Who compares and despairs? The effect of social comparison orientation on social media use and its outcomes
Introduction
In their daily interactions, people are afforded many opportunities to learn about others' opinions, abilities, and lives. Such social comparative information can be useful for a multitude of purposes, including self-evaluation (Festinger, 1954), self-enhancement (Gruder, 1971, Wills, 1981), and self-improvement (Lockwood & Kunda, 1997; for reviews see Buunk and Gibbons, 2007, Corcoran et al., 2011, Wood, 1989). Importantly, people differ in their tendencies to engage in social comparison and in the psychological consequences incurred. Social comparison orientation (SCO) is a trait that reflects these individual differences (Gibbons & Buunk, 1999). Individuals high in SCO have a chronic sensitivity to and awareness of others, and experience more uncertainty and instability regarding their self-concepts (Buunk and Gibbons, 2006, Gibbons and Buunk, 1999). For the current research, we suggest that social media offers a novel medium in which social comparison can take place—and that people high in SCO might be more drawn to social media and more affected by the comparisons made therein.
Social media use has become ubiquitous in many societies, with popular social network sites (SNSs) such as Facebook.com having 1.4 billion active users worldwide (Facebook, 2015). SNSs not only allow users to maintain friendships, form new relationships, and connect with others (Boyd and Ellison, 2007, Manago et al., 2012), but also allow people to construct their own personal profiles and present a rich set of information about themselves (e.g., accomplishments, attitudes, activities, personalities, relationship status, daily habits, routines). Based on the rich information we can learn about others and the expansive network of people from which we can learn it (Acar, 2008), SNSs offer up an ideal platform for social comparison to take place. Indeed, it appears that people are quite interested in learning about others on SNSs, as most networking activity consists of browsing others' profiles without initiating social interaction (Joinson, 2008, Pempek et al., 2009). Moreover, people have indicated that they use SNSs for the purpose of making social comparisons, specifically while viewing others' posts and photos (Lee, 2014).
It is clear that people use SNSs for the purpose of making social comparisons. But what differential consequences might online vs. offline social comparisons have for mental health and well-being? Critically, some research has found that online interactions and relationships on social media are different from those created offline (Ivcevic & Ambady, 2012). This may be attributed, in part, to the fact that people are better able to present themselves in a positive light online (Chou and Edge, 2012, Ellison et al., 2006, Gonzales and Hancock, 2011). Indeed, there is a growing body of evidence to suggest that personal SNS profiles tend to present the self in a favorable light (e.g., Nadkarni and Hofmann, 2012, Rosenberg and Egbert, 2011). Importantly, if people selectively self-present positive aspects of their lives on social media, then social comparisons that are made using that biased information should differ from in-person social comparisons and involve mostly upward social comparisons to those who are better off on some dimension (Feinstein et al., 2013, Haferkamp and Kramer, 2011, Lee, 2014, Vogel et al., 2014). Moreover, the consequences of exposure to upward comparisons should be quite negative. Indeed, empirical evidence suggests that both chronic and temporary upward social comparisons on social media have been associated with negative consequences, including changes in depression (Feinstein et al., 2013), self-esteem (Kalpidou et al., 2011, Lee, 2014, Vogel et al., 2014), self-evaluations (Haferkamp & Kramer, 2011), and well-being (Kross et al., 2013).
In sum, we have two main points about the interface between social comparison and social media. First, because of the rich and varied information posted about others on social media, people should be quite interested in using social media for the purpose of social comparison. Second, because social comparison information tends to be upward (positive) on social media, it produces negative consequences for well-being and self-evaluation. Based on their strong sensitivity to and interest in others (Buunk and Gibbons, 2006, Gibbons and Buunk, 1999), we suggest that people high (vs. low) in social comparison orientation (SCO) should, 1) be more drawn to using social media because it offers abundant social comparison opportunities, and 2) be more negatively affected by the upward social comparisons made on social media. Consistent with both ideas, Lee (2014) found that high-SCO participants reported making more social comparisons on Facebook than low-SCO users. Although consistent with our general hypotheses, the results of the Lee (2014) study have limited applicability. First, Lee's result suggests that, once on social media, high-SCO participants report making more social comparisons; however, that study did not provide any evidence to suggest that high- and low-SCO participants differ in terms of how much and intensely they tend to use social media. Second, Lee did not document whether high- and low-SCO participants suffer differential consequences as a result of making social comparisons on social media. Our research addresses each of these issues directly and builds on the research by Lee (2014).
Study 1 addressed the first research question involving the relationship between SCO and social media use. College student participants were asked about their social comparison orientation (Gibbons & Buunk, 1999) and general social media use. We hypothesized that higher SCO scores would be associated with greater social media use (e.g., frequency, intensity, and involvement). Consistent with the finding of Lee (2014) that high-SCO participants report comparing more once on social media, we reasoned that those who chronically compare themselves to others are more likely to recognize the value of SNSs for social comparison and therefore use it more heavily.
