Skip to main content
Log in

Tomato genome is comprised largely of fast-evolving, low copy-number sequences

  • Published:
Molecular and General Genetics MGG Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Fifty random clones (350–2300 bp), derived from sheared, nuclear DNA, were studied via Southern analysis in order to make deductions about the organization and evolution of the tomato genome. Thirty-four of the clones were mapped genetically and determined to represent points on 11 of the 12 tomato chromosomes. Under moderate stringency conditions (≤80% homology required) 44% of the clones were classified as single copy. Under higher stringency, the majority of the clones (78%) behaved as single copy. Most of the remaining clones belonged to multicopy families containing 2–20 copies, while a few contained moderately or highly repeated sequences (10% at moderate stringency, 4% at high stringency). Divergence rates of sequences homologous to the 50 random genomic clones were compared with those corresponding to 20 previously described cDNA (coding sequence) clones. Rates were measured by probing each clone (random genomics and cDNAs) onto filters containing DNA from various species from the family Solanaceae (including potato, Datura, petunia and tobacco) as well as one species (watermelon) from another plant family, Cucurbitaceae. Under moderate stringency conditions, the majority of the random clones (single copy and repetitive) failed to detect homologous sequences in the more distantly related species, whereas approximately 90% of the 20 coding sequences analyzed could still be detected in all solanaceous species. The most highly repeated sequences appear to be the fastest evolving and homologous copies could be detected only in species most closely related to tomato. Dispersion of repetitive sequences, as opposed to tandem clustering, appears to be the rule for the tomato genome. None of the repetitive sequences discovered by this random sampling of the genome were tandemly arranged — a finding consistent with the notion that the tomato genome contains only a small fraction of satellite DNA. This study, along with a companion paper (Ganal et al. 1988), provides the first general sketch of the tomato genome at the molecular level and indicates that it is comprised largely of single copy sequences and these sequences, together with repetitive sequences are evolving at a rate faster than the coding portion of the genome. The small genome and paucity of highly repetitive DNA are favourable attributes with respect to the possibilities of conducting chromosome walking experiments in tomato and the fact that coding regions are well conserved among solanaceous species may be useful for distinguishing clones that contain coding regions from those that do not.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Angerer RC, Davidson ED, Britten RJ (1976) Single copy DNA and structural gene sequence relationships among four sea urchin species. Chromosoma 56:213–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Bedbrook JR, Jones J, O'Dell M, Thompson RD, Flavell RB (1980) A molecular description of telomeric heterochromatin in Secale species. Cell 19:545–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Beltz G, Jacobs K, Eickbush T, Cherbas P, Kafatos F (1983) Isolation of multigene families and determination of homologies by filter hybridization methods. Methods Enzymol 100:266–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986a) Genetics of actin-related sequences in tomato. Theor Appl Genet 72:314–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986b) Majority of random cDNA clones correspond to single loci in the tomato genome. Mol Gen Genet 203:8–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986c) Toward a saturated linkage map in tomato based on isozymes and random cDNA sequences. Genetics 112:887–898

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernatzky R, Tanksley SD (1986d) Methods for detection of single or low copy sequences in tomato on Southern blots. Plant Mol Biol Rep 4:37–41

    Google Scholar 

  • D'Arcy WG (1976) The classification of the Solanaceae. In: Hawkes JG, Lester RN, Skelding AD (eds) The Biology and Taxonomy of the Solanaceae. Academic Press, London, pp 3–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Dover G (1982) Molecular drive: a cohesive mode of species evolution. Nature 284:111–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell RB (1980) The molecular characterization and organization of plant chromsomal DNA sequences. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 31:569–596

    Google Scholar 

  • Flavell RB (1986) Repetitive DNA and chromosome evolution in plants. Philos Trans R Soc Lond [Biol] 312:227–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith DW, Harkins KR, Maddox JM, Ayres NM, Sharma DF, Firoozabady E (1983) Rapid flow cytometric analysis of the cell cycle in intact plant tissues. Science 220:1049–1051

