Abstract
Sibling competition is widespread among bird and animal species and sometimes leads to siblicide. By influencing the strategies that siblings employ in their struggles for dominance, birth order affects the outcomes of such contests. In our own species, birth order is a proxy for disparities in age, physical size, and status, all of which contribute to personality. In addition, birth order is related to the roles and niches available to offspring within the family system. On average, firstborns—who tend to act as surrogate parents—are more conscientious than laterborns, whereas laterborns are more agreeable, extraverted, and nonconforming. As strategies for dealing with rivals in a dominance hierarchy, as well as for optimizing parental investment, these sibling differences are consistent with a Darwinian perspective on family life. So are other links between personality and family dynamics, particularly those associated with parental investment and parent-offspring conflict. In adulthood, human behavior continues to reflect these formative influences, although such behavioral dispositions generally need to be catalyzed by appropriate situations in order to be fully expressed.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Adler, Alfred. 1927. Understanding Human Nature. New York: Greenberg.
Adler, Alfred. 1928. “Characteristics of the First, Second, and Third Child”, Children, 3, 14–52.
Beer, Jeremy M. & Horn, Joseph M. 2000. “The Influence of Reading Order on Personality Development within Two Adoption Cohorts”, Journal of Personality, 68, 789–819.
Blanchard, Ray. 1997. “Birth Order and Sibling Sex Ratio in Homosexual versus Heterosexual Males and Females”, Annual Review of Sex Research, 8, 27–67.
Block, Jack. 1995. “A Contrarian View of the Five-Factor Approach to Personality Description”, Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187–215.
Bragg, Arthur N. 1954. “Further Study of Predation and Cannibalism in Spadefoot Tadpoles”, Herpetologica, 20, 17–24.
Costa, Paul T. Jr & McCrae, Robert R. 1992. NEOPI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Daly, Martin & Wilson, Margo. 1988. Homicide. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
Daly, Martin & Wilson, Margo. 1990. “Is Parent-offspring Conflict Sex-linked? Freudian and Darwinian Models”, Journal of Personality, 58, 163–89.
Darwin, Charles R. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray.
Darwin, Charles R. 1887. The Life and Letters of Charles Darwin, 3 vols. London: John Murray.
Downey, Douglas B. 2001. “Number of Siblings and Intellectual Development”, American Psychologist, 56, 497–504.
Drummond, Hugh & García-Chavelas, C. 1989. “Food Shortage Influences Sibling Aggression in the Blue-Footed Booby”, Animal Behavior, 37, 806–18.
Drummond, Hugh & Osorno, Jose Luis. 1992. “Training Siblings to Be Submissive Losers: Dominance between Booby Nestlings”, Animal Behavior, 44, 881–93.
Eaves, L.J., Eysenck, H.J., & Martin, N.G. 1989. Genes, Culture and Personality. London and San Diego: Academic Press.
Eaves, L.J., Eysenck, H.J., & Martin, N.G. 1989. Genes, Culture and Personality. London and San Diego: Academic Press.
Frank, Laurence G., Glickman, Stephen E., & Licht, Paul. 1991. “Fatal Sibling Aggression, Precocial Development, and Androgens in Neonatal Spotted Hyenas”, Science, 252, 702–704.
Freese, Jeremy, Powell, Brian, & Steelman, Lala Carr. 1999. “Rebel Without a Cause or Effect: Birth Order and Social Attitudes”, American Sociological Review, 64, 207–231.
Galton, Francis. 1874. English Men of Science. London: Macmillan.
Gould, Stephen Jay. 1977. Ontogeny and Phytogeny. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Haig, David. 1993. “Genetic Conflicts in Human Pregnancy”, Quarterly Review of Biology, 68, 495–531.
Hamilton, William D. 1964. “The Genetical Evolution of Social Behavior”, I and II, Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 1–16; 17–52.
Hamilton, William D. 1967. “Extraordinary Sex Ratios”, Science, 156, 477–88.
Harris, Judith Rich. 1995. “Where Is the Child’s Environment? A Group Socialization Theory of Development”, Psychological Review, 102, 458–89.
Harris, Judith Rich. 1998. The Nurture Assumption: Why Children Turn Out the Way They Do. New York: Free Press.
Hertwig, Ralph, Davis, Jennifer, & Sulloway, Frank J. 2001. “Parental Investment: How an Equality Motive Can Produce Inequality”, manuscript submitted for publication.
Hrdy, Sarah Blaffer & Judge, Debra. 1992. “Darwin and the Puzzle of Primogeniture”, Human Nature, 4, 1–45.
Hunter, John E. & Schmidt, Frank L. 1990. Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Jefferson, Tyrone Jr., Herbst, Jeffrey H., & McCrae, Robert R. 1998. “Associations between Birth Order and Personality Traits: Evidence from Self-reports and Observer Ratings”, Journal of Research on Personality, 32, 498–509.
