Lost Discoveries: The Ancient Roots of Modern Science-- from the Babylonians to the Maya

Lost Discoveries: The Ancient Roots of Modern Science-- from the Babylonians to the Maya

by Dick Teresi
Lost Discoveries: The Ancient Roots of Modern Science-- from the Babylonians to the Maya

Lost Discoveries: The Ancient Roots of Modern Science-- from the Babylonians to the Maya

by Dick Teresi

eBook

$9.99 

Available on Compatible NOOK Devices and the free NOOK Apps.
WANT A NOOK?  Explore Now

Related collections and offers


Overview

*A New York Times Notable Book* Boldly challenging conventional wisdom, acclaimed science writer and Omni magazine cofounder Dick Teresi traces the origins of contemporary science back to their ancient roots in this eye-opening and landmark work.

This innovative history proves once and for all that the roots of modern science were established centuries, and in some instances millennia, before the births of Copernicus, Galileo, and Newton. In this enlightening, entertaining, and important book, Teresi describes many discoveries from all over the non-Western world—Sumeria, Babylon, Egypt, India, China, Africa, Arab nations, the Americas, and the Pacific islands—that equaled and often surpassed Greek and European learning in the fields of mathematics, astronomy, cosmology, physics, geology, chemistry, and technology.

The first extensive and authoritative multicultural history of science written for a popular audience, Lost Discoveries fills a critical void in our scientific, cultural, and intellectual history and is destined to become a classic in its field.

Product Details

ISBN-13: 9781439128602
Publisher: Simon & Schuster
Publication date: 05/11/2010
Sold by: SIMON & SCHUSTER
Format: eBook
Pages: 464
Sales rank: 302,867
File size: 2 MB

About the Author

Dick Teresi is the author or coauthor of several books about science and technology, including The God Particle. He is cofounder of Omni magazine and has written for Discover, The New York Times Magazine, and The Atlantic Monthly, and is a frequent reviewer and essayist for The New York Times Book Review. He lives in Amherst, Massachusetts.

Read an Excerpt

Chapter Three
Astronomy: Sky Watchers and More
China

Chinese astronomy resembles most other premodern sky technologies in that it was driven by divination. Yet Chinese astronomy differed from all others. It was run solely by a government bureaucracy and based on a worldview that said the ruler was "emperor under all heaven" -- a divine appointment. Yet the connection between celestial events and human fate was perhaps even more profound. The link was not just between heavenly deities and the emperor; the earth, the emperor, and the entire cosmos were bound together in one gigantic entity, a superorganism in which the five elements, or "phases" -- fire, air, wood, earth, and water -- were in constant interaction as they sought their affinities with one another.

Yet in China as elsewhere, portent astrology called for careful and regular observations of celestial events. The cosmic importance of every omen in the sky demanded that its results be noted down in detail. As a consequence, the Chinese possess the longest unbroken run of astronomical records in the world, observations of considerable importance to modern astronomers, whose research requires data about long-term celestial events.

China developed astronomy very early in its history. Evidence goes back five thousand years. The ancients wrote stars-laden texts in many forms -- on wine jugs, tortoise shells, and silk. The earliest records from archaeological sites in Qinghai Province consist of ceramic fragments on which are painted images of rayed sun disks and moon crescents. A piece of bone found to be thirty-five hundred years old contains writing showing that the Chinese already knew the length of the year to be 3651Ž4 days. There is evidence of star observation from before the twenty-first century B.C.186

The first recorded astronomical inscriptions date from the sixteenth to nineteenth centuries B.C. in the Shang kingdom of Henan Province. These artifacts are examples of an astronomical-divination system, technically called scapulimancy, a technique going back to Neolithic times. Selecting an ox or deer shoulder blade (scapula) or a tortoise shell, the diviners then dried, polished, and drilled the material with holes. They inserted a hot metal brand into one hole and examined the pattern of resulting cracks in the bone or shell. The diviner noted both the prognostication and later results on the cracked material.

The oracle bones' existence was lost to the modern world until 1899, when a scholar from Peking became ill and sent his valet to a drugshop for medicines. One ingredient in the potion the pharmacist sent him was labeled "dragon's bones." The scholar realized it was bone chips with words inscribed on them in ancient Chinese -- oracle bones.

