Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Current trends in the classification of discomycetes

  • Interpreting Botanical Progress
  • Published:
The Botanical Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Literature Cited

  • Alexopoulos, C. J. 1962. Introductory Mycology. 613 pp. John Wiley & Sons. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andE. E. Butler. 1949. Conidia like structures inPlectania coccinea. Mycologia41: 180–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aragno, M. 1967. Formation et évolution de l’asque chezRhytisma acerinum (Pers.) Fr. Ber. Schweiz. botan. Ges.77: 173–186.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnaud, G. 1930. Les Astérinees. V. Étude sur les champignons parasites: Caliciacés, Hemisphaeriacées, etc. Ann. Epiphyt.16: 235–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arpin, N. 1968. Les Caroténoides de Discomycètes: Essai Chimiotaxonomique. Thèses 527. Univ. Lyon. 170 pp. Villeurbanne, France.

  • Arx, J. A. von, andE. Müller. 1954. Die Gattungen de amerosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beiträge zur Kryptofl. Schwiez11 (1): 1–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barker, P. T. B. 1904. Further observations on the ascocarp ofRhyparobius. Rept. Brit. Assoc. Adv. Sci. Cambridge1904: 825–826.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batra, L. R. 1960. The species ofCiborinia pathogenic toSalix, Magnolia, andQuercus. Amer. J. Botany47: 819–827.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1961a. New species of discomycetes from India.I. Mycologia52: 524–527.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1961b. New species of discomycetes from India.II. Mycologia52: 665–667.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andS. W. T. Batra. 1963. Indian Discomycetes. Univ. Kansas Sci. Bull.44: 109–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andR. P. Korf. 1959. The species ofCiborinia pathogenic to herbaceous angiosperms. Amer. J. Botany46: 441–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss-Elliott, J. S. 1927. Studies in Discomycetes. IV. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.12: 290–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellèmere, A. 1958. Quelques observations sur le dévelopment de l’apothécie d’un discomycète inoperculéCyathicula coronata (Bull.) DeNot. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France74: 70–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960. Sur les asques des Ostropales. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France76: 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedix, E. H. 1962. Zur polyphyletischen Herkunft der Helvellaceen ss. Lat. Zeit. Pilzk.27: 93–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, P., andL. Shanor. 1957. A new species ofStreptotheca. Mycologia49: 879–883.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berthet, P. 1961. Variation de nombre des noyaux dans les articles mycéliens des Discomycètes, en rapport avec la systématique et la phylogénie. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris252: 3855–3857.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. Le nombre des noyaux dans la spore et son intérêt pour la systématique des Discomycètes operculés. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris256: 5185–5186.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964a. Formes conidiennes de divers Discomycètes. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France80: 125–149.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1964b. Essai biotaxonomique sur les Discomycètes. Thèse, 160 pp., Univ. Lyon.

  • —. 1966. L’appareil conidien deTrichophaea confusa (Cooke) Berthet, nov. comb. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France82: 473–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bessey, E. A. 1950. Morphology and taxonomy of fungi. 791 pp., Philadelphia.

  • Biffin, R. H. 1901. On the biology ofBulgaria polymorpha Wett. Ann. Botany15: 119–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bistis, G. N. 1956a. Studies on the genetics ofAscobolus stercorarius (Bull.) Schroet. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club83: 35–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1956b. Sexuality inAscobolus stercorarius. I. Morphology of the ascogonium; plasmogamy; evidence for a sexual hormonal mechanism. Amer. J. Botany43: 389–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957. Sexuality inAscobolus stercorarius.II. Preliminary experiments on various aspects of the sexual process. Amer. J. Botany44: 436–443.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andJ. R. Raper. 1963. Heterothallism and sexuality inAscobolus stercorarius. Amer. J. Botany50: 880–891.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackman, V. H., andH. C. I. Fraser. 1906. On the sexuality and development of the ascocarp ofHumaria granulata. Proc. Royal Soc. Botany, London77: 354–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blodgett, E. C. 1936. The anthracnose of currents and gooseberry caused byPseudopeziza ribis. Phytopathology26: 115–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boedijn, K. B. 1934. Two new Malaysian genera of Discomycetes. Bull. Jard. Botan. Buitenzorg.III. ser.13: 478–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940. The genusPyronema in the Netherlands Indies (Fungi, Ascom.) Bull. Jard. Botan. BuitenzorgIII 16: 272–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudier, J. L. E. 1869. Mémoire sur les Ascobolés. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot. V.10: 191–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1879. On the importance that should be attached to the dehiscence of asci in the classification of the Discomycetes. Grevillea8: 45–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1885. Nouvelle classification naturelle des Discomycètes charnus connus généralement sous le nom de Pezizes. Bull. Soc. Mycol. Fr.1: 91–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1907. Histoire et classification des Discomycètes d’Europe.I-VII: 1–223. P. Klincksich, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, W. H. 1911. The development of the ascocarp ofLachnea scutellata. Botan. Gaz.52: 275–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brummelen, J. van. 1962. Studies on DiscomycetesI. Types of species ofAscobolus andSaccobolus in Spegazzini’s herbarium. Persoonia2: 195–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967. A world-monograph of the generaAscobolus andSaccobolus (Ascomycetes, Pezizales). Persoonia (Suppl.)1: 1–260.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burdsall, H. H. 1965. Operculate asci and puffing of ascospores inGeopora (Tuberales). Mycologia57: 485–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968. A revision of the genusHydnocystis (Tuberales) and of the hypogeous species ofGeopora (Pezizales). Mycologia60: 496–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, R. F., andN. A. Hastings. 1956. Studies of soil fungi.II. A new species ofSphaerospora with a Botrytis-like stage. Canad. J. Botany34: 360–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, G. C. 1969. A study of the fine structure of ascosporogenesis inSaccobolus keruerni. Arch. Mickrobiol.66: 321–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carruthers, D. 1911. Contributions to the cytology ofHelvella crispa. Ann. Botany25: 243–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chadefaud, M. 1940a. Etudes d’asques. I. Les asques et les ascospores deBulgaria inquinans. Rev. Mycol.5: 87–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940b. Le reseau ornemantal de spores et l’appareil apical des asques chezPeziza aurantia. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris211: 659–660.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942. Etudes d’asques.II. Structure et anatomie comparée de l’appareil apical de asques chez divers Discoet Pyrénomycètes. Rev. Mycol.7: 57–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1943. Sur les divers types d’éléments dangeardiens de Ascomycètes, et sur la formation des asques chez la PézizePustularia catinus. La. Rev. Sci.81: 77–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1944. Etudes d’asques. IV. L’asques hémiopercule déLeotia lubrica. Rev. Mycol.9: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1946a. Les asques para-operculés et la position systématique de la PézizeSarcoscypha coccinea. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris222: 753–755.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1946b. Sur les asques á nasse apicale. Bull. Sci. Bot. de France.93: 128–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949. Observations sur les asques de quelques Morchellaceae. Le Botaniste34: 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960. Les végétaux non vasculaires (Cryptogamie). In Chadefaude, M., and L. Emberger. Traité de Botanique. 1018 pp. Librairie Masson, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1969. Remarques sur les parois, L’appareil apical et les reserves nutritives de asques. Osterr. Bot. Zeit.116: 181–202.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,M. Letrouit-Galinou, andM. Janex-Favre. 1967. Sur l’origine phylogénétique et l’évolution des Ascomycètes des Lichens. Soc. Bot. France, Colloque sur les Lichens.1967: 79–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chardon, C. E. 1946. Fungi Domingenses novi vel minus cogniti.I. Farlowia2: 455–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, M. P. 1963. Danish species of the genusCoryne. Friesia7: 75–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claussen, P. 1905. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Ascomyceten.Boudiera. Botan. Ztg.63: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1912. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Ascomyceten.Pyronema confluens. Zeit. Bot.4: 1–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clements, F. E. 1909. The genera of fungi. 227 pp. Minneapolis.

