ACS Publications. Most Trusted. Most Cited. Most Read
My Activity
CONTENT TYPES

Figure 1Loading Img

Embodied Energy of Construction Materials: Integrating Human and Capital Energy into an IO-Based Hybrid Model

View Author Information
Sam Houston State University, Huntsville, Texas 77340, United States
Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, United States
Cite this: Environ. Sci. Technol. 2015, 49, 3, 1936–1945
Publication Date (Web):January 5, 2015
https://doi.org/10.1021/es503896v
Copyright © 2015 American Chemical Society

    Article Views

    1608

    Altmetric

    -

    Citations

    54
    LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICS
    Other access options
    Supporting Info (1)»

    Abstract

    Abstract Image

    Buildings alone consume approximately 40% of the annual global energy and contribute indirectly to the increasing concentration of atmospheric carbon. The total life cycle energy use of a building is composed of embodied and operating energy. Embodied energy includes all energy required to manufacture and transport building materials, and construct, maintain, and demolish a building. For a systemic energy and carbon assessment of buildings, it is critical to use a whole life cycle approach, which takes into account the embodied as well as operating energy. Whereas the calculation of a building’s operating energy is straightforward, there is a lack of a complete embodied energy calculation method. Although an input–output-based (IO-based) hybrid method could provide a complete and consistent embodied energy calculation, there are unresolved issues, such as an overdependence on price data and exclusion of the energy of human labor and capital inputs. This paper proposes a method for calculating and integrating the energy of labor and capital input into an IO-based hybrid method. The results demonstrate that the IO-based hybrid method can provide relatively complete results. Also, to avoid errors, the total amount of human and capital energy should not be excluded from the calculation.

    Read this article

    To access this article, please review the available access options below.

    Get instant access

    Purchase Access

    Read this article for 48 hours. Check out below using your ACS ID or as a guest.

    Recommended

    Access through Your Institution

    You may have access to this article through your institution.

    Your institution does not have access to this content. You can change your affiliated institution below.

    Supporting Information

    ARTICLE SECTIONS
    Jump To

    Additional text and tables as mentioned in the text. This material is available free of charge via the Internet at http://pubs.acs.org.

    Terms & Conditions

    Most electronic Supporting Information files are available without a subscription to ACS Web Editions. Such files may be downloaded by article for research use (if there is a public use license linked to the relevant article, that license may permit other uses). Permission may be obtained from ACS for other uses through requests via the RightsLink permission system: http://pubs.acs.org/page/copyright/permissions.html.

    Cited By

    This article is cited by 54 publications.