During the following decades the bones were traced to a field near An-yang, around three hundred miles southwest of Beijing. During the 1920s and '30s, some twenty-five thousand oracle bones were excavated there, from what may have been a palace archive. At least 135,000 more pieces have been excavated since, forming a treasury of information going back to Shang times. This vast library recorded on the bone texts has enabled modern historians of astronomy to backtrack regularly occurring celestial events with computers to match sky phenomena inscribed millennia ago.

Recently, NASA astronomers used fourteenth-century B.C. oracle bones to help determine how much the earth's rotation is slowing down. Based on analysis of the tortoiseshell inscriptions, Kevin Pang and his colleagues at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory at Pasadena reported they had fixed the exact date and path of a solar eclipse seen in China in 1302 B.C. That, in turn, led them to calculate that the length of each day was 47Ž1,000 of a second shorter in 1302 B.C. than it is today.

A cache of five thousand pieces of oracle bones excavated in An-yang in 1972 yielded a series of divinations of sky events. The Chinese astronomical historian Zhang Peiyu found that six dates recorded in the inscriptions matched perfectly with a series of solar eclipses visible from the Henan area in the twelfth century B.C., half a millennium earlier than records of such events obtained from Babylonia or Egypt. Other Shang bones yielded inscriptions of lunar eclipses.

A reconstruction of another bone recording from around the same time revealed the observation of a supernova. The supernova inscription, perhaps the most ancient extant record of a nova sighting, says, in part, "On the seventh day of the month...a great new star appeared in company with Antares." The Chinese called these supernovas "guest stars." Thus the Chinese knew well what they were observing when, in June 1054 (A.D.), a star in the constellation Taurus blew. Chinese sky watchers reported it to be as bright as Venus, apparent during daylight, and visible for twenty-three days. The remnant of this explosion can be seen today and is called the Crab Nebula. (The Greeks have no record of the supernova.) Experts today have compiled detailed descriptions of supernova explosions that coincide with contemporary X-ray and radio sources.

In the Greek-influenced West, the sun and heavens were supposed to be immaculate. But Chinese astronomers saw spots on the sun. The earliest surviving record of a sunspot observation is by the astronomer Kan Te in the fourth century B.C. Kan Te assumed that these spots were eclipses that began at the center of the sun and spread outward. Although he was wrong, he recognized the spots for what they were -- solar phenomena.

The next documentation of sunspots was in 165 B.C., when it was reported the Chinese character wang appeared in the sun -- shaped like a cross with a bar across the top and bottom. It is accepted as the world's earliest precisely dated sunspot. The West's earliest reference to sunspots is Einhard's Life of Charlemagne, around A.D. 807. Joseph Needham found 112 instances of sunspots recorded in Chinese histories between 28 B.C. and A.D. 1638. In other Chinese books he found hundreds more notices, "but no one has had time or stamina to collect them into a body," comments sinologist Robert Temple. Nonetheless, the sunspot records constitute the oldest continuous series of such observations. And again, these are of great use to modern astronomers. Sunspot cycles, for instance, affect the earth's ionosphere and weather (magnetic storms are related to sunspots). Analyzing available records, Japanese astronomer Shigeru Kanda reports he has detected a 975-year sunspot cycle. If so, it may have significant implications for weather cycles.

The Chinese were also careful observers of comets. They computed the approximate orbits of about forty comet trajectories with such precision that many of their trajectories could be drawn on star charts simply from reading ancient texts. They were interested in the precise position and direction of the tail of each comet.

In the year 240 B.C., astronomers officially documented the appearance of a comet today known as Halley's. Another comet recorded in 467 B.C. is also thought to be Halley's. In the 600s A.D., they observed that comets shine by reflected light like the moon. They noted that comet tails always pointed away from the sun, suggesting this phenomenon was the result of a solar "energy." Today it's known that this cometic tail direction is caused by the force of "solar wind," the sun's radiation. It wasn't much of a stretch, says Temple, for the Chinese to formulate the idea of solar wind. It is congenial with their cosmological assumptions, Chinese literature being filled with references to the ch'i of the sun's radiation. Ch'i, translated as something like the "emanative or radiative force," comes from the sun. To Chinese astronomers it would have been obvious that the sun's ch'i was strong enough to blow the tails of comets as if in a strong wind. The Chinese conceived of space as being full of strong forces.

As a consequence of the emperor's divine connection with the cosmos, it became traditional after important changes of rulership, and always after a switch to a new dynasty, for a fresh calendar to be drawn up. This custom was well established by Han times (206 B.C. to A.D. 220) and led to some forty new calendars made up between early Han and the beginning of the Ming dynasty in 1368.

