Skip to main content
Log in

The Role of the OECD and EU Conventions in Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The OECD Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (the OECD Convention) obligates signatory nations to make bribery of foreign public officials a criminal act on an extraterritorial basis. The purposes of this article are to describe the nature and consequences of bribery, outline the major provisions of the OECD Convention, and analyze its role in promoting transparency and accountability in international business. While the OECD Convention is not expected to totally eliminate the seeking or taking of bribes, there are hopes that a uniform set of rules will curtail corrupt behavior, as long as those rules are both enforceable and enforced.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, M.: 2000, ‘Finland Cleanest Country, Nigeria Most Corrupt in Survey’, Agence France-Press (13 September), 4–5.

  • Almond, M. and S. Syfert: 1997, ‘Beyond Compliance: Corruption, Corporate Responsibility and Ethical Standards in the New Global Economy’, North Carolina Journal of International Law and Commercial Regulation 22, 389–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, E.: 1997, ‘29 Nations Agree to Outlaw Bribery’, The New York Times (21 November), A1.

  • Anonymous: 1995, ‘Following the Money: Prosecutors Attempt to Trace Roh's Slush Fund’, Asiaweek (1 September), 39.

  • Anonymous: 1999, ‘A Global War on Bribery’, Economist (16 January), 22.

  • Anonymous: 2000, ‘Argentina Energy Repsol-YPF Denies Bribing Argentine Politicians’, EFE News Service (22 September).

  • Baker, C. R. and P. Wallage: 2000, ‘The Future of Financial Reporting in Europe: Its Role in Corporate Governance’, International Journal of Accounting 35(2), 173–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohlen, C.: 1995, ‘Bribery as a Way of Life in Italy’, The New York Times (10 December), 21.

  • Borrus, A.: 1995, ‘A World of Greased Palms’, Business Week (6 November), 36–38.

  • Buscaglia, E.: 1996, ‘Corruption and Judicial Reform in Latin America’, Policy Studies 17, 273–294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, K.: 2000, ‘Arms and Building Trades Lead the Worldwide Boom in Corruption’, The Independent (London) (11 January), 15.

  • Carlson, J.: 2000, ‘Money Laundering and Corruption: Two Sides of the Same Coin', in No Longer Business As Usual (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris), pp. 127–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cartier-Bresson, J.: 2000, ‘The Causes and Consequences of Corruption: Economic Analyses and Lessons Learnt', in No Longer Business As Usual (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris), pp. 11–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cateora, P. R. and J. L. Graham: 1999, International Marketing, 10th ed. (Irwin McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Corr, C. and J. Lawler.: 1999, ‘Damned If You Do, Damned If You Don't? The OECD Convention and the Globalization of Anti-Bribery Measures’, Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 32, 1249–1344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drozdiak, W.: 1999, ‘Scandals Threaten Kohl's Legacy: Charges of Bribery in Party Beset Ex-German Leader’, The New York Times (27 November), A16.

  • Earle, B.: 1996, ‘The United States Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and the OECD Anti-Bribery Recommendation: When Moral Suasion Won't Work, Follow the Money Argument’, Dickinson Journal of International Law 14, 207–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonson, G., S. Sansoni, K. Miller and L. Bernier: 1995, ‘Europe's New Morality’, Business Week (18 December), 26–30.

  • European Union: 1996, ‘Green Paper on the Role, the Position, and the Liability of the Statutory Auditor Within the European Union’, Official Journal of the European Communities (28 September), C321.

  • Gantz, D.: 1998, ‘Globalizing Sanctions Against Foreign Bribery: The Emergence of a New International Legal Consensus’, Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business 18, 457–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, B. K., K. Lacey and J. Birmele: 2000, ‘The 1998 OECD Convention: An Impetus for Worldwide Changes in Attitudes Towards Corruption in Business Transactions’, American Business Law Journal 37, 485–525.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glynn, P., S. Kobrin and M. Naim: 1997, ‘The Globalization of Corruption', in K. Elliott (ed.), Corruption and the Global Economy (Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC), pp. 7–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goering, L.: 1996, ‘Corruption a Hurdle Democracy Can't Jump’, The Ottawa Citizen (28 November), A10.

  • Gray, C. and W. Jarosz: 1995, ‘Law and the Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment: The Experience from Central and Eastern Europe’, Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 33, 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamra, W.: 2000, ‘Bribery in International Business Transactions and the OECD Convention: Benefits and Limitations’, Business Economics 35, 33–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsch, E.: 1993, ‘Accumulators and Democrats: Challenging State Corruption in Africa’, Journal of Modern African Studies 31, 31–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. F. P.: 1968, Political Order in Changing Societies (Yale University Press, New Haven).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, D.: 1998, ‘Research on Corruption: Critical Empirical Issues', in Arvin Jain (ed.), Economics of Corruption (Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston), pp. 129–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leff, N.: 1964, ‘Economic Development Through Bureaucratic Corruption’, American Behavioral Scientist, 8–14.

