Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Identification of dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of general species richness in boreal forest lakes

  • Published:
Biodiversity & Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We argue the need to select indicator species on empirical data to avoid influence of personal opinions. To test an empirical selection process based on a nested subset matrix, we sampled partivoltine dragonfly larvae from 74 small lakes in central Sweden. A nestedness matrix was set up using the 'nestedness temperature calculator' program, selecting 11 species as potential indicators of species richness. These were tested against a known indicator species for water quality (the pool frog) and plant diversity through inventories and comparison to existing surveys of biological values ('rich' lakes vs. 'ordinary' lakes). We could only see a trend towards the pool frog occurring in dragonfly-rich lakes, but found a significant connection between the number of aquatic plants along the shore line and the number of dragonfly species present. A significantly higher number of indicators were encountered in lakes previously surveyed as 'rich' in plants than in lakes classified as 'ordinary'. Dragonfly species richness therefore appears to be positively associated with species richness of vascular plants. We propose nestedness matrices to be a good selecting tool for indicator species, particularly in groups where the biology of the species is not well known. However, it is important to define what such indicators really indicate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atmar W andPatterson BD (1993) The measure of order and disorder in the distribution of species in fragmented habitat. Oecologia 96: 373-382

    Google Scholar 

  • Atmar W andPatterson BD (1995) The nestedness temperature calculator: a visual basic program, including 294 presence-absence matrices. AICS Research, Inc., University Park, New Mexico, and The Field Museum, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Blake JG (1991) Nested subsets and the distribution of birds on isolated woodlands. Conservation Biology 5: 58-66

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolger DT,Alberts C andSoulé ME (1991) Occurrence patterns of bird species in habitat fragments: sampling, extinction and nested species subsets. American Naturalist 137: 155-166

    Google Scholar 

  • Brock V,Hoffmann J,Kühnast O,Piper W andVoß K (1996) Die Libellen Schleswig-Holsteins-Rote Liste. Landesamt für Natur und Umwelt des Landes Schleswig-Holstein, Flintbek

  • Brown KS Jr (1991) Conservation of insects and their habitats: insects as indicators. In: Collins NM andThomas JA (eds) The Conservation of Insects and Their Habitats, pp 350-404. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald R (1992) Vegetation and dragonfly fauna-characteristics and exampels of biocenological field studies. Vegetatio 101: 99-107

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald R (1994) Experimentelle Untersuchungen zu Habitatselektion und Biotopbindung bei Ceriagrion tenellum De Villers, 1789 (Coenagrionidae, Odonata). Zoologische Jahrbücher Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere 121: 71-98

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchwald R andSchmidt B (1990) Der Kleine Blaupfeil (Orthetrum coerulescens, Odonata) in Südbaden: Spezielle Untersuchungen zu ökologischen Ansprüchen, Populationsdynamik und Gefährdung. Mitteilungen des Badischen Landesvereins für Naturkunde und Naturschutz E.V. Freiburg im Breisgau 15: 109-144

    Google Scholar 

  • Bulankova E (1997) Dragonflies (Odonata) as bioindicators of environment quality. Biologia 52: 177-180

    Google Scholar 

  • Carle FL (1979) Environmental monitoring potential of the Odonata, with a list of rare and endangered Anisoptera of Virginia, USA. Odonatologica 8: 319-323

    Google Scholar 

  • Castella E (1987) Larval Odonata distribution as a describer of fluvial ecosystems: the Rhône and Ain Rivers, France. Advances in Odonatology 3: 23-40

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherrill A,Rushton S,Sanderson R andByrne J (1997) Comparison of TWINSPAN classifications based on plant bugs, leaf hoppers, ground-beetles, spiders and plants. Entomologist 116: 73-83

    Google Scholar 

  • Chovanec A andRaab R (1997) Dragonflies (Insecta, Odonata) and the ecological status of newly created wetlands-examples for long term bioindication programmes. Limnology 27: 381-392

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark TE andSamways MJ (1996) Dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of biotope quality in the Krüger National Park, South Africa. Journal of Applied Ecology 33: 1001-1012

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet PS (1993) Are Odonata useful as bioindicators? Libellula 12: 91-102

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbet PS (1999) Dragonflies: Behaviour and Ecology of Odonata. Harley Books, Colchester, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutler A (1994) Nested biotas and biological conservation: metrics, mechanisms and meaning of nestedness. Landscape and Urban Planning 28: 73-82

    Google Scholar 

  • Dufrene M andLegendre P (1997) Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecological Monographs 67: 345-366

    Google Scholar 

  • Faith DP andWalker PA (1996) Environmental diversity: on the best-possible use of surrogate data for assessing the relative biodiversity of sets of areas. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 399-415

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidemann H andSeidenbusch R (1993) Die Libellenlarven Deutschlands und Frankreichs. Handbuch für Exuviensammler. Verlag Erna Bauer, Keltern

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmen M andPedersen H (1996) Odonata i Danmark, foreløbig status 1995. Nordisk Odonatologisk Forum, Nyhetsbrev 2: 4-7

    Google Scholar 

  • House NL (1991) Oviposition Preferences of Dragonflies and Their Influence on Larval Distribution. MSc thesis, Acadia University, Wolfville, Canada

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde KD (1997) Can we rapidly measure fungal diversity? Mycologist 11: 176-178

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C (1994) Biological inventory using target taxa: a case study of the butterflies of Madagascar. Ecological Applications 4: 407-422

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C,Colwell RK,Erwin TL,Murphy DD,Noss RF andSanjayan MA (1993) Terrestrial arthropod assemblages: their use in conservation planning. Conservation Biology 7: 796-808