    1. Nicholas I. Cool, Carlos A. Larriuz, Randall James, Jaime R. Ayala, Anita, Mohammed Al-Hashimi, Sarbajit Banerjee. Thermochromic Fenestration Elements Based on the Dispersion of Functionalized VO2 Nanocrystals within a Polyvinyl Butyral Laminate. ACS Engineering Au 2022, 2 (6) , 477-485. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsengineeringau.2c00027
    2. M.K. Dixit, P. Pradeep Kumar. Embodied impacts of buildings from energy-carbon-water nexus perspective: A case study of university buildings. Cleaner Energy Systems 2024, 7 , 100108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cles.2024.100108
    3. Vivian W.Y. Tam, Lei Liu, Khoa N. Le. Modelling and quantitation of embodied, operational and mobile energies of buildings: a holistic review from 2012 to 2021. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management 2023, 30 (9) , 4045-4079. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-01-2022-0050
    4. Shraddha Sharma, Anshuman Singh. Embodied energy assessment: a comprehensive review of methods and software tools. Environment, Development and Sustainability 2023, 12 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-04015-0
    5. Jianzhou You, Xian Xu, Yafeng Wang, Xinan Xiang, Yaozhi Luo. Life cycle carbon emission assessment of large-span steel structures: A case study. Structures 2023, 52 , 842-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2023.04.001
    6. Haibo Feng, Jianfeng Zhao, Alexander Hollberg, Guillaume Habert. Where to focus? Developing a LCA impact category selection tool for manufacturers of building materials. Journal of Cleaner Production 2023, 405 , 136936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136936
    7. M K Dixit, P Pradeep Kumar, S S Shanbhag. Analyzing embodied energy and embodied water for university buildings using input-output-based hybrid method. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2023, 1196 (1) , 012047. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1196/1/012047
    8. Uche Emmanuel Edike, Oko John Ameh, Olumide Afolarin Adenuga, Olutosin Peter Akintunde. Life cycle energy analysis of houses incorporating conventional and alternative masonry units. Architectural Engineering and Design Management 2023, 80 , 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1080/17452007.2023.2195610
    9. M K Dixit, P Pradeep Kumar. Analyzing Embodied Energy and Embodied Water of Construction Materials for an Environmentally Sustainable Built Environment. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 2022, 1122 (1) , 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/1122/1/012045
    10. Manish Kumar Dixit, Pranav Pradeep Kumar, Omid Haghighi. Embodied water analysis of higher education buildings using an input-output-based hybrid method. Journal of Cleaner Production 2022, 365 , 132866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.132866
    11. Neha Uppal, Asokan Pappu, Vijaya Kumar Sorna Gowri, Vijay Kumar Thakur. Cellulosic fibres-based epoxy composites: From bioresources to a circular economy. Industrial Crops and Products 2022, 182 , 114895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.114895
    12. Hyeong-Jae Jang, Yong-Han Ahn, Sung-Ho Tae. Proposal of Major Environmental Impact Categories of Construction Materials Based on Life Cycle Impact Assessments. Materials 2022, 15 (14) , 5047. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15145047
    13. Maxime Agez, Elliot Muller, Laure Patouillard, Carl‐Johan H. Södersten, Anders Arvesen, Manuele Margni, Réjean Samson, Guillaume Majeau‐Bettez. Correcting remaining truncations in hybrid life cycle assessment database compilation. Journal of Industrial Ecology 2022, 26 (1) , 121-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13132
    14. P. Pradeep Kumar, V. Venkatraj, M.K. Dixit. Evaluating the temporal representativeness of embodied energy data: A case study of higher education buildings. Energy and Buildings 2022, 254 , 111596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111596
    15. David A. Santos, Manish K. Dixit, Pranav Pradeep Kumar, Sarbajit Banerjee. Assessing the role of vanadium technologies in decarbonizing hard-to-abate sectors and enabling the energy transition. iScience 2021, 24 (11) , 103277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.103277
    16. V. Venkatraj, M.K. Dixit. Life cycle embodied energy analysis of higher education buildings: A comparison between different LCI methodologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2021, 144 , 110957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110957
    17. Nattaya Sangngamratsakul, Kuskana Kubaha. Embodied Energy Analysis of Building Materials in Thailand: The Quantification and Guideline using Input-Output Analysis Method. 2021, 128-132. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICBIR52339.2021.9465864
    18. Matheus Roberto Cabral, Pierre Blanchet. A State of the Art of the Overall Energy Efficiency of Wood Buildings—An Overview and Future Possibilities. Materials 2021, 14 (8) , 1848. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14081848