  • -, andC. L. Shear. 1931. The genera of fungi. 496 pp. New York.

  • Cooke, J. C., andM. E. Barr. 1964. The taxonomic position of the genusThelebolus. Mycologia56: 763–769.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, M. C. 1879. Mycographis, seu icones fungorum. 1. Discomycetes. 267 pp. London.

  • -. 1892. Handbook of Australian fungi. London.

  • Corner, E. J. H. 1930a. Studies in the morphology of discomycetes.III. The Clavuleae. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.15: 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1930b. Study in the morphology of Discomycetes. IV. The evolution of the ascocarp. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.15: 121–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crouan, P. L., andH. M. Crouan. 1857. Note sur quelquesAscobolus nouveaux et sur une èspece nouvelle deVibrissea. Ann. Sci. Nat. (Bot.)IV 7: 173–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutting, E. M. 1909. On the sexuality and development of the ascocarp inAscophanus carneus Pers. Ann. Botany23: 339–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dangeard, P. A. 1903. Sur le genreAscodesmis. Le Botaniste9: 33–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1907. L’origine du périthèce chez les Ascomycètes. Deuxième Partie. Recherches sur le developpement du périthèce chez les Ascomycètes. Le Botaniste10: 1–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darker, G. D. 1932. The Hypodermataceae of conifers. Contr. Arnold Arbor. Harvard Univ.1: 1–131.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. A new phragmosporous genus of the Hypodermataceae. Mycologia55: 812–818.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967. Revision of the genera of the Hypodermataceae. Canad. J. Botany45: 1399–1444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R. W. 1950.Urnula craterium is possibly the perfect stage ofStrumella coryneoideae. Mycologia42: 735–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeBary, A. 1863. Uber die Fruchtenwicklung der Ascomyceten. 38 pp. Englemann, Leipzig.

  • -. 1866. Morphology und Physiologie der Pilze, Flechten und Myxomyceten. 316 p. Leipzig.

  • Deutsch, H. 1926. Zur Entwicklungsgeschite der coprophilen Ascomyceten:Lasiobolus pulcherrimus Crouan:Humaria anceps Rehm, var.aurantiaca, n. var.; undSporormia leporina Niessl. Diss. 40 p. Leipzig.

  • Denison, W. C. 1961. Some species of the genusScutellinia. Mycologia51: 605–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. A preliminary study of the operculate cup-fungi of Costa Rica. Rev. Biol. Trop.11: 99–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964. The genusCheilymenia in North America. Mycologia56: 718–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1965. Central American Pezizales. I. A new genus of the Saccoscyphaceae. Mycologia57: 649–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967. Central American Pezizales. II. The genusCookeina. Mycologia59: 306–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1969. Central American Pezizales. III. The genusPhillipsia. Mycologia61: 289–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis, R. W. G. 1949. A revision of the British Hyaloscyphaceae with notes on related European species. Commonw. Mycol. Instn., Mycol. Papers32: 1–97. Kew.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1950. Karsten’s species ofMollisia. Kew Bull.1950: 171–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954a.Chloroscypha Seaver in Britain. Kew Bull.1953: 410.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954b. Some inoperculate Discomycetes of tropical America. Kew Bull.9: 289–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1955. A note on the spiny-spored species ofLamprospora. Kew Bull.1955: 571–572.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1956. A revision of the British Helotiaceae in the Herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, with notes on related European species. Mycol. Papers62: 1–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1958. Critical notes on some Australian Helotiales and Ostropales. Kew Bull.1958: 321–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960. British cup fungi and their allies. An introduction to the Ascomycetes. 280 pp. The Ray Soc., London.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1962a. New or interesting British Helotiales. Kew Bull.16: 317–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1962b. A reassessment ofBelonidium Mont. & Dur. Persoonia2: 171–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. A redisposition of some fungi ascribed to the Hyaloscyphaceae. Kew Bull.17: 319–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964. Remarks on the genusHymenoscyphus S. F. Gray, with observations on sundry species referred by Saccardo and others to the generaHelotium, Pezizella, orPhialea. Persoonia3: 29–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1968. British Ascomycetes. 455 pp. J. Cramer. Lehre.

  • —, andR. P. Korf. 1958. A Japanese species ofSphagnicola Velenovsky. Kew Bull.1958: 321–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Notaris, G. 1864. Proposte di alcune rettificazione al profilo dei Discomiceti. Comm. Soc. critt. ital.1: 357–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dharne, C. G. 1965. Taxonomic investigations on the discomycetous genusLachnellula Karst. Phytopath. Zeit.53: 101–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dillenius. J. J. 1719. Catalogus plantarum sponte circa Gissam nascentium. Cum appendice… Francofurti ad Moenum.

