Prevention of Rh Alloimmunization

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(16)31006-4 Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To provide guidelines on use of anti-D prophylaxis to optimize prevention of rhesus (Rh) alloimmunization in Canadian women.

Outcomes: Decreased incidence of Rh alloimmunization and minimized practice variation with regards to immunoprophylaxis strategies.

Evidence: The Cochrane Library and MEDLINE were searched for English-language articles from 1968 to 2001, relating to theprevention of Rh alloimmunization. Search terms included:Rho(D) immune globulin. Rh iso- or allo-immunization, anti-D, anti-Rh, WinRho, Rhogam, and pregnancy. Additional publications were identified from the bibliographies of these articles. All study types were reviewed. Randomized controlled trials were considered evidence of highest quality, followed by cohort studies. Key individual studies on which the principal recommendations are based are referenced. Supporting data for each recommendation is briefly summarized with evaluative comments and referenced.

Values: The evidence collected was reviewed by the Maternal-Fetal Medicine and Genetics Committees of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada (SOGC) and quantified using the Evaluation of Evidence guidelines developed by the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Exam.

Recommendations:

  • 1.

    Anti-D Ig 300 µg IM or IV should be given within 72 hours of delivery to a postpartum nonsensitized Rh-negative woman delivering an Rh-positive infant. Additional anti-D Ig may be required for fetomaternal hemorrhage (FMH) greater than 15 ml of fetal red blood cells (about 30 ml of fetal blood). Alternatively, anti-D Ig 120 µg IM or IV may be given within 72 hours of delivery, with testing and additional anti-D Ig given for FMH over 6 ml of fetal red blood cells (12 mL fetal blood). (I-A)

  • 2.

    If anti-D is not given within 72 hours of delivery or other potentially sensitizing event, anti-D should be given as soon as the need is recognized, for up to 28 days after delivery orother potentially sensitizing event. (III-B)

  • 3.

    There is poor evidence regarding inclusion or exclusion of routine testing for postpartum FMH, as the cost-benefit of such testing in Rh mothers at risk has not been determined. (III-C)

  • 4.

    Anti-D Ig 300 µg should be given routinely to all Rh-negative nonsensitized women at 28 weeks’ gestation when fetal blood type is unknown or known to be Rh-positive. Alternatively, 2 doses of 100–120 µg may be given (120 µg being the lowest currently available dose in Canada): one at 28 weeks and one at 34 weeks. (I-A)

  • 5.

    All pregnant women (D-negative or D-positive) should be typed and screened for alloantibodies with an indirect antiglobulin test at the first prenatal visit and again at 28 weeks. (III-C)

  • 6.

    When paternity is certain, Rh testing of the baby’s father may be offered to ail Rh-negative pregnant women to eliminate unnecessary blood product administration. (III-C)

  • 7.

    A woman with "weak D" (also known as Du-positive) should not receive anti-D. (III-D)

  • 8.

    A repeat antepartum dose of Rh immune globulin is generally not required at 40 weeks, provided that the antepartum injection was given no earlier than 28 weeks’ gestation. (III-C)

  • 9.

    After miscarriage or threatened abortion or induced abortion during the first 12 weeks of gestation, nonsensitized D-negative women should be given a minimum anti-D of 120 µg. After 12 weeks’ gestation, they should be given 300 µg. (II-3B)

  • 10.

    At abortion, blood type and antibody screen should be done unless results of blood type and antibody screen during the pregnancy are available, in which case antibody screening need not be repeated. (III-B)

  • 11.

    Anti-D should be given to nonsensitized D-negative women following ectopic pregnancy. A minimum of 120 µg should be given before 12 weeks’ gestation and 300 µg after 12 weeks’gestation. (III-B)

  • 12.

    Anti-D should be given to nonsensitized D-negative women following molar pregnancy because of the possibility of partial mole. Anti-D may be withheld if the diagnosis of complete mole is certain. (III-B)

  • 13.

    At amniocentesis, anti-D 300 µg should be given to nonsensitized D-negative women. (II-3B)

  • 14.

    Anti-D should be given to nonsensitized D-negative women following chorionic villous sampling, at a minimum dose of 120 µg during the first 12 weeks’ gestation, and at a dose of 300 µg after 12 weeks’ gestation. (II-B)

  • 15.

    Following cordocentesis, anti-D Ig 300 µg should be given to nonsensitized D-negative women. (II-3B)

  • 16.

    Quantitative testing for FMH may be considered following events potentially associated with placental trauma and disruption of the fetomaternal interface (e.g., placental abruption, blunt trauma to the abdomen, cordocentesis, placenta previa with bleeding). There is a substantial risk of FMH over30 mL with such events, especially with blunt trauma to the abdomen. (III-B)

  • 17.

    Anti-D 120 µg or 300 µg is recommended in association with testing to quantitate FMH following conditions potentially associated with placental trauma and disruption of the fetomaternal interface (e.g., placental abruption, external cephalic version, blunt trauma to the abdomen, placenta previa with bleeding). If FMH is in excess of the amount covered by the dose given (6 mL or 15 mL fetal RBC), 10 µg additional anti-D should be given for every additional 0.5 mL fetal red blood cells. There is a risk of excess FMH, especially when there has been blunt trauma to the abdomen. (III-B)

  • 18.

    Verbal or written informed consent must be obtained prior to administration of the blood product Rh immune globulin. (III-C)

Validation: These guidelines have been reviewed by the Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee and the Genetics Committee, with input from the Rh Program of Nova Scotia. Final approval has been given by the Executive and Council of the Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

Sponsors: The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada.

References (63)

  • S Urbaniak

    The scientific basis of antenatal prophylaxis

    Br J Obstet Gynaecol

    (1998)
  • K Joseph et al.

    The decline of Rh hemolytic disease: should Rh prophylaxis get ail the credit?

    Am J Public Health

    (1998)
  • J Bowman et al.

    Antenatal prophylaxis of Rh isoimmunization: 28 weeks gestation service programme

    Can Med Assoc J

    (1978)
  • BA Armson et al.

    The Rh program of Nova Scotia 1964–1994;

    (1995)
  • Urbaniak S. Consensus conference on anti-D prophylaxis, April 7 & 8. 1997: final consensus statement of the Royal...
  • SH Woolf et al.

    Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Exam

    (1994)
  • C Crowther et al.

    Anti-D administration after childbirth for preventing Rhesus alioimmunization

    The Cochrane Library (4)

    (2001)
  • K Stern et al.

    Experimental iso-immunization te hemo-antigens in man

    J Immunol

    (1961)
  • E Hartwell

    Use of Rh immune globulin. ASCP Practice Parameter

    Am J Clin Pathol

    (1998)
  • B Trolle

    Prenatal Rh-immune globulin prophylaxis with 300 mcg immune globulin anti-D in the 28th week of pregnancy

    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand

    (1989)
  • A Maayan-Metzger et al.

    Maternai anti-D prophylaxis during pregnancy does not cause neonatal haemolysis

    Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed

    (2001)
  • F Hong et al.

    Safety profile of WINHRO Anti-D

    Sem Hematol

    (1998)
  • WinRho SDFTM Rh (D) immune globulin (human) passive immunizing agent

  • A Murdoch

    Irish mothers called for hepatitis C virus screening

    Br J Med

    (1994)
  • J Bowman et al.

    Rh isoimmunization during pregnancy: antenatal prophylaxis

    Can Med Assoc J

    (1978)
  • J Bowman

    Preventing Rh sensitization during pregnancy

    Perinat Care

    (1978)
  • D Samson et al.

    Effect on primary Rh immunization of delayed administration anti-Rh

    Immunology

    (1975)
  • J Gorman et al.

    Prevention of sensitization to Rh with anti-Rh gamma globulin

    Fred Proc

    (1964)
  • J Bowman

    Antenatal suppression of Rh alloimmunization

    Clin Obstet Gynecol

    (1991)
  • J Bowman et al.

    Transplacental fetal haemorrhage after amniocentesis

    Obstet Gynecol

    (1985)
  • E Sebring et al.

    Fetomaternal hemorrhage: incidence, risk factors, time of occurrence and clinical effects

    Transfusion

    (1990)
  • Cited by (108)

    • Implementation of Low Titer Whole Blood for French overseas operations: O positive or negative products in massive hemorrhage?

      2022, Transfusion Clinique et Biologique
      Citation Excerpt :

      In that situation, antibodies against red cell antigens are investigated and assessed before deployment. The prevalence of these anti-RhD antibodies in pregnant women is around 0.1% in France and could be around 0.05% in the general population [25,26]. Another key point is that, in the absence of existing alloimmunization, the minimum delay for the appearance of antibodies is at least one week.

    • Alloimmunization in Pregnancy

      2020, Immunologic Concepts in Transfusion Medicine
    • Haemolytic Disease of the Fetus and Newborn

      2019, Fetal Medicine: Basic Science and Clinical Practice
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text