Skip to main content
Log in

A study of inter- and intrasubject variability in seven-day weighed dietary intakes with particular emphasis on trace elements

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Biological Trace Element Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study of inter- and intrasubject variance of trace element (TE) dietary intake data, 14 female university students recorded weighed, self-selected food intakes for seven consecutive days, starting on a randomly selected day of the week. Daily intakes of energy, dietary fiber, macronutrients, 7 vitamins, and Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn, and Se were calculated using food composition tables and literature values. Analysis of variance showed a significant weekend effect for energy and TE intakes that was reduced when data were expressed on the basis of nutrient densities. No day of the working week or training effect was noted for energy or any nutrient. The ratios of the inter- to intrasubject coefficient of variation for all the nutrients were surprisingly constant. However, the overall coefficients of variation—Fe, 36.5%; Zn, 45.7%; Cu, 43.7%; Mn, 58.2%, and Se, 52.7%—were markedly lower than for vitamin A (109.0%), Vitamin D (117.1%), and linoleic acid (82.2%), but slightly higher than those for energy (27.2%) and carbohydrate (30.1%). The widespread distribution of TE in the diets results in comparable reliability for dietary studies of TE and macronutrients. The 95% confidence intervals for mean individual TE intakes ranged from 25% (Zn) to 40% (Se). These relatively large uncertainties make it essential that any assessment of the significance of correlations between dietary TE intakes and biochemical indices takes into account the intra-individual variation associated with both variables.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. G. R. Kerr, E. S. Lee, M. M. Lam, R. J. Lorimor, E. Randall, R. N. Forthofer, M. A. Davis, and S. M. Magnetti,Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 35, 294 (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. C. Jansen and I. Harrill,Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 30, 1414 (1977).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. P. J. Garry, J. S. Goodwin, and W. C. Hunt,Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 36, 902 (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Health and Welfare Canada. Condensed Canadian Nutrient File, Health and Welfare Canada, 1984.

  5. R. S. Gibson and C. A. Scythes,Br. J. Nutr. 48, 241 (1982).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. G. H. Beaton, J. Milner, P. Corey, V. McGuire, M. Cousins, E. Steward, M. de Ramos, D. Hewitt, P. V. Grambsch, N. Kassim, and J. A. Little,Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 32, 2546 (1979).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. K. S. Todd, M. Hudes, and D. H. Calloway,Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 37, 139 (1983).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. F. W. Chalmers, M. M. Clayton, L. O. Gates, R. E. Tucker, A. W. Wertz, C. M. Young, and W. D. Foster,J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 28, 711 (1952).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. J. H. Hankin, W. E. Reynolds, and S. Margen,Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 20, 935 (1967).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. S. T. Jeor, H. A. Guthrie, and M. B. Jones,J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 83, 155 (1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. J. Acheson, I. T. Campbell, O. G. Edholm, D. S. Miller, and M. J. Stock,Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 33, 1147 (1980).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. K. Liu, J. Stamler, A. Dyer, J. McKeever, and P. McKeever,J. Chronic Dis. 31, 399 (1978).

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. D. D. Schnakenberg, T. M. Hill, M. J. Kretsch, and B. S. Morris, in Assessing Changing Food Consumption Patterns, National Research Council, Committee on Food Consumption Patterns, Food and Nutrition Board, Washington, DC, National Academy Press, 1981, pp. 180–197.

    Google Scholar 

  14. R. B. Reed and B. S. Burke,Am. J. Pub. Health 44, 1015 (1954).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. F. M. Cellier and M. Hankin,Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 13, 55 (1963).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Rush and A. R. Kristal,Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 35, 1259 (1982).

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gibson, R.S., Gibson, I.L. & Kitching, J. A study of inter- and intrasubject variability in seven-day weighed dietary intakes with particular emphasis on trace elements. Biol Trace Elem Res 8, 79–91 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02917462

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02917462

Index Entries

Navigation