Obstructed labor: using better technologies to reduce mortality
Corresponding Author
G.J Hofmeyr
East London Hospital Complex, Effective Care Research Unit, University of Witwatersrand and University of Fort Hare, South Africa
Tel.: +27-43-709-2483; fax: +27-43-709-2483Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
G.J Hofmeyr
East London Hospital Complex, Effective Care Research Unit, University of Witwatersrand and University of Fort Hare, South Africa
Tel.: +27-43-709-2483; fax: +27-43-709-2483Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Objective: To identify, from the best available evidence, underutilized and promising technologies that may reduce maternal mortality from obstructed labor. Methods: The author sought systematic reviews of randomized trials, individual randomized trials, and, in the absence of randomized data, non-randomized studies and clinical consensus. Data were presented according to the level of the evidence. Results: Obstructed labor causes approximately 8% of maternal deaths, and indirectly contributes to a greater percentage. Proven or widely accepted technologies that help reduce mortality from obstructed labor include contraception, external cephalic version, the partogram, augmentation of labor, selective amniotomy, selective episiotomy, vacuum extraction, caesarean section, symphysiotomy, and destructive procedures for non-viable fetuses. Technologies of uncertain usefulness include maternal height and shoe size, vaginal cleansing, upright posture for delivery and vaginal lubrication. Unuseful technologies include pelvimetry, estimating fetal weight, early labor induction, routine amniotomy and augmentation, routine episiotomy, and starvation during labor. Conclusion: Access to well-established technologies, particularly safe caesarean section, can reduce maternal mortality in resource-poor countries.
References
- [1] World Health Organization. Maternal mortality World health day—safe motherhood. 1998; WHO, 1–3
- [2]Pattinson R.C, Moodley J. Confidential enquiry into maternal deaths in South Africa. A.B MacLean, J.P Neilson. Maternal morbidity and mortality. 2002; RCOG Press: London; 34–54
- [3]Rahman M.H, Akhter H.H, Khan Chowdhury M.E, Yusuf H.R, Rochat R.W. Obstetric deaths in Bangladesh, 1996–1997. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 77: 2002; 161–169
- [4]Orach C.G. Maternal mortality estimated using the sisterhood method in Gulu district, Uganda. Trop Doct. 30: 2000; 72–74
- [5]Gaym A. Obstructed labor at a district hospital. Ethiopian Med J. 40: 2002; 11–18
- [6]Vork F.C, Kyanamina S, van Roosmalen J. Maternal mortality in rural Zambia. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 76: 1997; 646
- [7]Prual A, Huguet D, Garbin O, Rabe G. Severe obstetric morbidity of the third trimester, delivery and early puerperium in Niamey (Niger). Afr J Reprod Health. 2: 1998; 10–19
- [8]Liselele H.B, Boulvain M, Tshibangu K.C, Meuris S. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 107: 2000; 947–952
- [9]Tsu V.D. Maternal height and age: risk factors for cephalopelvic disproportion in Zimbabwe. Int J Epidemiol. 21: 1992; 941–946
- [10]Pattinson RC. Pelvimetry for fetal cephalic presentations at term (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [11]Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [12]Hofmeyr GJ. External cephalic version for breech presentation before term (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [13]Hodnett ED, Sakala C, Hofmeyr GJ. Continuous support for women during childbirth (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [14]Singata M, Tranmer JE. Restricting oral fluid and food intake during labour (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [15]Fraser WD, Turcot L, Krauss I, Brisson-Carrol G. Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [16]Fraser W, Venditelli F, Krauss I, Bréart G. Effects of early augmentation of labour with amniotomy and oxytocin in nulliparous women: a meta-analysis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 105: 1998; 189–194
- [17]Fraser WD, Roy C, Turcot L. Early amniotomy and early oxytocin for delay in nulliparae compared with routine care (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [18]Hofmeyr GJ, Gülmezoglu AM. Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [19]Hofmeyr G.J, Alfirevic Z, Matonhodze B, Brocklehurst P, Campbell E, Nikodem V.C. Titrated oral misoprostol solution for induction of labour: a multi-centre, randomised trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 108 (9): 2001; 952–959
- [20]Souka A.P, Haritos T, Basayiannis K, Noikokyri N, Antsaklis A.J. Intrapartum ultrasound for the examination of the fetal head position in normal and obstructed labor. Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 13: 2003; 59–63
- [21]Andrews C.M, Andrews E.C. Nursing, maternal postures and fetal position. Nurs Res. 32: 1983; 336–341
- [22]Hofmeyr GJ, Kulier R. Hands/knees posture in late pregnancy or labour for fetal malposition (lateral or posterior) (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2002
- [23]Caldeyro-Barcia R, Noriega-Guerra L, Cibils L.A, Alvarez H, Poseiro J.J, Pose S.V, et al. Effect of position changes on the intensity and frequency of uterine contractions during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 80: 1960; 284–290
- [24]Andrews C.M, Chrzanowski M. Maternal position, labor and comfort. Appl Nurs Res. 3: 1990; 7–13
- [25]Hofmeyr G.J, Nikodem V.C. Position during labour. Contemp Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2: 2002; 153–160
- [26]Gupta JK, Hofmeyr GJ. Position for women during second stage of labour (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 2. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [27]Cartmill R, Thornton J. Effect of presentation of partogram information on obstetric decision-making. Lancet. 339: 1992; 1520–1522
- [28]Bosse G, Massawe S, Jahn A. The partograph in daily practice: it's quality that matters. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 77: 2002; 243–244
- [29]Lavender T, Wallymahmed A.H, Walkinshaw S.A. Managing labor using partograms with different action lines: a prospective study of women's views. Birth. 26: 1999; 89–96
- [30]Pattinson R.C, Howarth G.R, Mdululi W, Macdonald A.P, Makin J.D, Funk M. Aggressive or expectant management of labour: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 110: 2003; 457–461
- [31]Lavender T, Alfirevic Z, Walkinshaw S. Partogram action line study: a randomised trial. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 105: 1998; 976–980
- [32]Theron G.B. Effect of the maternal care manual of the perinatal education programme on the ability of midwives to interpret antenatal cards and partograms. J Perinatol. 19: 1999; 432–435
- [33]Wacker J, Utz B, Kyelem D, Lankoande J, Bastert G. Introduction of a simplified round partogram in rural maternity units: Seno province, Burkino Faso, West Africa. Trop Doct. 28: 1998; 146–152
- [34]Sizer A.R, Evans J, Bailey S.M, Wiener J. A second-stage partogram. Obstet Gynecol. 96: 2000; 678–683
- [35]Stray-Pedersen B, Bergan T, Hafstad A, Normann E, Grogaard J, Vangdal M. Vaginal disinfection with chlorhexidine during childbirth. Int J Antimicrob Agent. 12: 1999; 245–251
- [36]Taha T.E, Biggar R.J, Broadhead R.L, Mtimavalye L.A.R, Miotti P.G, Justesen A.B. Effect of cleansing the birth canal with antiseptic solution on maternal and newborn morbidity and mortality in Malawi: clinical trial. Br Med J. 315: 1997; 216–219
- [37]Lumbiganon P, Thinkhamrop J, Thinkhamrop B, Tolosa JE. Vaginal chlorhexidine during labour for preventing maternal and neonatal infections (excluding Group B Streptococcal and HIV) (Protocol for a Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [38]Schaub AF. Happy child birth lubricant: the revolution in obstetric pain and safety measurement. Swiss Patent Application No. 2002 0121/02, 2003
- [39]Carroli G, Belizan J. Episiotomy for vaginal birth (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [40]Johanson RB, Menon V. Vacuum extraction vs. forceps for assisted vaginal delivery (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [41]O'Grady J.P, Pope C.S, Patel S.S. Vacuum extraction in modern obstetric practice: a review and critique. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 12: 2000; 475–480
- [42]Hofmeyr G.J, Gobetz L, Sonnendecker E.W.W, Turner M.J. New design rigid and soft vacuum extractor cups: a preliminary comparison of traction forces. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 97: 1990; 681–685
- [43]Johanson R, Menon V. Soft vs. rigid vacuum extractor cups for assisted vaginal delivery (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [44]Vacca A. Operative vaginal delivery: clinical appraisal of a new vacuum extraction device. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 41: 2001; 156
- [45]Hayman R, Gilby J, Arulkumaran S. Clinical evaluation of a ‘hand pump’ vacuum delivery device. Obstet Gynecol. 100: 2002; 1190–1195
- [46]Ferguson J.E, Cistrom G.L. Can fetal-pelvic disproportion be predicted?. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 43: 2000; 247–264
- [47]Gherman R.B, Ouzonian J.G, Goodwin T.M. Analysis of McRoberts’ maneuver by X-ray pervimetry. Obstet Gynecol. 95: 2000; 43–47
- [48]Gonk B, Allen R, Sorab J. Objective evaluation of the shoulder dystocia phenomenon: effect of maternal pelvic orientation on force reduction. Obstet Gynecol. 74: 1989; 44–48
- [49]Buhimschi C.S, Buhimschi I.A, Malinow A, Weiner C.P. Use of McRoberts’ position during delivery and increase in pushing efficiency. Lancet. 358: 2001; 470–471
- [50]Sandberg E.C. The Zavanelli maneuver: 12 years of recorded experience. Obstet Gynecol. 93: 1999; 312–317
- [51]Dumant A, de Bernis L, Bouvier-Colle M-H, Breart G for the MOMA Study Group. Caesarean section rate for maternal indication in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. Lancet 2001; 358: 1328–1333
- [52]Rannay B. Advantages of local anesthesia for caesarean section. Obstet Gynecol. 4: 1975; 163–167
- [53]Smaill F, Hofmeyr GJ. Antibiotic prophylaxis for cesarean section (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 1. Oxford: Update Software, 2003
- [54]Fasubaa O.B, Ezechi O.C, Orji E.O, Ogunniyi S.O, Akindele S.T, Loto O.M, et al. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods. J Obstet Gynaecol. 22: 2002; 375–378
- [55]Wykes C.B, Johnston T.A, Paterson-Brown S, Johanson R.B. Symphysiotomy: a lifesaving procedure. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 110: 2003; 219–221
- [56]Bjorklund K. Minimally invasive surgery for obstructed labour: a review of symphysiotomy during the twentieth century (including 5000 cases). Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 109: 2002; 236–248
- [57]Maharaj D, Moodley J. Symphysiotomy and fetal destructive operations. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 16 (1): February 2002; 117–131
- [58]Biswas A, Chakraborty P.S, Das H.S, Bose A, Kalsar P.K. Role of destructive operations in modern day obstetrics. J Indian Med Assoc. 99: 2001; 248, 250–251
- [59]Nhindiri P, Munjanja S, Zhanda I, Lindmark G, Nystrom L. A community-based study of utilisation of maternity services in rural Zimbabwe. Afr J Health Sci, November 1996; 3
- [60]The Better Births Initiative. In: WHO Reproductive Health Library, No. 6. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2003 (WHO/RHR/03.5)
- [61]Mekbib T, Kassaye E, Getachew A, Tadesse T, Debebe A. The FIGO save the mothers initiative: the Ethiopia–Sweden collaboration. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 81: 2003; 93–102
- [62]Olaniran N, Offiong S, Ottong J, Asuquo E, Duke F. Mobilizing the community to utilize obstetric services, Cross River State, Nigeria. The Calabar PMM Team. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 59 (Suppl 2): 1997; S181–S189
- [63]Adanu R, Obed S.A. Ruptured uterus: a 7-year review of cases from Accra, Ghana. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 25: 2003; 225–230
- [64]Aboyeji A.P, Ijaiya M.D, Yahaya U.R. Ruptured uterus: a study of 100 consecutive cases in Ilorin, Nigeria. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 27: 2001; 341–348
- [65]Khanam R.A, Khatun M. Ruptured uterus: an ongoing tragedy of motherhood. Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull. 27: 2001; 43–47