    Google Scholar 

  • Lapin M andBarnes BV (1995) Using the landscape ecosystem approach to assess species and ecosystem diversity. Conservation Biology 9: 1148-1158

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson DJ andHouse NL (1991) Insect communities of Newfoundland bog pools with emphasis on the Odonata. Canadian Entomologist 122: 469-502

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton JH,Bignell DE,Bolton B,Bloemers GF,Eggleton P,Hammond PM,Hodda M,Holt RD,Larsen TB,Mawdsley NA,Stork NE,Srivastava DS andWatt AD (1998) Biodiversity inventories, indicator taxa and effects of habitat modification in tropical forest. Nature 391: 72-76

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomolino MV (1996) Investigating casuality of nestedness of insular communities: selective immigrations or extinctions? Journal of Biogeography 23: 699-703

    Google Scholar 

  • May RM (1994) Conceptual aspects of the quantification of the extent of biological diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B. Biological Sciences 345: 13-20

    Google Scholar 

  • Minitab (1996) Minitab Release 11. 12. Minitab Inc., State College, Pennsylvania

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore NW (1984) Dragonflies as indicators of environmental health. IUCN Species Survival Commission Newsletter 1984: 7-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Münchberg P (1930) Zur Biologie der Odonatengenera Brachytron Ev. und Aeschna Fbr. Zeitschrift für Morphologie und Ökologie der Tiere 20: 172-232

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen OF (1998) De danske guldsmede. Danmarks Dyreliv, bind 8. Apollo Books Aps., Stenstrup, Denmark

    Google Scholar 

  • Norling U (1971) The life history and seasonal regulation of Aeshna viridis Eversm. in southern Sweden (Odonata). Entomologica Scandinavica 2: 170-190

    Google Scholar 

  • Norling U (1975) Livscykler hos svenska odonater. Entomologen 4: 1-14

    Google Scholar 

  • Norling U andSahlén G (1997) Odonata, dragonflies and damselflies. The Aquatic Insects of North Europe 2: 13-65

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton TW (1996) Conservation of biological diversity in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems Forest Ecology and Management 85: 1-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsvik H and Dolmen D (1992) Distribution, habitat and conservation status of threatened Odonata in Norway. Fauna Norv. Ser B 39: 1-21

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MW (1995) How should one count species? Natural Areas Journal 15: 124-135

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD (1987) The principle of nested subsets and its implications for biological conservation. Conservation Biology 1: 323-334

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD andAtmar W (1986) Nested subsets and the structure of insular mammalian faunas and archipelagos. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 28: 65-82

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson BD andBrown JH (1991) Regionally nested patterns of species composition in granivorous rodent assemblages. Journal of Biogeography 18: 395-402

    Google Scholar 

  • Rith-Najarian JC (1998) The influence of forest vegetation variables on the distribution and diversity of dragonflies in a northern Minnesota forest landscape: a preliminary study (Anisoptera). Odonatologica 27: 335-351

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert P-A (1958) Les Libellules. Delachaux & Niestlié, Neuchâtel, France

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryti RT andGilpin ME (1987) The comparative analysis of species occurrence patterns on archipelagoes. Oecologia 73: 282-287

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlén G (1996) Sveriges trollsländor (Odonata). (2nd ed) Fältbiologernas förlag, Sollentuna, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlén G (1999) The impact of forestry on dragonfly diversity in Central Sweden. The International Journal of Odonatology 2: 177-186

    Google Scholar 

  • Samways MJ,Caldwell PM andOsborn R (1996) Spatial patterns of dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators for design of a conservation pond. Odonatologica 25: 157-166

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandhall Å (1986) Trollsländor i Europa. Interpublishing, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Schiemenz H (1953) Die Libellen unserer Heimat. Urania-Verlag, Jena, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt E (1985) Habitat inventarization, characterization and bioindication by a Representative Spectrum of Odonata species (RSO). Odonatologica 14: 127-133

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: is single-species management passé in the landscape era? Biological Conservation 83: 247-257

    Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D andMartin JL (1991) Nestedness of insular avifaunas: simple summary statistics masking complex species patterns. Ornis Fennica 68: 178-192

    Google Scholar 

  • Sjögren Gulve P (1994) Distribution and extinction patterns within a northern metapopulation of the pool frog Rana lessonae. Ecology 75: 1357-1367

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokland JN (1997) Representativeness and efficiency of bird and insect conservation in Norwegian boreal forest reserves. Conservation Biology 11: 101-111

    Google Scholar 

  • Uppsala Kommun (1988) Naturvårdsinventering av Uppsala kommun 1988.

  • Uppsala van Tol J andVerdonk MJ (1988) The Protection of Dragonflies (Odonata) and their Biotopes. European Committee for the conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Strasbourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams PH andGaston KJ (1994) Measuring more of biodiversity: can higher-taxon richness predict wholesale species richness? Biological Conservation 67: 211-217

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulka KP,Milasowszky N andLethmayer C (1997) Spider biodiversity potential of an ungrazed and a grazed inland salt meadow in the National Park 'Neusiedler See-Seewinkel' (Austria): implications for management (Arachnida: Araneae). Biodiversity and Conservation 6: 75-88

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Systematic Zoology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, Norbyvägen 18d, SE-752 36, Uppsala, Sweden

    Göran Sahlén

  2. Björksundsslingan 12III, SE-124 31, Bandhagen, Sweden

    Katarina Ekestubbe

Authors
  1. Göran Sahlén
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Katarina Ekestubbe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sahlén, G., Ekestubbe, K. Identification of dragonflies (Odonata) as indicators of general species richness in boreal forest lakes. Biodiversity and Conservation 10, 673–690 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016681524097

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016681524097

Search

Navigation