Study 2 addressed the second research question by examining the differential effects of social comparison occurring on social media for people high and low in SCO. Participants were randomly assigned to one of three conditions in which they either browsed an acquaintance's social media profile (presumably engaging in social comparison) or performed control tasks. Afterwards, participants provided self-evaluations and rated their momentary self-esteem and affect. We hypothesized that, because information about others on social media tends to be positive, participants browsing an acquaintance's profile would have poorer self-evaluations, self-esteem, and affect than those participants in control conditions. However, most critically for our purposes, this was expected to be particularly true for participants high in SCO due to their sensitivity to comparison information.
Section snippets
Overview
The main purpose of Study 1 was to examine the association between social comparison orientation and social media use. Facebook was chosen because it is the most popular and researched SNS, and most theoretically relevant to social comparison. College student participants were surveyed about their social comparison orientation and their social networking attitudes and habits. We conducted two studies (Studies 1a and 1b) in order to replicate our results across two distinct samples.
Participants
Participants were 145 undergraduates (106 female) from a Midwestern university in the United States who received course credit for participating (M age = 19.65, SD = 2.87). The sample was 64.1% White, 22.8% Black, 4.1% Asian, 1.4% American Indian or Alaskan Native, 4.8% mixed race, and 2.8% unknown race(s).
Procedure and measures
Participants completed a series of questionnaires as part of a larger study involving social media use in college students.1
Participants
Participants were 275 undergraduate students (157 female) from the introductory psychology subject pool at a different large, Midwestern university who participated in exchange for course credit (M age = 18.70, SD = 2.16). The sample was 72.4% White, 15.3% Black, 2.5% Pacific Islander, 5.1% Hispanic/Latino, and 4.7% other race(s).
Procedure and measures
Participants came to the lab as part of a larger study that was purportedly concerned with Facebook use and person perception. In Study 1b, participants answered questions
Overview
Having established in Study 1 that Facebook use tends to be heavier among those high in SCO, the goal of Study 2 was to examine whether the consequences of Facebook use for self-evaluation and affect differ for those high versus low in SCO. Participants were brought into the lab and were randomly assigned to one of three conditions. In the experimental condition, participants browsed the Facebook profile of an acquaintance (presumably engaging in social comparison). In two control conditions,
General discussion
The current research had two primary purposes: 1) to examine the relationship between SCO and Facebook use, and 2) to explore the differential effects of social comparison on Facebook for participants who differed in SCO. To fulfill the first goal, Study 1 surveyed participants about their general social comparison tendencies and Facebook use (e.g., frequency, intensity, psychological involvement). Results showed that participants high in SCO appear to use Facebook more heavily than
References (45)
- et al.
Social comparison: The end of a theory and the emergence of a field
Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
(2007) Determinants of social comparison choices
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(1971)How do people compare themselves with others on social network sites? The case of Facebook
Computers in Human Behavior
(2014)- et al.
Resilience and affect balance as mediators between trait emotional intelligence and life satisfaction
Personality and Individual Differences
(2013) - et al.
Self-presentation and gender on MySpace
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
(2008) - et al.
The man who wasn't there: Subliminal social comparison standards influence self-evaluation
Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
(2004) - et al.
Why do people use Facebook?
Personality and Individual Differences
(2012) - et al.
College students' social networking experiences on Facebook
Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
(2009) - et al.
Identity construction on Facebook: Digital empowerment in anchored relationships
Computers in Human Behavior
(2008) Antecedents and consequences of online social networking behavior: The case of Facebook
Journal of Website Promotion
(2008)
Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions
Development of a Facebook addiction scale
Psychological Reports
Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Narcissism and social networking web sites
Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin
Social comparison orientation: A new perspective on those who do and those who don't compare with others
Social comparison and satisfaction with one's social life
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
“They are happier and having better lives than I am”: The impact of using Facebook on perceptions of others' lives
Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking
Social comparison: Motives, standards, and mechanisms
Managing impressions online: Self-presentation processes in the online dating environment
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students' use of online social network sites
Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication
Company info
Negative social comparison on Facebook and depressive symptoms: Rumination as a mechanism
Psychology of Popular Media Culture
Cited by (292)
-
Social media use among Australian university students: Understanding links with stress and mental health
2024, Computers in Human Behavior Reports -
Social media use in the workplace: The role of social comparison in negative behaviors
2024, Acta Psychologica -
Materialism in social media–More social media addiction and stress symptoms, less satisfaction with life
2024, Telematics and Informatics Reports -
Depressive symptoms and upward social comparisons during Instagram use: A vicious circle
2024, Personality and Individual Differences -
Leveraging Instagram to enhance self-esteem: A self-affirmative intervention study and multilevel mediation analysis
2024, Computers in Human Behavior