  • Dissing, H. 1964. Studies in artic and subartic Discomycetes I. The genusHelvella. Botan. Tidskr.60: 108–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1966a. The genusHelvella in Europe with special emphasis on the species found in Norden. Dansk Botan. Ark.25: 1–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1966b. A revision of collections of the genusHelvella L. ex St-Amans emend. Nannf. in the Boudier Herbarium. Rev. Mycol.31: 189–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andM. Lange. 1967. Notes on the genusHelvella in North America. Mycologia59: 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andJ. A. Nannfeldt. 1966.Helvella cupuliformis sp. nov.,H. villosa (Hedw. ex O. Kuntze) comb. nov.,H. macropus (Pers. ex Fr.) Karst., and their allies. Svensk Botan. Tidskr.60: 325–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, B. O. 1912. Methods of culture and the morphology of the archicarp in certain species of the Ascobolaceae. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club39: 139–197.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1922. ALachnea with a botryose conidial stage. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club49: 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1936. Facultative and obligate heterothallism in Ascomycetes. Mycologia28: 399–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1937. The conidial stage ofPeziza pustulata. Mycologia29: 651–655.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andF. J. Seaver. 1946. Species ofAscobolus for genetic study. Mycologia38: 639–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drayton, F. L. 1932. The sexual function of the microconidia in certain discomycetes. Mycologia24: 345–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1934. The sexual mechanism ofSclerotinia gladioli. Mycologia26: 46–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andJ. W. Groves. 1943. A newSclerotinia causing a destructive disease of bulbs and legumes. Mycologia35: 517–528.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1952.Stromatinia narcissi, a new sexually dimorphic discomycete. Mycologia44: 119–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duff, G. H. 1922. Development of the Geoglossaceae. Botan. Gaz.74: 264–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, E. J. 1900. The classification of the fleshy Pezizineae with reference to the structural characters illustrating the bases of their division into families. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club.27: 463–495.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1901. Studies in North American discomycetes. I. The genusHolwaya Sacc. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club28: 349–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1908. The Geoglossaceae of North America. Ann. Mycol.6: 387–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1921. New or noteworthy Geoglossaceae. Mycologia13: 184–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durand, F. 1968. Sur l’ontogénie du Discomycete operculéAntracobia nitida Boudier. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris267: 2316–2318.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckblad, F.-E. 1957. Norges Sarcoscyphaceer. Blyttia15: 2–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. Contributions to the Geoglossaceae of Norway. Nytt. Mag. Bot.10: 137–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968. The genera of the Operculate Discomycetes. A reevaluation of their taxonomy, phylogeny and nomenclature. Nytt. Mag. Bot.15: 1–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, M. E. 1962.Streptotinia caulophylli sp. nov. produced in culture. Canad. J. Botany40: 1197–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964a.Sclerotinia artica n. sp. onCarex from Northern Canada. Canad. J. Botany42: 1065–1070.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964b. Self fertility inBotryotinia pori. Canad. J. Botany42: 1393–1395.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967.Rutstroemia cuniculi, a coprophilous species of the Sclerotiniaceae. Canad. J. Botany45: 521–524.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esser, K. 1967. Die Incompatibilität. Handbuch der Pflanzenphysiologie (W. Rhuland ed.) Vol.18.

  • —, andR. Kuenen. 1965. Genetik der Pilze. 497 pp. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fergus, C. L. 1960. A note on the occurrence ofPeziza ostracoderma. Mycologia52: 959–961.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fink, B. 1915. The ascomycetes of Ohio. I. Ohio Biol. Sur. Bull. 5, Vol.II. 70 pp.

  • Fischer, E. 1938. Tuberineae,In Engler, A. und K. Prantl., Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien II, 5b(8): 1–42.

  • Fitzpatrick, H. M. 1918. Sexuality inRhizina undulata. Botan. Gaz.65: 201–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1920. Monograph of the Coryneliaceae. Mycologia12: 206–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942. Revisionary studies in the Coryneliaceae. Mycologia34: 464–514.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andR. P. Korf. 1959. Lectures on mycology, Ascomycetes. Plant Pathology Department, Cornell University, Ithaca, N. Y. (Mimeo).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, H. C. I. 1907. On the sexuality and development of the ascocarp inLachnea stercorea. Ann. Botany21: 349–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1913. The development of the ascocarp inLachnea cretea. Ann. Botany27: 553–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andS. W. S. Brooks. 1909. Further studies on the cytology of the ascus. Ann. Botany23: 537–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andE. J. Welsford. 1908. Further contributions to the cytology of the ascomycetes. Ann. Botany22: 465–477.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fries, E. M. 1821. Systema mycologicum.I. Lundae.

  • -. 1822. Systema mycologicum. 2. Lundae.

  • -. 1849. Summa vegetabilium Scandinaviae. 259–572.

  • Fuckel, L. 1869. Symbolae mycologicae, Beiträge zur Kenntniss der rheinischen Pilze. Jahrb. Nassauischen Ver. Naturk.23-24: 1–459.

    Google Scholar 

  • Funk, A. 1963. Studies in the genusCaliciopsis. Canad. J. Botany41: 503–543.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gamundi, I. J. 1956. El generoScutellinia en Argentina. Contr. cient. Fac. Co. exact. fis. nat. Univ. B. Aires (Bot.)1: 69–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957. El generoCookeina en la Republica Argentina. Boln Soc. argent. Bot.6: 212–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1959. Addenda a las especies argentinas deCookeina Kuntze. Boln Soc. argent. Bot.7: 201–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960. Discomycetes operculados de la Argentina, familias Pezizaceae y Humariaceae. Lilloa30: 257–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964. “Discomycetes” operculados del Parque Nacional Nahuel Huapi, Argentina. Darwiniana12: 568–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andM. E. Ranalli. 1964. Estudio sistemàtico y biológico de las Ascoboláceas de Argentina. I. Nova Hedwigia7: 517–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1966. Estudio sistemático y biológico de las Ascoboláceas de Argentina. II. Nova Hedwigia10: 337–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gäumann, E. A. 1926. Vergleichende Morphologie der Pilze. 626 pp. Jena.