John, Oliver P. 1990. “The ‘Big Five’ Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in the Natural Language and in Questionnaires”, in Pervin, L.A., ed., Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research. New York: Guilford, pp. 66–100.
Jones, M.B. & Blanchard, Ray. 1998. “Birth Order and Male Homosexuality: Extension of Slater’s Index”, Human Biology, 70, 775–787.
Koch, Helen. 1956. “Attitudes of Young Children Toward Their Peers as Related to Certain Characteristics of Their Siblings”, Psychological Monographs, 70, 1–41.
Krebs, John R. & Davies, Nicholas B. 1997. Behavioural Ecology: An Evolutionary Approach, 4th ed. Oxford: Blackwell.
Krishnamurthy, K.S., Shaanker, R. Uma, & Ganeshaiah, K.N. 1997. “Seed Abortion in an Animal Dispersed Species, Syzygium cuminii (L.) Skeels (Myrtaceae): The Chemical Basis”, Current Science, 73, 869–73.
Lewis, David L. 1970. King: A Critical Biography. New York: Praeger.
Loehlin, John C. 1992. Genes and Environment in Personality Development. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Mayr, Ernst. 1961. “Cause and Effect in Biology”, Science, 134, 1501–1506.
McCrae, Robert R. 1994. “Openness to Experience: Expanding the Boundaries of Factor V”, European Journal of Personality, 8, 251–72.
McCrae, Robert R. & Costa, Paul T., Jr. 1987. “Validation of the Five-Factor Model of Personality across Instruments and Observers”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81–90.
McCrae, Robert R. & John, Oliver P. 1992. “An Introduction to the Five-Factor Model and Its Applications”, Journal of Personality, 60: 175–215.
Mock, Douglas W. & Parker, G.A. 1998. The Evolution of Sibling Rivalry. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mock, Douglas W., Drummond, Hugh, & Stinson, Christopher H. 1990. “Avian Siblicide”, American Scientist, 78, 438–49.
Modell, John. 1996. “Family Niche and Intellectual Bent”, review of Born to Rebel, by Frank J. Sulloway, Science, 275, 624.
Nicholson, Nigel. 2001. “Personality and Birth Order—Is There a Relationship? An Evolutionary Analysis”, unpublished manuscript.
Numbers, Ronald. L. 1998. Darwinism Comes to America. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.
Nyman, Lawrence. 1995. “The Identification of Birth Order Personality Attributes”, Journal of Psychology, 129, 51–59.
Ozer, Daniel J. 1985. “Correlation and the Coefficient of Determination”, Psychological Bulletin, 97, 307–315.
Parker, Wayne D. 1998. “Birth Order Effects in the Academically Talented”, Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 29–36.
Paulhus, Delroy L., Chen, David, & Trapnell, Paul D. 1999. “Birth Order and Personality within Families”, Psychological Science, 10, 482–88.
Phillips, Suzanne M. 1998. “Birth Order and Personality—Not Again!”, paper presented at the 69th Annual Meeting of the Eastern Psychological Association, February 1998, Boston.
Plomin, Robert & Daniels, Denise. 1987. “Why Are Children in the Same Family So Different from One Another”, Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 10, 1–60.
Retherford, Robert A. & Sewell, William H. 1991. “Birth Order and Intelligence: Further Tests of the Confluence Model”, American Sociological Review, 56, 141–58.
Rogers, Joseph Lee. 2001. “What Causes Birth Order-Intelligence Patterns? The Admixture Hypothesis, Revisited”, American Psychologist, 56, 505–510.
Rodgers, Joseph Lee, Cleveland, Hobart H., van den Oord, Edwin, & Rowe, David C. 2000. “Resolving the Debate Over Birth Order, Family Size, and Intelligence”, American Psychologist, 55, 599–612.
Rosenthal, Robert. 1987. Judgment Studies: Design, Analysis, and Meta-analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Rosenthal, Robert & Rubin, Donald B. 1982. “A Simple, General Purpose Display of Magnitude in Experimenter Effect”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 166–69.
Salmon, Catherine A. 1998. “The Evocative Nature of Kin Terminology in Political Rhetoric”, Politics and the Life Sciences, 17, 51–57.
Salmon, Catherine A. 1999. “On the Impact of Sex and Birth Order on Contact with Kin”, Human Nature, 10, 183–97.
Salmon, Catherine A. & Daly, Martin. 1998. “Birth Order and Familial Sentiment: Middleborns are Different”, Human Behavior and Evolution, 19, 299–312.
Saudino, Kimberly J. 1997. “Moving beyond the Heritability Question: New Directions in Behavioral Genetic Studies of Personality”, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 6, 86–90.
Schachter, Frances Fuchs, Gilutz, Gabi, Shore, Ellen, & Adler, Michelle. 1978. “Sibling Deidentification Judged by Mothers: Cross-validation and Developmental Studies”, Child Development, 49, 543–46.
