scholar.google.com › citations
It was observed that the self-promoted articles received more citations than those in the other two sets. The articles that fortuitously appeared near the top, however, also appear to receive more citations than had they appeared in a lower position, indicating as well some visibility bias.
Jul 27, 2009
Jul 27, 2009 · Abstract: arXiv.org mediates contact with the literature for entire scholarly communities, both through provision of archival access and ...
Positional Effects on Citation and Readership in arXiv. Asif-ul Haque and Paul Ginsparg. Dept of Information Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853. E ...
People also ask
What is the citation style for arXiv?
Do citations from arXiv count?
Does the arXiv lead to higher citations and reduced publisher downloads for mathematics articles?
What is arXiv used for?
A surprising correlation between article position in initial announcements, ordered by submission time, and later citation impact is confirmed and a variety ...
Jul 22, 2009 · We confirm and extend a surprising correlation between article position in these initial announcements and later citation impact, due primarily ...
Oct 13, 2010 · Abstract:We continue investigation of the effect of position in announcements of newly received articles, a single day artifact, ...
Astrophysics articles announced in position 1, for example, overall received a median number of citations 83% higher, while those there accidentally had a 44% ...
Jul 29, 2009 · List position matters when it comes to readership and citations. That's the result of an analysis of articles deposited into the arXiv by ...
Here we consider a “reverse-visibility” effect for positions near the ends of announcements, and on a “procrastination” effect associated with submissions made ...
Here we consider a “reverse‐visibility” effect for positions near the ends of announcements, and on a “procrastination” effect associated with submissions made ...