  • —. 1964. Die Pilze, Grundzüge ihrer Entwicklungsgeschichte und Morphologie. 541 pp. Birkhäuser Verlag, Basel und Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andC. W. Dodge. 1928. Comparative morphology of fungi.I-XIV: 1–701. New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilkey, H. M. 1939. Tuberales of North America. Oregon State Monogr. (Stud. Botany)1: 1–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. Tuberales. No. Amer. Flora II,1: 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, C. C. 1966. Ascocarp centrum ontogeny of species of Hypodermataceae of conifers. Amer. J. Botany53: 319–327.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1968. Ascocarpic centrum ontogeny of species of Hypodermataceae of conifers. II. Amer. J. Botany55: 45–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graddon, W. D. 1965. A guide to lignicolous species ofApostemidium. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.48: 639–646.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greis, H. 1940. Befruchtungsarten beiMorchella. Jahrb. Wissen. Botan.89: 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grelet, L. J. 1942. Les Discomycètes de France d’apres la Classification de Boudier. Rev. Mycol.7: 3–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1943. Ibid.8: 3–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1944. Ibid.9: 14–35, 78–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1945. Ibid.10: 96–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1946. Ibid.11: 89–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947. Ibid.12: 24–36, 45–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1948. Ibid.13: 22–24, 105–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949. Ibid.14: 26–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1950. Ibid.15: 29–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1951. Ibid.16: 11–26, 80–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1953. Ibid.18: 24–28, 200–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. Ibid.19: 138–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1956. Ibid.21: 14–39, 146–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957. Ibid.22: 26–52, 166–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1959. Ibid.24: 81–92, 234–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gremmen, J. 1949. De imperfecte vorm vanDesmazierella acicola Lib. Fungus (Wagen.)19: 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1950. Het genusBelonioscypha sensu Rehm en de indentiteit vanB. ciliatospora (Fuckel) Rehm enHelotium scutula (Pers. ex Fr.) Karst. Fungus (Wagen.)20: 7–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1952. Het genusPyrenopeziza. Levenswijze en cultuur vanP. plataginis. Fungus (Wagen.)22: 22–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi. I. A study on some Dutch species growing onRubus stems. Fungus (Wagen.)24: 1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1955. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi.II. Some caulicolousMollisia species inhabiting various hosts, mainly Compositae. Fungus (Wagen.)25: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1956a. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi.III. The polyphagous speciesMollisia pastinaceae Nannfeldt. Fungus (Wagen.)26: 28–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1956b. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi.IV. Species inhabiting prevous year’s stems ofEpilobium andUlmaria. Fungus (Wagen.)26: 32–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi. V. On some species described by Velenovsky. Fungus (Wagen.)27: 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1958. Taxonomical notes on Mollisiaceous fungi.VI. The genusPyrenopeziza Fuckel. Fungus (Wagen.)28: 37–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. Preliminary notes onGodronia and association with conidial fungi. Nova Hedwigia6: 15–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, E. 1959. The cytology ofGloeotinia temulenta (blind seed disease of Ryegrass). Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.42: 132–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, J. W. 1939. SomePezicula species and their conidial stages. Canad. J. Res.17: 125–143.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1940. SomeDermatea species and their conidial stages. Mycologia32: 736–751.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1946. North American species ofDermea. Mycologia38: 351–431.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1952. The genusTympanis. Canad. J. Botany30: 571–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. The genusDurandiella. Canad. J. Botany32: 116–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1965. The genusGodronia. Canad. J. Botany43: 1195–1276.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967. The genusPragmopara. Canad. J. Botany45: 169–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andC. A. Bowerman. 1955. The species ofCiborinia onPopulus. Canad. J. Botany33: 577–590.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andF. L. Drayton. 1939. The perfect stage ofBotrytis cinerea. Mycologia31: 485–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andM. E. Elliott. 1961. Self-fertility in the Sclerotiniaceae. Canad. J. Botany39: 215–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andS. C. Hoare. 1953. The Helvellaceae of the Ottawa district. Canad. Fld. Nat.67: 95–102.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andC. A. Loveland. 1953. The connection betweenBotryotinia fuckeliana andBotrytis cinerea. Mycologia45: 415–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andD. E. Wells. 1956. The genusRetinocyclus. Mycologia48: 865–871.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andD. E. Wilson. 1967. The nomenclatural status ofCoryne. Taxon16: 35–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grund, D. W., andK. A. Harrison. 1967. Nova Scotian fungi. Geoglossaceae. Canad. J. Botany45: 1625–1641.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gwynne-Vaughan, H. C. I. 1922. Fungi. 232 pp. Cambridge.

  • —, andH. S. Williamson. 1931. Contributions to the study ofPyronema confluens. Ann. Botany45: 355–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1932. The cytology and development ofAscobolus magnificus. Ann. Botany46: 653–670.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, G. G., andT. T. Ayers. 1934. Dasyscyphae on conifers in North America.III.Dasyscypha pini. Mycologia26: 479–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hakelier, N. 1964. Bidrag till Sveriges Svampflora II. Geoglossaceer. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.58: 337–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlin, R. T. 1965.Lamprospora planchonis from Georgia. Mycologia57: 131–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harper, R. A. 1900. Sexual reproduction inPyronema confluens and the morphology of the Ascocarp. Ann. Botany14: 321–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heald, F. D., andF. A. Wolf. 1910. The structure and relationship ofUrnula geaster. Botan. Gaz.49: 182–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heim, R. 1966. Quelques ascomycetes remarquables. V. Morilles tropicales (Pacifique sud.). Bull. Trimest. Soc. Mycol. Fr.82: 442–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hennings, P. 1900. Fungi. MonsuniaI: 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, B. B. 1914. Contribution to the life history and physiology ofCylindrosporium on stone fruits. Amer. J. Botany1: 145–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, H. E. 1950. No brachymeiosis inPyronema confluens. Mycologia42: 301–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Höhnel, F. von. 1903. Mycologische Fragmente. Ann. Mycol.1: 396–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1907. Fragmente zur Mykologie. Sitzb. k. ak. Wissen. Wein.116: 135 pp.