  • Mauro, P.: 1995, ‘Corruption and Growth’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 681–712.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauro, P.: 1997, ‘The Effects of Corruption on Growth, Investment, and Government Expenditure', in K. Elliott (ed.), Corruption and the Global Economy (Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC), pp. 83–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, L.: 2000, ‘No More "This for That?" The Effect of the OECD Convention on Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions’, Cardozo Journal of International and Comparative Law 8, 139–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millet-Einbinder, M.: 2000, ‘No More Tax Breaks for Bribes', in No More Business As Usual (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris), pp. 67–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moss, N.: 1997, ‘Who Bribes Wins’, The European (11 December), 26–27.

  • Nakarmi, L.: 1995, ‘The Slush Fund That is Shaking Up Seoul’, Business Week (November), 60–61.

  • Nathan, S.: 1999, ‘U.S.: Tie Loans to Corruption: Weigh Bribery in Aid Decisions’, U.S.A. Today (17 February), 3B.

  • Nichols, P. M.: 1999, ‘Are Extraterritorial Restrictions on Bribery a Viable and Desirable International Policy Goal Under the Global Conditions of the Late Twentieth Century? Increasing Global Security By Controlling Transnational Bribery’, Michigan Journal of International Law 20, 451–476.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD: 2000a, 'What is the OECD?' (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) http://www.oecd.org/about/general/index.htm/ visited December 18, 2000.

  • OECD: 2000b, 'Recommendation of the Council on the Tax Deductibility of Bribes to Foreign Officials', (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) http://www.oecd.org/daf/ cmis/bribery/bribrecm.htm/ visited December 18, 2000.

  • Oldenburg, P.: 1987, ‘Middlemen in Third-World Corruption: Implication of an Indian Case’, World Politics 39, 508–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omestad, T.: 1997, ‘Bye-bye to Bribes: The Industrial World Takes Aim at Official Corruption’, U.S. News and World Report (22 December), 39–43.

  • Pieth, M.: 2000, ‘From Ideal to Reality: Making the New Global Standard Stick', in No Longer Business As Usual (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris), pp. 51–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posadas, A.: 2000, ‘Combating Corruption Under International Law’, Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 10, 346–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pricewaterhouse Coopers: 2001, The Opacity Index (Pricewaterhouse Coopers, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinones, E.: 2000, ‘The Promise and the Reality: Monitoring Compliance with the Convention', in No Longer Business As Usual (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris), pp. 101–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinones, E.: 2001, ‘Implementing the Anti-Bribery Convention: An Update from the OECD', in R. Hodess and J. Banfield (eds.), Global Corruption Report 2001 (Transparency International, Berlin), pp. 197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S.: 1997a, ‘Corruption as an International Policy Problem: Overview and Recommendations', in K. Elliott (ed.), Corruption and the Global Economy (Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC), pp. 175–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S.: 1997b, ‘The Political Economy of Corruption', in K. Elliott (ed.), Corruption and the Global Economy (Institute for International Economics, Washington, DC), pp. 31–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S.: 1999, Corruption and Government: Causes, Consequences, and Reform (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacerdoti, G.: 2000, ‘To Bribe or Not to Bribe?’ in K. Elliott (ed.), No Longer Business As Usual (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris), pp. 29–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schollhammer, H.: 1977, ‘Ethics in an International Business Context’, MSU Business Topics (Spring), 53–63.

  • Sergueva, V.: 2000, ‘Corruption Sours Day-to-Day Life in Bulgaria’, Agence France-Presse (9 November), 3–4.

  • Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny: 1993, ‘Corruption’, Quarterly Journal of Economics 108, 599–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transparency International: 2001, 'The Global Coalition Against Corruption,' 2000.htm/ visited December 18, 2000 and November 27, 2001.

  • Von Waldersee, K.: 1995, ‘Inquiry into Airbus Bribery Allegations Picks Up Speed’, The Guardian (London) (19 December), 17.

  • Walsh, J.: 1998, ‘A World War on Bribery: The Costs of Corruption Have Reached Earth-Shaking Proportions Prompting Herculean International Efforts to Clear Out the Muck’, Time (22 June), 16.

  • Wei, S. J.: 1997, ‘How Taxing is Corruption on International Investors?’ NBER Working Paper, No.6030.

  • Williams, J. and M. Beare: 1999, ‘The Business of Bribery: Globalization, Economic Liberalization, and the 'Problem" of Socialization’, Crime, Law and Social Change 32, 115–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagaris, B. and S. L. Ohri: 1999, ‘The Emergence of an International Enforcement Regime on Transnational Corruption in the Americas’, Law and Policy in International Business 30 (Supplement), 53–93.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pacini, C., Swingen, J.A. & Rogers, H. The Role of the OECD and EU Conventions in Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials. Journal of Business Ethics 37, 385–405 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015235806969

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015235806969

Navigation