Skip to main content
Log in

Identity tests: determination of cell line cross-contamination

  • Review
  • Published:
Cytotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cell line cross-contamination is a phenomenon that arises as a result of the continuous cell line culture. It has been estimated that around 20% of the cell lines are misidentified, therefore it is necessary to carry out quality control tests for the detection of this issue. Since cell line cross-contamination discovery, different methods have been applied, such as isoenzyme analysis for inter-species cross-contamination; HLA typing, and DNA fingerprinting using short tandem repeat and a variable number of tandem repeat for intra-species cross-contamination. The cell banks in this sense represent the organizations responsible for guaranteeing the authenticity of cell lines for future research and clinical uses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AFLP:

Amplified fragment length polymorphism

MCB:

Master cell bank

STR:

Short tandem repeat

SBT:

Sequence based typing

SSO:

Sequence specific oligonucleotide

SSOP:

Sequence specific oligonucleotide probe

VNTR:

Variable number tandem repeat

WCB:

Working cell bank

References

  • AATB American Association of Tissue Banks (2002) Standards for tissue banking, 10th edn. American Association of Tissue Banks, McLean, VA

  • ATCC Connection Newsletter (2000) Verify cell line identity with DNA profiling 21:1

  • Borge OJ, Evers K (2003) Aspects on properties, use and ethical considerations of embryonic stem cells—a short review. Cytotechnology 41:59–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buehring GC, Eby EA, Eby MJ (2004) Cell line cross-contamination: how aware are mammalian cell culturists of the problem and how to monitor it? In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 40:211–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao K, Chopek M, Fernández-Vina MA (1999) High and intermediate resolution DNA typing systems for class I HLA-A, B, C genes by hybridization with SSOP. Rev Immunogenet 1:177–208

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cobo F, Stacey GN, Hunt C, Cabrera C, Nieto A, Montes R, Cortes JL, Catalina P, Barnie A, Concha A (2005) Microbiological control in stem cell banks: approaches to standardisation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 68:456–466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Defendi V, Billingham RE, Silvers WK, Moorhead P (1960) Immunological and karyological criteria for identification of cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst 25:359–385

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Freshney RI (1994) Culture of animal cells: a manual of basic techniques. Wiley-Liss, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gartler SM (1968) Apparent HeLa cell contamination of human heteroploid cell lines. Nature 217:750–751

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlach JA (2001) Human lymphocyte antigen molecular typing: how to identify the 1250+ alleles out there. Arch Pathol Lab Med 126:281–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Gey GO, Coffman WD, Kubicek MT (1952) Tissue culture studies of the proliferative capacity of cervical carcinoma and normal epithelium. Cancer Res 12:264–265

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy L, Hunt C, Young L, Stacey GN (2005) The UK Stem Cell Bank: its role as a public research centre providing access to well-characterised seed stocks of human stem cell lines. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 57:1981–1988

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hyslop LA, Armstrong L, Stojkovic M, Lako M (2005) Human embryonic stem cells: biology and clinical implications. Expert Rev Mol Med 7:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical requirements for registration of Pharmaceuticals for human use (1997) ICH harmonised tripartite guideline. Viral safety evaluation of biotechnology products derived from lines of human or animal origin, March

  • Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985a) Hypervariable “minisatellite” regions in human DNA. Nature 314:67–73

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeffreys AJ, Wilson V, Thein SL (1985b) Individual specific DNA fingerprints of human DNA. Nature 316:76–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Koreth J, O’Leary JJ, O’D McGee J (1996) Microsatellites and PCR genomic analysis. J Pathol 178:239–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MacLeod RA, Dirks WG, Matsuo Y, Kaufmann M, Milch H, Drexler HG (1999) Widespread intraspecies cross-contamination of human tumor cell lines arising at source. Int J Cancer 83:555–563

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masters JR, Thomson JA, Daly-Burns B et al (2001) Short tandem repeat profiling provide an international reference standard for human cell lines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:8012–8017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Masters JR (2002) HeLa cells 50 years on: the good, the bad and the ugly. Nat Rev Cancer 2:315–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • MCA (MHRA) (2002) Rules and guidance for pharmaceutical manufactures and distributors. The Stationery Office, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees WA, Flandermeyer RA, Hawthorne PK (1975) Distinctive banded marker chromosomes of human tumor cell lines. Int J Cancer 16:74–82

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees WA, Flandermeyer RA (1976) HeLa cultures defined. Science 191:96–98

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson-Rees WA, Daniels DW, Flandermeyer RR (1981) Cross-contamination of cells in culture. Science 212:446–452

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nims RW, Shoemaker AP, Bauernschub MA, Rec LJ, Harbell JW (1998) Sensitivity of isoenzyme analysis for the detection of interspecies cell line cross-contamination. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 34:35–39

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nomenclature for factors of the HLA system: update October 2000 (2001) Tissue Antigens 57:93–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Page-Bright B (1982) Proving paternity-human leukocyte antigen test. J Forensic Sci 27:135–153

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rajalingam R, Ge P, Reed EF (2004) A sequencing-based typing for HLA-DQA1 alleles. Hum Immunol 65:373–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaeffer WI (1990) Terminology associated with cell, tissue, and organ culture, molecular biology, and molecular genetics. Tissue Culture Association Terminology Committee. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol 26:97–101

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey GN, Hoelzl H, Stephenson JR, Doyle A (1997) Authentication of animal cell cultures by direct visualization of repetitive DNA, aldolase gene PCR and isoenzyme analysis. Biologicals 25:75–85

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stacey GN (2000) Cell contamination leads to inaccurate data: we must take action now. Nature 403:356

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stevanovic S (2002). Structural basis of immunogenicity. Transpl Immunol 10:133–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tamaki K, Jeffreys AJ (2005) Human tandem repeat sequences in forensic DNA typing. Leg Med (Tokyo) 7:244–250

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • United Kingdom Coordinating Committee on Cancer Research (2000) Br J Cancer 82:1495–1509

    Google Scholar 

  • Welsh K, Bunce M (1999) Molecular typing for the MHC with PCR-SSP. Rev Immunogenet 1:157–176

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wong Z, Wilson V, Patel I, Povey S, Jeffreys AJ (1987) Characterization of a panel of highly variable minisatellites cloned from human DNA. Ann Hum Genet 51:269–288

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (1987) Acceptability of cell substrates for production of biologicals. Technical Report Series. WHO, Geneva

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Ms. Angela Barnie for checking the use of English in the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. M. Cabrera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cabrera, C.M., Cobo, F., Nieto, A. et al. Identity tests: determination of cell line cross-contamination. Cytotechnology 51, 45–50 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-006-9013-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10616-006-9013-8

Keywords

Navigation