Skip to main content
Log in

Success factors of management consulting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Review of Managerial Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Management consulting as a service has become part of almost every medium to big company’s daily business. Despite management consulting’s high practical relevance the scientific discussion of this discipline is relatively young and needs to advance. Notably, there is little empirical research that focuses on the conceptualization and operationalization of management consulting’s success factors from a client perspective. Therefore, in this article we theoretically conceptualize and subsequently operationalize critical success factors of management consulting. Also, we examine those factors’ particular impact on management consulting success. Based on a survey of 255 companies and structural equation modeling, we show that six out of seven theoretically derived success factors have a significant positive effect on management consulting success. In particular, Consultant Expertise, Intensity of Collaboration and Common Vision have a strong impact on the performance of management consulting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alvesson M, Johansson A (2002) Professionalism and politics in management consultancy work. In: Clark T, Fincham R (eds) Critical consulting. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 228–246

  • Amit R, Schoemaker PJH (1993) Strategic assets and organizational rent. Strateg Manag J 14(1):33–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anand N, Gardner HK, Morris T (2007) Knowledge-based innovation: emergence and embedding of new practice areas in management consulting firms. Acad Manag J 50(2):406–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1982) Some methods for respecifying measurement models to obtain unidimensional construct measurement. J Mark 19(4):453–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1991) Predicting the performance of measures in a confirmatory factor analysis with a pretest assessment of their substantive validities. J Appl Psychol 76(5):732–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antonakis J, Bendahan S, Jacquart P, Lalive R (2010) On making causal claims: a review and recommendations. Leadersh Q 21:1086–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum SH (2004) Critical success factors in the client-consulting relationship. J Am Acad Bus 4(1/2):183–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum SH, Steed AJ (2005) The critical success factors in the client-consulting relationship. J Manag Dev 24(1):68–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi RP, Yi Y (1988) On the evaluation of structural equation models. J Acad Mark Sci 16(1):74–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney J (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1998) On becoming a strategic partner: the role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Hum Resour Manag 37(1):31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner H, Homburg C (1996) Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review. Int J Res Mark 13(2):139–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bei LT, Chiao YC (2006) The determinants of customer loyalty: an analysis of intangible factors in three service industries. Int J Commer Manag 16(3/4):162–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergen M, Dutta S, Walker OC (1992) Agency relationships in marketing: a review of the implications and applications of agency and related theories. J Mark 56(3):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliese PD (1998) Group size, ICC values, and group-level correlations: a simulation. Organ Res Methods 1(4):355–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodet G (2008) Customer satisfaction and loyalty in service: two concepts, four constructs, several relationships. J Retail Consum Serv 15(3):156–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butcher K, Sparks B, O’Callaghan F (2001) Evaluative and relational influences on service loyalty. Int J Serv Ind Manag 12(4):310–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin WW (1998) The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In: Marcoulides GA (ed) Modern methods for business research.  Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, pp 295–336

  • Churchill GA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Mark Res 16(1):64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark T (1993) The market provision of management services, information asymmetries and service quality. Br J Manag 4(4):235–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ

  • Covin TJ, Fisher TV (1991) Consultant and client must work together. J Manag Consult 6(4):11–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Crocker L, Algina J (2008) Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Wadsworth, Mason, OH

  • Crosby LA, Evans KR, Cowles D (1990) Relationship quality in services selling: an interpersonal influence perspective. J Mark 54(3):68–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes PL, Dowling GR, Patterson PG (1992) Criteria used to select management consultants. Ind Mark Manag 21(3):187–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeSarbo WS, Di Benedetto CA, Jedidi K, Song M (2006) Identifying sources of heterogeneity for empirically deriving strategic types: a constrained finite-mixture structural-equation methodology. Manag Sci 52(6):909–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVellis R (2011) Scale development: theory and applications. Sage, Los Angeles, CA

  • Dickson JP, Maclachlan DL (1996) Fax surveys: return patterns and comparison with mail surveys. J Mark Res 33(1):108–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ein-Dor P, Segev E (1982) Organisational context & MIS structure: same empirical evidence. MIS Q 6(3):55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM (1989) Agency theory: an assessment and review. Acad Manag Rev 14(1):57–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Feaco (2013) Survey of the European management consultancy 2010/2011. Available at: http://www.feaco.org/sites/default/files/Feaco%20Survey%202010-2011.pdf (accessed 18 January 2013)

  • Ford CH (1974) Developing a successful client-consulting relationship. Hum Resour Manag 13(2):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluation structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gable GG (1996) A multidimensional model of client success when engaging external consultants. Manag Sci 42(8):1175–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gagnon RJ (1984) An integrated strategy for increasing management consulting research. In: Academy of Management Proceedings, August 1984, pp 148–152

  • Gallessich J (1982) The profession and practice of consultation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

