Skip to main content
Log in

A recruitment theory of simple behavior

  • Published:
Psychometrika Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A statistical theory of choice is developed using a sequential sampling assumption. Response latency distributions for certain simple reaction-time situations are derived and tested. Both response probability and response latency measures are developed for a two-alternative judgment situation and the relationship between the two measures explored. The sampling parameter is proposed as a means of representing incentive conditions in choice situations and ROC curves are obtained by appropriate manipulations of this parameter. A solution to the overlap problem in simple discrimination-learning situations is also derived.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Audley, R. J. A stochastic model for individual choice behavior.Psychol. Rev., 1960,67, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bower, G. H. Choice-point behavior. In R. R. Bush and W. K. Estes (Eds.),Studies in mathematical learning theory. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1959, Ch. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Burington, R. S. and May, D. C.Handbook of probability and statistics with tables. Sandusky, Ohio: Handbook Publishers, 1953.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bush, R. R. and Mosteller, F. A model for stimulus generalization and discrimination.Psychol. Rev., 1951,58, 413–423.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bush, R. R. and Mosteller, F.Stochastic models for learning. New York: Wiley, 1955.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chernikoff, R. and Brogden, W. J. The effect of response termination of the stimulus upon reaction time.J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1949,42, 357–364.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Donders, F. C. Die schnelligkeit psychischer processe.Arch. anat. Phys., 1868, 657–681.

  8. Estes, W. K. Toward a statistical theory of learning.Psychol. Rev., 1950,57, 94–107.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Estes, W. K. A random-walk model for choice behavior. In K. J. Arrow, S. Karlin, and P. Suppes (Eds.),Mathematical methods in the social sciences. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Estes, W. K. The statistical approach to learning theory. In S. Koch (Ed.),Psychology: a study of a science. Vol. 2. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1959. Pp. 380–491.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Estes, W. K. and Burke, C. J. A theory of stimulus variability in learning.Psychol. Rev., 1953,60, 276–286.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Feller, W.An introduction to probability theory and its applications (2nd ed.). New York: Wiley, 1957.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Goodwin, W. R. and Lawrence, D. H. The functional independence of two discrimination habits associated with a constant stimulus situation.J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1955,48, 437–443.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gregg, L. W. and Brogden, W. J. The relation between duration and reaction time difference to fixed duration and response terminated stimuli.J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1950,43, 329–337.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hald, A.Statistical tables and formulas. New York: Wiley, 1952.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hughes, C. L. and North, A. J. Effect of introducing a partial correlation between a critical cue and a previously irrelevant cue.J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1959,52, 126–128.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Jeeves, M. A. and North, A. J. Irrelevant or partially correlated stimuli in discrimination learning.J. exp. Psychol., 1956,52, 90–94.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Johanson, A. M. The influence of incentive and punishment upon reaction time.Arch. Psychol., 1922,54.

  19. LaBerge, D. A model with neutral elements. In R. R. Bush and W. K. Estes (Eds.),Studies in mathematical learning theory. Stanford: Stanford Univ. Press, 1959. Ch. 2.

    Google Scholar 

  20. LaBerge, D. and Smith, A. Selective sampling in discrimination learning.J. exp. Psychol., 1957,54, 423–430.

    Google Scholar 

  21. McCarthy, P. I. Approximate solutions for means and variances in a certain class of box problems.Ann. math. Statist., 1947,18, 349–383.

    Google Scholar 

  22. McGill, W. Stochastic latency mechanisms. In R. R. Bush, R. D. Luce, and E. Galanter (Eds.),Handbook of mathematical psychology. Vol. 1. New York: Wiley, in press.

  23. Olkin, I. and Sobel, M. Integral expressions for certain sums of multinomial and negative multinomial probabilities. Tech. Report No. 1, Department of Statistics, Univ. of Minnesota.

  24. Pearson, K.Tables of the incomplete beta-function. London: Cambridge Univ. Press, 1932.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Restle, F. A theory of discrimination learning.Psychol. Rev., 1955,62, 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Swets, J. A., Tanner, W. P., Jr., and Birdsall, T. G. Decision processes in perception.Psychol. Rev., 1961.68, 301–340.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Tanner, W. P., Jr. and Swets, J. A. A decision-making theory of visual detection.Psychol. Rev., 1954,61, 401–409.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Verplanck, W. S., Collier, G. H., and Cotton, J. W. Non-independence of successive responses in measurements of visual threshold.J. exp. Psychol., 1952,44, 273–282.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Woodworth, R. S. and Schlosberg, H.Experimental psychology (Rev.). New York: Holt, 1956.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

This research was supported in part by a grant from the National Science Foundation. The writer has benefited from discussions with his students, James R. Erickson, James G. Greeno, Duane R. Martin, Kirk H. Smith, and Charles F. Stroebel. For generous suggestions with regard to certain mathematical matters, the writer is indebted to Professors Ingram Olkin, Stephen Orey, and Milton Sobel of the Statistics Department at the University of Minnesota.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LaBerge, D. A recruitment theory of simple behavior. Psychometrika 27, 375–396 (1962). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289645

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289645

Keywords

Navigation