  • —. 1909. Fragmente zur Mykologie. Sitzb. k. ak. Wissen. Wein.118: 275–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1917a. Mycologische Fragmente, CXX-CXC. Ann. Mycol.15: 292–383.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1917b. System der Phacidiales. Ber. Deutsch. Botan. Ges.35: 416–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1918. Fragmente zur Mykologie. Sitzb. k. ak. Wissen. Wein, Math.-nat.K1. I.127: 549–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1920. UberPseudopeziza, Pyrenopeziza, Ephelina, undSpilopodia. Ber. Deutsch. Botan. Ges.38: 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honey, E. E. 1928. The monilioid species ofSclerotinia. Mycologia20: 127–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howarth, W. O., andH. G. Chippindale. 1931. Notes on the biology ofCoryne sarcoides Jacq. andC. urnalis Nyl. Mem. Proc. Manchester Lit. Phil. Soc.75: 47–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, S. J. 1951. Studies on microfungi. IX.Calcarisporium, Verticicladium andHansfordia. C. M. I. Mycol. Pap.43: 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hotter, R. 1958. Untersuchungen über die GattungPyrenopeziza Fuckl. Phytopath. Zeit.33: 1–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai, S. 1940. The Geoglossaceae of Norway. Ann. Mycol.38: 268–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1941. Geoglossaceae Japoniae. J. Fac. Agr. Hokkaido Imp. Univ.45: 155–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. Evellaceae Japoniae. Sci. Rep. Yokohama Nat. Univ.2: 1–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1956. Contributions ad studia monographica Geoglossacearum.II. III. Sci. Rep. Yokohama Univ.1955: 1–11,1956: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito, S., andS. Imai. 1937. Fungi of the Bonin Islands.II. Trans. Sapporo Nat. Hist. Soc.15: 52–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. G. 1935. The structure ofLophodermium pinastri (Schrader ex Fr.) Chev. Ann. Botany40: 699–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanouse, B. B. 1949. Studies in the genusOtidea. Mycologia41: 660–677.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karsten, P. A. 1869. Monographia Pezizarum fennicarum. Notis. Sallsk. Fauna. Fl. fenn Forh.10: 99–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1871. Mycologia fennica. I. Discomycetes. 263 pp. Helsingfors.

  • Kihlman, O. 1883. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Ascomyceten. Acta. Soc. Sci. Fenn.13: 5–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killian, K. 1918. Morphologie, Biologia, und Entwickelungsgeschichte vonCryptomyces pteridis (Rebent.) Rehm. Zeit. Bot.10: 49–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killian, C., andV. Likhite. 1924. Observations sur le genreLophodermium. C. R. Hebdomad. Soc. Biol.2: 574–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbrough, J. W. 1966a. The structure and development ofTrichobolus zukalii. Mycologia58: 289–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1966b. Studies in the Pseudoascoboleae. Canad. J. Botany44: 685–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1969a. North American species ofThecotheus (Pezizeae, Pezizaceae). Mycologia61: 99–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andR. P. Korf. 1967. A synopsis of the genera and species of the tribeTheleboleae (= Pseudoascoboleae). Amer. J. Botany54: 9–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,E. R. Luck-Allen, andR. F. Cain. 1969b.Iodophanus, the Pezizeae segregate of “Ascophanus” (Pezizaceae). Amer. J. Botany56: 1187–1202.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knapp, A. 1950. Die europaischen Hypogaeen-Gattungen und ihre Gattungenstypen. Schweiz. Z. Pilzk.28: 101–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kniep, H. 1928. Die Sexualitat der niederen Pflanzen, Differenzierung, Verteilung, Bestimmung und Vererbung des Geschlechts bei den Thallophyten. 544 pp. Jena.

  • Kobayashi, T. 1965. Taxonomic notes on Chloroscyphae causing needle blight on Japanese conifers. Bull. Gov’t For. Exp. Sta. Mergura176: 55–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kobayasi, Y., N. Hiratsuka, R. P. Korf, K. Tubaki, K. Aoshima, M. Soneda, andJ. Sugiyama. 1967. Mycological studies on the Alaskan Arctic. Ann. Rep. Inst. Ferment., Osaka.3: 1–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korf, R. P. 1951. A monograph of the Arachnopezizeae. Lloydia14: 129–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1953. The new rules of typification as they affectSarcoscypha andVelutaria. Mycologia45: 296–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. A revision of the classification of operculate Discomycetes (Pezizales). VIII Congr. Int. Bot., Rapp. & Comm.18-20: 80.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1956.Daleomyces, Durandiomyces and other sparassoid forms of operculate Discomycetes. Mycologia48: 711–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957a. Nomenclatural notes. II. OnBulgaria, Phaeobulgaria andSarcosoma. Mycologia49: 102–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957b. Two bulgarioid genera:Galiella andPlectania. Mycologia49: 107–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1958. Japanese Discomycete notesI-VIII. Sci. Rep. Yokohama Nat. Univ.II, 7: 7–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1959. Japanese Discomycete NoteIX-XVI. Bull. Nat. Sci. Mus., Tokoyo.45: 389–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960a. Nomenclatural notes.IV. The generic namePlicaria. Mycologia52: 648–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1960b.Jafnea, a new genus of the Pezizaceae. Nagaoa7: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1962a. A synopsis of the Hemiphacidiaceae, a family of the Helotiales (Discomycetes) causing needle-blights of conifers. Mycologia54: 12–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1962b. A rare North American discomycete, together with some comments on the genusLachnellula. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan3: 47–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963a. Discomycete Flora of Asia, Precursor I: The Scope and Status of Exploration. Lloydia26: 16–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1969. On four major discomycete works published in 1968. Mycologia61: 442–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andJ. K. Rogers. 1967. A new term, the Schizotype, and the concept of implicit typification. Taxon16: 19–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer, E. M. 1902. Studies onUrnula andGeopyxis. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club.29: 137–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langeron, M. 1952. Précis de mycologie, mycologie générale, mycologie humaine et animale, techniques. 2nd Ed. by R. Vanbreuseghem. 703 pp. Paris.

  • Le Gal, M. 1942. Mode de formation des ornamentations sporales chez quelques Discomycètes operculés. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris.214: 125–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1946a. Mode déhiscence de asques chez lesCookeina et lesLeotia et ses conséquences du point de vue phylogenetique. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris.222: 755–757.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1946b. Les Discomycètes suboperculés. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France.62: 218–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1947. Recherches sur les Ornamentations sporales des Discomycètes operculés. Ann. Sci. Nat., Bot. ser.11: 73–297.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949. Deux Discomycètes mal connu:Ascodesmis nigricans van Tieghem etAscodesmis microscopica (Crouan) Le Gal, non Seaver. Rev. Mycol.14: 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1953a. Les Discomycètes de Madagascar. 465 pp. Paris.