According to the theory of monarchy, the ruling dynasty remained fit to rule because of the accord the emperor maintained with the heavenly order. His special status in the order of nature allowed him to maintain a parallel order in the political realm, for the state was a microcosm. If the emperor lacked virtue or was careless in his duties, disorderly phenomena would appear in the sky as a warning of potential political disaster. Thus astronomers had to incorporate as many phenomena as possible in a "correct" calendar. The calendar, issued in the emperor's name, became part of the trappings of power that demonstrated his dynasty's right to rule, a function, writes sinologist Nathan Sivin, "not entirely different from that of economic indicators in a modern nation."

The importance of astronomical observing in this world of extreme politics, then, made secrecy absolutely necessary. Because the data could be easily manipulated, it could be dangerous in the hands of someone trying to undermine the current dynasty. It was therefore state policy that the proper place to do astronomy was the imperial court. In certain periods it was illegal to do it elsewhere. With this information virtually classified as top secret, the astronomer became a high-level administrative functionary in a country that developed the most elaborate bureaucracy in the ancient world. The databases resided in a state observatory deep within the bowels of the palace.

If not the greatest astronomical mathematicians, the Chinese were the greatest star charters before the Renaissance. Their earliest star chart goes back to at least 2000 B.C., to a carving on a cliff at Jiangjunya in Jiangsu Province. The carving contains many stars, as well as human and animal heads. There are disks indicating the sun in seasonal positions and where a number of bright stars and the moon appear over the seasons. This bright region is recognizable as the Milky Way by its position and appearance; the Milky Way displays gaps and divisions that are depicted on the carving.

China, being in the Northern Hemisphere, fixed itself on the northern circumpolar stars, both for orientation and to express its concept of divine rulership. The circumpolar stars in the higher latitudes are raised quite high in the sky as they rotate about the pole, so the fixity of the polar axis became an apt metaphor for the divine right of emperors. The pivot point about which this rotation occurs is known as the north celestial pole. The emperors were clever to adopt the stars of the north, such as Cassiopeia and Cepheus. These stars are located near the celestial pole, so that in the temperate latitudes of most of China they are visible eternally in the sky, never hidden by the horizon.

The first catalogs of star positions appear to have been drawn up by Shi Shen, Gan De, and Wu Xian, the earliest notable astronomer in China, who worked between 370 and 270 B.C., two centuries before Hipparchus. Together their lists enumerated 1,464 stars grouped into 284 constellations. (The West made bigger groups, with only 88 constellations.) In A.D. 310, during the Western Chin dynasty (A.D. 265-317), this early work was collated by the astronomer royal Qian Luozhi, who cast a bronze celestial globe with the stars on it colored in red, black, and white to distinguish the listings of the three astronomers. As early as the Han dynasty, astronomers prepared star charts. Carvings and reliefs show individual constellations or asterisms depicted as dots or small circles connected by lines to delineate the constellation itself. This ball-and-link convention did not appear in the West until the late nineteenth century.

Star maps need a means of specifying positions of heavenly bodies with reference to one another. The science of mapmaking took a leap forward in the second century B.C. when Chang Heng invented what's now called quantitative cartography. Chang, the inventor of the seismograph and a leading scientist, applied a grid system to maps so that positions, distances, and itineraries could be calculated and analyzed. Chang Heng's own works are lost, although an official history of the Han dynasty stated, "He cast a network of coordinates about heaven and earth, and reckoned on the basis of it." Copies of these maps were never made, since the information on them was too dangerous to risk its falling into the wrong hands. Meanwhile, in Europe, mapmaking had degenerated under the influence of religion, says Robert Temple, "to a point scarcely credible."

Drawing actual charts of the sky means finding a way to depict positions as if one is drawing a map. Preparing maps also involves the problem of mapping the curved surface of the celestial sphere on a flat surface, just as mapping the near-spherical surface of the earth requires the use of map projection. This is made more difficult if the sky is seen as a dome curving above one's head. In both China and the West, projection goes back a long way for mapping the earth. But for mapping the stars, Chang Heng was first, drawing up in Han times a chart that was a "Mercator" projection.