Schachter, Frances Fuchs. 1982. “Sibling Deidentification and Split-parent Identifications: A Family Tetrad”, in Lamb, M.E. & Sutton-Smith, B., eds., Sibling Relationships: Their Nature and Significance Across the Lifespan. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp. 123–52.
Schafer, Joseph L. 1991. “Algorithms for Multiple Imputation and Posterior Simulation from Incomplete Multivariate Data with Ignorable Nonresponse”, Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Statistics, Harvard University.
Schwabl, Hubert. 1996. “Environment Modifies the Testosterone Levels of a Female Bird and Its Eggs”, Journal of Experimental Zoology, 276, 157–63.
Schwabl, Hubert, Mock, Douglas W., & Gieg, Jennifer A. 1997. “A Hormonal Mechanism for Parental Favouritism”, Nature, 386, 231.
Skinner, William G. 1992. “Seek a Loyal Subject in a Filial Son: Family Roots of Political Orientation in Chinese Society”, in Family Process and Political Process in Modern Chinese History. Taipei, Republic of China: Chiang Ching-kuo Foundation for International Scholarly Exchange, pp. 943–93.
Somit, Albert, Arwine, Alan, & Peterson, Steven A. 1996. Birth Order and Political Behavior. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.
Sulloway, Frank J. 1979. Freud, Biologist of the Mind: Beyond the Psychoanalytic Legend. New York: Basic Books.
Sulloway, Frank J. 1982. “Freud and Biology: The Hidden Legacy”, in Wood-ward, W.R. & Ash, M.G., eds., The Problematic Science: Psychology in Nineteenth-Century Thought. New York: Praeger Publishers, pp. 198–227.
Sulloway, Frank J. 1995. “Birth Order and Evolutionary Psychology: A Meta-analytic Overview”, Psychological Inquiry, 6, 75–80.
Sulloway, Frank J. 1996. Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics, and Creative Lives. New York: Pantheon.
Sulloway, Frank J. 1997. Born to Rebel: Birth Order, Family Dynamics, and Creative Lives, revised ed. New York: Vintage.
Sulloway, Frank J. 1999. “Birth Order”, in Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S.R., eds., Encyclopedia of Creativity, 1: 189–202.
Sulloway, Frank J. (in press-a). “Born to Rebel and Its Critics”, Politics and the Life Sciences.
Sulloway, Frank J. (in press-b). “Sibling-Order Effects”, International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences.
Townsend, F. (in press). “Birth Order and Rebelliousness: Reconstructing the Research in Born to Rebel”, Politics and the Life Sciences.
Trivers, Robert L. 1974. “Parent-offspring Conflict”, American Zoologist, 14, 249–64.
Trivers, Robert L. 1985. Social Evolution. Menlo Park, CA: Benjamin/Cummings.
Voland, Ekart. 1988. “Differential Infant and Child Mortality in Evolutionary Perspective: Data from the late 17th to 19th Century Ostfriesland (Germany)”, in Betzig, Laura, Mulder, Monique Borgerhoff, & Türke, Paul, eds., Human Reproduction Behaviour: A Darwinian Perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 253–62.
Voland, Ekart. 1990. “Differential Reproductive Success within the Krummhorn Population (Germany, 18th and 19th Centuries)”, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 26, 54–72.
Wilkinson, Leland & Hill, MaryAnn. 1994. SYSTAT forDOS, 2 vols. Evanston, Illinois: SYSTAT, Inc.
Williams, Terrance J., Pepitone, Michelle E., Christensen, Scott E., Cooke, Bradley M., Huberman, Andrew D., Breedlove, Nicholas J., Breedlove, Tessa J., Jordan, Cynthia L., & Breedlove, S. Marc. 2000. “Finger Length Ratios and Sexual Orientation”, Nature, 404, 455–456.
Zajonc, Robert B. 1976. “Family Configuration and Intelligence”, Science, 192, 227–36.
Zajonc, Robert B. 2001. “The Family Dynamics of Intellectual Development”, American Psychologist, 56, 490–96.
Zajonc, Robert B. & Mullally, Patricia R. 1997. “Birth Order: Reconciling Conflicting Effects”, American Psychologist, 52, 685–99.
Zweigenhaft, Richard L. & Von Ammon, Jessica. 2000. “Birth Order and Civil Disobedience: A Test of Sulloway’s ‘Born to Rebel’ Hypothesis”, Journal of Social Psychology, 140, 624–27.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sulloway, F.J. (2001). Birth Order, Sibling Competition, and Human Behavior. In: Holcomb, H.R. (eds) Conceptual Challenges in Evolutionary Psychology. Studies in Cognitive Systems, vol 27. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0618-7_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0618-7_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3890-4
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0618-7
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive