Summary
Fifty random clones (350–2300 bp), derived from sheared, nuclear DNA, were studied via Southern analysis in order to make deductions about the organization and evolution of the tomato genome. Thirty-four of the clones were mapped genetically and determined to represent points on 11 of the 12 tomato chromosomes. Under moderate stringency conditions (≤80% homology required) 44% of the clones were classified as single copy. Under higher stringency, the majority of the clones (78%) behaved as single copy. Most of the remaining clones belonged to multicopy families containing 2–20 copies, while a few contained moderately or highly repeated sequences (10% at moderate stringency, 4% at high stringency). Divergence rates of sequences homologous to the 50 random genomic clones were compared with those corresponding to 20 previously described cDNA (coding sequence) clones. Rates were measured by probing each clone (random genomics and cDNAs) onto filters containing DNA from various species from the family Solanaceae (including potato, Datura, petunia and tobacco) as well as one species (watermelon) from another plant family, Cucurbitaceae. Under moderate stringency conditions, the majority of the random clones (single copy and repetitive) failed to detect homologous sequences in the more distantly related species, whereas approximately 90% of the 20 coding sequences analyzed could still be detected in all solanaceous species. The most highly repeated sequences appear to be the fastest evolving and homologous copies could be detected only in species most closely related to tomato. Dispersion of repetitive sequences, as opposed to tandem clustering, appears to be the rule for the tomato genome. None of the repetitive sequences discovered by this random sampling of the genome were tandemly arranged — a finding consistent with the notion that the tomato genome contains only a small fraction of satellite DNA. This study, along with a companion paper (Ganal et al. 1988), provides the first general sketch of the tomato genome at the molecular level and indicates that it is comprised largely of single copy sequences and these sequences, together with repetitive sequences are evolving at a rate faster than the coding portion of the genome. The small genome and paucity of highly repetitive DNA are favourable attributes with respect to the possibilities of conducting chromosome walking experiments in tomato and the fact that coding regions are well conserved among solanaceous species may be useful for distinguishing clones that contain coding regions from those that do not.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angerer RC, Davidson ED, Britten RJ (1976) Single copy DNA and structural gene sequence relationships among four sea urchin species. Chromosoma 56:213–226
Bedbrook JR, Jones J, O'Dell M, Thompson RD, Flavell RB (1980) A molecular description of telomeric heterochromatin in Secale species. Cell 19:545–560
Beltz G, Jacobs K, Eickbush T, Cherbas P, Kafatos F (1983) Isolation of multigene families and determination of homologies by filter hybridization methods. Methods Enzymol 100:266–285
Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986a) Genetics of actin-related sequences in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 72:314–321
Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986b) Majority of random cDNA clones correspond to single loci in the tomato genome. Mol Gen Genet 203:8–14
Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986c) Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics 112:887–898
Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986d) Methods for detection of single or low copy sequences in tomato on Southern blots. Plant Mol Biol Rep 4:37–41
D'Arcy WG (1976) The classification of the Solanaceae. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Skelding AD (eds) The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press, London, pp 3–47
Dover G (1982) Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature 284:111–117
Flavell RB (1980) The molecular characterization and organization of plant chromsomal DNA sequences. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 31:569–596
Flavell RB (1986) Repetitive DNA and chromosome evolution in plants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol] 312:227–242
Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DF, Firoozabady E (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049–1051
Goldberg RB, Hoschek G, Kamalay JC (1978) Sequence complexity of nuclear and polysomal RNA in leaves of the tobacco plant. Cell 14:123–131
Kleiman L, Birnie GD, Young BD, Paul J (1977) Comparison of the base-sequence complexities of polysomal and nuclear RNAs in growing Friend erythroleukemia cells. Biochemistry 16:1218–1223
Leutwiler LS, Hough-Evans BR, Meyerowitz EM (1984) The DNA of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 194:15–23
Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York
McCormick S, Niedermeyer J, Fry J, Barnason A, Horsch R, Fraley R (1986) Leaf disc transformation of cultivated tomato L. esculentum using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Reports 5:81–84
Monaco AP, Neve RL, Colletti-Feener C, Bertelson CJ, Kurnit DM, Kunkel LM (1986) Isolation of candidate cDNA's for portions of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene. Nature 323:646–650
Murray MG, Cuellar RE, Thompson WF (1978) DNA sequence organization in the pea genome. Biochemistry 17:5781–5790
Murray MG, Peters DL, Thompson WF (1981) Ancient repeated sequences in pea and mung bean genomes and implications for genome evolution. J Mol Evol 17:31–42
Orkin SH (1986) Reverse genetics and human disease. Cell 47:845–850
Pruitt RE, Meyerowitz EM (1986) Characterization of the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Mol Biol 187:169–183
Rick CM (1971) Some cytogenetic features of the genome in diploid plant species. Stadler Symposia 1/2: 153–174
Rick CM (1975) The tomato. In: King RC (ed) Handbook of genetics, vol 3. Plenum Press, New York, pp 247–280
Rick CM, DeVerna JW, Chetelat RT, Stevens MA (1986) Meiosis in sesquidiploid hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:3580–3583
Robash M, Campo MS, Gummerson KS (1975) Conservation of cytoplasmic poly(A)-containing RNA in mouse and rat. Nature 258:682–686
Scheller RM, Thomas RL, Lee AS, Klein WH, Niles WD, Britten RJ, Davidson EH (1977) Clones of individual repetitive sequences from sea urchin DNA constructed with synthetic EcoRI sites. Science 196:197–200
Schweizer G, Ganal M, Ninnemann H, Hemleben V (1988) Species-specific DNA sequences for identification of somatic hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum acaule. Theor Appl Genet 75:679–684
Tanksley SD (1987) Organization of the nuclear genome in tomato and related diploid species. Am Nat 130:s46-s56
Tanksley SD, Miller J, Paterson A, Bernatzky R (1987) Molecular mapping of plant chromosomes. Stadler Genetics Symp (in press)
Thompson WF, Murray MG (1981) The nuclear genome: structure and function. In: Stumpf PK, Conn EE (eds) The biochemistry of plants. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–81
Wilimzig M (1985) LiCl-boiling method for plasmid mini-preps. Trends Genet 1:158
Young ND, Zamir D, Ganal MW, Tanksley SD (1988) Use of isogenic lines and simultaneous probing to identify DNA markers tightly linked to the Tm-2a gene in tomato. Genetics (in press)
Zabel P, Meyers D, Stolpe O van de, Zaal B van de, Ramanna MS, Koorneef M, Krens F, Hille J (1985) Towards the construction of artificial chromosomes in tomato. In: Vloten-Doting L van, Groot GSP, Hall TC (eds) Molecular form and function of the plant genome. Plenum Press, New York, pp 609–629
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Communicated by R.B. Goldberg
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zamir, D., Tanksley, S.D. Tomato genome is comprised largely of fast-evolving, low copy-number sequences. Mol Gen Genet 213, 254–261 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00339589
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00339589