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg RB, Hoschek G, Kamalay JC (1978) Sequence complexity of nuclear and polysomal RNA in leaves of the tobacco plant. Cell 14:123–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Kleiman L, Birnie GD, Young BD, Paul J (1977) Comparison of the base-sequence complexities of polysomal and nuclear RNAs in growing Friend erythroleukemia cells. Biochemistry 16:1218–1223

    Google Scholar 

  • Leutwiler LS, Hough-Evans BR, Meyerowitz EM (1984) The DNA of Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Gen Genet 194:15–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J (1982) Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • McCormick S, Niedermeyer J, Fry J, Barnason A, Horsch R, Fraley R (1986) Leaf disc transformation of cultivated tomato L. esculentum using Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Plant Cell Reports 5:81–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Monaco AP, Neve RL, Colletti-Feener C, Bertelson CJ, Kurnit DM, Kunkel LM (1986) Isolation of candidate cDNA's for portions of the Duchenne muscular dystrophy gene. Nature 323:646–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray MG, Cuellar RE, Thompson WF (1978) DNA sequence organization in the pea genome. Biochemistry 17:5781–5790

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray MG, Peters DL, Thompson WF (1981) Ancient repeated sequences in pea and mung bean genomes and implications for genome evolution. J Mol Evol 17:31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Orkin SH (1986) Reverse genetics and human disease. Cell 47:845–850

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt RE, Meyerowitz EM (1986) Characterization of the genome of Arabidopsis thaliana. J Mol Biol 187:169–183

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick CM (1971) Some cytogenetic features of the genome in diploid plant species. Stadler Symposia 1/2: 153–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick CM (1975) The tomato. In: King RC (ed) Handbook of genetics, vol 3. Plenum Press, New York, pp 247–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick CM, DeVerna JW, Chetelat RT, Stevens MA (1986) Meiosis in sesquidiploid hybrids of Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum lycopersicoides. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:3580–3583

    Google Scholar 

  • Robash M, Campo MS, Gummerson KS (1975) Conservation of cytoplasmic poly(A)-containing RNA in mouse and rat. Nature 258:682–686

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheller RM, Thomas RL, Lee AS, Klein WH, Niles WD, Britten RJ, Davidson EH (1977) Clones of individual repetitive sequences from sea urchin DNA constructed with synthetic EcoRI sites. Science 196:197–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer G, Ganal M, Ninnemann H, Hemleben V (1988) Species-specific DNA sequences for identification of somatic hybrids between Lycopersicon esculentum and Solanum acaule. Theor Appl Genet 75:679–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD (1987) Organization of the nuclear genome in tomato and related diploid species. Am Nat 130:s46-s56

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanksley SD, Miller J, Paterson A, Bernatzky R (1987) Molecular mapping of plant chromosomes. Stadler Genetics Symp (in press)

  • Thompson WF, Murray MG (1981) The nuclear genome: structure and function. In: Stumpf PK, Conn EE (eds) The biochemistry of plants. Academic Press, New York, pp 1–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilimzig M (1985) LiCl-boiling method for plasmid mini-preps. Trends Genet 1:158

    Google Scholar 

  • Young ND, Zamir D, Ganal MW, Tanksley SD (1988) Use of isogenic lines and simultaneous probing to identify DNA markers tightly linked to the Tm-2a gene in tomato. Genetics (in press)

  • Zabel P, Meyers D, Stolpe O van de, Zaal B van de, Ramanna MS, Koorneef M, Krens F, Hille J (1985) Towards the construction of artificial chromosomes in tomato. In: Vloten-Doting L van, Groot GSP, Hall TC (eds) Molecular form and function of the plant genome. Plenum Press, New York, pp 609–629

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Communicated by R.B. Goldberg

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zamir, D., Tanksley, S.D. Tomato genome is comprised largely of fast-evolving, low copy-number sequences. Mol Gen Genet 213, 254–261 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00339589

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00339589

Key words

Navigation