Mercator projection was "invented" in Europe by the Flemish mathematician and geographer Gerhard Kremer, a.k.a. Gerardus Mercator, and first published in 1568. But this projection system had been used by the Chinese centuries before Mercator. The projection works by means of a cylinder. If one inserts a transparent globe of the earth (or other celestial sphere) in the center of a hollow cylinder and turns on a light inside the globe, the features of the sphere's surface will be thrown, or projected, onto this cylinder, and will reflect a certain distortion. The higher up and lower down from the sphere's center, or equator, the more the features are distorted. Virtually useless for land travel, this projection has the odd property that a navigational course drawn on it will come out as a straight line, whereas with other maps such courses are arcs.

The oldest surviving projection chart depicting the whole of the visible sky is painted on paper and now resides in the British Library. Dating from about A.D. 940, it comes from Dunhuang in Gansu Province and gives a flat representation of Qian Luozhi's (the astronomer royal's) tricolored chart, working from his celestial globe. It presents the celestial globe as projected onto a surface by the cylindrical projection technique, displaying over 1,350 stars in thirteen sections. One section is a planisphere -- that is, in a kind of Mercator projection it depicts the circle of the sphere on a flat map centered on the north pole. The remaining twelve are flat maps centered on the celestial equator.

A century later, in 1094, Su Sung published further Mercator-style map projections in his book New Design for a Mechanized Armillary Sphere and Celestial Globe. One map had a straight line running across the middle as the equator and an arc above it, the ecliptic. The rectangular boxes of the lunar mansions are clearly seen, with the stars near the equator being more tightly packed together and those near the poles spread farther apart.

The evolution of Chinese instrumentation parallels that of the West. Notched jade disks and cylindrical sighting tubes date back to the fifth century B.C., and probably functioned as means of computing rudimentary celestial cycles. The Chinese used the gnomon as far back as 1500 B.C. Just as the Chinese had begun to standardize weights, measures, and other practical details in the sixth century B.C., and more extensively in the next three centuries, they standardized the gnomon. In addition to timekeeping, they used the gnomon to determine the terrestrial distance corresponding to an arc of the meridian. Such a determination of this north-south line was vital for precise calendar making, because precision calendars required measuring the latitude of those stations where the relevant observations were made. The gnomon was also significant in mapmaking and in the Chinese fascination with determining the size of the earth -- nearly a millennium before Eratosthenes!

Between A.D. 721 and 725, under the auspices of the Buddhist astronomer and mathematician Yi Xing and the Chinese astronomer royal Nangong Yue, Chinese scholars set out to do this. To measure the size of the earth, they selected nine locations covering the prodigious distance of more than 3,500 kilometers (2,175 miles) on a nearly north-south axis. They made simultaneous measurements of shadows at the summer and winter solstices at all nine stations. The main outcome of this feat: they determined that the distance on earth corresponding to 1 degree latitude was 155 kilometers (97 miles). This is larger than today's value of 111 kilometers (69 miles), but far more accurate than previous attempts. Indeed, they found that the variation on shadow length with changed latitude was four times the value previously thought. There was no piece of research like it carried out anywhere else during the Middle Ages. In making his tabulations, Yi Xing used "tangent tables." This was thought to have been a Muslim invention of the ninth century, but it turns out that the Chinese discovered the use of tangents and tabulated them at least one hundred years earlier.

The Muslim big-observatory concept came to China in the thirteenth century, and during the Mongol dynasty, in 1276, the astronomer Guo Shoujing built a giant gnomon called Tower of the Winds. It was an all-purpose observatory with the tower itself serving as a gnomon. A horizontal rod in an aperture at roof level -- about forty feet above the ground -- cast a shadow on the long low wall extending northward below. A chamber at the top was designed for watching stars, while the inner rooms of the tower housed a water-driven clock and an armillary sphere.

Modern astronomical observatories derive not from the European tradition but from the Chinese. Modern telescopes are oriented and mounted in the equatorial system, which in China goes back at least to 2400 B.C. Equatorial mounting takes the equator as the horizontal circle around the side of the instrument, and the pole as the top point. Europeans originally followed the Greek-Indian-Muslim tradition in which the two circles that were important were the horizontal and the ecliptic, the circle described by the sun's motion in the sky that is in the same plane as the earth's orbit around the sun. This tradition more or less ignored the equator. China, meanwhile, largely ignored the horizon and the ecliptic. In the seventeenth century, European astronomers came to realize that the Chinese equatorial system was more convenient and showed greater promise. It was adopted by Tycho Brahe and his successors and remains the basis of astronomy today.

