Abstract
In western liberal countries late modernity brings in its wake certain distinctive patterns of crime control. Common sense, experience and stigmatization of crime and deviance seem to be the basis on which crime control policies are debated and eventually implemented. Insecurity and fear of crime are the enemies for an effective legal system. What is left for specialist crime control agencies? The Italian case can demonstrate that legal actors, in particular prosecutors, can still effectively participate in the developing of the criminal justice discourse. I will argue that prosecutorial practice can possibly provide the information to understand the socio-legal conditions that shape prosecutors’ role during the pre-trial phase. This role is far from being merely reactive to certain social, historical and cultural developments. Prosecutors’ reactions appear to be aimed at restating their role of guardians of the law. While they react to external influences they try not to adapt to them. In this way they partially mediate the impact of moral panics.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
LL.B, LLM, Ph.D, Research Assistant, Cardiff Law School. I am grateful to Dr. Stewart Field, Prof. David Nelken, Dr. Elen Stokes and to the anonymous referees for their comments. Responsibility for any error in the present work rests with the author.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Montana, R. Prosecutors and the Definition of the Crime Problem in Italy: Balancing the Impact of Moral Panics. Crim Law Forum 20, 471–494 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-009-9108-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-009-9108-y