    19. J U D Hatmoko, L Lendra. Quantifying energy consumptioneandogreenhouse gass emissions of construction projects: A case study of Semarang -Bawen road project. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 2021, 1072 (1) , 012070. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1072/1/012070
    20. Dan Wang, Klaus Hubacek, Yuli Shan, Winnie Gerbens-Leenes, Junguo Liu. A Review of Water Stress and Water Footprint Accounting. Water 2021, 13 (2) , 201. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13020201
    21. Clyde Zhengdao Li, Xulu Lai, Bing Xiao, Vivian W.Y. Tam, Shan Guo, Yiyu Zhao. A holistic review on life cycle energy of buildings: An analysis from 2009 to 2019. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2020, 134 , 110372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110372
    22. Xiaocun Zhang, Xueqi Zhang. A subproject-based quota approach for life cycle carbon assessment at the building design and construction stage in China. Building and Environment 2020, 185 , 107258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107258
    23. Varusha Venkatraj, Manish Kumar Dixit, Wei Yan, Sarel Lavy. Evaluating the impact of operating energy reduction measures on embodied energy. Energy and Buildings 2020, 226 , 110340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2020.110340
    24. Milad Moradibistouni, Brenda Vale, Nigel Isaacs. Evaluating the use of polymers in residential buildings: Case study of a single storey detached house in New Zealand. Journal of Building Engineering 2020, 32 , 101517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101517
    25. Jan Göttsche, Mark Kelly. Assessing the impact of resource efficiency on selected case studies in Ireland. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Waste and Resource Management 2020, 173 (4) , 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1680/jwarm.20.00006
    26. Weina Zhu, Wei Feng, Xiaodong Li, Zhihui Zhang. Analysis of the embodied carbon dioxide in the building sector: A case of China. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 269 , 122438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122438
    27. Edwin Koźniewski, Karolina Banaszak. Geometric Aspects of Assessing the Amount of Material Consumption in the Construction of a Designed Single-Family House. Energies 2020, 13 (20) , 5382. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13205382
    28. Xiaocun Zhang, Kaihua Liu, Zihua Zhang. Life cycle carbon emissions of two residential buildings in China: Comparison and uncertainty analysis of different assessment methods. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 266 , 122037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122037
    29. Won-Jun Park, Rakhyun Kim, Seungjun Roh, Hoki Ban. Analysis of Major Environmental Impact Categories of Road Construction Materials. Sustainability 2020, 12 (17) , 6951. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12176951
    30. Aayushi Bajpayee, Mehdi Farahbakhsh, Umme Zakira, Aditi Pandey, Lena Abu Ennab, Zofia Rybkowski, Manish Kumar Dixit, Paul Arthur Schwab, Negar Kalantar, Bjorn Birgisson, Sarbajit Banerjee. In situ Resource Utilization and Reconfiguration of Soils Into Construction Materials for the Additive Manufacturing of Buildings. Frontiers in Materials 2020, 7 https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2020.00052
    31. Ming Hu. The Embodied Impact of Existing Building Stock. 2020, 1-31. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-2426-8.ch001
    32. Xiaocun Zhang, Rongyue Zheng. Reducing building embodied emissions in the design phase: A comparative study on structural alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production 2020, 243 , 118656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118656
    33. NNC Pushpamali, Duzgun Agdas, Timothy M. Rose. A Review of Reverse Logistics: An Upstream Construction Supply Chain Perspective. Sustainability 2019, 11 (15) , 4143. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154143
    34. Jingke Hong, Jianping Gu, Xin Liang, Guiwen Liu, Geoffrey Qiping Shen. Characterizing embodied energy accounting with a multi-dimensional framework: A study of China's building sector. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019, 215 , 154-164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.300
    35. Manish K. Dixit. Life cycle recurrent embodied energy calculation of buildings: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2019, 209 , 731-754. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.230
    36. Soo Huey Teh, Thomas Wiedmann, Robert H. Crawford, Ke Xing. Assessing Embodied Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Built Environment. 2019, 119-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-7940-6_7
    37. Victor Echarri-Iribarren, Fernando Echarri-Iribarren, Carlos Rizo-Maestre. Ceramic panels versus aluminium in buildings: Energy consumption and environmental impact assessment with a new methodology. Applied Energy 2019, 233-234 , 959-974. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.08.091