The Chinese, furthermore, had the skills to build the precision observational instruments to display this system. Having invented cast iron, they built large astronomical instruments of bronze and iron that took the form of armillary spheres -- huge metal rings precisely graduated with the degrees of a circle.

Different rings representing different sky circles were joined together at the two points where they crossed each other. Always with an emphasis on the meridians, one ring would represent the equator, another the sky-circle meridian passing directly overhead and through the celestial pole. These devices had sighting tubes through which astronomers could observe specific stars. The astronomer could move the sighting tube along the equator ring until he found a star. Then he counted the number of degrees marked on that ring back to the meridian ring, which stood up from it at 90 degrees. As soon as he counted the degrees, he could detect the exact position of the star along the equator and tell which sky segment it was in. These instruments aided astronomers in drawing star maps with great precision.

The earliest known instrument of this type was built in 104 B.C., and the instrumentation became increasingly complex until the thirteenth century. Ken Shou-Ch'ang introduced the first permanently mounted equatorial armillary ring in 52 B.C. and in A.D. 84 Fu An and Chia Kmuei added a second ring to show the ecliptic. Chang Heng, the mapmaker, added a ring for the meridian in A.D. 125, as well as one for the horizon. But Chang Heng was not yet satisfied. He made an armillary sphere that rotated by water pressure in about A.D. 132. He used a wheel powered by a constant pressure head of water in a water clock to rotate the instrument slowly. This instrument was a tremendous tool for demonstrating and computing the movements of heavenly bodies.

An advanced version of the armillary sphere is the torquetum, first invented by Arabs sometime between A.D. 1000 and 1200. (Some credit al-Tusi for the invention.) Here all the various rings are no longer nested together in a single sphere but are mounted at various different parts of a set of struts in a way more efficient than that allowed by the constraints of a single sphere. In 1270 Kuo Shou-Ching made a metal torquetum called the "simplified instrument." It was purely equatorial, with all the Arab ecliptic components left out. It survives today at the Purple Mountain Observatory in Nanking. It was moved there from its home site at Linfen in Shanxi during the Ming dynasty when government officials no longer understood that the difference of 33Ž4 degrees in latitude caused by the move would render it useless. Needham called this "simplified instrument" the precursor of all equatorial-mounted telescopes. Needham believed that some knowledge of it eventually reached Tycho Brahe in Denmark three centuries later and led to Brahe's taking up equatorial astronomy for his instruments. Actually, an equatorial mounting of the kind devised by Guo Shoujing wasn't constructed in the West until 1791, when it was used for a telescope made in England, and thus its design became known as the "English mounting."

Astronomy was the first real science practiced by the world's ancient cultures. It was primarily observational (rather than experimental), but it meets most criteria for what a science should be. Next we will continue on to an associated discipline, cosmology. I write "discipline" rather than "science" because, as you shall see, it's not clear what cosmology is. Cosmology is dependent on astronomy, extrapolating its data to a worldview. Which is not to say that astronomers always agree with the tales spun by their cosmology colleagues.

Copyright © 2002 by Dick Teresi

Table of Contents

1 A History of Science: Rediscovered 1
2 Mathematics: The Language of Science 21
3 Astronomy: Sky Watchers and More 89
4 Cosmology: That Old-Time Religion 157
5 Physics: Particles, Voids, and Fields 193
6 Geology: Stories of Earth Itself 231
7 Chemistry: Alchemy and Beyond 279
8 Technology: Machines as a Measure of Man 325
Notes 369
Selected Bibliography 421
Acknowledgments 431
Index 433

What People are Saying About This

From the Publisher

Dava Sobel Author of Galileo's Daughter and Longitude If you think, as I did, that science flowered in ancient Greece — the way Athena sprang fully formed from the brow of Zeus — then read Dick Teresi's Lost Discoveries and revel in the global expression of early genius, from Sumerian mathematics and ancient Indian particle physics to the sky maps of the Skidi Pawnee and the rubber 'factories' of the Aztecs.

Leon Lederman Winner of the Nobel Prize in Physics and coauthor of The God Particle Wow, Teresi's Lost Discoveries is a romp through the history of mathematics, astronomy, cosmology, physics, geology, chemistry, and technology. Teresi must have pored through tons of ancient manuscripts and scholarly compendia to unearth a rich mine of historical achievements of largely non-Western civilizations that preceded and enabled the Golden Age of Greece. For science buffs who are curious about 'How do we know?' and 'How did we learn?' this is a spectacular canvas, and it illuminates the power of cultural diversity. Yes, there were peaks in the progress of science, but today science is the only universal culture, the same in the West, East, North, and South. Teresi's important book helps to explain why.

Reading Group Guide

Lost Discoveries by Dick Teresi
Further Discussion Questions
During the golden age of Islamic civilization, from A.D. 750 onward, the Muslims flourished from North Africa to France, across Persia to China, and south to Northern India. Discuss this central location in Medieval Eurasia, in the midst of other cultures, which was a crucial developing site for most scientific practice in the world. What discoveries and inventions from India and China, ancient Greece and Hellenistic Egypt did they acquire? If, as Teresi maintains, "writing is the unification technology par excellence," characterize the role of Arab academic centers in transmitting the achievements of other cultures?
Today, we recognize Gutenberg as the father of modern printing, from his invention of 1454. The Chinese were using paper and movable type at least two centuries earlier, with the first completely printed book, the translation of a Sanskrit work into Chinese, surviving from A.D. 868. The math used in the Pythagorean Theorem, used by Egyptians was "lost" for generations. Are there political or sociological factors that prevented the spread of such achievements? What arrests progress in a civilization?
Encountering the divine was a very common feature of early "science." In most ancient cultures, astronomers were also priests. These realms of thought were never too distant for those observing the world and struggling to associate it with a cosmological understanding. Which natural events did the ancient Mesoamericans, the Inca, Maya, and Aztecs attribute to a divine presence. How did they use them to support their belief systems and their right to govern?
In early civilizations, natural phenomena were explained in terms of magic, experience, and religion. How did geological events and other physical forces figure in the Creation myths of ancient peoples? How do they shape their ideas of the structure of the universe? And how do these ideas resemble those put forward in modern physics today?
According to the Western thinker Francis Bacon, the three most important inventions to transform the antique and Medieval worlds into a modern age were gunpowder, paper and printing, and the magnetic compass. All three had origins (unrecognized) in China. What might be another essential unsung contribution to modern science? The numeration of the Indians? The geological records of Mesopotamia or the astronomical ones of China?
A traditional Western view of history holds that the Greeks founded original science, which was lost with the collapse of their civilization. Their works were preserved by the "custodial" Arab world during the middle ages until it was recovered by Enlightened Europe. In view of Teresi's vindication of ancient, Eastern, and non-Western sciences, the former model must be revised if not rejected altogether. What adjustments must be made to yield a more accurate picture of scientific enterprise as we now understand it: a story of rediscovery, or translation?
An early example of Egyptian math illustrates how to break nine loaves of bread among ten men. The alchemists who experimented with gold and metals, the shamans of Mesoamerica and Africa who developed early antibiotics — were all inspired by necessity, a teleological mother of invention. Describe what other achievements, in agriculture, commerce, and religious practice stimulated purposeful innovation.
Ancient civilizations have left many clues about their passion for time. Rock sculptures in the American Midwest use light and shadow, much like the Egyptian pyramids and Aztec monuments, to tell the time of day and year. The Babylonians used a unique math with a base 60 system that was sensible to the spherical nature of the world and contributed to our modern sense of time. What was the nature of the relevance of time to ancient and early peoples? Is it linked to an obsession with the divine or, more centrally, a need to grasp the cosmological structure of the universe?
In early civilizations, natural phenomena were explained in terms of magic, experience, and religion. How did geological events and other physical forces figure in the Creation myths of ancient peoples? How do they shape their ideas of the structure of the universe? And how do these ideas resemble those put forward in modern physics today?
While some disciplines seemed more driven by theory, like math, and others by experiment, like early chemistry, the path of scientific discovery seems to have been a gradual integration of both approaches. Many ancient cultures had impressions of quantum theory and imaginative visions of chemical relationships, which resonate with the discoveries made possible by a modern interplay of theory and experiment in the last few hundred years. If sciences, and their tools — like mathematical notation and the language of physics and chemistry, have become universal, can we hypothesize a natural progress of science? What long-range predictions about the future of science could we make?
If science began and first flourished in the nonwestern world, what happened? Why did science in the non-European world seem to stop dead in its tracks by the end of the middle ages? There are exceptions, such as Indian mathematics, which flourished until India was invaded by Britain. But mostly science has been a western endeavor since the Enlightenment. Teresi never addresses this problem. One common answer is that European scientists were able to throw off the handcuffs of religion. Yet religion inspired much of early science. What is your theory?

Introduction

Lost Discoveries by Dick Teresi

Further Discussion Questions

During the golden age of Islamic civilization, from A.D. 750 onward, the Muslims flourished from North Africa to France, across Persia to China, and south to Northern India. Discuss this central location in Medieval Eurasia, in the midst of other cultures, which was a crucial developing site for most scientific practice in the world. What discoveries and inventions from India and China, ancient Greece and Hellenistic Egypt did they acquire? If, as Teresi maintains, "writing is the unification technology par excellence," characterize the role of Arab academic centers in transmitting the achievements of other cultures?

Today, we recognize Gutenberg as the father of modern printing, from his invention of 1454. The Chinese were using paper and movable type at least two centuries earlier, with the first completely printed book, the translation of a Sanskrit work into Chinese, surviving from A.D. 868. The math used in the Pythagorean Theorem, used by Egyptians was "lost" for generations. Are there political or sociological factors that prevented the spread of such achievements? What arrests progress in a civilization?

Encountering the divine was a very common feature of early "science." In most ancient cultures, astronomers were also priests. These realms of thought were never too distant for those observing the world and struggling to associate it with a cosmological understanding. Which natural events did the ancient Mesoamericans, the Inca, Maya, and Aztecs attribute to a divine presence. How did they use them to support their belief systems and their right to govern?

In early civilizations, naturalphenomena were explained in terms of magic, experience, and religion. How did geological events and other physical forces figure in the Creation myths of ancient peoples? How do they shape their ideas of the structure of the universe? And how do these ideas resemble those put forward in modern physics today?

According to the Western thinker Francis Bacon, the three most important inventions to transform the antique and Medieval worlds into a modern age were gunpowder, paper and printing, and the magnetic compass. All three had origins (unrecognized) in China. What might be another essential unsung contribution to modern science? The numeration of the Indians? The geological records of Mesopotamia or the astronomical ones of China?

A traditional Western view of history holds that the Greeks founded original science, which was lost with the collapse of their civilization. Their works were preserved by the "custodial" Arab world during the middle ages until it was recovered by Enlightened Europe. In view of Teresi's vindication of ancient, Eastern, and non-Western sciences, the former model must be revised if not rejected altogether. What adjustments must be made to yield a more accurate picture of scientific enterprise as we now understand it: a story of rediscovery, or translation?

An early example of Egyptian math illustrates how to break nine loaves of bread among ten men. The alchemists who experimented with gold and metals, the shamans of Mesoamerica and Africa who developed early antibiotics — were all inspired by necessity, a teleological mother of invention. Describe what other achievements, in agriculture, commerce, and religious practice stimulated purposeful innovation.

Ancient civilizations have left many clues about their passion for time. Rock sculptures in the American Midwest use light and shadow, much like the Egyptian pyramids and Aztec monuments, to tell the time of day and year. The Babylonians used a unique math with a base 60 system that was sensible to the spherical nature of the world and contributed to our modern sense of time. What was the nature of the relevance of time to ancient and early peoples? Is it linked to an obsession with the divine or, more centrally, a need to grasp the cosmological structure of the universe?

In early civilizations, natural phenomena were explained in terms of magic, experience, and religion. How did geological events and other physical forces figure in the Creation myths of ancient peoples? How do they shape their ideas of the structure of the universe? And how do these ideas resemble those put forward in modern physics today?

While some disciplines seemed more driven by theory, like math, and others by experiment, like early chemistry, the path of scientific discovery seems to have been a gradual integration of both approaches. Many ancient cultures had impressions of quantum theory and imaginative visions of chemical relationships, which resonate with the discoveries made possible by a modern interplay of theory and experiment in the last few hundred years. If sciences, and their tools — like mathematical notation and the language of physics and chemistry, have become universal, can we hypothesize a natural progress of science? What long-range predictions about the future of science could we make?

If science began and first flourished in the nonwestern world, what happened? Why did science in the non-European world seem to stop dead in its tracks by the end of the middle ages? There are exceptions, such as Indian mathematics, which flourished until India was invaded by Britain. But mostly science has been a western endeavor since the Enlightenment. Teresi never addresses this problem. One common answer is that European scientists were able to throw off the handcuffs of religion. Yet religion inspired much of early science. What is your theory?

From the B&N Reads Blog

Customer Reviews