  • —. 1953b. Les Discomycètes de l’herbier Crouan. Rev. Mycol.18: 73–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1957. Le genreLeucoscypha Boud. Bull. Jar. Bot. Bruxelles.27: 720–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1958. Le genreMelastiza Boudier. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France.74: 149–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1959. Discomycètes du Congo Belge d’après les récoltes de madame Goossens-Fontana. Bull. Jard. Botan. de l’Etat.29: 73–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1961. Les Discomycètes de l’herbier Crouan. Deuxième sćrie. Ann. Sci. Nat. (Bot.)XII.1: 441–467.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1962. Combinaisons nouvelles concernant les genresGalactinia (Cooke) Boud. emend. Le Gal,Scutellinia (Cooke) Lamb, emend Le Gal etSarcosoma Casp. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France78: 204–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. Valeur taxonomique particulière de certains caractères chez les Discomycètes supérieurs. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France79: 456–470.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1964. Combinaisons nouvelles concernant le genreScutellinia (Cooke) Lamb. emend. Le Gal. Bull. Trimest. Soc. Mycol. France80: 123–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1966. Contribution à la connaissance du genreScutellinia (Cooke) Lamb. emend Le Gal. Bull. Soc. Mycol. France82: 310–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andF. Magenot. 1956. Contributions à l’étude des Mollisioidées. 1. Note preliminaire; les formes conidiennes. Rev. Mycol. Paris21: 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1958. Contribution à l’étude Mollisioidées.II Rev. Mycol. Paris23: 28–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1960. Contribution à l’étude des Mollisioidées.III. Rev. Mycol. Paris25: 135–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1961. Contribution à l’étude des Mollisioidées.IV. Rev. Mycol. Paris26: 263–331.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1966. Contribution à l’étude des Mollisioidées.V. Rev. Mycol. Paris31: 3–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindau, G. 1897. Pezizineae, Phacidiineae, Hysteriineae. In Engler & Prantl’s Naturl. Pfl-Fam.1(1): 177–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linnaeus, C. 1753. Species Plantarum. 1200 pp. Holmiae.

  • Lohwag, H. 1927. Das Oogon als Wesensbestandteil der Geschlechtsorgame im Pilzreich. Biol. Gen.3: 699–772.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luttrell, E. S. 1951. Taxonomy of the Pyrenomycetes. Univ. Mo. Stud.24: 1–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1955. The ascostromatic ascomycetes. Mycologia47: 511–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maas Geesteranus, R. A. 1955. Notes on Dutch fungi. Fungus25: 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1965. Geoglossaceae of India and adjacent countries. Persoonia4: 19–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1967. Studies in cup-fungi. I. Persoonia4: 417–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mains, E. B. 1954. North American species ofGeoglossum andTrichoglossum. Mycologia46: 586–631.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1955. North American hyaline-spored species of Geoglosseae. Mycologia47: 846–877.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1956a. The relationship ofCudoniella andHelotium. Mycologia48: 410–419.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1956b. North American species of the Geoglossaceae. Tribe Cudonieae. Mycologia48: 694–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malençon, G. 1938. Les truffes Europeennes. Rev. Mycol., Mem. Hors-ser.1: 1–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massee, G. E. 1895. British fungus-flora.4: 1–522. London.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCubbin, W. A. 1910. Development of the Helvellineae I.Helvella elastica. Botan. Gaz.49: 195–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • McIntosh, D. L. 1954. A cytological study of ascus development inPyronema confluens Tul. Canad. J. Botany32: 440–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, E. J. 1963. The ontogeny of the apothecia inPyronema domesticum. Amer. J. Botany50: 37–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1965. Ontogeny of gelatinous fungi. Mycologia57: 114–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andR. P. Korf. 1963. The genusPyronema. Bull. Torrey Botan. Club90: 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moravec, J. 1968. Piīspěvek k poznáni operkulátnich discomycetu roduCheilymenia Boud. Česká Mykol.22: 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreau, F., andMme. Moreau. 1930. Le développement du périthèce chez quelques Ascomycètes. Rev. Gén. Bot.42: 65–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, M. 1951. Beiträg zur Anatomie der Discomyceten. Das Morchellaproblem. Sydowia5: 56–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. Ascomyceten. In H. Gams, Kleine Kryptogamenflora 2a,147 pp. Gustav Fischer Verlag. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munk, A. 1957. Danish Pyrenomycetes. A preliminary flora. Dansk Botan. Ark.17(1): 1–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nannfeldt, J. A. 1932. Studien über die Morphologie und Systematik der nichtlichenisierten inoperculaten Discomyceten. Nov. Act. Reg. Soc. Sci. Uppsala. ser. 4,8: 1–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1937. Contributions to the mycoflora of Sweden. 4. On some species ofHelvella, together with a discussion of the natural affinities within Helvellaceae Pezizaceae trib. Acetabuleae. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.31: 47–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942. The Geoglossaceae of Sweden. Arkiv för Botany30A: 1–67.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1949. Contributions to the Mycoflora of Sweden.7. A new winter Discomycete,Urnula hiemalis Nannf. n. sp., and a short account of the Swedish species of Sarcoscyphaceae. Svensk Bot. Tidskr.43: 468–484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naumov, N. A. 1964. Flora gribov Leningradskoi oblasti. Vypusk II. Diskcomitsety. 258 pp. Izdatel’stvo Nauka. Moscow & Leningrad.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nylander, W. 1869. Observationes circa Pezizas Fenniae. Not. Fauna Fl. Fenn.10: 1–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberwinkler, F., F. Dasacrade, andE. Müller. 1967. ÜberAscocorticium anomalum (Ell. et. Harkn.) Earle. Nova Hedwigia14: 283–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obrist, W. 1961. The genusAscodesmis. Canad. J. Botany39: 943–953.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olive, L. S. 1950. A cytological study of ascus development inPatella melaloma. Amer. J. Botany37: 757–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1954. Sexuality of the Ascomycetes. Rapp. Comm.VIII Congr. Int. Bot., Paris.18-20: 67–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otani, Y. 1967. Note on some cup fungi of the Hyaloscyphaceae collected in Hokkaido, Japan. Trans. Mycol. Soc. Japan8: 33–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouellette, G. B., andL. P. Magasi. 1966.Lophomerum a new genus of Hypodermataceae. Mycologia58: 275–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overton, J. B. 1906. The morphology of the ascocarp and spore formation in the many-spored asci ofThecotheus pelletieri. Botan. Gaz.42: 451–492.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paden, J. W. 1967. The conidial stage ofPeziza brunneoatra. Mycologia59: 932–934.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andE. E. Tylutki. 1968. Idaho Discomycetes. I. A new genus of the Sarcoscyphaceae. Mycologia60: 1160–1168.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1969. Idaho Discomycetes. II. Mycologia61: 683–693.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palm, B. T. 1932. OnCyttaria Berk, andCyttariella gen. nov. Ann. Mycol. Berl.30: 405–420.

    Google Scholar 

  • Persoon, C. H. 1801. Synopsis methodica Fungorum. 706 pp. Gottingae.

  • Peter, J. 1962.Aleuria varia (Hedw.) Boudier, Syn.Peziza varia (Hedw.) Fr.,Plicaria varia Hedw. undPlicaria stevensoma Ellis. Zeit. Pilzk.40: 84–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrak, F. 1962. Uber die GattungGremmenia Korf. Sydowia16: 350–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W. 1887. A manual of the British Discomycetes. 1–462. London. Pliny (C. Plinius Secundus). A.D. 22. Historia Naturalis. 37 vols.

  • Quelet, L. 1886. Enchiridion fungorum in Europa media et praesertim in Gallia vigentium. 352 pp. Lutetiae.

  • Rahm, E. 1966. Geoglossaceae in Hochtal von Arosa. Schwiez. Z. Pilck.44: 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raitviir, A. 1961. A survey of the distribution of the species of Geoglossaceae in Estonia. Flor. Mark.1: 137–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramamurthi, C. S., R. P. Korf, andL. R. Batra. 1958. A revision of the North American species ofChlorociboria (Sclerotiniaceae). Mycologia49: 854–863.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramlow, G. 1906. Zur Entwicklungsgeschichte vonThelebolus stercoreus Tode. Botan. Zeit.64: 85–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1915. Beiträge zur Entwicklungsgeschichte der Ascoboleen. Mycol. Centralblatt5: 177–198.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsbottom, J., andF. L. Balfour-Browne. 1951. List of Discomycetes recorded from the British Isles. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.34: 38–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawlings, G. B. 1956. Australasian Cyttariaceae. Trans. Royal Soc. N. Z.84: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeves, F. 1967. The fine structure of ascospore formation inPyronema domesticum. Mycologia59: 1018–1033.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rehm, H. 1887-1896. Die Pilze Deutschlands, Oesterreichs und der Schweiz. III. Abtheilung: Ascomyceten: Hysteriaceen und Discomyceten. In Rab. Krypt-Fl.1(3): 1–1272.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1912. Zur Kenntnis der Discomyceten Deutschlands, Deutsch-Osterreichs und der Schwiez. I. Ber. Bayerinschen Botan. Ges.13: 102–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, J., andR. F. Cain. 1961. The genusTherrya. Canad. J. Botany39: 1117–1129.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1962a. Studies on the organisms associated with “snow blight” of conifers in North America. I. A new genus of the Helotiales. Mycologia54: 194–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1962b. Studies on the organisms associated with “snow blight” of conifers in North America. Some species of the generaPhacidium, Lophophacidium, Sarcotrichila, andHemiphacidium. Mycologia54: 481–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1963. A new genus of the Hemiphacidiaceae. Mycologia55: 781–785.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andA. Funk. 1966. The genusAtropellis and a new genus of the Helotiales associated with branch cankers of Western Hemlock. Mycologia58: 417–439.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andK. A. Pirozynski. 1966. Notes on some interesting North American fungi. Canad. J. Botany44: 645–653.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1968. Critical notes on genera of the Hemiphacidiaceae. I.Gremmenia. Mycologia60: 526–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rifai, M. A. 1968. The Australasian Pezizales in the Herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Verh. K. ned. Akad. Wet.II.57: 1–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rimpau, R. H. 1962. Untersuchungen uber die GattungDrepanopeziza (Kleb.) v Höhn. Phytopath. Zeit.43: 257–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosinski, M. H. 1953. Two types of spore germination inSarcoscypha coccinea (Scop. ex Fr.) Lambotte. Mycologia45: 302–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1956. Development of the ascocarp ofAnthracobia melaloma. Mycologia48: 506–533.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saggardo, P. A. 1884. Conspectus generum Discomycetum hucusque cognitorum. Bot. Cbl.18: 213–220, 247–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1889–1931. Sylloge fungorum omnium hucusque cognitorum.8: 1–1143;24: 705–1438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez, A. 1967. The sectionsApostemium andMicrostemium of the genusVibrissea (Fungi). J. Agr. Univ. Puerto Rico51: 79–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andR. P. Korf. 1966. The genusVibrissea and the generic namesLeptosporium, Apostemium, Apostemidium, Gorgoniceps andOphiogloea. Mycologia48: 722–737.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santesson, R. 1945.Cyttaria, a genus of inoperculate Discomycetes. Svensk Botan. Tidsk.39: 319–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satina, S. 1921. Kistorii razvitiiaPhacidium repandum. Zhyrn. Russk. Botan. Obshchestva.4: 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter, J. 1893. Die Pilze Schlesiens. In Cohn’s Krypt.-Fl. Sch1.3(2): 1–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • -. 1897. Pezizineae,In Engler, A. und K. Prantl, Die naturlichen Pflanzenfamilien,I,1: 173–243.

  • Schüepp, H. 1959. Untersuchungen uber Pseudopezizoideae sensu Nannfeldt. Phytopath. Zeit.36: 213–269.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, E. S. 1927. Nuclear division and spore formation in the ascus ofPeziza domiciliana. Amer. J. Botany 14: 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seaver, F. J. 1928. The North American Cup-fungi (Operculates). 284 pp. New York.

  • -. 1951. The North American Cup-fungi (Inoperculates). 428 pp. New York.

  • Šebek, S. 1966. Klič k určeni smrzovitych hub (Morchellaceae) rostoucich v CSSR. C. C. H.43: 19–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Starbäck, K. 1895. Discomyceten-Studien. Bihang Kongl. Svenska Vet.-Akad. Handl.III, 21(5): 1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svrček, M. 1954. Revise Velenovského druhu rudoOrbilia (Discomycetes). Sborn. Přír. Národ. Mus. 10: 1–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andJ. Kubička. 1961. Operkulátni diskomycety od rybníka Dvořiště v jizních Cechach. Česká Mykol.15: 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1963. Druhý přispěvek k operkulátnim diskomycetúm z ololi rybníka Dvořiště v jizních Cechach. Česká Mykol.17: 61–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swingle, D. B. 1934. Fertilization inAscodesmis nigricans van Tieghem. Amer. J. Botany21: 519–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tehon, L. R. 1935. A monographic rearrangement ofLophodermium.I11. Biol. Monogr.13: 1–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terrier, C. A. 1942. Essai sur la systématique des Phacidiaceae (Fr.) sensu Nannfeldt (1932). Beitr. Krypt.fl. Schweiz9: 1–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thind, K. S., andL. R. Batra. 1957a. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills. I. J. Indian Bot. Soc.36: 51–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1957b. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills.IV. J. Indian Bot. Soc.36: 428–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • —,E. K. Cash, andJ. S. Sethi. 1958. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills. V. Mycologia49: 831–836.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——, andP. Singh. 1959. The Helotiales of the Mussoorie Hills.II. Mycologia51: 833–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andS. S. Saini. 1967. The Helotiales of India. VI. Mycologia59: 467–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. andJ. S. Sethi. 1957a. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills.II. J. Indian Bot. Soc.36: 192–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1957b. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills.III. Indian Phytopath.10: 26–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andHarnek Singh. 1964. The Helotiales of India.III. J. Indian Bot. Soc.43: 530–542.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1965. The Helotiales of India.IV. J. Indian Bot. Soc.44: 122–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andP. Singh. 1958. The Pezizaceae of the Mussoorie Hills.VI. J. Indian Bot. Soc.38: 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1961. The Helotiales of Mussoorie Hills. I. J. Indian Bot. Soc.40: 295–307.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andK. S. Waraitch. 1964. The Pezizales of India.VIII. J. Indian Bot. Soc.43: 459–475.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1966. The Pezizales of India.IX. J. Indian Bot. Soc.45: 384–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, G. E. 1939. A canker disease of poplars caused by a new species ofNeofabrae. Mycologia31: 455–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tulasne, L. R., andC. Tulasne. 1865. Selecta fungorum carpologia. The Imperial Press, Paris.3: 1–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——. 1866. Note sur les phénomènes de copulation que présentent quelques champignons. Ann. Sci. Nat. Bot., V.6: 211–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tieghem, P. 1876. Sur de développement du fruit desAscodesmis, genre nouve de l’ordre des Ascomycètes. Bull. Soc. Botan. France23: 271–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voorhees, R. K. 1939. The validity and morphology ofTryblidiella species. Mycologia31: 113–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J., M. A. Rifai, andSamy Sl-Abyad. 1964. Culture observations on some Discomycetes from burnt ground. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.47: 445–454.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeyer, L. E. 1966. Development of the ascocarp inCryptomycina pteridis. Mycologia58: 752–760.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, F. 1940.Ovulinia, a new generic segregate fromSclerotinia. Phytopathology30: 236–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whetzel, H. H. 1926. North American species ofSclerotinia. I. Mycologia18: 224–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1928. North American species ofSclerotinia.II. Two species onCarex, S. duriaeana (Tul.) Rehm, andS. longisclerotialis n. sp. Mycologia21: 5–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1937.Septotinia, a new genus of the Ciborioideae. Mycologia29: 128–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942. A new genus and new species of brown-spored inoperculate Discomycetes from Panama. Mycologia34: 584–591.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1943. A monograph ofLambertella, a genus of brown-spored inoperculate discomycetes. Lloydia6: 18–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1944. A new genus of the Sclerotiniaceae. Farlowia1: 483–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1945. A synopsis of the genera and species of the Sclerotiniaceae, a family of stromatic inoperculate Discomycetes. Mycologia37: 648–714.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1946. The cypericolous and juncicolous species ofSclerotinia. Farlowia3: 385–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, N. H. 1954. The development of the ascocarp ofCyttaria gunnii Berk. Trans. Brit. Mycol. Soc.37: 431–436.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, W. L. 1941. A monograph of the genusRutstroemia (Discomycetes). Lloydia4: 153–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942a. Studies in the genusHelotium.I. A review of the species described by Peck. Mycologia34: 154–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1942b. Studies in the genusHelotium.II.Lachnum pygmaeum and the status of the genusHelolachnum. Amer. Mid. Nat.28: 512–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1943. Studies in the genusHelotium. III. History and diagnosis of certain European and North American foliicolous species. Farlowia1: 135–170.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1944. Studies in the genusHelotium.IV. Some miscellaneous species. Farlowia1: 599–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, andH. H. Whetzel. 1938. Pleomorphic life cycle in a new genus of the Helotiaceae. Mycologia30: 187–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehouse, H. L. K. 1949. Heterothallism and sex in the fungi. Biol. Rev.24: 411–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitney, H. S., andJ. R. Parmeter. 1964. The perfect stage ofRhizoctonia hiemalis. Mycologia56: 114–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wojewoda, W. 1966. Morchellaceae zebrane w poludniowej Polsce w latach 1962–1965. Fragm. flor. geobot.12: 205–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, F. A. 1958. The conidial stage ofLamprospora trachycarpa (Currey) Seaver. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.74: 163–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1959. Mechanism of apothecial opening and ascospore expulsion by the cup-fungusUrnula craterium. Mycologia50: 837–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • —. 1963. The disc fungusSphaerospora hinnulea (Berk. & Br.) Massee and its conidial stage. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc.79: 156–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • -, andF. T. Wolf. 1947. The Fungi. Vol.I, 437 pp., Vol.II, 538 pp. John Wiley and Sons. New York.

  • Zukal, H. 1886. Mycologische Untersuchungen. Denkschr. k. ak. Wissen. Wien51: 21–36.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Botany, University of Florida, Gainesville

    James W. Kimbrough

Authors
  1. James W. Kimbrough
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Fla. Agri. Exp. Sta. Jour. Series #3601.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kimbrough, J.W. Current trends in the classification of discomycetes. Bot. Rev 36, 91–161 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858958

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02858958

Keywords

Search

Navigation