    38. Bin Liu, Dedong Wang, Youquan Xu, Chunlu Liu, Mark Luther. Vertical specialisation measurement of energy embodied in international trade of the construction industry. Energy 2018, 165 , 689-700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.151
    39. Tihomir Tomić, Daniel Rolph Schneider. The role of energy from waste in circular economy and closing the loop concept – Energy analysis approach. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2018, 98 , 268-287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2018.09.029
    40. Arezoo Shirazi, Baabak Ashuri. Embodied life cycle assessment comparison of single family residential houses considering the 1970s transition in construction industry: Atlanta case study. Building and Environment 2018, 140 , 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2018.05.021
    41. Aneesh N.R., K.N. Shivaprasad, B.B. Das. Life cycle energy analysis of a metro station building envelope through computer based simulation. Sustainable Cities and Society 2018, 39 , 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.02.006
    42. Timothy M. Baynes, Robert H. Crawford, Judith Schinabeck, Paul-Antoine Bontinck, André Stephan, Thomas Wiedmann, Manfred Lenzen, Steven Kenway, Man Yu, Soo Huey Teh, Joe Lane, Arne Geschke, Jacob Fry, Guangwu Chen. The Australian industrial ecology virtual laboratory and multi-scale assessment of buildings and construction. Energy and Buildings 2018, 164 , 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.12.056
    43. Manish K. Dixit, Shashank Singh. Embodied energy analysis of higher education buildings using an input-output-based hybrid method. Energy and Buildings 2018, 161 , 41-54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.12.022
    44. Robert H. Crawford, André Stephan, Monique Schmidt. Embodied Carbon in Buildings: An Australian Perspective. 2018, 393-416. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-72796-7_18
    45. Robert H. Crawford, Paul-Antoine Bontinck, André Stephan, Thomas Wiedmann, Man Yu. Hybrid life cycle inventory methods – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production 2018, 172 , 1273-1288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.10.176
    46. Yaowu Wang, Shiwei Chen, Jiabin Zhang. A Life-Cycle Analysis for Both Energy and Cost of Precast Concrete Building Components: A Process-Based Model. 2017, 97-108. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784481059.010
    47. Xiaocun Zhang, Fenglai Wang. Analysis of embodied carbon in the building life cycle considering the temporal perspectives of emissions: A case study in China. Energy and Buildings 2017, 155 , 404-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2017.09.049
    48. Manish K. Dixit. Life cycle embodied energy analysis of residential buildings: A review of literature to investigate embodied energy parameters. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 2017, 79 , 390-413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.051
    49. Kailun Feng, Yaowu Wang, Weizhuo Lu, Xiaodong Li. Weakness of the Embodied Energy Assessment on Construction: A Literature Review. 2017, 547-559. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784480274.065
    50. Manish K. Dixit. Embodied energy and cost of building materials: correlation analysis. Building Research & Information 2017, 45 (5) , 508-523. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2016.1191760
    51. Manish K. Dixit. Embodied energy analysis of building materials: An improved IO-based hybrid method using sectoral disaggregation. Energy 2017, 124 , 46-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.02.047
    52. André Stephan, Aristide Athanassiadis. Quantifying and mapping embodied environmental requirements of urban building stocks. Building and Environment 2017, 114 , 187-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.11.043
    53. André Stephan, Laurent Stephan. Life cycle energy and cost analysis of embodied, operational and user-transport energy reduction measures for residential buildings. Applied Energy 2016, 161 , 445-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.10.023
    54. Murat Kucukvar, Gokhan Egilmez, Omer Tatari. Life Cycle Assessment and Optimization-Based Decision Analysis of Construction Waste Recycling for a LEED-Certified University Building. Sustainability 2016, 8 (1) , 89. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010089

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    Pair your accounts.

    Export articles to Mendeley

    Get article recommendations from ACS based on references in your Mendeley library.

    You’ve supercharged your research process with ACS and Mendeley!

    STEP 1:
    Click to create an ACS ID

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    Please note: If you switch to a different device, you may be asked to login again with only your ACS ID.

    MENDELEY PAIRING EXPIRED
    Your Mendeley pairing has expired. Please reconnect