  • Gefen D (2002) Nurturing clients’ trust to encourage engagement success during the customization of ERP systems. Omega 30(4):287–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glückler J, Armbrüster T (2003) Bridging uncertainty in management consulting: the mechanisms of trust and networked reputation. Organ Stud 24(2):269–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood R, Li SX, Prakash R, Deephouse DL (2005) Reputation, diversification, and organizational explanation of performance in professional service firms. Organ Sci 16(6):661–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greiner LE, Metzger RO (1983) Consulting to management. Englewood Cliffs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves RM (2004) Survey errors and survey costs. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

  • Hair J, Babin B, Anderson R (2010) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

  • Hartman F, Ashrafi RA (2002) Project management in the information systems and information technologies industries. Proj Manag J 33(3):5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoegl M, Weinkauf K, Gemuenden HG (2004) Interteam coordination, project commitment, and teamwork in multiteam R&D Projects: a longitudinal study. Organ Sci 15(1):38–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg C, Klarmann M, Reimann M, Schilke O (2012) What drives key informant accuracy? J Mark Res 49(4):594–608

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppenstedt (2012) Inhalte - Hoppenstedt Firmendatenbank für Hochschulen. http://www.hoppenstedt-hochschuldatenbank.de/inhalte.htm#4 (accessed 02 August 2012)

  • Hu LT, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model 6(1):1–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang Y, Suh K, Lee J (1997) Empirical study of management consulting success in Korea. Asia Pac J Manag 14(2):165–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen MC, Meckling WH (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jha KN, Iyer KC (2006) Critical determinants of project coordination. Int J Proj Manag 24(4):314–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipping M, Clark T (2012) Researching management consulting. In: Kipping M, Clark T (eds) The oxford handbook of management consulting. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–28

  • Klein KJ, Kozlowski SW (2000) From micro to meso: critical steps in conceputalizing and conducting multilevel research. Organ Res Methods 3(3):211–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline R (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New York

  • Kubr M (2005) Management consulting: a guide to the profession. Bookwell Publications, New Delhi

  • Kumar N, Stern LW, Anderson JC (1993) Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad Manag J 36(6):1633–1651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larzelere RE, Huston TL (1980) The dyadic trust scale: toward understanding interpersonal trust in close relationships. J Marriage Fam 42(3):595–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liberatore M, Luo W (2010) Coordination in consultant-assisted IS projects: an agency theory perspective. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 57(2):255–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-selectional research designs. J Appl Psychol 86(1):114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo W, Liberatore MJ (2009) Achieving it consultant objectives through client project success. Inf Manag 46(5):259–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra NK, Kim SS, Patil A (2006) Common method variance in IS research: a comparison of alternative approaches and a reanalysis of past research. Manag Sci 52(12):1865–1883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marr B (2005) Management consulting practice on intellectual capital. J Intellect Cap 6(4):473–496

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlin DB, Sweeney PD (1992) Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Acad Manag J 35(3):626–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney Kellogg D (1984) Contrasting successful and unsuccessful OD consultation relationship. Group Organ Stud 9:151–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlin RD (1999) Factors for consulting engagement success. Manag Decis 37(5/6):394–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLachlin RD (2000) Service quality in consulting: what is engagement success? Manag Serv Qual 10(4):239–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLarty R, Robinson T (1998) The practice of consultancy and a professional development strategy. Leadersh Organ Dev J 19(5):256–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris KF, Raben CS (1995) The fundamental of change management. In: Nadler DA, Shaw RB, Walton AE (eds) Discontinuous change leading organizational transformation. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA, pp 47–65

  • Nidumolu SR (1995) The effect of coordination and uncertainty on software project performance: residual performance risk as an intervening variable. Inf Syst Res 6(3):191–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nidumolu SR (1996) A comparison of the structural contingency and risk-based perspectives on coordination in software-development projects. J Manag Inf Syst 13(2):77–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nitithamyong P, Tan Z (2007) Determinants for effective performance of external project management consultants in Malaysia. Eng Constr Archit Manag 14(5):463–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Driscoll MP, Eubanks JL (1993) Behavioral competencies, goal setting, and OD practitioner effectiveness. Group Org Manag 18(3):308–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson PG, Spreng RA (1997) Modelling the relationship between perceived value, satisfaction and repurchase intentions in a business-to-business, services context: an empirical examination. Int J Serv Ind Manag 8(5):414–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson PG, Johnson LW, Spreng RA (1997) Modeling the determinants of customer satisfaction for business-to-business professional services. J Acad Mark Sci 25(1):4–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penrose E (1959) The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley, New York

