Twitter’s Latest Valuation: $1 Billion

Twitter

Twitter, the fashionable microblogging service, is set to close a round of financing of around $100 million that values the three-and-a-half-year-old start-up at $1 billion, according to a person briefed on the company’s plans.

The investors include Insight Venture Partners, a New York venture capital firm, T. Rowe Price, the mutual fund company, and the current Twitter backers Spark Capital and Institutional Venture Partners.

Twitter does not necessarily need the capital. It previously raised $55 million and says it has only spent $25 million of that cash. But the company has big plans to expand the service from its roughly 50 million current users and to ultimately catch up to Facebook — which recently reached 300 million members. Both of these companies believe they can one day reach a billion users around the world — nearly the entire current population of the Internet. The extra cash, this person said, will help the company keep up with demand and build out the service.

As for how Twitter managed to raise money and score an impressive valuation without ever actually bringing in any significant revenue on its own, that apparently was never a problem. Investors have been competing furiously to inject cash into the promising start-up, the person briefed on its plans said.

Twitter’s last round of financing, raised in February, valued the firm at $250 million, meaning Twitter has quadrupled in value in less than a year.

The news of the new valuation was first reported last week by the blog TechCrunch. This morning, details about some of the new investors and the timing were added by the Web site of The Wall Street Journal.

Comments are no longer being accepted.

This is laughable, just like all the other fairy tales being handed down to the gullible public.

If anyone can show how in the world a company that has NO visible means of support has NO income and provides a Global service with no intent of letting up but only spending more money to get people to just type “what you feel”, I would be interested.

Twitter said about advertising income “advertising is not fun” so they wont be doing it. Yet they support a huge infrastructure.

Who in the world would be interested in “what you are thinking” ?

That is a good question and who would pay for this information without ANY resulting income from its creation.

People are sooooooooooo stupid, go twitter that.

maudib

$1 billion for a company with no revenue. Didn’t we hear this old song before? Citizens, get ready for the next round of taxpayer bailouts.

How much profit or revenue would a company need to have to be legitimately be valued at 1 billion?

Fbook and Twitter say they want to reach a billion users around the world. But is that realistic? I mean, won’t many current users get tired of both and drop off or at the very least cut way back on use?

Take fbook for example. It’s initial growth was in colleges, where it was novel and new and kind of cool. Then it’s second big growth phase was in the older than 30 set (or older than 35) who found fbook as a “neat” way to get caught up on the lives of those in their past, such as high school and college friends that have not been seen in years.

But, once all the older crowd gets “caught up” with all those hundreds of people from the past without really cultivating any lasting friendship (there is a reason people in our past are…past friends. It’s because there was not much of a basis for long term friendship in the first place)…then the older crowd’s use will wane, people may occasionally login, but I’d guess eventually many people will simply stop using fbook.

Then the new generation of college kids will find some other new social media to use…

So it would seem that at some point, fbook and twitter will not have a billion users… sure, they’ll have millions, but at some point the novelty will wear off and it will be relegated to a core set of users, i.e. like what bands and musicians us myspace for…and then this core set of users will not be enough to justify whatever valuation these companies have.

And the bubble economy is still alive and well…

With nonsense like this, it should be no surprise that our economy is in the current state that it is…I mean, honestly, what does Twitter produce? Where is the revenue (the article even stated that it has produced none)…So, this Billion $ valuation is based upon….?

Vinodh Ramasubramanian September 24, 2009 · 1:55 pm

$1B for a company without revenues. Sure feels like 1999 all over again.

Amazing for a simple mindless idea in which almost 90% of the iniital users abandon actively using the free service within 30 days and a company that has no way to make money.

God bless Capitalism ! And its lottery like way of assigning value and choosing winners.

wow! guess we’re not suprised

$1 billion? That’s almost a dollar for every sucker.

It’s so reassuring to know that we’ve learned our lesson and will never again fall victim to ‘irrational exuberance’! These tulip bulbs are worth every penny. Time to put more canned goods in the bomb shelter?

Twitter is a sure-fire go-getter,
It’s bound to do better and better,
The devout who care,
Soon will use it for prayer,
A swift course to Heaven, unfetter.

Prayer’s more efficacious, much fitter,
When it is expressed via Twitter,
The length is controlled,
Terseness is extolled,
Makes old-fashioned worshippers bitter.

I don’t think Twitter will be around 5 years from now. Anything popular with Ashton Kutcher is usually the sign of a short term fad. Eg. is anyone interested in Demi Moore anymore other than her plastic surgeon?

The imaginary value of Twitter has quadrupled in an year? Can anyone say bubble? :-)

A billion dollars. . . let’s see: the dollar is worth about 60 cents and going further down, and it’s exactly because we’ve become a society of gadget-punching, thumb-sucking babies that can think of nothing more constructive to do but Twitter their lives away. . . It we were a culture where producing something of value meant anything at all Twitter would be worthless (as it will be within three years anyway). Our demise continues.

They don’t call it TWITTER for nothing. As twits blather away on electronic devices wasting time and not really contributing anything useful, somebody’s making money mining the vast wasteland.

Along with the periods of the Renaissance, the Golden Age, the Industrial Age and the Age of Reason, this period will be aptly known as the Age of Twits using a lot of energy, but not actually accomplishing much.

yeah but didn’t you see? 37signals is now valued at $100 BILLION //37signals.com/svn/posts/1941

Hilarious. There is nothing mind-boggling innovative with all these “billion dollar” companies, but it is mind-boggling that they are “worth” so much because investors invested in the companies declare and publicize that they are. I guess I still don’t understand why anyone pays to have advertisements put up on such sites. If you’ve ever paid attention to yourself or watched other people use the sites, the first thing you notice is that no one notices the advertisements. I suppose as long as businesses are convinced that advertising through those channels will result in sales, then they are willing to pay out the wazzoo for it. Billion dollars… hah. Funny stuff. I think I’ll invent sillysocialtimesinksite2pointOhhh.com

I believe the Chinese are working on their own version, which could make 1B a difficult number to reach. Facebook status updates could easily become Twitter with the right privacy and access controls in place. Twitter is plumbing, plain and simple, as per the founders recent comments.

The people who pay for Twitter will be like the recruiters paying facebook. The rest of us? No way.

Ads and Twitter don’t go along, unless Tweetdeck turns into a sponsored communications management deck.

Twitter has had a difficult time as it is with current demand. Time to start buying services and redeveloping their systems.

If Twitter can’t figure out how to make money … it’s value will soon be zero.

hahahahahahah, i’d trade ownership of twitter for 10 million much less a 1000 million… twitter will never generate a significant revenue, how? advertising? people will jump ship.

Funny, Moore’s new movie will undoubtedly make more than Twitter will over it’s years in existence and the next 2 or 3, if not for it’s lifetime.

#12, someone other than her plastic surgeon IS interested in Demi Moore: Ashton Kutcher.

I still do not see why twittter As discussed here, //www.savingtoinvest.com/2008/12/why-twitter-will-not-help-your-blog.html , hardly any of the referred twitter traffic converts to outbound (revenue generating) clicks or new subscribers.

Party like it’s 1999!!!

What a joke. It doesn’t take a genius to realize how stupid this is. I mean, seriously…there’s no revenue stream…and there’s nothing preventing another company from offering the exact same service.