Elsevier

Biological Conservation

Volume 232, April 2019, Pages 8-27
Biological Conservation

Review
Worldwide decline of the entomofauna: A review of its drivers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2019.01.020 Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Over 40% of insect species are threatened with extinction.

  • Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and dung beetles (Coleoptera) are the taxa most affected.

  • Four aquatic taxa are imperiled and have already lost a large proportion of species.

  • Habitat loss by conversion to intensive agriculture is the main driver of the declines.

  • Agro-chemical pollutants, invasive species and climate change are additional causes.

Abstract

Biodiversity of insects is threatened worldwide. Here, we present a comprehensive review of 73 historical reports of insect declines from across the globe, and systematically assess the underlying drivers. Our work reveals dramatic rates of decline that may lead to the extinction of 40% of the world's insect species over the next few decades. In terrestrial ecosystems, Lepidoptera, Hymenoptera and dung beetles (Coleoptera) appear to be the taxa most affected, whereas four major aquatic taxa (Odonata, Plecoptera, Trichoptera and Ephemeroptera) have already lost a considerable proportion of species. Affected insect groups not only include specialists that occupy particular ecological niches, but also many common and generalist species. Concurrently, the abundance of a small number of species is increasing; these are all adaptable, generalist species that are occupying the vacant niches left by the ones declining. Among aquatic insects, habitat and dietary generalists, and pollutant-tolerant species are replacing the large biodiversity losses experienced in waters within agricultural and urban settings. The main drivers of species declines appear to be in order of importance: i) habitat loss and conversion to intensive agriculture and urbanisation; ii) pollution, mainly that by synthetic pesticides and fertilisers; iii) biological factors, including pathogens and introduced species; and iv) climate change. The latter factor is particularly important in tropical regions, but only affects a minority of species in colder climes and mountain settings of temperate zones. A rethinking of current agricultural practices, in particular a serious reduction in pesticide usage and its substitution with more sustainable, ecologically-based practices, is urgently needed to slow or reverse current trends, allow the recovery of declining insect populations and safeguard the vital ecosystem services they provide. In addition, effective remediation technologies should be applied to clean polluted waters in both agricultural and urban environments.

Introduction

For years, biologists and ecologists have been concerned about the worldwide reduction in biodiversity undergone by many terrestrial and aquatic vertebrates (Ceballos and Ehrlich, 2002; Pimm and Raven, 2000; Wilson, 2002), yet scientists have only recently voiced similar concerns about invertebrate taxa, particularly insects. Population declines imply not only less abundance but also a more restricted geographical distribution of species, and represent the first step towards extinction (Diamond, 1989). Much of the blame for biodiversity loss falls on human activities such as hunting and habitat loss through deforestation, agricultural expansion and intensification, industrialisation and urbanisation (Ceballos et al., 2017; Maxwell et al., 2016), which jointly claimed a 30–50% encroachment on natural ecosystems at the end of the 20th century (Vitousek et al., 1997).

There is compelling evidence that agricultural intensification is the main driver of population declines in unrelated taxa such as birds, insectivorous mammals and insects. In rural landscapes across the globe, the steady removal of natural habitat elements (e.g. hedgerows), elimination of natural drainage systems and other landscape features together with the recurrent use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides negatively affect overall biodiversity (Fuller et al., 1995; Newton, 2004; Tilman et al., 2001). Recent analyses point to the extensive usage of pesticides as primary factor responsible for the decline of birds in grasslands (Mineau and Whiteside, 2013) and aquatic organisms in streams (Beketov et al., 2013), with other factors contributing to or amplifying their effects to varying extent. Yet, we don't know whether the same factors explain the parallel entomological demise that we are witnessing.

In 2017, a 27-year long population monitoring study revealed a shocking 76% decline in flying insect biomass at several of Germany's protected areas (Hallmann et al., 2017). This represents an average 2.8% loss in insect biomass per year in habitats subject to rather low levels of human disturbance, which could either be undetectable or regarded statistically non-significant if measurements were carried out over shorter time frames. Worryingly, the study shows a steady declining trend over nearly three decades. A more recent study in rainforests of Puerto Rico has reported biomass losses between 98% and 78% for ground-foraging and canopy-dwelling arthropods over a 36-year period, with respective annual losses between 2.7% and 2.2% (Lister and Garcia, 2018). The latter authors showed parallel declines in birds, frogs and lizards at the same areas as a result of invertebrate food shortages. Both studies agree with the declining trend in flying insects (mainly Diptera) observed a decade earlier in parts of Southern Britain (Shortall et al., 2009). As insects comprise about two thirds of all terrestrial species on Earth, the above trends confirm that the sixth major extinction event is profoundly impacting life forms on our planet (Thomas et al., 2004).

While the arthropod declines in tropical rainforests correlate well with climatic changes, the 12 different factors (e.g. increases in arable land, deforestation, global warming) that were thought to be responsible for year-to-year drops in insect biomass in Germany barely accounted for ~20% of observed declines. Rather surprisingly, 80% of observed inter-annual variability in insect numbers was left unexplained (Hallmann et al., 2017). Although the authors did not assess the effect of synthetic pesticides, they did point to them as a likely driver of the pervasive losses in insect biomass.

The above studies, however, are in line with previous reports on population declines among numerous insect taxa (i.e. butterflies, ground beetles, ladybirds, dragonflies, stoneflies and wild bees) in Europe and North America over the past decades. It appears that insect declines are substantially greater than those observed in birds or plants over the same time periods (Thomas et al., 2004), and this could trigger wide-ranging cascading effects within several of the world's ecosystems.

This review summarises our current state of knowledge about insect declines, i.e., the changes in species richness (biodiversity) and population abundance through time, and points to the likely drivers of the losses so that conservation strategies to mitigate or even reverse them may be implemented. Previous reviews are partial in scope, restricted to individual groups of insects (e.g. butterflies, carabids) in specific regions, but no study has put together a comprehensive review of all insect taxa nor compared the local findings among different parts of the world.

Section snippets

Methodology

We aimed at compiling all long-term insect surveys conducted over the past 40 years that are available through global peer-reviewed literature databases. To that effect we performed a search on the online Web of Science database using the keywords [insect*] AND [declin*] AND [survey], which resulted in a total of 653 publications. The majority of these referred to Hymenoptera (55), Diptera (45), Coleoptera (44) and Lepidoptera (37) taxa, among which only a few dealt with long-term surveys.

Lepidoptera

Butterflies and moths are valuable indicators of environmental quality, considering their high degree of host-plant specialisation and vulnerability to habitat deterioration (Erhardt and Thomas, 1991). Given their presence in a broad range of habitats, the loss of Lepidoptera may directly impact the delivery of key ecosystem services such as pollination and natural pest control (Fox, 2013). Moths, which are about 10 times more diverse than butterflies, constitute important prey items of bats

Discussion

Biodiversity loss has become a major global issue, and the current rates of species decline – which could progress into extinction – are unprecedented (Barnosky et al., 2011; Pimm and Raven, 2000). Yet, until recently, most scientific and public attention has focused on charismatic vertebrates, particularly on mammals and birds (Ceballos and Ehrlich, 2002; Manne et al., 1999), whereas insects were routinely underrepresented in biodiversity and conservation studies in spite of their paramount

Conclusions

This review highlights the dreadful state of insect biodiversity in the world, as almost half of the species are rapidly declining and a third are being threatened with extinction. The information presented here refers mostly to developed countries of Europe and North America (Fig. 1) since those regions have the most comprehensive historical records that allow comparisons of biodiversity on a temporal scale.

Habitat change and pollution are the main drivers of such declines. In particular, the

References (305)

  • N. Dudley et al.

    How should conservationists respond to pesticides as a driver of biodiversity loss in agroecosystems?

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2017)
  • J.F. Egan et al.

    Herbicide drift can affect plant and arthropod communities

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2014)
  • J. Ekroos et al.

    Optimizing agri-environment schemes for biodiversity, ecosystem services or both?

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2014)
  • E. Fuentes-Montemayor et al.

    Pipistrelle bats and their prey do not benefit from four widely applied agri-environment management prescriptions

    Biol. Conserv.

    (2011)
  • L. Furlan et al.

    Risk assessment of soil-pest damage to grain maize in Europe within the framework of Integrated Pest Management

    Crop Prot.

    (2017)
  • N. Gallai et al.

    Economic valuation of the vulnerability of world agriculture confronted with pollinator decline

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2009)
  • M.A. Aizen et al.

    How much does agriculture depend on pollinators? Lessons from long-term trends in crop production

    Ann. Bot.

    (2009)
  • M. Alburaki et al.

    Neonicotinoid-coated Zea mays seeds indirectly affect honeybee performance and pathogen susceptibility in field trials

    PLoS One

    (2015)
  • M. Alburaki et al.

    Honey bee survival and pathogen prevalence: from the perspective of landscape and exposure to pesticides

    Insects

    (2018)
  • J.D. Allan et al.

    Biodiversity conservation in running waters

    Bioscience

    (1993)
  • K.E. Anderson et al.

    An emerging paradigm of colony health: microbial balance of the honey bee and hive (Apis mellifera)

    Insect. Soc.

    (2011)
  • J. Aubert

    L'atles des plécoptères de Suisse - influence de la pollution

    Ann. Limnol.

    (1984)
  • J.E. Ball-Damerow et al.

    Changes in occurrence, richness, and biological traits of dragonflies and damselflies (Odonata) in California and Nevada over the past century

    Biodivers. Conserv.

    (2014)
  • C.N.B. Bambaradeniya et al.

    Biodiversity Associated with the Rice Field Agroecosystem in Asian Countries: A Brief Review

    (2003)
  • A.D. Barnosky et al.

    Has the Earth's sixth mass extinction already arrived?

    Nature

    (2011)
  • I. Bartomeus et al.

    Climate-associated phenological advances in bee pollinators and bee-pollinated plants

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2011)
  • I. Bartomeus et al.

    Contribution of insect pollinators to crop yield and quality varies with agricultural intensification

    PeerJ

    (2014)
  • M.A. Beketov et al.

    Acute and delayed effects of the neonicotinoid insecticide thiacloprid on seven freshwater arthropods

    Environ. Toxicol. Chem.

    (2008)
  • M.A. Beketov et al.

    Pesticides reduce regional biodiversity of stream invertebrates

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2013)
  • T.M. Bezemer et al.

    Response of native insect communities to invasive plants

    Annu. Rev. Entomol.

    (2014)
  • D.J. Biddinger et al.

    Comparative toxicities and synergism of apple orchard pesticides to Apis mellifera (L.) and Osmia cornifrons (Radoszkowski)

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • R. Biedermann et al.

    Conservation of grassland leafhoppers: a brief review

    J. Insect Conserv.

    (2005)
  • J.C. Biesmeijer et al.

    Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands

    Science

    (2006)
  • Birdlife_International

    European Red List of Birds

    (2015)
  • B.R. Blaauw et al.

    Flower plantings increase wild bee abundance and the pollination services provided to a pollination-dependent crop

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2014)
  • G.H. Boettner et al.

    Effects of a biological control introduction on three nontarget native species of Saturniid moths

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2008)
  • J. Bojková et al.

    Species loss of stoneflies (Plecoptera) in the Czech Republic during the 20th century

    Freshw. Biol.

    (2012)
  • J. Bojková et al.

    Trends in species diversity of lotic stoneflies (Plecoptera) in the Czech Republic over five decades

    Insect Conserv. Divers.

    (2014)
  • R. Bommarco et al.

    Drastic historic shifts in bumble-bee community composition in Sweden

    Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.

    (2012)
  • A. Brandt et al.

    Immunosuppression in honeybee queens by the neonicotinoids thiacloprid and clothianidin

    Sci. Rep.

    (2017)
  • M.M. Bredeson et al.

    Thiamethoxam seed treatments have no impact on pest numbers or yield in cultivated sunflowers

    J. Econ. Entomol.

    (2018)
  • G.A. Breed et al.

    Climate-driven changes in northeastern US butterfly communities

    Nat. Clim. Chang.

    (2012)
  • T. Brereton et al.

    The development of butterfly indicators in the United Kingdom and assessments in 2010

    J. Insect Conserv.

    (2011)
  • D.R. Brooks et al.

    Large carabid beetle declines in a United Kingdom monitoring network increases evidence for a widespread loss in insect biodiversity

    J. Appl. Ecol.

    (2012)
  • M. Brown et al.

    Coccinellidae (Coleoptera) in apple orchards of eastern West Virginia and the impact of invasion by Harmonia axyridis

    Entomol. News

    (1998)
  • P.M.J. Brown et al.

    Reflections on the long-term assessment of ladybird (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae) populations in the Czech Republic and the United Kingdom

    Acta Soc. Zool. Bohemicae

    (2015)
  • F.J. Burdon et al.

    Habitat loss drives threshold response of benthic invertebrate communities to deposited sediment in agricultural streams

    Ecol. Appl.

    (2013)
  • L.A. Burkle et al.

    Plant-pollinator interactions over 120 years: loss of species, co-occurrence, and function

    Science

    (2013)
  • M. Camacho-Cervantes et al.

    From effective biocontrol agent to successful invader: the harlequin ladybird (Harmonia axyridis) as an example of good ideas that could go wrong

    PeerJ

    (2017)
  • S.A. Cameron et al.

    Patterns of widespread decline in North American bumble bees

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (2011)
  • Cited by (1910)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text