  • Peteraf MA (1993) The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resourcebased perspective. Strateg Manag J 14(3):179–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips LW (1981) Assessing measurement error in key informant reports: a methodological note on organizational analysis in marketing. J Mark Res 18(4):395–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinto JK, Prescott JE (1990) Planning and tactical factors in the project implementation process. J Manag Stud 27(3):207–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • PMI (2013) What is project management? Available at: http://www.pmi.org/en/ About-Us/About-Us-What-is-Project-Management.aspx (accessed Retrieved 01. February 2013)

  • Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Jeong-Yeon L, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Research P (2013) Consulting industry overview. Available at: http://www.plunkettresearch.com/consulting-market-research/industry-statistics (accessed 17 January 2013)

  • Richter A, Schmidt SL (2006) Antecedents of the performance of management consultants. Schmalenbach Bus Rev 58(4):332–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross SA (1973) The economic theory of agency: the principal’s problem. Am Econ Rev 63(2):134–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Rynning M (1992) Successful consulting with small and medium-sized vs large clients: meeting the needs of the client? Int Small Bus J 11(1):47–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saam NJ (2012) Economics approaches to management consulting. In: Kipping M, Clark T, (eds) The oxford handbook of management consulting. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 207–224

  • Sanchez R, Heene A, Thomas H (1996) Introduction: towards the theory and practice of competence-based competition. In: Sanchez R, Heene A, Thomas H (eds) Dynamics of competence- based competition: theory and practice in the new strategic management. Pergamon, Oxford, pp 1–35

  • Schaffer RH (2002) High-impact consulting: how clients and consultants can work together to achieve extraordinary results. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

  • Schweizer L, Knyphausen-Aufsess D, Rajes M (2009) Consulting success and contingent fees as important elements on the way to a theory of management consulting. Int J Serv Econ Manag 1(4):393–413

    Google Scholar 

  • Sewchurran K, Barron M (2008) An investigation into successfully managing and sustaining the project sponsor-project manager relationship using soft systems methodology. Proj Manag J 39:S56–S68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon A, Kumar V (2001) Client’s views on strategic capabilities which lead to management consulting success. Manag Decis 39(5):362–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon A, Schoeman P, Sohal AS (2010) Prioritised best practices in a ratified consulting services maturity model for ERP consulting. J Enterp Inf Manag 23(1):100–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slevin DP, Pinto JK (1986) The project implementation profile: new tool for project managers. Proj Manag J 16:57–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomonson WL (2011) A mediated model of trust and its antecedents in the client-consultant relationship. Dissertations, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI

  • Solomonson WL (2012) Trust and the client–consultant relationship. Perform Improv Q 25(3):53–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spremann K (1985) The signaling of quality by reputation. In: Feichtinger G (ed) Optimal control theory and economic analysis. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 235–252

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2012) Klassifikation der Wirtschaftszweige, Ausgabe 2008 (WZ 2008) Available at: https://www.destatis.de/DE/Methoden/Klassifikationen/GueterWirtschaftklassifikationen/Content75/KlassifikationWZ08.html (accessed 06 August 2012)

  • Sturdy A (1997) The consultancy process—an insecure business. J Manag Stud 34(3):389–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang SL, Lu M, Chan YL (2003) Achieving client satisfaction for engineering consulting firms. J Manag Eng 19(4):166–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilles A (1961) Understanding the consultant’s role. Harv Bus Rev 39(6):87–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosi HL, Katz JP, Gomez-Mejia LR (1997) Disaggregating the agency contract: the effects of monitoring, incentive alignment, and term in office on agent decision making. Acad Manag J 40(3):584–602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner JR (1999) The handbook of project-based management: improving the processes for achieving strategic objectives. McGraw-Hill, London

  • Van Bruggen GH, Lilien GL, Kacker M (2002) Informants in organizational marketing research: why use multiple informants and how to aggregate responses. J Mark Res 39(4):469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vanlommel E, de Brabander B (1975) The organization of electronic data processing (EDP) activities and computer use. J Bus 48(3):391–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verlander EG (2012) The practice of professional consulting. Pfeiffer, San Francisco, CA

  • Wernefelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernefelt B (1995) The resource-based view of the firm: ten years after. Strateg Manag J 16(2):171–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Werr A, Styhre A (2002) Management consultants—friend or foe? Int Stud Manag Organ 32(4):43–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams APO, Woodward S (1994) The competitive consultant: a client-oriented approach for achieving superior performance. Macmillan, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wu WY, Chiag CY, Wu YJ, Tu HJ (2004) The influencing factors of commitment and business integration on supply chain management. Ind Manag Data Syst 104(4):322–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bernd W. Wirtz.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 3.

Table 3 Reliability and validity of the single factors/dimensions

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bronnenmayer, M., Wirtz, B.W. & Göttel, V. Success factors of management consulting. Rev Manag Sci 10, 1–34 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0137-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-014-0137-5

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation