Elsevier

The Lancet

Volume 363, Issue 9411, 6 March 2004, Page 750
The Lancet

Commentary
Retraction of an interpretation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(04)15715-2 Get rights and content

References (4)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (230)

  • Teratology

    2020, Encyclopedia of Infant and Early Childhood Development
  • Vaccine development

    2019, Genomic and Precision Medicine: Infectious and Inflammatory Disease
  • Midwives’ attitudes, beliefs and concerns about childhood vaccination: A review of the global literature

    2018, Vaccine
    Citation Excerpt :

    In the United Kingdom, MMR vaccination coverage dropped to below 80% in 2004 [33]. The partial retraction of the paper in 2004 [34] was either not yet published or not widely known; the full retraction did not occur until 2010 [35,36]. During this period, Jelleyman et al. (in 2002) [9] and Leask et al. (in 2006) [10] asked specific questions about attitudes towards the MMR vaccine.

  • A Millian Case for Censoring Vaccine Misinformation

    2023, Journal of Bioethical Inquiry
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text