Academia.edu no longer supports Internet Explorer.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds to upgrade your browser.
2023, Reading Acts
In his introduction to this new volume of the Kregel Exegetical Library, Shepherd explains the justification for yet another major commentary on the book of Jeremiah. First, the base text for this commentary is the Hebrew source behind the old Greek of Jeremiah, not the Masoretic text. Shepherd states there is a growing consensus that the Hebrew behind the old Greek Jeremiah is the earlier edition. This is not a radically new idea, but basing a commentary on a reconstructed Hebrew text behind the Septuagint is unique. Shepherd argues that a single translator produced Old Greek Jeremiah (possibly Ezekiel and the Book of the Twelve). Following Joseph Ziegler's Göttingen critical edition of the Septuagint and Louis Stuhlman's 1986 monograph on the prose sections of Jeremiah, Shepherd reconstructs the "Hebrew source behind the Greek" (reproduced on pages 873-909). Throughout the commentary, he refers to the "Hebrew source behind the Greek Jeremiah" (perhaps an abbreviation could have been coined for this hypothetical source).
The Septuagint (LXX) and Masoretic Text (MT) of the book of Jeremiah demonstrate that Jeremiah’s textual history is one of extremely complexity. This fact was only exaggerated by the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls. In some ways, the discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls verified the LXX as primary, in other ways the MT, and still in other ways the scrolls hinted at a possible third version of the book. This has led many to question the current definition of the term “autograph.” Thus, this article will seek to overview the history of research concerning the LXX and MT of Jeremiah in hopes of finding a way forward through the collected minds of the past. This article will not seek to imply any definitive solutions to this problem, but only suggestions that will be inferred from the work of those who came before.
www.scholarspub.com
The Textual Differences Between Rahlfs’ and Ziegler’s Septuagint Jeremiah2016 •
Originally published online with scholarspub in 2016.
1978 •
Isaiah in Context: Studies in Honour of Arie van der Kooij on the Occasion of his Sixty-Fifth Birthday (Brill: Leiden))
OF TRANSLATION AND REVISION: FROM GREEK ISAIAH TO GREEK JEREMIAH2010 •
Textual criticism deals not only with small differences between sources, but also with large ones. One of the key areas in which this type of evidence has become known is in the book of Jeremiah, in which abundant textual data beyond MT are available in the LXX and some in Hebrew sources. Therefore, they are a welcome source for the scholarly inquiry of the book. Some scholars believe that these data illuminate not only the textual transmission of the book, but also its literary development, as they provide a glimpse into the activity that took place during the last stage of the literary growth of the book. The differences between MT, on the one hand, and the LXX and Qumran texts, on the other, seemingly represent solid facts, but scholars espouse different views on their interpretation. The LXX of Jeremiah is shorter than the corresponding MT text by onesixth or one-seventh, and thus potentially has a bearing on the exegesis of that book. In addition, the LXX reflects a different internal sequence of the OAN (Oracles against the Nations), and of their placement in the book. Further, within chapters 10 and 23, the LXX presents a different sequence. The LXX is a translation, and the translator may have shortened his parent text and changed the sequence of translation units, in which case the LXX has no bearing on a deviating Hebrew Vorlage. While these issues were disputed over the last two centuries, they are rarely debated in the twenty-first century because of evidence supporting the trustworthiness of the LXX: the translation style of the Greek Jeremiah is relatively literal, 1 and therefore large-scale shortening or shifting
Metody Ilościowe w Badaniach Ekonomicznych
FX-Linked Structured Time Deposits Versus Barrier and Standard Options: A Comparative StudySFB 619: Forum …
Literaturpreisverleihungen: ritualisierte Konsekrationspraktiken im kulturellen Feld2005 •
Revista Enfermagem Atual In Derme
Assistência De Enfermagem a Uma Paciente Surda Hospitalizada: Relato Reflexivo De Uma Experiência2015 •
2010 •
1970 •
2021 •
Egészségfejlesztés
A „füstmentes levegő törvény” hatása az akut szívinfarktus miatti kórházi felvételekre Indianapolisban és Marion megyében, Indianában2018 •
2018 •
Review of International American Studies
Campaigning Culture and the Global Cold War: The Journals of the Congress for Cultural Freedom, edited by Giles Scott-Smith and Charlotte Lerg2019 •
Social Science Research Network
Agricultural Trade Restrictiveness in the European Union and the United States2005 •
Social Science Research Network
The Role of Institutional Investors in Open-Market Share Repurchase Programs2014 •
Kemija u Industriji
Aktivnosti vezane uz rješavanje statusa kemijskih inženjera i osnivanje inženjerskih komora2015 •
Anais do XX Simpósio Brasileiro de Segurança da Informação e de Sistemas Computacionais (SBSeg 2020)
Abordagem fim-a-fim para uso de aprendizado de máquina em IDS – Caso de detecção stateless para TCP ScanClinical Case Reports
Brown adipose activation and reversible beige coloration in adipose tissue with multiple accumulations of 18F‐fluorodeoxyglucose in sporadic paraganglioma: A case report2019 •
Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry
Regulation of Contractile Proteins and Protein Translational Signaling in Disused Muscle2012 •
Journal Of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research
Comparison of Regional Circumferential Strain by Different Speckle Tracking Methods with Tagged MRI in Patients with Left Bundle Branch BlockInternational journal of health sciences
How do online learning environment stimulations affect learning involvement determinants in the setting of COVID-19?