fehr E., & Schmidt K. M. 2006. The economics of fairness, reciprocity and altruism—Experimental evidence and new theories. In S.-C. KolmJ. M. Ythier (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of giving, altruism and reciprocity, vol. 1: 615–691. Amsterdam: Elsevier North Holland. Google Scholar
    • Ferraro F., Pfeffer J., & Sutton R. I. 2005. Economic language and assumptions: How theories can become self-fulfilling. Academy of Management Review, 30: 8–24.Link , Google Scholar
    • Fiske A. P. 1992. Four elementary forms of sociality: Framework for a unified theory of social relations. Psychological Review, 99: 689–723. Google Scholar
    • Freeman R. E. 1984. Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman. Google Scholar
    • Freeman R. E., Harrison J. S., Wicks A. C., Parmar B., & de Colle S. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
    • Friedman M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine, September 13: 17. Google Scholar
    • Garcia-Castro R., & Francoeur C. 2016. When more is not better: Complementarities, costs and contingencies in stakeholder management. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 406–424. Google Scholar
    • Ghoshal S. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 4: 75–91.Link , Google Scholar
    • Gibbons R., & Henderson R. 2012. Relational contracts and organizational capabilities. Organization Science, 23: 1350–1364. Google Scholar
    • Greve H. R., Palmer D., & Pozner J.-E. 2010. Organizations gone wild: The causes, processes, and consequences of organizational misconduct. Academy of Management Annals, 4: 53–107.Link , Google Scholar
    • Harris J. D., & Freeman R. E. 2008. The impossibility of the separation thesis: A response to Joakim Sandberg. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18: 541–548. Google Scholar
    • Harrison J. S., & Bosse D. A. 2013. How much is too much? The limits to generous treatment of stakeholders. Business Horizons, 56: 313–322. Google Scholar
    • Harrison J. S., Bosse D. A., & Phillips R. A. 2010. Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 31: 58–74. Google Scholar
    • Harrison J. S., & Thompson S. M. 2015. Strategic management of healthcare organizations: A stakeholder management approach. New York: Business Expert Press. Google Scholar
    • Harrison J. S., & Wicks A. C. 2013. Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23: 97–124. Google Scholar
    • Haslam N., & Fiske A. P. 1999. Relational models theory: A confirmatory factor analysis. Personal Relationships, 6: 241–250. Google Scholar
    • Haslam N., Reichert T., & Fiske A. P. 2002. Aberrant social relations in the personality disorders. Psychology and Psychotherapy: Theory, Research and Practice, 75: 19–31. Google Scholar
    • Hayibor S. 2017. Is fair treatment enough? Augmenting the fairness-based perspective on stakeholder behaviour. Journal of Business Ethics, 140: 43–64. Google Scholar
    • Hendry J. 2001. Economic contract versus social relationships as a foundation for normative stakeholder theory. Business Ethics: A European Review, 10: 223–232. Google Scholar
    • Hendry J. 2004. Between enterprise and ethics: Business and management in a bimoral society. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Henisz W. J., Dorobantu S., & Nartey L. J. 2014. Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement. Strategic Management Journal, 35: 1727–1748. Google Scholar
    • Hinde R. A. 1997. Relationships: A dialectical perspective. Hove, UK: Psychology Press. Google Scholar
    • Hosmer L. T. 1994. Why be moral? A different rationale for managers. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4: 191–204. Google Scholar
    • Jones T. M. 1995. Instrumental stakeholder theory: A synthesis of ethics and economics. Academy of Management Review, 20: 404–437.Link , Google Scholar
    • Jones T. M. 2011. The nature of firm-stakeholder relationships: Realizing the potential of an underappreciated contribution of Freeman’s 25-year-old classic. In R. Phillips (Ed.), Stakeholder theory: Impact and prospects: 54–75. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
    • Jones T. M., Donaldson T., Freeman R. E., Harrison J. S., Leana C. R., Mahoney J. T., & Pearce J. L. 2016. Management theory and social welfare: Contributions and challenges. Academy of Management Review, 41: 216–228.Link , Google Scholar
    • Jones T. M., & Felps W. 2013a. Shareholder wealth maximization and social welfare: A utilitarian critique. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23: 207–238. Google Scholar
    • Jones T. M., & Felps W. 2013b. Stakeholder happiness enhancement: A neo-utilitarian objective for the modern corporation. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23: 349–379. Google Scholar
    • Jones T. M., Felps W., & Bigley G. A. 2007. Ethical theory and stakeholder-related decisions: The role of stakeholder culture. Academy of Management Review, 32: 137–155.Link , Google Scholar
    • Jones T. M., & Wicks A. C. 1999. Convergent stakeholder theory. Academy of Management Review, 24: 206–222.Link , Google Scholar
    • Joshi A. W., & Campbell A. J. 2003. Effect of environmental dynamism on relational governance in manufacturer-supplier relationships: A contingency framework and an empirical test. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31: 176–188. Google Scholar
    • Kessler J. B., & Leider S. 2011. Norms and contracting. Management Science, 58: 62–77. Google Scholar
    • Larson A. 1992. Network dyads in entrepreneurial settings: A study of the governance of exchange relationships. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37: 76–104. Google Scholar
    • Lewicki R. J., & Bunker B. B. 1995. Trust in relationships: A model of trust development and decline. In B. B. Bunker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation and justice: A tribute volume to Morton Deutsch: 133–173. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar
    • Litz R. 1996. A resource-based view of the socially responsible firm: Stakeholder interdependence, ethical awareness, and issue responsiveness as strategic assets. Journal of Business Ethics, 15: 1355–1363. Google Scholar
    • MacNeil I. R. 1974. The many futures of contracts. Southern California Law Review, 47: 691–816. Google Scholar
    • Manroop L., Singh P., & Ezzedeen S. 2014. Human resource systems and ethical climates: A resource-based perspective. Human Resource Management, 53: 795–816. Google Scholar
    • Mayer D. M. 2014. A review of the literature on ethical climate and culture. In B. Schneider & K. M. Barbera (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of organizational climate and culture: 451–472. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Mayer D. M., Kuenzi M., Greenbaum R., Bardes M., & Salvador R. 2009. How low does ethical leadership flow? Test of a trickle-down model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108: 1–13. Google Scholar
    • Miller D. T. 1999. The norm of self-interest. American Psychologist, 54: 1053–1060. Google Scholar
    • Mills J., & Clark M. S. 1984. Exchange and communal relationships. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 3: 121–144. Google Scholar
    • Mintzberg H., Simons R., & Basu K. 2002. Beyond selfishness. MIT Sloan Management Review, 44(1): 67–74. Google Scholar
    • MSCI ESG Research . 2011. MSCI ESG stats: User guide and ESG ratings definition. New York: MSCI Inc. Google Scholar
    • Nag R., Hambrick D. C., & Chen M.-J. 2007. What is strategic management, really? Inductive derivation of a consensus definition of the field. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 935–955. Google Scholar
    • Nelson R. R., & Winter S. G. 1982. An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Google Scholar
    • Newbert S. L. 2007. Empirical research on the resource-based view of the firm: An assessment and suggestions for future research. Strategic Management Journal, 28: 121–146. Google Scholar
    • Nishiguchi T. 1994. Strategic industrial sourcing: The Japanese advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Ouchi W. G., & Jaeger A. M. 1978. Type Z organization: Stability in the midst of mobility. Academy of Management Review, 3: 305–314.Link , Google Scholar
    • Peteraf M. A., & Barney J. B. 2003. Unraveling the resource-based tangle. Managerial and Decision Economics, 24: 309–323. Google Scholar
    • Phillips R. A., Berman S. L., Elms H., & Johnson-Cramer M. E. 2010. Strategy, stakeholders and managerial discretion. Strategic Organization, 8: 176–183. Google Scholar
    • Podolny J. M. 2009. The buck stops (and starts) at business school. Harvard Business Review, 87(6): 62–67. Google Scholar
    • Powell W. W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 12: 295–336. Google Scholar
    • Powell W. W., & Snellman K. 2004. The knowledge economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 30: 199–220. Google Scholar
    • Reis H. T., Collins W. A., & Berscheid E. 2000. The relationship context of human behavior and development. Psychological Bulletin, 126: 844–872. Google Scholar
    • Schultz M., Hatch M. J., & Larsen M. 2000. The expressive organization: Linking identity, reputation, and the corporate brand. London: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Scott R. E. 2003. A theory of self-enforcing indefinite agreements. Columbia Law Review, 103: 1641–1699. Google Scholar
    • Sisodia R., Wolfe D. B., & Sheth J. 2007. Firms of endearment: How world-class companies profit from passion and purpose. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Wharton School Publishing. Google Scholar
    • Sluss D. M., & Ashforth B. E. 2008. How relational and organizational identification converge: Processes and conditions. Organization Science, 19: 807–823. Google Scholar
    • Sluss D. M., van Dick R., & Thompson B. S. 2011. Role theory in organizations: A relational perspective. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology. Volume 1: Building and developing the organization: 505–534. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar
    • Stout L. A. 2012. The shareholder value myth: How putting shareholders first harms investors, corporations, and the public. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler. Google Scholar
    • Su H.-Y. 2014. Business ethics and the development of intellectual capital. Journal of Business Ethics, 119: 87–98. Google Scholar
    • Sullivan B. N., Haunschild P., & Page K. 2007. Organizations non gratae? The impact of unethical corporate acts on interorganizational networks. Organization Science, 18: 55–70. Google Scholar
    • Tantalo C., & Priem R. L. 2016. Value creation through stakeholder synergy. Strategic Management Journal, 37: 314–329. Google Scholar
    • Thompson J. D. 1967. Organizations in action. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
    • Turban D. B., & Greening D. W. 1997. Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40: 658–672.Link , Google Scholar
    • Uzzi B. 1997. Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42: 35–67. Google Scholar
    • Valentine S., Godkin L., Fleischman G. M., Kidwell R. E., & Page K. 2011. Corporate ethical values and altruism: The mediating role of career satisfaction. Journal of Business Ethics, 101: 509–523. Google Scholar
    • von Hippel E. 1988. The sources of innovation. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
    • Wagner J. A. 1995. Studies of individualism-collectivism: Effects on cooperation in groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38: 152–173.Link , Google Scholar
    • Zheng Q., Luo Y., & Wang S. L. 2014. Moral degradation, business ethics, and corporate social responsibility in a transitional economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 120: 405–421. Google Scholar
    Academy of Management
      Academy of Management
      100 Summit Lake Drive, Suite 110
      Valhalla, NY 10595, USA
      Phone: +1 (914) 326-1800
      Fax: +1 (914) 326-1900
    © 2024 Academy of Management
    Powered by Atypon® Literatum