Microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix
References (16)
- et al.
The results of treatment of microinvasive carcinoma (Stage IA) of the uterine cervix by means of simple and extended hysterectomy
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
(1979) - et al.
The role of ovarian transposition in conservation of ovarian function in radical hysterectomy followed by pelvic radiation
Gynecol. Oncol.
(1982) Probeexzision and Kolposkopie in der Fruhdiagnose des Portiokaszinomas
Zentralbl. Gynaekol.
(1947)- et al.
Diagnosis and management of microinvasive (Stage IA) carcinoma of the uterine cervix
Cancer
(1976) - et al.
A critical review of the frequency of lymph node metastasis and death from microinvasive carcinoma of the cervix
Obstet. Gynecol.
(1977) Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix
Obstet. Gynecol. Surv.
(1878)- et al.
Stage IA squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix
Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol.
(1969) - et al.
Microinvasive carcinoma of the uterine cervix
Cancer
(1980)
Cited by (124)
-
Invasive cervical cancer
2023, DiSaia and Creasman Clinical Gynecologic Oncology -
Complementary surgery for cervical cancer patients inadequately treated with extrafacial hysterectomy
2020, Journal of Gynecology Obstetrics and Human ReproductionCitation Excerpt :Current management of early stage cervical cancer is primarily surgery in the majority of patients. Patients with FIGO (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics) stage 1A1 disease can be treated with an extrafascial hysterectomy only, if lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) is absent [1]. More advanced early stage lesions, FIGO stage 1A2–2A, require either radical surgery or radiotherapy.
-
Invasive cervical cancer
2018, Clinical Gynecologic Oncology -
Chapter 13 - Cervical Squamous Neoplasia
2017, Diagnostic Gynecologic and Obstetric Pathology -
Invasive Cervical Cancer
2012, Clinical Gynecologic Oncology: Eighth Edition -
Clinical outcome of patients with FIGO stage IA2 squamous cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix
2012, Gynecologic OncologyCitation Excerpt :Individualization of treatment to reduce therapy-associated early and late morbidity is the most current trend in cervical cancer surgery [6,7]. Despite advances over the past 3 decades in decreasing the treatment-related morbidity, the cure rate associated with radical surgery (approximately 90%) has not changed appreciably [20]. The limited risk of parametrial and node involvement in case of MIC unbalances the morbidity of radical hysterectomy and pelvic node removal [21].
-
Presented by invitation at the First Annual Meeting of the American Gynecological and Obstetrical Society, Hot Springs, Virginia, September 8–11, 1982.
- *
-
American Cancer Society Professor of Clinical Oncology.