Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Anti-Intellectualism Attitudes and Academic Self-Efficacy on Business Students’ Perceptions of Cheating

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

College cheating represents a major ethical problem facing students and educators, especially in colleges of business. The current study surveys 666 business students in three universities to examine potential determinants of cheating perceptions. Anti-intellectualism refers to a student’s negative view of the value and importance of intellectual pursuits and critical thinking. Academic self-efficacy refers to a student’s belief in one’s ability to accomplish an academic task. As hypothesized, students high in anti-intellectualism attitudes and those with low academic self-efficacy were least likely to perceive college cheating as unethical. Considering that college cheating has been found as a predictor of workplace cheating, the results urge business instructors to reduce anti-intellectualism among students and to encourage them to put forth their best efforts. The results also serve employers by focusing attention on these two psychological variables during the hiring and promotion processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allmon D. E., Page D., & Roberts, R. (2000). Detecting, Understanding, and Controlling for Cheating on Tests. Research in Higher Education, 32, 725–736

    Google Scholar 

  • Angell L. R. (2006). The Relationship of Impulsiveness, Personal Efficacy, and Academic Motivation to College Cheating. College Student Journal, 40, 118–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Antion D. L., & Michael W. B. (1983). Short-Term Predictive Validity of Demographic, Affective, Personal, and Cognitive Variables in Relation to Two Criterion Measures of Cheating Behaviors. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 43, 467–482. doi:10.1177/001316448304300216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: Toward a Unifying Theory of Behavioral Change. Psychological Review, 84, 191–215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A. (1986). Social Foundation of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: Freeman

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes W. F. (1975). Test Information: An Application of the Economics of Search. The Journal of Economic Education, 7, 28–33. doi:10.2307/1182030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck L., & Ajzen I. (1991). Predicting Dishonest Actions Using the Theory of Planned Behavior. Journal of Research in Personality, 25, 285–301. doi:10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-H

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berube M. (1996). Public Perceptions of Universities and Faculty. Academe, 82, 10–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowers W. J. (1964). Student Dishonesty and Its Control in College. New York: Columbia Bureau of Applied Research

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman K. J., Davis R. D., Toy D., & Wright L. (2004). Academic Integrity in the Business School Environment: I’ll Get by with a Little Help from My Friends. Journal of Marketing Education, 26, 236–249. doi:10.1177/0273475304268779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chemers, M. M., L. T. Hu and B. F. Garcia: 2001, ‘Academic Self-Efficacy and First-Year College Student Performance and Adjustment’, Journal of Educational Psychology 93, 55–64. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.55

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, D. R. and C. W. Emory: 1995, Business Research Methods (Irwin, Chicago, IL)

  • Crown D. F., & Spiller M. S. (1998). Learning from Literature on Collegiate Cheating: A Review of Empirical Research. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 683–700

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis S. F., Grover C. A., Becker A., & McGregor L. N. (1992). Academic Dishonesty: Prevalence, Determinants, Techniques and Punishments. Teaching of Psychology (Columbia, Mo.), 19, 16–20. doi:10.1207/s15328023top1901_3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis S. F., & Ludvigson H. W. (1995). Additional Data on Academic Dishonesty and a Proposal for Remediation. Teaching of Psychology (Columbia, Mo.), 22, 119–121. doi:10.1207/s15328023top2202_6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenberger M. E., & Sealander K. A. (2001). A Scale for Measuring Students’ Anti-Intellectualism. Psychological Reports, 89, 387–402. doi:10.2466/PR0.89.6.387-402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias S. M., & Loomis R. J. (2000). Using an Academic Self- Efficiency Scale to Address University Major Persistence. Journal of College Student Development, 41, 450–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Fass R. A. (1990). Cheating and Plagiarism: Ethics in Higher Education. New York, NY: McMillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman F. M., Anderman L. H., & Jensen J. M. (2007). Sense of Belonging in College Freshman at the Classroom and Campus Levels. Journal of Experimental Education, 75, 203–220. doi:10.3200/JEXE.75.3.203-220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham M. A., Monday J., O’ Brien K., & Steffen S. (1994). Cheating at Small Colleges: An Examination of Student and Faculty Attitudes and Behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 35, 255–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstadter R. (1963). Anti-Intellectualism in American Life. New York: Knopf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hook R. J. (2004). Students’ Anti-Intellectual Attitudes and Adjustment to College. Psychological Reports, 94, 909–914. doi:10.2466/PR0.94.3.909-914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houston J. P. (1976). The Assessment and Prevention of Answer Coping on Undergraduate Multiple-Choice Exams. Research in Higher Education, 5, 301–311. doi:10.1007/BF00993429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, R. and J. K. Eastman: 2006, ‘Academic Dishonesty: Are Business Students Different from Other College Students?’, Journal of Education for Business 82, 101-110

    Google Scholar 

  • Karabenick S. A., & Scrull T. K. (1978). Effects of Personality and Situation Variation in Locus of Control on Cheating: Determinants of the “Congruence Effect”. Journal of Personality, 46, 72–95. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.1978.tb00603.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kisamore J. L., Stone T. H., & Jawahar I. M. (2007). Academic Integrity: The Relationship Between Individual and Situational Factors on Misconduct Contemplations. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 381–394. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9260-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein H. A., Levengurg N. M., McKendall M., & Mothersell W. (2007). Cheating During the College Years: How Do Business School Students Compare? Journal of Business Ethics, 72, 197–206. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9165-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo F., Lin C. S., & Hsu M. (2007). Assessing Gender Differences in Computer Professionals’ Self-Regulatory Efficacy Concerning Information Privacy Practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 73, 145–160. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9179-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawson R. A. (2004). Is Classroom Cheating Related to Business Students’ Propensity to Cheat in the Real World?. Journal of The American Academy of Business, 8, 142–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach C. W., Queirolo S. S., Voe S. D., & Chemers M. (2003). Choosing Letter Grade Evaluations: The Interaction of Students’ Achievement Goals and Self-Efficacy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 28, 495–509. doi:10.1016/S0361-476X(02)00058-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lock E. A., Frederick E., Lee C., & Bobko P. (1984). Effects of Self-Efficacy, Goals, and Task Strategies on Task Performance. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 241–251. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.69.2.241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long C. D. (1996). It Came from Hollywood: Popular Culture Casts Professors in a Negative Light. Academe, 82, 32–36

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe D. L. (1997). Classroom Cheating Among Natural Science and Engineering Majors. Science and Engineering Ethics, 3, 433–445. doi:10.1007/s11948-997-0046-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Multon K. D., Brown S. D., & Lent R. W. (1991). Relation of Self-Efficacy Beliefs to Academic Outcomes: A Meta-Analytic Investigation. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 30–38. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.1.30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonis, S. and C. O. Swift: 1998, “Deterring Cheating Behavior in the Marketing Classroom: An Analysis of the Effects of Demographics, Attitudes and in-class Deterrent Strategies”, Journal of Marketing Education, 20(3), 188–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares F. (1996). Self-Efficacy Believes in Academic Settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry A. R., Kane K. M., Bernesser K. J., & Picker P. T. (1990). Type A Behavior, Competitive Achievement-Striving, and Cheating among College Students. Psychological Reports, 66, 459–465. doi:10.2466/PR0.66.2.459-465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pino N. W., & Smith W. L. (2003). College Students and Academic Dishonesty. College Student Journal, 37, 490–500

    Google Scholar 

  • Premeaux, S.: 2005, “Undergraduate Student Perceptions Regarding Cheating: Tier 0 Versus 2 AACSB Accredited Business Schools”, Journal of Business Ethics, 62(4), 407–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rettinger D. A., & Jordan A. E. (2005). The Relations Among Religion, Motivation, and College Cheating: A Natural Experiment. Ethics & Behavior, 15, 107–129. doi:10.1207/s15327019eb1502_2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaffer L. S. (1981). The Growth and Limits of Recipe Knowledge. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 2, 71–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims R. L. (1993). The Relationship Between Academic Dishonesty and Unethical Business Practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68, 207–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. L.: 1995, ‘The Severity of Academic Dishonesty: A Comparison of Faculty and Student Views’, Psychology in the Schools 32, 233–238. doi:10.1002/1520-6807(199507)32:3<233::AID-PITS2310320311>3.0.CO;2-H

  • Smyth L. S., & Davis J. R. (2004). Perceptions of Dishonesty Among Two-Year College Students: Academic Versus Business Situations. Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 62–73. doi:10.1023/B:BUSI.0000032347.79241.3c

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swift C. O., & Nonis S. (1998). When No One is Watching: Cheating Behavior on Projects and Assignments. Marketing Education Review, 8, 27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Torres J. B., & Solberg V. S. (2001). Role of Self-Efficiency, Stress, Social Integration, and Family Support in Latino College Student Persistence and Health. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 59, 53–63. doi:10.1006/jvbe.2000.1785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant L. J. (1996). The Self-Inflicted Irrelevance of American Academics. Academe, 82, 18–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams M. S., & Hosek W. R. (2003). Strategies for Reducing Academic Dishonesty. Journal of Legal Studies Education, 21, 87. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1722.2003.tb00326.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitley B. E. (1998). Factors Associated with Cheating Among College Students. Research in Higher Education, 39, 235–274. doi:10.1023/A:1018724900565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood R. E., & Locke E. A. (1987). The Relation of Self-Efficiency and Grade Goals to Academic Performance. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47, 1013–1024. doi:10.1177/0013164487474017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zajacova A., Lynch S. M., & Espenshade T. J. (2005). Self-Efficacy, Stress, and Academic Success in College. Research in Higher Education, 46, 677–705. doi:10.1007/s11162-004-4139-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. California State University, Los Angeles, CA, U.S.A.

    Rafik Z. Elias

Authors
  1. Rafik Z. Elias
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafik Z. Elias.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elias, R.Z. The Impact of Anti-Intellectualism Attitudes and Academic Self-Efficacy on Business Students’ Perceptions of Cheating. J Bus Ethics 86, 199–209 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9843-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9843-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation